Children Requiring IV PlacementNCT02997631
Robot-Based Distraction to Reduce Pain and Distress in the Pediatric Emergency Department
A study testing MEDi Robot in people with Children Requiring IV Placement, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Intravenous (IV) insertion is one of the most common procedures for children seeking medical treatment in the Emergency Department (ED). This procedure is often painful and distressing for children and families. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 11 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Children Requiring IV Placement
- What is being tested?
- MEDi Robot
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 86 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 20 Apr 2017to 13 May 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 11 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- 6 to 11 years of age
- Needs an IV placement
- Fully conscious and alert
- Has sufficient knowledge of the English language to understand and complete the pain assessments
- Accompanied by a legal guardian.
Who cannot join
- Hearing or visual impairments
- Neurocognitive delays
- Sensory impairment to pain (e.g., spina bifida)
- Previous enrollment in the same study
- Other exclusion at the discretion of the clinical staff
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Stollery Children's Hospital Emergency Department
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Humanoid Robot-Based Distraction for Venipuncture Pain: The MEDi Study
Intravenous (IV) insertion is one of the most common procedures for children seeking medical treatment in the Emergency Department (ED). This procedure is often painful and distressing for children and families. This can result in an uncooperative child, a need for multiple cannulation attempts, needle phobia, and dissatisfaction with care for family and healthcare workers. Non-pharmacological treatments are emerging as a newly favoured adjunct to pharmacotherapy, such as distraction therapy.
Distraction therapy involves engaging children in cognitive tasks in order to divert attention from painful stimuli and reduce pain and distress. Currently, distraction therapy is not utilized as a standard of care in the ED. Given children's enthusiasm for technological devices, we propose that the use of a technologically enhanced device may be a more effective distractor and may have a greater impact on pain reduction outcomes of patient importance. The primary objective of this study is to compare the reduction of pain and distress with the use of distraction (via the MEDi robot) versus current standard care in children aged 6 to 11 years who are undergoing IV placement.
Read the detailed description
Setting and Study Period: This study is a randomized controlled trial and will be conducted in the Emergency Department of the Stollery Children's Hospital (SCH). The SCH is a tertiary care hospital in Edmonton, Alberta whose annual ED census is >50,000 children. Based on our team's previous successful work in this field,12 months of patient recruitment is anticipated, and projected to occur from February 2017 to January 2018.
Study Population: The study will include children aged 6-11 years attending the SCH ED, and requiring an IV placement. See Eligibility section for detailed inclusion/ exclusion criteria. We plan to recruit 80 patients, overall.
Recruitment: Research Assistants (RAs) will be on shift from approximately 15:00 to 23:00 seven days a week. This time corresponds with peak visits requiring IV placements based on data collected from previous studies conducted in the SCH ED. RAs will identify and approach patients aged 6-11 years who require an IV placement. Inclusion/ exclusion criteria will be further assessed, and if the child is eligible, the RA will explain the study and invite the parent and child to participate. After obtaining written, informed consent from the parent (and assent from the child, if applicable), the RA will randomize the patient into one of two study arms and begin data collection. The RA will ask one parent/ caregiver for each child to participate and complete all relevant questionnaires.
Study Assessments: After consent/ assent has been obtained, the RA will collect information from the parent on baseline demographic variables (ex. age, gender), presenting signs and symptoms (ex. chief complaint), as well as previous history with ED visits and IV placement. Before the procedure, the RA will bring the MEDi (Medicine and Engineering Designing intelligence) robot into the room for children in the distraction group, set it up, and explain how to interact with it. The staff nurse will then perform the routine set up for IV placement. Pain will be measured using the child's self-reported scores on the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R). These scores will be collected immediately before and after IV placement has occurred. The child's response behaviors to pain will be assessed using the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress (OSBD). The procedure and child will be video-taped during IV insertion to complete the OSBD scoring. Parental anxiety will be measured pre and post procedure with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory - State Scale Revised Version (STAI-S, Form Y). The degree of the child's engagement with the robot will be measured immediately following the procedure with the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Additionally, vitals will be collected pre, post and during the procedure. Data will be entered in real-time into a secure online database hosted on REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture).
