AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart FailureECOST-CRTNCT03012490

Efficacy, Safety and Cost of Remote Monitoring of Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

A study testing CRT-P or CRT-D standard remote monitoring, CRT-P or CRT-D full remote monitoring and Symptoms and signs remote monitoring in people with Heart Failure and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, run by University Hospital, Lille at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective is to determine whether comprehensive remote follow-up in HF patients with CRT will reduce the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or worsening heart failure hospitalizations, whichever comes first, when compared to basic remote monitoring, over a 27-month follow-up. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
CRT-P or CRT-D standard remote monitoring, CRT-P or CRT-D full remote monitoring and Symptoms and signs remote monitoring
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
652 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
27 Feb 2017to 9 Jun 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient more than 18 years old, newly implanted, in accordance to the latest European guidelines, with a CRT-P or CRT-D device (upgrading is tolerated but no device replacement), with Home-Monitoring® activated
  • Patient willing and able to comply with the protocol and who has provided written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Lead model under advisory
  • Non-functional lead except particular case of non-functional or deactivated right atrial lead due to atrial fibrillation
  • Known drug or alcohol abuse
  • Pregnant woman or woman who plan to become pregnant during the trial (the data will be collected by querying the patient without a pregnancy test is required)
  • Participation (ongoing or planned during the trial) in another interventional clinical study, and/or another remote monitoring and/or follow-up concept, unless authorized by the Executive Committee
  • Participation (ongoing or planned during the trial) in an investigational HF program (e.g. PRADO, PIMPS, OSICAT, CARDIAUVERGNE)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Estimated life-expectancy, regardless of the cardiovascular condition, <1year
  • Patient under- or planned for - ventricular assistance
  • Patient not living in Metropolitan France and/or not geographically stable

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Institut coeur poumon, CHRU

    Lille

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Efficacy, Safety and Cost of Comprehensive Versus Standard Remote Monitoring of Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

The primary objective is to determine whether comprehensive remote follow-up in HF patients with CRT will reduce the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or worsening heart failure hospitalizations, whichever comes first, when compared to basic remote monitoring, over a 27-month follow-up.

Being tested
CRT-P or CRT-D standard remote monitoring, CRT-P or CRT-D full remote monitoring, Symptoms and signs remote monitoring
Keywords
Remote monitoring
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CRT-P or CRT-D standard remote monitoringOther

    standard for the control group: remote monitoring of ventricular rhythm disorders and technical parameters of the implanted system

  • CRT-P or CRT-D full remote monitoringOther

    Full follow-up for the Active group: remote monitoring of ventricular rhythm disorders and technical parameters of the implanted system + supraventricular rhythm disorders, parameters related to heart failure, including symptoms and clinical signs of the patient

  • Symptoms and signs remote monitoringOther

    symptoms and clinical signs of the patient

Study groups in NCT03012490
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard remote monitoringActive comparatorRemote monitoring of CRT-P and CRT-D is activated. The physician will only receive the notifications related to technical events and ventricular arrhythmias. Therapy will be added or changed in response to these notifications and/or the symptoms and signs observed during ambulatory visits.
Receives: Other: CRT-P or CRT-D standard remote monitoring
Comprehensive remote monitoringExperimentalRemote monitoring of CRT-P and CRT-D is activated, as well as remote assessment of symptoms and signs. In addition to notifications related to technical events and ventricular arrhythmias, the physician will receive notifications related to heart failure parameters, atrial arrhythmias, and patient's symptoms and signs. Therapy will be added or changed in response to these notifications, and/or to the symptoms and signs observed during ambulatory visits.
Receives: Other: CRT-P or CRT-D standard remote monitoring; Other: CRT-P or CRT-D full remote monitoring; Other: Symptoms and signs remote monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. composite criteria including death from any cause and hospitalization for worsening HF

    Measured: during the 27 months follow-up

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Costs including hospital costs for unplanned cardiovascular hospitalizations, medical charges for ambulatory follow-up of CRT devices and transportation related costs

    Measured: 27 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start27 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion9 Jun 2020
  4. Study completion9 Jun 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
652 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03012490
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016_03
Other IDs
2016-A00873-48
Acronym
ECOST-CRT
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
19 Dec 2016
Last updated
5 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Klein C, Kouakam C, Lazarus A, de Groote P, Bauters C, Marijon E, Mouquet F, Degand B, Guyomar Y, Mansourati J, Leclercq C, Guedon-Moreau L; ECOST-CRT study Investigators. Comprehensive vs. standard remote monitoring of cardiac resynchronization devices in heart failure patients: results of the ECOST-CRT study. Europace. 2024 Oct 3;26(10):euae233. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae233.

    PubMed 39400005

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CRT-P or CRT-D standard remote monitoring, CRT-P or CRT-D full remote monitoring and Symptoms and signs remote monitoring in people with Heart Failure and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, run by University Hospital, Lille at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

composite criteria including death from any cause and hospitalization for worsening HF (time frame: during the 27 months follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03012490, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in