Hearing-ImpairmentNCT03005912
Telephone vs. Voice Over IP Speech Comprehension in Hearing Aided Subjects.
A study testing Conventional acoustic telephony, Conventional bluetooth telephony and VoIP acoustic telephony in people with Hearing-Impairment, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Despite modern hearing aids such as cochlear implants, speech comprehension during telephone conversation is challenging for hearing-impaired patients. On the one hand, conventional telephones transmit a limited spectrum of the acoustic signal compared to a normal conversation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hearing-Impairment
- What is being tested?
- Conventional acoustic telephony, Conventional bluetooth telephony and VoIP acoustic telephony
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2017to 11 May 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Bluetooth enabled hearing aid (Nucleus 6 CI or a GN Resound hearing aid) compatible to the phone clip
- Use of hearing aid for ≥ 3 months.
- Native German speaker
Who cannot join
- Mentally or physically unfit to participate
- Vulnerable Person
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Clinical Single Centre Cohort Study Comparing Telephone vs. Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Speech Comprehension for Acoustical and Bluetooth Speech Signal Transmission in Hearing Aided Subjects.
Despite modern hearing aids such as cochlear implants, speech comprehension during telephone conversation is challenging for hearing-impaired patients. On the one hand, conventional telephones transmit a limited spectrum of the acoustic signal compared to a normal conversation. On the other hand, lip reading during a phone call is generally not possible. As a result, speech comprehension during a telephone conversation is reduced. In previous studies, the authors demonstrated an improved speech comprehension for hearing-impaired patients using voice-over internet protocol (VoIP) telephony (Skype) compared to conventional telephony.
New bluetooth-enabled hearing aids allow for direct transmission of the telephone signal to the hearing device. As the direct transmission is expected to improve signal-to-noise ratio, speech comprehension is tested in patients with bluetooth-enabled hearing aids for 4 different scenarios: 1. conventional telephony without bluetooth device 2. conventional telephony with bluetooth device 3. VoIP telephony without bluetooth device 4. VoIP telephony with bluetooth device
Read the detailed description
Speech comprehension of hearing impaired individuals is limited in telephone conversations due to the limited acoustic spectrum transmitted by conventional analogue telephones, such as background noise, interferences with the hearing aid and the absent possibility of lip-reading. This can provide an impact on quality of life as better speech comprehension reduces exclusion from social interactions as well as potential professional occupations. Furthermore, in elderly population an impaired hearing function is associated with a higher risk of dementia, mortality rate and dependency in the daily activities.
Mantokoudis et al. recently demonstrated that the larger acoustic spectrum of internet telephony (Voice over Internet Protocol [VoIP]) results in superior speech comprehension of individuals with hearing aids compared to conventional telephones. Low signal quality during internet telephony does not significantly attenuate speech understanding. Another study revealed that internet telephony combined with a webcam further improves speech comprehension as additional lip reading was possible.
New bluetooth audio streaming devices allow for pairing with smart phones or other devices supporting bluetooth technology such as computers for direct routing of the audio signal to the hearing aid. Current state of research shows significant benefits for hearing impaired individuals using this technology for telephone conversations. The speech comprehension and subjective satisfaction can be improved due to a better sound quality and accuracy and less noise interference.
However, speech comprehension of these new bluetooth devices has not been investigated in combination with internet telephony (VoIP) and it remains unclear whether hearing impaired individuals could benefit of this possibility. This study investigates, whether bluetooth audio streaming devices paired to hearing aids/implants combined with internet telephony improves speech comprehension in hearing impaired individuals.
VoIP and conventional telephone speech comprehension will be compared with and without a wireless bluetooth phone clip (Cochlear Wireless Phone Clip, Cochlear Ltd., 1 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales 2109, Australia). The phone clip is capable to directly connect to other bluetooth-enabled devices and transmits the audio signal directly to the sound processor of the hearing implant. A microphone in the phone clip enables to record and transmit the user's spoken words to the mobile phone therefore a hands-free use is possible.
