Gait ApraxiaNCT03020381
Gait as Predictor of Dementia and Falls. The Gait and Brain Cohort Study
An observational study of Gait Apraxia and Mild Cognitive Impairment, run by Manuel Montero Odasso at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Motor slowing and cognitive slowing are more prevalent as we age. Importantly, the presence of both in an older person increases their risk of having dementia by ten times. Currently, there are no clinically meaningful predictors of progression to dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Gait Apraxia, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Subjective Cognitive Impairment
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Dec 2007to Jan 2033
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 85 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Participants 60 years or older are being recruited from the community, our Geriatrics and Memory Clinics at University of Western Ontario affiliated hospitals, from advertisements placed in local (London, ON) newspapers, and referrals from family physicians or community partners. Participants are being followed-up for up to 25 years after baseline measurements (twice annual or annual follow-up visits).
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Unable to understand English;
- Parkinsonism or any neurological disorder with residual motor deficit (e.g.: stroke, epilepsy);
- Musculoskeletal disorder detected by clinical examination which affects gait performance;
- Active osteoarthritis affecting the lower limbs at clinical evaluation
- Use of psychotropics which can affect motor performance (e.g. neuroleptics and benzodiazepines)
- Severe Depression (score > 12/15 on the Geriatric Depression Scale).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Dr. Manuel Montero Odasso, MD, PhD contact
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Gait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute
London, Ontario, N6C 0A7
Dr. Manuel Montero Odasso, 5196854292 ext. 45024, mmontero@uwo.ca
About this study
Official title: Gait as Predictor of Cognitive Decline, Dementia, and Risk of Falls in MCI. A Cohort Study
Motor slowing and cognitive slowing are more prevalent as we age. Importantly, the presence of both in an older person increases their risk of having dementia by ten times. Currently, there are no clinically meaningful predictors of progression to dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The main hypothesis is that subtle variations in gait while performing a simple cognitive task is a reliable, easy to perform, and feasible methodology to detect those older adults at higher risk of progression to dementia and also, at higher risk of further mobility decline and falls.
Rationale. The Canadian population is aging. According to recent estimates, the proportion of the population aged 65 and older will increase rapidly from 13% in 2005 to 25% by 2031. This increase in proportion is accompanied by a considerable amount of disability and subsequent dependency which has major effects on both the quality of life of older adults and their caregivers, and on the Canadian health care system. An important goal of geriatric medicine is to reduce the gap between life expectancy and disability-free life expectancy by reducing disability and dependency in the later years of life. A substantial portion of this disability stems from two major geriatric syndromes: cognitive impairment and mobility limitation. The ultimate manifestations of these syndromes are dementia and falls. Interestingly, these manifestations often coexist in elderly people: falling is a common geriatric syndrome affecting about a third of older adults each year, and dementia affects about a third of Canadians aged 80 and over. Together, dementia and falls are responsible for much of the discomfort, disability, and health care utilization in older adults and each will become more prevalent as older Canadians are expected to number approximately $9 million by 2031. The combined direct cost of dementia and falls for the Canadian Health System is over $4.9 billion per year.
Establishing reliable and easy to obtain predictors to accurately identify MCI patients at highest risk of progressing to dementia is essential first, to determine who will benefit from additional and/or invasive testing and second, to implement preventative strategies, including cognitive training, physical exercises, and aggressive vascular risk factors correction to delay progression. Even a modest one-year delay in dementia incidence could save Canada $109 billion over 30 years.
Read the detailed description
This longitudinal cohort study started in 2007 and is aiming to assess 600 older persons (60 y/o to 85 y/o) at risk of development cognitive impairment and dementia, during a 25 year of follow-up, since we expanded the study to recruit more participants, which was approved by our Institutional Research Board. The follow-up period was selected in order to cover the potential progression to dementia of at least two-third of the participants. From 2007 to 2023, for the first five years of follow up, assessments were conducted at baseline and every 6 months; since 2023, this was changed by which assessments are being conducted every 12-months along with performing a virtual assessment of outcomes only, every 6-months. After the visit at 60 months, participants will then be followed once a year for 20 years. The six months period between assessments during the first 5 years was selected since it is the minimum time required for detecting significant changes between assessments in cognitive measurements and for avoiding testing learning effects. If changes are not noted within the first five years, then the annual follow-up period will provide sufficient time periods to detect significant changes in cognition, gait, and balance measures.
