AzTrials
AzTrials

Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryNCT03011983

Neural Injury in Adolescents With Concussion

An observational study of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion, Mild, run by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study utilizes multimodal brain imaging to obtain quantitative biomarkers of brain injury and to improve understanding of the biological basis of brain pathology in adolescents with concussion. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
MEG, MRI and Neuropsychology assessment
How many people
4 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
11 Apr 2017to 1 Jun 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Study population: Adolescents with a recent concussion will be recruited from outpatient clinics in orthopedics and trauma surgery. Healthy controls will be obtained via volunteers and previous brain imaging research studies.

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of concussion and within 2 weeks of injury (case subjects)
  • No history of diagnosed concussion (control subjects)

Who cannot join

  • Head injury within 1 year of recent concussion (case subjects)
  • History of neurologic, psychiatric, developmental or learning disorders (all subjects)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study utilizes multimodal brain imaging to obtain quantitative biomarkers of brain injury and to improve understanding of the biological basis of brain pathology in adolescents with concussion. Adolescents with a concussion will undergo neuroimaging and neuropsychology assessments acutely and four months after injury.

Read the detailed description

Concussion is a highly prevalent condition in adolescence, but it remains a clinical diagnosis that largely relies on subjective patient report with no reliable objective biomarkers for diagnosis. Traditional clinical brain imaging has not been found useful for concussion as the pathology is generally not visible on conventional acute MRI or CT. The proposed study addresses this gap in concussion diagnosis and management by examining the sensitivity of magnetoencephalography (MEG) for identifying areas of brain injury through detection of abnormal neural activity (slowing) in adolescents with concussion compared to healthy controls. Adolescents with a concussion will complete neuroimaging (MEG and MRI) and neuropsychology assessments at two time points within ten days and then again 4 months post-injury. Healthy controls will complete neuroimaging and neuropsychology assessments at a single time point.

Being tested
MEG, MRI, Neuropsychology assessment
Keywords
Magnetoencephalography (MEG), Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Medical subject headings
Brain Concussion, Brain Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MEGDevice

    MEG is a non-invasive functional imaging technique that can measure slow-wave neural activity.

  • MRIDevice

    MRI is a non-invasive imaging modality that provides measures of brain structure.

  • Neuropsychology assessmentBehavioural

    A battery of tests will be administered by a neuropsychologist to evaluate the cognitive function of adolescents with concussion compared to healthy controls.

Study groups in NCT03011983
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adolescents With ConcussionAdolescents with a concussion (n=120) will undergo neuroimaging (MEG and MRI) and neuropsychology assessments at two time points in the acute and chronic periods after injury, respectively. Brain imaging injury measures will be compared to a control normative database we will create. These brain measures will also be associated with cognitive and clinical outcomes.
Receives: Device: MEG; Device: MRI; Behavioral: Neuropsychology assessment
Adolescents Without ConcussionAge- and gender-matched healthy controls (n=160) will be recruited to establish a normative database of whole-brain slow-wave maps from MEG resting-state data as well as white-matter diffusion measures from MRI.
Receives: Device: MEG; Device: MRI; Behavioral: Neuropsychology assessment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in MEG Whole-Brain Slow-Wave Sensitivity between Controls and Concussion Patients

    Whole-brain, resting-state slow-wave maps of whole brain activity will be obtained from the MEG imaging in both adolescents with a concussion and healthy controls. Control images will be analyzed to determine a whole brain z-score value that includes typically developing controls below the 95th percentile, the z-score threshold for this group). Z-score images for the adolescents with concussion will be obtained and the number of adolescents with concussion above this z-score threshold will be determined, and compared to the healthy controls. The sensitivity and specificity of this method determined.

    Measured: Up to 2 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Difference in MRI White-Matter Diffusion Measures between Controls and Concussion Patients

    MRI diffusion data will be collected to examine associations between abnormal brain slowing and white matter damage in the adolescents with a concussion versus controls. Regions showing abnormal white matter diffusion will be comparing to normative control diffusion data.

    Measured: Up to 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start11 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2018
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
4 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03011983
Sponsor's protocol ID
16-013207
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
29 Dec 2016
Last updated
24 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Huang MX, Theilmann RJ, Robb A, Angeles A, Nichols S, Drake A, D'Andrea J, Levy M, Holland M, Song T, Ge S, Hwang E, Yoo K, Cui L, Baker DG, Trauner D, Coimbra R, Lee RR. Integrated imaging approach with MEG and DTI to detect mild traumatic brain injury in military and civilian patients. J Neurotrauma. 2009 Aug;26(8):1213-26. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0672.

    PubMed 19385722
  • Huang MX, Nichols S, Robb A, Angeles A, Drake A, Holland M, Asmussen S, D'Andrea J, Chun W, Levy M, Cui L, Song T, Baker DG, Hammer P, McLay R, Theilmann RJ, Coimbra R, Diwakar M, Boyd C, Neff J, Liu TT, Webb-Murphy J, Farinpour R, Cheung C, Harrington DL, Heister D, Lee RR. An automatic MEG low-frequency source imaging approach for detecting injuries in mild and moderate TBI patients with blast and non-blast causes. Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1067-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.029. Epub 2012 Apr 20.

    PubMed 22542638
  • Lewine JD, Davis JT, Bigler ED, Thoma R, Hill D, Funke M, Sloan JH, Hall S, Orrison WW. Objective documentation of traumatic brain injury subsequent to mild head trauma: multimodal brain imaging with MEG, SPECT, and MRI. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):141-55. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000271115.29954.27.

    PubMed 17510590
  • Huang MX, Nichols S, Baker DG, Robb A, Angeles A, Yurgil KA, Drake A, Levy M, Song T, McLay R, Theilmann RJ, Diwakar M, Risbrough VB, Ji Z, Huang CW, Chang DG, Harrington DL, Muzzatti L, Canive JM, Christopher Edgar J, Chen YH, Lee RR. Single-subject-based whole-brain MEG slow-wave imaging approach for detecting abnormality in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Jun 16;5:109-19. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.06.004. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 25009772

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion, Mild, run by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in MEG Whole-Brain Slow-Wave Sensitivity between Controls and Concussion Patients (time frame: Up to 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03011983, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in