Bluetooth connection is a well-established wireless technology transmitting at 2.4 gigahertz at distances up to approximately seven meters. The wireless technology is the same for most of bluetooth and Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) devices. According to the Swiss federal health office the electromagnetic radiation of the bluetooth device as intended to be used in the proposed study fulfils the requirements of the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC).
Several previous studies demonstrated a significantly increased conventional telephone speech perception with the Cochlear Wireless Phone Clip than without this device. On the other hand, speech perception in hearing impaired people using internet telephony is improved compared to conventional telephony. However, speech perception using the phone clip in connection to internet telephony has not been studied to this date and remains unknown.
The purpose of the proposed study is to quantify VoIP vs. conventional telephone speech comprehension in individuals with or without application of bluetooth phone clip. Potentially better speech comprehension due to the application of the phone clip could alleviate the handicap of communication in individuals with hearing aids. As a consequence the social life and contacts of the affected individuals such as worsening of mental state and dependency in the everyday life could be ameliorated only by using a simple device.
The goal of this study is to measure speech comprehension of individuals with hearing aids using a bluetooth paired phone clip and VoIP telephony. To quantify a potential benefit of this, speech comprehension has to be tested with and without the phone clip for VoIP and conventional telephony in the same individuals. Speech comprehension will be quantified with a signal/noise ratio of the HSM- sentence test (Hochmair, Schulz, Moser)
Upon agreement to participate, patients are invited to the audiological department at Inselspital in Bern. After remaining questions are clarified, the patient has to sign a written informed consent. The investigation will take approximately two hours and takes place in the sound-proof hearing test chambers of the audiological department.
Four different speech comprehension scenarios are tested:
- Conventional telephony without bluetooth device
- Conventional telephony with bluetooth device
- VoIP telephony without bluetooth device
- VoIP telephony with bluetooth device
To evaluate speech comprehension, the HSM (Hochmair-Schulz-Moser) sentence test is used. This is a test mainly applied to evaluate the speech comprehension in patients with cochlear implants and consists of 30 lists each including 20 short sentences. After initial presentation of exercise sentences without background noise, additional noise is added while the speech signal is kept at a constant volume level. The percentage of speech comprehension is determined by the quantity of correctly understood sentences at a certain signal-to-noise ratio (S/N Ratio). In this study a S/N Ratio of 10dB, with a signal at 70dB and noise at 60dB, will be analysed.
For representativeness of speech comprehension results, participants will use their hearing aids with their daily use volume settings. The phone clip will be programmed for a 1:1 transmission of the telephone conversation and the ambient noise. At the end, the patient has to evaluate the subjective perception of the speech sound quality by means of the Mean Opinion Score (MOS).
- Conditions
- Hearing-Impairment
- Being tested
- Conventional acoustic telephony, Conventional bluetooth telephony, VoIP acoustic telephony, VoIP bluetooth telephony
- Keywords
- Speech Comprehension, Telephony, VoIP
- Medical subject headings
- Hearing Loss
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conventional acoustic telephonyDevice
Quantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test.
Conventional bluetooth telephonyDevice
Quantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test.
VoIP acoustic telephonyDevice
Quantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test.
VoIP bluetooth telephonyDevice
Quantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional acoustic telephony | Placebo comparator | Telephone speech comprehension in hearing aided patients (Cochlear Implant or GN Resound hearing aid) for a conventional mobile phone call with acoustic transmission of the speech signal. Receives: Device: Conventional acoustic telephony |
| Conventional bluetooth telephony | Active comparator | Telephone speech comprehension in hearing aided patients (Cochlear Implant or GN Resound hearing aid) for a conventional mobile phone call with direct bluetooth transmission of the speech signal to the cochlear implant or hearing aid. Receives: Device: Conventional bluetooth telephony |
| VoIP acoustic telephony | Active comparator | Telephone speech comprehension in hearing aided patients (Cochlear Implant or GN Resound hearing aid) for a VoIP mobile phone call with acoustic transmission of the speech signal. Receives: Device: VoIP acoustic telephony |
| VoIP bluetooth telephony | Active comparator | Telephone speech comprehension in hearing aided patients (Cochlear Implant or GN Resound hearing aid) for a VoIP mobile phone call with direct bluetooth transmission of the speech signal to the cochlear implant or hearing aid. Receives: Device: VoIP bluetooth telephony |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Speech comprehension scores
Speech comprehension scores of the HSM-sentence test for each patient with and without bluetooth connection will be measured and compared in conventional and internet telephony.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Subjective perception of speech sound quality
Subjective perception of speech sound quality by means of the Mean Opinion Score (MOS).