Randomization, Allocation and Blinding of Study Treatment: Randomization will be determined using a secure online randomization tool, through REDCap, and hosted via the Clinical Research Informatics Core at the University of Alberta. A trained RA will obtain the computer-generated randomized assignment after child and parent consent/assent has been obtained. Allocation will be concealed from the research staff, ED staff, and participants until after consent and randomization has been assigned by computer. Due to the nature of the intervention, it will not be possible to blind the children, parents, RAs, or ED staff. The children and their parents will be informed that the study is to evaluate different forms of distraction but will not know the study hypothesis for the MEDi robot. The data analyst will be blind to treatment assignment through the use of randomization codes that will not identify groups until analysis is complete.
Study Intervention and Comparison: The intervention will be the use of the MEDi robot. The robot will be at the child's eye level, and will be programmed to introduce itself, interact with the child, and make encouraging comments about how brave he/she was. The duration of its actions will coincide with the length of the procedure (approximately 5-8 minutes). The control group will receive standard care, which generally includes the use of topical anesthetic cream. This comparison is based on the pragmatic preferences of physicians at the Stollery Children's Hospital as well as precedent in the literature.Overall, it is felt that any new intervention (e.g., the MEDi robot) should be compared to what is currently in practice (i.e., standard care), as no single distraction therapy is consistently and routinely employed in EDs at this time.
- Conditions
- Children Requiring IV Placement
- Being tested
- MEDi Robot
- Keywords
- Pain Management, Distraction Therapy, Robot Based Distraction, MEDi
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MEDi RobotDevice
Distraction therapy using an interactive humanoid robot
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MEDi Distraction | Experimental | The intervention will be the use of the MEDi robot. The robot will be at the child's eye level, and will be programmed to introduce itself, interact with the child, and make encouraging comments about how brave he/she was. The duration of its actions will coincide with the length of the procedure (approximately 5-8 minutes). Receives: Device: MEDi Robot |
| Standard Care | No intervention | The control group will receive standard care, which generally includes the use of topical anesthetic cream. This comparison is based on the pragmatic preferences of physicians at the Stollery Children's Hospital as well as precedent in the literature. Overall, it is felt that any new intervention (e.g., the MEDi robot) should be compared to what is currently in practice (i.e., standard care), as no single distraction therapy is consistently and routinely employed in EDs at this time. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain of IV insertion
Pain scores will be self-reported by the child on the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R)
Measured: <5 minutes before IV placement, and immediately after IV placement
Distress associated with IV insertion
Two RAs will independently observe a videotape of each child and use the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress (OSBD) to assess children's response behaviors to pain.
Measured: During continuous 15-second intervals before, during, and after the IV placement procedure. Approximately 5 minutes before and after the procedure will be captured.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Parental anxiety
Measured with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory - State Scale Revised Version (STAI-S, Form Y), a validated and commonly used version of STAI, which has improved psychometric properties
Measured: Immediately before and after IV placement
Degree of child's engagement with robot
To determine a child's degree of engagement with the robotic technology, children, parents, and nurses will complete the 18-item version of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory
Measured: Approximately 2-5 minutes after IV placement
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start20 Apr 2017
- Primary completion13 May 2018
- Study completion13 May 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Children Requiring IV PlacementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AlbertaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Samina Ali, MD, Principal investigator, University of Alberta/Stollery Children's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02997631
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00068199
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 13 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Ali S, Manaloor R, Ma K, Sivakumar M, Beran T, Scott SD, Vandermeer B, Beirnes N, Graham TAD, Curtis S, Jou H, Hartling L. A randomized trial of robot-based distraction to reduce children's distress and pain during intravenous insertion in the emergency department. CJEM. 2021 Jan;23(1):85-93. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00023-5. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
PubMed 33683608Ali S, Sivakumar M, Beran T, Scott SD, Vandermeer B, Curtis S, Jou H, Hartling L. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of humanoid robot-based distraction for venipuncture pain in children. BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e023366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023366.
