GliomaNCT03009318
MRS and 11C-methionine PET/CT in the Diagnosis of Glioma
A study testing tumors are confirmed by surgery and pathology in people with Glioma, run by Huashan Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
MET PET and MRS are often performed as imaging tool for the differential diagnosis of gliomas. But both techniques have limitations causing misdiagnosis; thus, the investigators tried to combine these two imaging tools to study whether the combination of MET PET and MRS could raise the diagnosis ability of the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Glioma
- What is being tested?
- tumors are confirmed by surgery and pathology
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Jan 2012to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with non-enhancing supratentorial lesions shown by contrast-enhanced MRI
- No surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy history
- All patients gave written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Patients with infratentorial Neoplasms
- Patients with enhancing supratentorial lesions
- Recurrent gliomas after surgery
- Primary gliomas with history of radiotherapy or chemotherapy
- History of malignant tumours at any body site
- Inability to give informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Combination of 11C-MET PET and MRS in the Diagnosis of Glioma.
MET PET and MRS are often performed as imaging tool for the differential diagnosis of gliomas. But both techniques have limitations causing misdiagnosis; thus, the investigators tried to combine these two imaging tools to study whether the combination of MET PET and MRS could raise the diagnosis ability of the radiological diagnosis of gliomas.
- Conditions
- Glioma
- Being tested
- tumors are confirmed by surgery and pathology
- Keywords
- Glioma, Magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Methionine, PET/CT
- Medical subject headings
- Glioma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tumors are confirmed by surgery and pathologyOther
Each patient undergoes both MRS and MET PET scan before surgery. The lesion will be considered as a glioma when either MRS or MET PET results indicated the diagnosis. Pathologic diagnosis will be performed to confirm the final diagnosis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MRS imaging and 11C-MET PET/CT | Other | Each patient underwent both MRS and MET PET before surgery. Receives: Other: tumors are confirmed by surgery and pathology |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity of the combination of MRS and 11C-MET PET/CT
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
The relationship between 11C-MET PET/CT results and molecular pathogeneses
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2012
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completionDec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for GliomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Huashan HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Huashan Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dongxiao Zhuang, Huashan Hospital
- Investigators
- Dongxiao Zhuang, Professor, Principal investigator, Huashan Hospital, Sudan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03009318
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 81171295
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 29 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 9 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, Rouse C, Chen Y, Dowling J, Wolinsky Y, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan J. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011. Neuro Oncol. 2014 Oct;16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv1-63. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou223. No abstract available.
PubMed 25304271Fouke SJ, Benzinger T, Gibson D, Ryken TC, Kalkanis SN, Olson JJ. The role of imaging in the management of adults with diffuse low grade glioma: A systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol. 2015 Dec;125(3):457-79. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1908-9. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
PubMed 26530262Wang W, Hu Y, Lu P, Li Y, Chen Y, Tian M, Yu L. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in brain tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 13;9(11):e112577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112577. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25393009Martinez-Bisbal MC, Celda B. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in the study of human brain cancer. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Dec;53(6):618-30.
PubMed 20016453Guo J, Yao C, Chen H, Zhuang D, Tang W, Ren G, Wang Y, Wu J, Huang F, Zhou L. The relationship between Cho/NAA and glioma metabolism: implementation for margin delineation of cerebral gliomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Aug;154(8):1361-70; discussion 1370. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1418-x. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
PubMed 22729482Yamasaki F, Takayasu T, Nosaka R, Amatya VJ, Doskaliyev A, Akiyama Y, Tominaga A, Takeshima Y, Sugiyama K, Kurisu K. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy detection of high lipid levels in intraaxial tumors without central necrosis: a characteristic of malignant lymphoma. J Neurosurg. 2015 Jun;122(6):1370-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS14106. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
PubMed 25748300Oz G, Alger JR, Barker PB, Bartha R, Bizzi A, Boesch C, Bolan PJ, Brindle KM, Cudalbu C, Dincer A, Dydak U, Emir UE, Frahm J, Gonzalez RG, Gruber S, Gruetter R, Gupta RK, Heerschap A, Henning A, Hetherington HP, Howe FA, Huppi PS, Hurd RE, Kantarci K, Klomp DW, Kreis R, Kruiskamp MJ, Leach MO, Lin AP, Luijten PR, Marjanska M, Maudsley AA, Meyerhoff DJ, Mountford CE, Nelson SJ, Pamir MN, Pan JW, Peet AC, Poptani H, Posse S, Pouwels PJ, Ratai EM, Ross BD, Scheenen TW, Schuster C, Smith IC, Soher BJ, Tkac I, Vigneron DB, Kauppinen RA; MRS Consensus Group. Clinical proton MR spectroscopy in central nervous system disorders. Radiology. 2014 Mar;270(3):658-79. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130531.