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Apr 2017
- Primary completion11 May 2018
- Study completion11 May 2018
Why it stopped: Insufficient recruitment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hearing-ImpairmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cochlear, Stiftung Besser Hören
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Markus Huth, Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Investigators
- Georgios Mantokoudis, MD, Principal investigator, Attending physician
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03005912
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Bluetooth-Study
- Other IDs
- 2016-01935, 2016
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 26 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 21 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tyler RS, Baker LJ, Armstrong-Bednall G. Difficulties experienced by hearing-aid candidates and hearing-aid users. Br J Audiol. 1983 Aug;17(3):191-201. doi: 10.3109/03005368309107884.
PubMed 6357328Cray JW, Allen RL, Stuart A, Hudson S, Layman E, Givens GD. An investigation of telephone use among cochlear implant recipients. Am J Audiol. 2004 Dec;13(2):200-12. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2004/025).
PubMed 15903146Ito J, Nakatake M, Fujita S. Hearing ability by telephone of patients with cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Dec;121(6):802-4. doi: 10.1053/hn.1999.v121.a93864.
PubMed 10580241Liu C, Fu QJ, Narayanan SS. Effect of bandwidth extension to telephone speech recognition in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Feb;125(2):EL77-83. doi: 10.1121/1.3062145.
PubMed 19206836Horng MJ, Chen HC, Hsu CJ, Fu QJ. Telephone speech perception by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implantees. Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):66S-69S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803153bd.
PubMed 17496651Fu QJ, Galvin JJ 3rd. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users. Am J Audiol. 2006 Dec;15(2):127-32. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2006/016).
PubMed 17182877Milchard AJ, Cullington HE. An investigation into the effect of limiting the frequency bandwidth of speech on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol. 2004 Jun;43(6):356-62. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050045.
PubMed 15457818Kepler LJ, Terry M, Sweetman RH. Telephone usage in the hearing-impaired population. Ear Hear. 1992 Oct;13(5):311-9. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199210000-00009.
PubMed 1487091Rumeau C, Frere J, Montaut-Verient B, Lion A, Gauchard G, Parietti-Winkler C. Quality of life and audiologic performance through the ability to phone of cochlear implant users. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Dec;272(12):3685-92. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3448-x. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
PubMed 25527411Cacciatore F, Napoli C, Abete P, Marciano E, Triassi M, Rengo F. Quality of life determinants and hearing function in an elderly population: Osservatorio Geriatrico Campano Study Group. Gerontology. 1999 Nov-Dec;45(6):323-8. doi: 10.1159/000022113.
PubMed 10559650Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist. 2003 Oct;43(5):661-8. doi: 10.1093/geront/43.5.661.
PubMed 14570962Gates GA, Cobb JL, Linn RT, Rees T, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB. Central auditory dysfunction, cognitive dysfunction, and dementia in older people. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Feb;122(2):161-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140047010.
PubMed 8630210Barnett S, Franks P. Deafness and mortality: analyses of linked data from the National Health Interview Survey and National Death Index. Public Health Rep. 1999 Jul-Aug;114(4):330-6. doi: 10.1093/phr/114.4.330.
PubMed 10501133Mantokoudis G, Kompis M, Dubach P, Caversaccio M, Senn P. How internet telephony could improve communication for hearing-impaired individuals. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Sep;31(7):1014-21. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181ec1d46.