PubMed 30552264
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Humanoid Robot-Based Distraction for Venipuncture Pain: The MEDi Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02997631
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00068199
- Conditions
- Children Requiring IV Placement
- Keywords
- Pain Management, Distraction Therapy, Robot Based Distraction, MEDi
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Intravenous (IV) insertion is one of the most common procedures for children seeking medical treatment in the Emergency Department (ED). This procedure is often painful and distressing for children and families. This can result in an uncooperative child, a need for multiple cannulation attempts, needle phobia, and dissatisfaction with care for family and healthcare workers. Non-pharmacological treatments are emerging as a newly favoured adjunct to pharmacotherapy, such as distraction therapy.
Distraction therapy involves engaging children in cognitive tasks in order to divert attention from painful stimuli and reduce pain and distress. Currently, distraction therapy is not utilized as a standard of care in the ED. Given children's enthusiasm for technological devices, we propose that the use of a technologically enhanced device may be a more effective distractor and may have a greater impact on pain reduction outcomes of patient importance. The primary objective of this study is to compare the reduction of pain and distress with the use of distraction (via the MEDi robot) versus current standard care in children aged 6 to 11 years who are undergoing IV placement.
Detailed description
Setting and Study Period: This study is a randomized controlled trial and will be conducted in the Emergency Department of the Stollery Children's Hospital (SCH). The SCH is a tertiary care hospital in Edmonton, Alberta whose annual ED census is >50,000 children. Based on our team's previous successful work in this field,12 months of patient recruitment is anticipated, and projected to occur from February 2017 to January 2018.
Study Population: The study will include children aged 6-11 years attending the SCH ED, and requiring an IV placement. See Eligibility section for detailed inclusion/ exclusion criteria. We plan to recruit 80 patients, overall.
Recruitment: Research Assistants (RAs) will be on shift from approximately 15:00 to 23:00 seven days a week. This time corresponds with peak visits requiring IV placements based on data collected from previous studies conducted in the SCH ED. RAs will identify and approach patients aged 6-11 years who require an IV placement. Inclusion/ exclusion criteria will be further assessed, and if the child is eligible, the RA will explain the study and invite the parent and child to participate. After obtaining written, informed consent from the parent (and assent from the child, if applicable), the RA will randomize the patient into one of two study arms and begin data collection. The RA will ask one parent/ caregiver for each child to participate and complete all relevant questionnaires.
Study Assessments: After consent/ assent has been obtained, the RA will collect information from the parent on baseline demographic variables (ex. age, gender), presenting signs and symptoms (ex. chief complaint), as well as previous history with ED visits and IV placement. Before the procedure, the RA will bring the MEDi (Medicine and Engineering Designing intelligence) robot into the room for children in the distraction group, set it up, and explain how to interact with it. The staff nurse will then perform the routine set up for IV placement. Pain will be measured using the child's self-reported scores on the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R). These scores will be collected immediately before and after IV placement has occurred. The child's response behaviors to pain will be assessed using the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress (OSBD). The procedure and child will be video-taped during IV insertion to complete the OSBD scoring. Parental anxiety will be measured pre and post procedure with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory - State Scale Revised Version (STAI-S, Form Y). The degree of the child's engagement with the robot will be measured immediately following the procedure with the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Additionally, vitals will be collected pre, post and during the procedure. Data will be entered in real-time into a secure online database hosted on REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture).