PubMed 24568703WRENN FR Jr, GOOD ML, HANDLER P. The use of positron-emitting radioisotopes for the localization of brain tumors. Science. 1951 May 4;113(2940):525-7. doi: 10.1126/science.113.2940.525. No abstract available.
PubMed 14828392Demetriades AK, Almeida AC, Bhangoo RS, Barrington SF. Applications of positron emission tomography in neuro-oncology: a clinical approach. Surgeon. 2014 Jun;12(3):148-57. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.12.001. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
PubMed 24629841Herholz K, Holzer T, Bauer B, Schroder R, Voges J, Ernestus RI, Mendoza G, Weber-Luxenburger G, Lottgen J, Thiel A, Wienhard K, Heiss WD. 11C-methionine PET for differential diagnosis of low-grade gliomas. Neurology. 1998 May;50(5):1316-22. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.5.1316.
PubMed 9595980Kracht LW, Miletic H, Busch S, Jacobs AH, Voges J, Hoevels M, Klein JC, Herholz K, Heiss WD. Delineation of brain tumor extent with [11C]L-methionine positron emission tomography: local comparison with stereotactic histopathology. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Nov 1;10(21):7163-70. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0262.
PubMed 15534088Glaudemans AW, Enting RH, Heesters MA, Dierckx RA, van Rheenen RW, Walenkamp AM, Slart RH. Value of 11C-methionine PET in imaging brain tumours and metastases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Apr;40(4):615-35. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2295-5. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
PubMed 23232505
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Combination of 11C-MET PET and MRS in the Diagnosis of Glioma.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03009318
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 81171295
- Conditions
- Glioma
- Keywords
- Glioma, Magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Methionine, PET/CT
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Huashan HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2012
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
MET PET and MRS are often performed as imaging tool for the differential diagnosis of gliomas. But both techniques have limitations causing misdiagnosis; thus, the investigators tried to combine these two imaging tools to study whether the combination of MET PET and MRS could raise the diagnosis ability of the radiological diagnosis of gliomas.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MRS imaging and 11C-MET PET/CT | Other | Other: tumors are confirmed by surgery and pathologyEach patient underwent both MRS and MET PET before surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with non-enhancing supratentorial lesions shown by contrast-enhanced MRI
- No surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy history
- All patients gave written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with infratentorial Neoplasms
- Patients with enhancing supratentorial lesions
- Recurrent gliomas after surgery
- Primary gliomas with history of radiotherapy or chemotherapy
- History of malignant tumours at any body site
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tumors are confirmed by surgery and pathologyEach patient undergoes both MRS and MET PET scan before surgery. The lesion will be considered as a glioma when either MRS or MET PET results indicated the diagnosis. Pathologic diagnosis will be performed to confirm the final diagnosis. | Other | MRS imaging and 11C-MET PET/CT |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity of the combination of MRS and 11C-MET PET/CT
Time frame: 5 years
1 secondary outcome
The relationship between 11C-MET PET/CT results and molecular pathogeneses
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Apr 2018.
- Background: PubMed 25304271Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, Rouse C, Chen Y, Dowling J, Wolinsky Y, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan J. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011. Neuro Oncol. 2014 Oct;16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv1-63. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou223. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26530262Fouke SJ, Benzinger T, Gibson D, Ryken TC, Kalkanis SN, Olson JJ. The role of imaging in the management of adults with diffuse low grade glioma: A systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol. 2015 Dec;125(3):457-79. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1908-9. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
- Background: PubMed 25393009Wang W, Hu Y, Lu P, Li Y, Chen Y, Tian M, Yu L. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in brain tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 13;9(11):e112577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112577. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 20016453Martinez-Bisbal MC, Celda B. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in the study of human brain cancer. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Dec;53(6):618-30.