PubMed 20634771Mantokoudis G, Dubach P, Pfiffner F, Kompis M, Caversaccio M, Senn P. Speech perception benefits of internet versus conventional telephony for hearing-impaired individuals. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jul 16;14(4):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1818.
PubMed 22805169
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Single Centre Cohort Study Comparing Telephone vs. Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Speech Comprehension for Acoustical and Bluetooth Speech Signal Transmission in Hearing Aided Subjects.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03005912
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Bluetooth-Study
- Conditions
- Hearing-Impairment
- Keywords
- Speech Comprehension, Telephony, VoIP
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Insufficient recruitment
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cochlear, Stiftung Besser Hören
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Despite modern hearing aids such as cochlear implants, speech comprehension during telephone conversation is challenging for hearing-impaired patients. On the one hand, conventional telephones transmit a limited spectrum of the acoustic signal compared to a normal conversation. On the other hand, lip reading during a phone call is generally not possible. As a result, speech comprehension during a telephone conversation is reduced. In previous studies, the authors demonstrated an improved speech comprehension for hearing-impaired patients using voice-over internet protocol (VoIP) telephony (Skype) compared to conventional telephony.
New bluetooth-enabled hearing aids allow for direct transmission of the telephone signal to the hearing device. As the direct transmission is expected to improve signal-to-noise ratio, speech comprehension is tested in patients with bluetooth-enabled hearing aids for 4 different scenarios: 1. conventional telephony without bluetooth device 2. conventional telephony with bluetooth device 3. VoIP telephony without bluetooth device 4. VoIP telephony with bluetooth device
Detailed description
Speech comprehension of hearing impaired individuals is limited in telephone conversations due to the limited acoustic spectrum transmitted by conventional analogue telephones, such as background noise, interferences with the hearing aid and the absent possibility of lip-reading. This can provide an impact on quality of life as better speech comprehension reduces exclusion from social interactions as well as potential professional occupations. Furthermore, in elderly population an impaired hearing function is associated with a higher risk of dementia, mortality rate and dependency in the daily activities.
Mantokoudis et al. recently demonstrated that the larger acoustic spectrum of internet telephony (Voice over Internet Protocol [VoIP]) results in superior speech comprehension of individuals with hearing aids compared to conventional telephones. Low signal quality during internet telephony does not significantly attenuate speech understanding. Another study revealed that internet telephony combined with a webcam further improves speech comprehension as additional lip reading was possible.
New bluetooth audio streaming devices allow for pairing with smart phones or other devices supporting bluetooth technology such as computers for direct routing of the audio signal to the hearing aid. Current state of research shows significant benefits for hearing impaired individuals using this technology for telephone conversations. The speech comprehension and subjective satisfaction can be improved due to a better sound quality and accuracy and less noise interference.
However, speech comprehension of these new bluetooth devices has not been investigated in combination with internet telephony (VoIP) and it remains unclear whether hearing impaired individuals could benefit of this possibility. This study investigates, whether bluetooth audio streaming devices paired to hearing aids/implants combined with internet telephony improves speech comprehension in hearing impaired individuals.
VoIP and conventional telephone speech comprehension will be compared with and without a wireless bluetooth phone clip (Cochlear Wireless Phone Clip, Cochlear Ltd., 1 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales 2109, Australia). The phone clip is capable to directly connect to other bluetooth-enabled devices and transmits the audio signal directly to the sound processor of the hearing implant. A microphone in the phone clip enables to record and transmit the user's spoken words to the mobile phone therefore a hands-free use is possible.
Bluetooth connection is a well-established wireless technology transmitting at 2.4 gigahertz at distances up to approximately seven meters. The wireless technology is the same for most of bluetooth and Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) devices. According to the Swiss federal health office the electromagnetic radiation of the bluetooth device as intended to be used in the proposed study fulfils the requirements of the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC).