Blood test for genotyping (ApoE4 carrier) is being performed only at baseline assessments. Cognitive, gait and balance assessments are being performed in all 12-month follow-up visits. From 2010 to 2021, 3Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (structural and functional -resting state-) and MRI spectroscopy are being performed at four different time points: at baseline, month 18 and month 36, and month 60, following the Canadian Dementia Imaging protocol (http://www.cdip-pcid.ca.). Since 2021, the 18-month MRI timepoint changed to be performed at 12-month visit to align MRI timepoints with blood draw, which allows analysis of MRI and biomarker comparisons over time. For the 20-month Follow-Up period, MRI was performed at Year-2, Year-5 and Year-7 until 2018. Since 2018, the 20-Year Follow-Up MRI timepoints changed to Year-3, Year-5, Year-7 and Year-10. Blood and brain imaging were added after the second wave of the study, in 2010.
- Conditions
- Gait Apraxia, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Subjective Cognitive Impairment, Cerebral Atrophy, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia
- Medical subject headings
- Gait Apraxia, Cognitive Dysfunction, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitively Normal (Control Group) | Participants aged 60 and older, with absence of Dementia (by DSM IV and DSM V) criteria. Normal age-, sex-, and education-adjusted performance on standardized cognitive tests, which are used to classify mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or prodromal AD. | |
| Subjective Cognitive Impairment (SCI) | Participants aged 60 and older, with absence of Dementia (by DSM IV and DSM V) criteria. Normal age-, sex-, and education-adjusted performance on standardized cognitive tests, which are used to classify mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or prodromal AD. Self-experienced persistent decline in cognitive capacity in comparison with a previously normal status and unrelated to an acute event. Answering "yes" to both of the following questions: "Do you feel like your memory or thinking is becoming worse?" and "Does this concern you?" | |
| Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) | Participants aged 60 and older that have self-experienced persistent decline in cognitive capacity and unrelated to an acute event. MCI is operationalized following Peterson's criteria as: i) presence of subjective memory complaints from the patient and family; ii) objective memory impairment in cognitive tests (below 1.5 SD on standardized cognitive tests adjusted by age, sex, and education-); iii) preserved activities of daily living (assessed using the Lawton-Brody scale); iv) absence of clinical dementia established using DSM-IV-TR (from 2007 to 2013) and DSM V (from 2014 and onwards) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression to Dementia
The primary outcome is "progression to dementia" ascertained by clinician investigator using DSM-IV-TR (from 2007 to 2013) and DSM V (from 2014 and onwards). At the time of diagnosis, clinicians are blinded to baseline gait or baseline neuro-psychological test scores. Participants are being re-assessed after six months of the time point of ascertainment of dementia to confirm dementia status.
Measured: 25 years of follow-up
Type of Dementia
Type of dementia is being established using standardized criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body dementia, and vascular dementia (VaD).
Measured: 25 years of follow-up
Secondary outcomes (6)
Development of Mobility Decline
It is expected that MCI individuals with higher gait variability at baseline will develop mobility decline, defined as incident slowing in gait velocity (cm/s) by 10 cm/s
Measured: 25 years of follow-up
Incidence of Falls
Falls is defined as 'an unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor, or other lower level and not due to a seizure or an acute stroke. Recurrent falls are defined as two or more events in a 12 months period. This outcome will be analyzed as the rate of falls over 36 months (defined as number of falls person-time at risk), the proportion of participants who fall (0, 1) and the proportion of recurrent fallers (2+ falls).
Measured: 25 years of follow-up
Brain anatomical changes (grey matter)
Changes in grey matter volume are being as absolute change (in cm3) across assessments
Measured: 25 years of follow-up
Brain anatomical changes (white matter)
Changes in white matter volume is being evaluated as absolute change (in cm3) across assessments.