- Background: PubMed 22729482Guo J, Yao C, Chen H, Zhuang D, Tang W, Ren G, Wang Y, Wu J, Huang F, Zhou L. The relationship between Cho/NAA and glioma metabolism: implementation for margin delineation of cerebral gliomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Aug;154(8):1361-70; discussion 1370. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1418-x. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
- Background: PubMed 25748300Yamasaki F, Takayasu T, Nosaka R, Amatya VJ, Doskaliyev A, Akiyama Y, Tominaga A, Takeshima Y, Sugiyama K, Kurisu K. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy detection of high lipid levels in intraaxial tumors without central necrosis: a characteristic of malignant lymphoma. J Neurosurg. 2015 Jun;122(6):1370-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS14106. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
- Background: PubMed 24568703Oz G, Alger JR, Barker PB, Bartha R, Bizzi A, Boesch C, Bolan PJ, Brindle KM, Cudalbu C, Dincer A, Dydak U, Emir UE, Frahm J, Gonzalez RG, Gruber S, Gruetter R, Gupta RK, Heerschap A, Henning A, Hetherington HP, Howe FA, Huppi PS, Hurd RE, Kantarci K, Klomp DW, Kreis R, Kruiskamp MJ, Leach MO, Lin AP, Luijten PR, Marjanska M, Maudsley AA, Meyerhoff DJ, Mountford CE, Nelson SJ, Pamir MN, Pan JW, Peet AC, Poptani H, Posse S, Pouwels PJ, Ratai EM, Ross BD, Scheenen TW, Schuster C, Smith IC, Soher BJ, Tkac I, Vigneron DB, Kauppinen RA; MRS Consensus Group. Clinical proton MR spectroscopy in central nervous system disorders. Radiology. 2014 Mar;270(3):658-79. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130531.
- Background: PubMed 14828392WRENN FR Jr, GOOD ML, HANDLER P. The use of positron-emitting radioisotopes for the localization of brain tumors. Science. 1951 May 4;113(2940):525-7. doi: 10.1126/science.113.2940.525. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24629841Demetriades AK, Almeida AC, Bhangoo RS, Barrington SF. Applications of positron emission tomography in neuro-oncology: a clinical approach. Surgeon. 2014 Jun;12(3):148-57. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.12.001. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
- Background: PubMed 9595980Herholz K, Holzer T, Bauer B, Schroder R, Voges J, Ernestus RI, Mendoza G, Weber-Luxenburger G, Lottgen J, Thiel A, Wienhard K, Heiss WD. 11C-methionine PET for differential diagnosis of low-grade gliomas. Neurology. 1998 May;50(5):1316-22. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.5.1316.
- Background: PubMed 15534088Kracht LW, Miletic H, Busch S, Jacobs AH, Voges J, Hoevels M, Klein JC, Herholz K, Heiss WD. Delineation of brain tumor extent with [11C]L-methionine positron emission tomography: local comparison with stereotactic histopathology. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Nov 1;10(21):7163-70. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0262.
- Background: PubMed 23232505Glaudemans AW, Enting RH, Heesters MA, Dierckx RA, van Rheenen RW, Walenkamp AM, Slart RH. Value of 11C-methionine PET in imaging brain tumours and metastases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Apr;40(4):615-35. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2295-5. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
Related trials for Glioma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
EF-41/KEYNOTE D58: Phase 3 Study of Optune Concomitant With Temozolomide Plus Pembrolizumab in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of the Drugs Selumetinib vs. Carboplatin and Vincristine in Patients With Low-Grade Glioma
Low Grade Astrocytoma, Low Grade Glioma
RecruitingPhase 3
Beginning Radiation Immediately With GammaTile at GBM Excision Versus Standard of Care
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Testing the Addition of an Anti-cancer Drug, Selinexor, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Temozolomide) for Brain Tumors That Have Returned After Previous Treatment
Recurrent Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype, Recurrent MGMT-Methylated Glioblastoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dongxiao Zhuang, Professor principal investigator
Huashan Hospital, Sudan University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing tumors are confirmed by surgery and pathology in people with Glioma, run by Huashan Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity of the combination of MRS and 11C-MET PET/CT (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03009318, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2018.