Several previous studies demonstrated a significantly increased conventional telephone speech perception with the Cochlear Wireless Phone Clip than without this device. On the other hand, speech perception in hearing impaired people using internet telephony is improved compared to conventional telephony. However, speech perception using the phone clip in connection to internet telephony has not been studied to this date and remains unknown.
The purpose of the proposed study is to quantify VoIP vs. conventional telephone speech comprehension in individuals with or without application of bluetooth phone clip. Potentially better speech comprehension due to the application of the phone clip could alleviate the handicap of communication in individuals with hearing aids. As a consequence the social life and contacts of the affected individuals such as worsening of mental state and dependency in the everyday life could be ameliorated only by using a simple device.
The goal of this study is to measure speech comprehension of individuals with hearing aids using a bluetooth paired phone clip and VoIP telephony. To quantify a potential benefit of this, speech comprehension has to be tested with and without the phone clip for VoIP and conventional telephony in the same individuals. Speech comprehension will be quantified with a signal/noise ratio of the HSM- sentence test (Hochmair, Schulz, Moser)
Upon agreement to participate, patients are invited to the audiological department at Inselspital in Bern. After remaining questions are clarified, the patient has to sign a written informed consent. The investigation will take approximately two hours and takes place in the sound-proof hearing test chambers of the audiological department.
Four different speech comprehension scenarios are tested:
- Conventional telephony without bluetooth device
- Conventional telephony with bluetooth device
- VoIP telephony without bluetooth device
- VoIP telephony with bluetooth device
To evaluate speech comprehension, the HSM (Hochmair-Schulz-Moser) sentence test is used. This is a test mainly applied to evaluate the speech comprehension in patients with cochlear implants and consists of 30 lists each including 20 short sentences. After initial presentation of exercise sentences without background noise, additional noise is added while the speech signal is kept at a constant volume level. The percentage of speech comprehension is determined by the quantity of correctly understood sentences at a certain signal-to-noise ratio (S/N Ratio). In this study a S/N Ratio of 10dB, with a signal at 70dB and noise at 60dB, will be analysed.
For representativeness of speech comprehension results, participants will use their hearing aids with their daily use volume settings. The phone clip will be programmed for a 1:1 transmission of the telephone conversation and the ambient noise. At the end, the patient has to evaluate the subjective perception of the speech sound quality by means of the Mean Opinion Score (MOS).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional acoustic telephony | Placebo comparator | Device: Conventional acoustic telephonyTelephone speech comprehension in hearing aided patients (Cochlear Implant or GN Resound hearing aid) for a conventional mobile phone call with acoustic transmission of the speech signal. |
| Conventional bluetooth telephony | Active comparator | Device: Conventional bluetooth telephonyTelephone speech comprehension in hearing aided patients (Cochlear Implant or GN Resound hearing aid) for a conventional mobile phone call with direct bluetooth transmission of the speech signal to the cochlear implant or hearing aid. |
| VoIP acoustic telephony | Active comparator | Device: VoIP acoustic telephonyTelephone speech comprehension in hearing aided patients (Cochlear Implant or GN Resound hearing aid) for a VoIP mobile phone call with acoustic transmission of the speech signal. |
| VoIP bluetooth telephony | Active comparator | Device: VoIP bluetooth telephonyTelephone speech comprehension in hearing aided patients (Cochlear Implant or GN Resound hearing aid) for a VoIP mobile phone call with direct bluetooth transmission of the speech signal to the cochlear implant or hearing aid. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Bluetooth enabled hearing aid (Nucleus 6 CI or a GN Resound hearing aid) compatible to the phone clip
- Use of hearing aid for ≥ 3 months.
- Native German speaker
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Mentally or physically unfit to participate
- Vulnerable Person
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional acoustic telephonyQuantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test. | Device | Conventional acoustic telephony |
| Conventional bluetooth telephonyQuantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test. | Device | Conventional bluetooth telephony |
| VoIP acoustic telephonyQuantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test. | Device | VoIP acoustic telephony |
| VoIP bluetooth telephonyQuantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test. | Device | VoIP bluetooth telephony |
Primary outcome
Speech comprehension scores
Time frame: 2 years
Speech comprehension scores of the HSM-sentence test for each patient with and without bluetooth connection will be measured and compared in conventional and internet telephony.
