AzTrials
AzTrials

SimulationNCT02995785

The First Aid Skill Simulation Training of Nurses of General Wards.

A study testing simulation-based training and traditional training in people with Simulation, run by National Taiwan University Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

[Background and Objective]First-aid skill training plays an important role in the education of nurses. How to implement stable and efficient skill is very important. (Kardong-Edgren, Oermann, Odom-Maryon, \& Ha, 2010). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Simulation
What is being tested?
simulation-based training and traditional training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
92 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2016to Mar 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • general ward nurse

Who cannot join

  • intensive care unit nurses, emergency department nurses.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Jin-Shing chen contact

chenjs@ntu.edu.tw

About this study

[Background and Objective]First-aid skill training plays an important role in the education of nurses. How to implement stable and efficient skill is very important. (Kardong-Edgren, Oermann, Odom-Maryon, \& Ha, 2010). Simulation-based workshops,or training, as the most common enhancing skills.(Topping et al., 2015) .This study was designed to assist nurses enhancing the clinical ability and safety the patients in the first aid-related skills and knowledge. The purpose of this study is to compare the two groups of(1) first aid knowledge online test. (2) first aid skills test.【Methods】This study is a general ward nurses first aid technical examination, pre-test and post-test, the random control trial. Review by the hospital ethics committee and execution date on105/12/12-107/03/08, a total of 92 cases, obtained consent of all cases, then the case will be test in our hospital clinical skills center. Subject condition: general ward nurse (minimum age> 20 years),exclusion conditions: intensive care unit nurses, emergency department nurses. Study Procedure: Subjects who obtained the informed consent were randomly assigned to the first aid skill simulation training group (FAST) or the traditional group (T) by using a computer generated number. Randomization envelopes were opened and randomization performed by the study nurse after informed consent was obtained. Each group consisted of 46 subjects. All the subjects were pre-test first aid knowledge online test, followed were pre-test first aid skills test at the Clinical Skills Center.After pre-test,the experimental group are give the first aid skill simulation training with debriefing(75-min) and online lecture(15-min).While the traditional group only give online lecture(15-min). Two weeks later, the post-test include online test and skills test for two groups. After all the data were collected by the researchers who unknown the groups, the names of the cases were removed and the scores of the two groups were compared before and after.The test Based on 2015 AHA Guidelines for CPR \& ECC (2015 Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality \& 2015American Heart Association and 2015).The data will be archived in SPSS20.0 statistical package software. Statistical methods such as T-test and Anova variance analysis are used to analyze the data【Expected Result】: The knowledge and skills in the experimental group were better than the traditional group, and the first-aid simulation skill training was helpful for the clinical emergency situations.

Read the detailed description

[Background and Objective]First-aid skill training plays an important role in the education of nurses. How to implement stable and efficient skill is very important. (Kardong-Edgren, Oermann, Odom-Maryon, \& Ha, 2010). Nursing first aid simulation is very often used to teaching, the teaching have significant significance of cognitive, skills, satisfaction and other indicators of achievement (Cant \& Cooper, 2010),simulation-based workshops,or training, as the most common enhancing skills. (Topping et al., 2015) BLS as the basic first aid common sense and basic knowledge of resuscitation.In our hospital BLS was trained the basic knowledge and chest compression technique. According to the Department of Nursing first aid site performance check list found that the first aid equipment used unskilled , 25.5% on 2016/01 to 2016/06.The most unfamiliar techniques and knowledge of 109 nurses(all completed BLS) were as follows: 33.9% of defibrillator, 25.7% of staff role positions, 20.7% of first aid medications, and 14.7% of intubation device and LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway ) on 105/10/1-105/10/17.This study was designed to assist nurses enhancing the clinical ability and safety the patients in the first aid-related skills and knowledge. The purpose of this study is to compare the two groups of(1) first aid knowledge online test. (2) first aid skills test.【Methods】This study is a general ward nurses first aid technical examination, pre-test and post-test, the random control trial. Review by the hospital ethics committee and execution date on105/12/12-107/03/08, a total of 92 cases, obtained consent of all cases, then the case will be test in our hospital clinical skills center. Subject condition: general ward nurse (minimum age> 20 years),exclusion conditions: intensive care unit nurses, emergency department nurses. Study Procedure: Subjects who obtained the informed consent were randomly assigned to the first aid skill simulation training group (FAST) or the traditional group (T) by using a computer generated number. Randomization envelopes were opened and randomization performed by the study nurse after informed consent was obtained. Each group consisted of 46 subjects. All the subjects were pre-test first aid knowledge online test, followed were pre-test first aid skills test at the Clinical Skills Center by eight instructors who were more than 20 years worked experience. After pre-test, the experimental group are give the first aid skill simulation training guidance on-site with discussion and debriefing(75-min) and TMS online lecture(15-min).While the traditional group only give TMS online lecture(15-min). Two weeks later, the post-test include first aid knowledge online test and first aid skills test for two groups. After all the data were collected by the researchers who unknown the groups, the names of the cases were removed and the scores of the two groups were compared before and after about(1) first aid knowledge online test. (2) first aid skills test. The test Based on 2015 AHA Guidelines for CPR \& ECC (2015 Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality \& 2015American Heart Association and 2015).First Station: Equipment testing, Second Station: Assisted with intubation and fixation, Third Station: LMA, Fourth Station: Ambu bagging, Fifth Station: Drugs, Sixth Station: Defribrator, Seventh Station: Role positioning, and Eighth Station: Leader Training. The data will be archived in SPSS20.0 statistical package software. Statistical methods such as T-test and Anova variance analysis are used to analyze the data【Expected Result】: The knowledge and skills in the experimental group were better than the traditional group, and the first-aid simulation skill training was helpful for the clinical emergency situations.

Conditions
Simulation
Being tested
simulation-based training, traditional training
Keywords
Simulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • simulation-based trainingOther

    simulation-based training:The first aid skill simulation training with discussion and debriefing(75-min) and TMS online lecture(15-min).

  • traditional trainingOther

    traditional training:Give TMS online lecture(15-min).

Study groups in NCT02995785
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental:simulation-based trainingOtherExperimental
Receives: Other: simulation-based training; Other: traditional training
Active comparatorr: traditional trainingOtherTraditional
Receives: Other: traditional training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from Baseline in First aid skills test at 2 Weeks.

    The test Based on 2015 AHA Guidelines for CPR \& ECC (2015 Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality \& 2015American Heart Association and 2015).The contents of the test,first station:equipment test 13%, second station:assisted with intubation and fixation 16%, third station: LMA 12%, fourth station: Ambu bagging 10%, fifth station: Drugs 12%, sixth station: Defribrator 12%, seventh station: Role positioning 17%, and eighth station: Leader Training 8%, total score is 100 points, the higher the better.

    Measured: baseline and 2 weeks.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change from Baseline in First aid knowledge online test at 2 Weeks.

    The test Based on 2015 AHA Guidelines for CPR \& ECC (2015 Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality \& 2015American Heart Association and 2015). The contents of the test, 20 questions from 40 questions of random, each question 5 points, total score is 100 points, the higher the better.

    Measured: baseline and 2 weeks.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2016
  3. Primary completionMar 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
92 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02995785
Sponsor's protocol ID
201611028RINB
Status last verified
Dec 2016
First submitted
12 Dec 2016
Last updated
16 Dec 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing simulation-based training and traditional training in people with Simulation, run by National Taiwan University Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Pei-Yin Hsieh, MSN (+886-2-23123456 ext. 63501, peiyin3111@ntuh.gov.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from Baseline in First aid skills test at 2 Weeks. (time frame: baseline and 2 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in