Measured: 25 years of follow-up
Brain anatomical changes (ventricular volume)
Changes in ventricular volume is being evaluated as absolute change (in cm3) across assessments
Measured: 25 years of follow-up
Mortality
When a participant pass away informed/documented by caregiver or medical record
Measured: 25 years of follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2007
- Primary completionJan 2033 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2033 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gait ApraxiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Manuel Montero Odasso
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Manuel Montero Odasso, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Investigators
- Dr. Manuel Montero Odasso, M.D., Principal investigator, Director, Gait and Brain Lab
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03020381
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17200
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 6 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 21 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Pieruccini-Faria F, Sarquis-Adamson Y, Montero-Odasso M. Mild Cognitive Impairment Affects Obstacle Negotiation in Older Adults: Results from "Gait and Brain Study". Gerontology. 2019;65(2):164-173. doi: 10.1159/000492931. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
PubMed 30317237Pieruccini-Faria F, Muir-Hunter SW, Montero-Odasso M. Do depressive symptoms affect balance in older adults with mild cognitive impairment? Results from the "gait and brain study". Exp Gerontol. 2018 Jul 15;108:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
PubMed 29653157Montero-Odasso M, Speechley M, Muir-Hunter SW, Sarquis-Adamson Y, Sposato LA, Hachinski V, Borrie M, Wells J, Black A, Sejdic E, Bherer L, Chertkow H; Canadian Gait and Cognition Network. Motor and Cognitive Trajectories Before Dementia: Results from Gait and Brain Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Sep;66(9):1676-1683. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15341. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
PubMed 29608780Montero-Odasso M, Speechley M. Falls in Cognitively Impaired Older Adults: Implications for Risk Assessment And Prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Feb;66(2):367-375. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15219. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
PubMed 29318592Montero-Odasso M, Camicioli R, Muir-Hunter SW. Dual-Task Gait And Incident Dementia-A Step Forward, But Not There Yet-Reply. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Nov 1;74(11):1380-1381. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2880. No abstract available.
PubMed 29049479Sakurai R, Montero-Odasso M. Apolipoprotein E4 Allele and Gait Performance in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results From the Gait and Brain Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Nov 9;72(12):1676-1682. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx075.
PubMed 28482102Montero-Odasso MM, Barnes B, Speechley M, Muir Hunter SW, Doherty TJ, Duque G, Gopaul K, Sposato LA, Casas-Herrero A, Borrie MJ, Camicioli R, Wells JL. Disentangling Cognitive-Frailty: Results From the Gait and Brain Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016 Nov;71(11):1476-1482. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw044. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
PubMed 26984391Montero-Odasso M, Sarquis-Adamson Y, Song HY, Bray NW, Pieruccini-Faria F, Speechley M. Polypharmacy, Gait Performance, and Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Results from the Gait and Brain Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jun;67(6):1182-1188. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15774. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
PubMed 30698285Pieruccini-Faria F, Montero-Odasso M. Obstacle Negotiation, Gait Variability, and Risk of Falling: Results From the "Gait and Brain Study". J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Aug 16;74(9):1422-1428. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly254.
PubMed 30380013Pieruccini-Faria F, Hassan Haddad SM, Bray NW, Sarquis-Adamson Y, Bartha R, Montero-Odasso M. Brain Structural Correlates of Obstacle Negotiation in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results from the Gait and Brain Study. Gerontology. 2023;69(9):1115-1127. doi: 10.1159/000530796. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
PubMed 37166343Pieruccini-Faria F, Black SE, Masellis M, Smith EE, Almeida QJ, Li KZH, Bherer L, Camicioli R, Montero-Odasso M. Gait variability across neurodegenerative and cognitive disorders: Results from the Canadian Consortium of Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA) and the Gait and Brain Study. Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Aug;17(8):1317-1328. doi: 10.1002/alz.12298. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
PubMed 33590967Montero-Odasso M, Oteng-Amoako A, Speechley M, Gopaul K, Beauchet O, Annweiler C, Muir-Hunter SW. The motor signature of mild cognitive impairment: results from the gait and brain study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 Nov;69(11):1415-21. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu155. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
PubMed 25182601Osman A, Speechley M, Ali S, Montero-Odasso M. Fall-Risk-Increasing Drugs and Gait Performance in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Exploratory Results from the Gait and Brain Study. Drugs Aging. 2023 Aug;40(8):721-730. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01045-1. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
PubMed 37347412Sakurai R, Bartha R, Montero-Odasso M. Entorhinal Cortex Volume Is Associated With Dual-Task Gait Cost Among Older Adults With MCI: Results From the Gait and Brain Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Apr 23;74(5):698-704. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly084.