1 secondary outcome
Subjective perception of speech sound quality
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Insufficient recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 May 2018.
- Background: PubMed 6357328Tyler RS, Baker LJ, Armstrong-Bednall G. Difficulties experienced by hearing-aid candidates and hearing-aid users. Br J Audiol. 1983 Aug;17(3):191-201. doi: 10.3109/03005368309107884.
- Background: PubMed 15903146Cray JW, Allen RL, Stuart A, Hudson S, Layman E, Givens GD. An investigation of telephone use among cochlear implant recipients. Am J Audiol. 2004 Dec;13(2):200-12. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2004/025).
- Background: PubMed 10580241Ito J, Nakatake M, Fujita S. Hearing ability by telephone of patients with cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Dec;121(6):802-4. doi: 10.1053/hn.1999.v121.a93864.
- Background: PubMed 19206836Liu C, Fu QJ, Narayanan SS. Effect of bandwidth extension to telephone speech recognition in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Feb;125(2):EL77-83. doi: 10.1121/1.3062145.
- Background: PubMed 17496651Horng MJ, Chen HC, Hsu CJ, Fu QJ. Telephone speech perception by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implantees. Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):66S-69S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803153bd.
- Background: PubMed 17182877Fu QJ, Galvin JJ 3rd. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users. Am J Audiol. 2006 Dec;15(2):127-32. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2006/016).
- Background: PubMed 15457818Milchard AJ, Cullington HE. An investigation into the effect of limiting the frequency bandwidth of speech on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol. 2004 Jun;43(6):356-62. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050045.
- Background: PubMed 1487091Kepler LJ, Terry M, Sweetman RH. Telephone usage in the hearing-impaired population. Ear Hear. 1992 Oct;13(5):311-9. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199210000-00009.
- Background: PubMed 25527411Rumeau C, Frere J, Montaut-Verient B, Lion A, Gauchard G, Parietti-Winkler C. Quality of life and audiologic performance through the ability to phone of cochlear implant users. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Dec;272(12):3685-92. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3448-x. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
- Background: PubMed 10559650Cacciatore F, Napoli C, Abete P, Marciano E, Triassi M, Rengo F. Quality of life determinants and hearing function in an elderly population: Osservatorio Geriatrico Campano Study Group. Gerontology. 1999 Nov-Dec;45(6):323-8. doi: 10.1159/000022113.
- Background: PubMed 14570962Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist. 2003 Oct;43(5):661-8. doi: 10.1093/geront/43.5.661.
- Background: PubMed 8630210Gates GA, Cobb JL, Linn RT, Rees T, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB. Central auditory dysfunction, cognitive dysfunction, and dementia in older people. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Feb;122(2):161-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140047010.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hearing-Impairment
Not yet recruiting
Auditory-Cognitive Optimization Care Program for Older Adults With Hearing Loss and Cognitive Impairment
Hearing Loss, Cognitive Impairment
Not yet recruiting
SENSE-Brain Health Pro for Older Adults With Sensory Loss
Vision and Hearing Loss, Vision Impairment
Recruiting
OTC Hearing Aid and MCI
Hearing Loss, Mild Cognitive Impairment
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Evaluation of the Developed Syntactic-Semantic Visual Configuration Intervention for Children With Language Impairment
Language Impairment, Autism
Not yet recruiting
A Study Examining Acceptability of Auditory Implant Fitting Software Technologies
Hearing Impairment
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Georgios Mantokoudis, MD principal investigator
Attending physician
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conventional acoustic telephony, Conventional bluetooth telephony and VoIP acoustic telephony in people with Hearing-Impairment, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Insufficient recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Speech comprehension scores (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03005912, which also lists 26 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 2 Nov 2026.