Randomization, Allocation and Blinding of Study Treatment: Randomization will be determined using a secure online randomization tool, through REDCap, and hosted via the Clinical Research Informatics Core at the University of Alberta. A trained RA will obtain the computer-generated randomized assignment after child and parent consent/assent has been obtained. Allocation will be concealed from the research staff, ED staff, and participants until after consent and randomization has been assigned by computer. Due to the nature of the intervention, it will not be possible to blind the children, parents, RAs, or ED staff. The children and their parents will be informed that the study is to evaluate different forms of distraction but will not know the study hypothesis for the MEDi robot. The data analyst will be blind to treatment assignment through the use of randomization codes that will not identify groups until analysis is complete.
Study Intervention and Comparison: The intervention will be the use of the MEDi robot. The robot will be at the child's eye level, and will be programmed to introduce itself, interact with the child, and make encouraging comments about how brave he/she was. The duration of its actions will coincide with the length of the procedure (approximately 5-8 minutes). The control group will receive standard care, which generally includes the use of topical anesthetic cream. This comparison is based on the pragmatic preferences of physicians at the Stollery Children's Hospital as well as precedent in the literature.Overall, it is felt that any new intervention (e.g., the MEDi robot) should be compared to what is currently in practice (i.e., standard care), as no single distraction therapy is consistently and routinely employed in EDs at this time.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MEDi Distraction | Experimental | Device: MEDi RobotThe intervention will be the use of the MEDi robot. The robot will be at the child's eye level, and will be programmed to introduce itself, interact with the child, and make encouraging comments about how brave he/she was. The duration of its actions will coincide with the length of the procedure (approximately 5-8 minutes). |
| Standard Care | No intervention | –The control group will receive standard care, which generally includes the use of topical anesthetic cream. This comparison is based on the pragmatic preferences of physicians at the Stollery Children's Hospital as well as precedent in the literature. Overall, it is felt that any new intervention (e.g., the MEDi robot) should be compared to what is currently in practice (i.e., standard care), as no single distraction therapy is consistently and routinely employed in EDs at this time. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 11 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- 6 to 11 years of age
- Needs an IV placement
- Fully conscious and alert
- Has sufficient knowledge of the English language to understand and complete the pain assessments
- Accompanied by a legal guardian.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Hearing or visual impairments
- Neurocognitive delays
- Sensory impairment to pain (e.g., spina bifida)
- Previous enrollment in the same study
- Other exclusion at the discretion of the clinical staff
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MEDi RobotDistraction therapy using an interactive humanoid robot | Device | MEDi Distraction |
Primary outcome
Pain of IV insertion
Time frame: <5 minutes before IV placement, and immediately after IV placement
Pain scores will be self-reported by the child on the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R)
Distress associated with IV insertion
Time frame: During continuous 15-second intervals before, during, and after the IV placement procedure. Approximately 5 minutes before and after the procedure will be captured.
Two RAs will independently observe a videotape of each child and use the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress (OSBD) to assess children's response behaviors to pain.
2 secondary outcomes
Parental anxiety
Time frame: Immediately before and after IV placement
Degree of child's engagement with robot
Time frame: Approximately 2-5 minutes after IV placement
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33683608Ali S, Manaloor R, Ma K, Sivakumar M, Beran T, Scott SD, Vandermeer B, Beirnes N, Graham TAD, Curtis S, Jou H, Hartling L. A randomized trial of robot-based distraction to reduce children's distress and pain during intravenous insertion in the emergency department. CJEM. 2021 Jan;23(1):85-93. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00023-5. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30552264Ali S, Sivakumar M, Beran T, Scott SD, Vandermeer B, Curtis S, Jou H, Hartling L. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of humanoid robot-based distraction for venipuncture pain in children. BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e023366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023366.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Samina Ali, MD principal investigator
University of Alberta/Stollery Children's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MEDi Robot in people with Children Requiring IV Placement, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain of IV insertion (time frame: <5 minutes before IV placement, and immediately after IV placement). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02997631, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.