PubMed 29767690Montero-Odasso MM, Sarquis-Adamson Y, Speechley M, Borrie MJ, Hachinski VC, Wells J, Riccio PM, Schapira M, Sejdic E, Camicioli RM, Bartha R, McIlroy WE, Muir-Hunter S. Association of Dual-Task Gait With Incident Dementia in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results From the Gait and Brain Study. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Jul 1;74(7):857-865. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0643.
PubMed 28505243
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Gait as Predictor of Cognitive Decline, Dementia, and Risk of Falls in MCI. A Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03020381
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 17200
- Conditions
- Gait Apraxia, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Subjective Cognitive Impairment, Cerebral Atrophy, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Manuel Montero OdassoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2007
- Primary completion
- Jan 2033 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2033 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Motor slowing and cognitive slowing are more prevalent as we age. Importantly, the presence of both in an older person increases their risk of having dementia by ten times. Currently, there are no clinically meaningful predictors of progression to dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The main hypothesis is that subtle variations in gait while performing a simple cognitive task is a reliable, easy to perform, and feasible methodology to detect those older adults at higher risk of progression to dementia and also, at higher risk of further mobility decline and falls.
Rationale. The Canadian population is aging. According to recent estimates, the proportion of the population aged 65 and older will increase rapidly from 13% in 2005 to 25% by 2031. This increase in proportion is accompanied by a considerable amount of disability and subsequent dependency which has major effects on both the quality of life of older adults and their caregivers, and on the Canadian health care system. An important goal of geriatric medicine is to reduce the gap between life expectancy and disability-free life expectancy by reducing disability and dependency in the later years of life. A substantial portion of this disability stems from two major geriatric syndromes: cognitive impairment and mobility limitation. The ultimate manifestations of these syndromes are dementia and falls. Interestingly, these manifestations often coexist in elderly people: falling is a common geriatric syndrome affecting about a third of older adults each year, and dementia affects about a third of Canadians aged 80 and over. Together, dementia and falls are responsible for much of the discomfort, disability, and health care utilization in older adults and each will become more prevalent as older Canadians are expected to number approximately $9 million by 2031. The combined direct cost of dementia and falls for the Canadian Health System is over $4.9 billion per year.
Establishing reliable and easy to obtain predictors to accurately identify MCI patients at highest risk of progressing to dementia is essential first, to determine who will benefit from additional and/or invasive testing and second, to implement preventative strategies, including cognitive training, physical exercises, and aggressive vascular risk factors correction to delay progression. Even a modest one-year delay in dementia incidence could save Canada $109 billion over 30 years.
Detailed description
This longitudinal cohort study started in 2007 and is aiming to assess 600 older persons (60 y/o to 85 y/o) at risk of development cognitive impairment and dementia, during a 25 year of follow-up, since we expanded the study to recruit more participants, which was approved by our Institutional Research Board. The follow-up period was selected in order to cover the potential progression to dementia of at least two-third of the participants. From 2007 to 2023, for the first five years of follow up, assessments were conducted at baseline and every 6 months; since 2023, this was changed by which assessments are being conducted every 12-months along with performing a virtual assessment of outcomes only, every 6-months. After the visit at 60 months, participants will then be followed once a year for 20 years. The six months period between assessments during the first 5 years was selected since it is the minimum time required for detecting significant changes between assessments in cognitive measurements and for avoiding testing learning effects. If changes are not noted within the first five years, then the annual follow-up period will provide sufficient time periods to detect significant changes in cognition, gait, and balance measures.
Blood test for genotyping (ApoE4 carrier) is being performed only at baseline assessments. Cognitive, gait and balance assessments are being performed in all 12-month follow-up visits. From 2010 to 2021, 3Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (structural and functional -resting state-) and MRI spectroscopy are being performed at four different time points: at baseline, month 18 and month 36, and month 60, following the Canadian Dementia Imaging protocol (http://www.cdip-pcid.ca.). Since 2021, the 18-month MRI timepoint changed to be performed at 12-month visit to align MRI timepoints with blood draw, which allows analysis of MRI and biomarker comparisons over time. For the 20-month Follow-Up period, MRI was performed at Year-2, Year-5 and Year-7 until 2018. Since 2018, the 20-Year Follow-Up MRI timepoints changed to Year-3, Year-5, Year-7 and Year-10. Blood and brain imaging were added after the second wave of the study, in 2010.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitively Normal (Control Group) | – | –Participants aged 60 and older, with absence of Dementia (by DSM IV and DSM V) criteria. Normal age-, sex-, and education-adjusted performance on standardized cognitive tests, which are used to classify mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or prodromal AD. |
| Subjective Cognitive Impairment (SCI) | – | –Participants aged 60 and older, with absence of Dementia (by DSM IV and DSM V) criteria. Normal age-, sex-, and education-adjusted performance on standardized cognitive tests, which are used to classify mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or prodromal AD. Self-experienced persistent decline in cognitive capacity in comparison with a previously normal status and unrelated to an acute event. Answering "yes" to both of the following questions: "Do you feel like your memory or thinking is becoming worse?" and "Does this concern you?" |
| Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) | – | –Participants aged 60 and older that have self-experienced persistent decline in cognitive capacity and unrelated to an acute event. MCI is operationalized following Peterson's criteria as: i) presence of subjective memory complaints from the patient and family; ii) objective memory impairment in cognitive tests (below 1.5 SD on standardized cognitive tests adjusted by age, sex, and education-); iii) preserved activities of daily living (assessed using the Lawton-Brody scale); iv) absence of clinical dementia established using DSM-IV-TR (from 2007 to 2013) and DSM V (from 2014 and onwards) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Participants 60 years or older are being recruited from the community, our Geriatrics and Memory Clinics at University of Western Ontario affiliated hospitals, from advertisements placed in local (London, ON) newspapers, and referrals from family physicians or community partners. Participants are being followed-up for up to 25 years after baseline measurements (twice annual or annual follow-up visits).
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Unable to understand English;
- Parkinsonism or any neurological disorder with residual motor deficit (e.g.: stroke, epilepsy);
- Musculoskeletal disorder detected by clinical examination which affects gait performance;
- Active osteoarthritis affecting the lower limbs at clinical evaluation
- Use of psychotropics which can affect motor performance (e.g. neuroleptics and benzodiazepines)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Progression to Dementia
Time frame: 25 years of follow-up
The primary outcome is "progression to dementia" ascertained by clinician investigator using DSM-IV-TR (from 2007 to 2013) and DSM V (from 2014 and onwards). At the time of diagnosis, clinicians are blinded to baseline gait or baseline neuro-psychological test scores. Participants are being re-assessed after six months of the time point of ascertainment of dementia to confirm dementia status.
Type of Dementia
Time frame: 25 years of follow-up
Type of dementia is being established using standardized criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body dementia, and vascular dementia (VaD).
6 secondary outcomes
Development of Mobility Decline
Time frame: 25 years of follow-up
Incidence of Falls
Time frame: 25 years of follow-up
Brain anatomical changes (grey matter)
Time frame: 25 years of follow-up
Brain anatomical changes (white matter)
Time frame: 25 years of follow-up
Brain anatomical changes (ventricular volume)
Time frame: 25 years of follow-up
Mortality
Time frame: 25 years of follow up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Dec 2023.
- Background: PubMed 30317237Pieruccini-Faria F, Sarquis-Adamson Y, Montero-Odasso M. Mild Cognitive Impairment Affects Obstacle Negotiation in Older Adults: Results from "Gait and Brain Study". Gerontology. 2019;65(2):164-173. doi: 10.1159/000492931. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
- Background: PubMed 29653157Pieruccini-Faria F, Muir-Hunter SW, Montero-Odasso M. Do depressive symptoms affect balance in older adults with mild cognitive impairment? Results from the "gait and brain study". Exp Gerontol. 2018 Jul 15;108:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
- Background: PubMed 29608780Montero-Odasso M, Speechley M, Muir-Hunter SW, Sarquis-Adamson Y, Sposato LA, Hachinski V, Borrie M, Wells J, Black A, Sejdic E, Bherer L, Chertkow H; Canadian Gait and Cognition Network. Motor and Cognitive Trajectories Before Dementia: Results from Gait and Brain Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Sep;66(9):1676-1683. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15341. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
- Background: PubMed 29318592Montero-Odasso M, Speechley M. Falls in Cognitively Impaired Older Adults: Implications for Risk Assessment And Prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Feb;66(2):367-375. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15219. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
- Background: PubMed 29049479Montero-Odasso M, Camicioli R, Muir-Hunter SW. Dual-Task Gait And Incident Dementia-A Step Forward, But Not There Yet-Reply. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Nov 1;74(11):1380-1381. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2880. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28482102Sakurai R, Montero-Odasso M. Apolipoprotein E4 Allele and Gait Performance in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results From the Gait and Brain Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Nov 9;72(12):1676-1682. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx075.
- Background: PubMed 26984391Montero-Odasso MM, Barnes B, Speechley M, Muir Hunter SW, Doherty TJ, Duque G, Gopaul K, Sposato LA, Casas-Herrero A, Borrie MJ, Camicioli R, Wells JL. Disentangling Cognitive-Frailty: Results From the Gait and Brain Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016 Nov;71(11):1476-1482. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw044. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
- Background: PubMed 30698285Montero-Odasso M, Sarquis-Adamson Y, Song HY, Bray NW, Pieruccini-Faria F, Speechley M. Polypharmacy, Gait Performance, and Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Results from the Gait and Brain Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jun;67(6):1182-1188. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15774. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
- Background: PubMed 30380013Pieruccini-Faria F, Montero-Odasso M. Obstacle Negotiation, Gait Variability, and Risk of Falling: Results From the "Gait and Brain Study". J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Aug 16;74(9):1422-1428. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly254.
- Background: PubMed 37166343Pieruccini-Faria F, Hassan Haddad SM, Bray NW, Sarquis-Adamson Y, Bartha R, Montero-Odasso M. Brain Structural Correlates of Obstacle Negotiation in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results from the Gait and Brain Study. Gerontology. 2023;69(9):1115-1127. doi: 10.1159/000530796. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
- Background: PubMed 33590967Pieruccini-Faria F, Black SE, Masellis M, Smith EE, Almeida QJ, Li KZH, Bherer L, Camicioli R, Montero-Odasso M. Gait variability across neurodegenerative and cognitive disorders: Results from the Canadian Consortium of Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA) and the Gait and Brain Study. Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Aug;17(8):1317-1328. doi: 10.1002/alz.12298. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
- Background: PubMed 25182601Montero-Odasso M, Oteng-Amoako A, Speechley M, Gopaul K, Beauchet O, Annweiler C, Muir-Hunter SW. The motor signature of mild cognitive impairment: results from the gait and brain study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 Nov;69(11):1415-21. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu155. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Gait Apraxia
RecruitingObservational study
Post-Stroke Apraxia, Motor Function, Balance, and Gait
Stroke, Ideomotor Apraxia
RecruitingObservational study
Ideomotor Apraxia and Robotic Gait Rehabilitation Outcomes After Stroke
Stroke, Ideomotor Apraxia
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Dr. Manuel Montero Odasso, MD, PhD contact
Dr. Manuel Montero Odasso, M.D. principal investigator
Director, Gait and Brain Lab
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Gait Apraxia and Mild Cognitive Impairment, run by Manuel Montero Odasso at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dr. Manuel Montero Odasso, MD, PhD (5196854292 ext. 45024), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression to Dementia (time frame: 25 years of follow-up). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03020381, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Dec 2023.