AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP)Phase 3APEKS-NPNCT03032380

Clinical Study of Cefiderocol (S-649266) for the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia Caused by Gram-negative Pathogens

A Phase 3 study testing Cefiderocol, Meropenem and Linezolid in people with Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP) and Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), run by Shionogi at 119 sites in 19 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare all-cause mortality at Day 14 in participants receiving cefiderocol with participants receiving the comparator, meropenem, in adults with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or healthcare-associated bacterial… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Cefiderocol, Meropenem and Linezolid
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
119 sitesin 19 countries
Study dates
24 Oct 2017to 1 Apr 2019
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent
  • Subjects who have provided written informed consent or their informed consent has been provided by a legally authorized representative
  • Subjects who meet the clinical diagnosis criteria for hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or healthcare-associated bacterial pneumonia (HCABP)
  • All subjects must fulfill at least 1 of the following clinical criteria at screening:
  • New onset or worsening of pulmonary symptoms or signs, such as cough, dyspnea, tachypnea (eg, respiratory rate > 25 breaths/minute), expectorated sputum production, or requirement for mechanical ventilation
  • Hypoxemia (eg, a partial pressure of oxygen [PaO2] < 60 mm Hg while the subject is breathing room air, as determined by arterial blood gas [ABG], or worsening of the ratio of the PaO2 to the fraction of inspired oxygen [PaO2/FiO2])
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Need for acute changes in the ventilator support system to enhance oxygenation, as determined by worsening oxygenation (ABG or PaO2/FiO2) or needed changes in the amount of positive end-expiratory pressure
  • New onset of or increase in (quantity or characteristics) suctioned respiratory secretions, demonstrating evidence of inflammation and absence of contamination
  • All subjects must have at least 1 of the following signs:
  • Documented fever (ie, core body temperature [tympanic, rectal, esophageal] ≥ 38°C [100.4°F], oral temperature ≥ 37.5°C, or axillary temperature ≥ 37°C)
  • Hypothermia (ie, core body temperature [tympanic, rectal, esophageal] ≤ 35°C [95.0°F], oral temperature ≤ 35.5°C and axillary temperature ≤ 36°C)
  • Leukocytosis with a total peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count ≥ 10,000 cells/mm³
  • Leukopenia with total peripheral WBC count ≤ 4500 cells/mm³
  • Greater than 15% immature neutrophils (bands) noted on peripheral blood smear
  • All subjects must have a chest radiograph during screening showing the presence of new or progressive infiltrate(s) suggestive of bacterial pneumonia. A computed tomography (CT) scan in the same time window showing the same findings could also be acceptable
  • All subjects must have a suspected Gram-negative infection involving the lower respiratory tract

Who cannot join

  • Subjects who have known or suspected community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), atypical pneumonia, viral pneumonia, or chemical pneumonia (including aspiration of gastric contents, inhalation injury)
  • Other exclusions based on the prescribing information of meropenem or linezolid, prior antibiotic usage, age, and pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

119 sites in 19 countries.

119 sites in 19 countries

Russia16 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Barnaul, 656024

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Barnaul, 656045

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Chelyabinsk, 454000

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Krasnodar, 350012

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Moscow, 105203

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Moscow, 115280

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Moscow, 127015

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Novosibirsk, 630051

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Novosibirsk, 630075

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 192242

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 196247

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197706

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 454091

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Sait-Petersburg, 194354

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Smolensk, 214019

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Tomsk, 634063

Other trials in Russia

United States15 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Annapolis, Maryland, 21404

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18105

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1267

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Council Bluffs, Iowa, 51503

  • Shionogi Research Site

    DeLand, Florida, 32720

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202

  • Shionogi Research Site

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06511

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19141

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103

  • Shionogi Research Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110-0250

Other trials in United States

Ukraine13 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Chernivtsi, 58001

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Dnipropetrovsk, 49000

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Ivano-Frankivsk, 76008

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kharkiv, 61037

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kharkiv, 61103

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kherson, 73000

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kiev, 01133

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kiev, 041112

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kremenchuk, 39617

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Poltava, 36038

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Sumy, 40031

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Vinnitsya, 21029

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Zaporizhzhya, 69035

Other trials in Ukraine

Spain9 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Alicante, 03010

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Barcelona, 08003

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Barcelona, 08026

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Barcelona, 8036

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Madrid, 28007

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Madrid, 28922

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Torrejón de Ardoz, 28850

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Torrevieja, 03186

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Valencia, 46010

Other trials in Spain

Philippines8 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Caloocan, National Capital Region, 1400

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Caloocan, 1427

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Iloilo City, 5000

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Jaro, Iloilo City, 5000

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Manila, 1000

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Quezon City, National Capital Region, 1104

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Quezon City, National Capital Region, 1109

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Tondo, Manila, 1012

Other trials in Philippines

Czechia7 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Brno, 65693

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Hradec Králové, 50005

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kolín, 28000

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kyjov, 69701

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Ostrava-Poruba, 708 52

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Prague, 15006

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Příbram, 26101

Other trials in Czechia

France7 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Angers, 49933

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Argenteuil, 95100

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Bron, 69677

  • Shionogi Research Site

    LaRoche-sur-Yon, 85925

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Lyon, 69437

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Nice, 06202

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Paris, 75018

Other trials in France

Japan6 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kumamoto, 860-0008

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Shimajiri-gun, Okinawa, 901-1193

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Tsu, Mie-ken, 514-8507

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, 300-8585

Other trials in Japan

Hungary5 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Budapest, 1121

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Budapest, 1125

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Debrecen, H-4031

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Fehérgyarmat, 4900

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Székesfehérvár, 8000

Other trials in Hungary

Israel5 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Holon, 58100

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Jerusalem, 9103102

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Tel Aviv, 64239

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Tel HaShomer, 52621

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Tikva, 49100

Other trials in Israel

Estonia4 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kohtla-Järve, 31025

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Pärnu, 80010

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Tallinn, 13419

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Tartu, 51014

Other trials in Estonia

Georgia4 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Batumi, 6010

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kutaisi, 4600

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kutaisi, 4601

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Tbilisi, 0160

Other trials in Georgia

Germany4 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Bonn, 53127

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Hamburg, 20246

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Leipzig, 04103

Other trials in Germany

Latvia4 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Daugavpils, LV-5417

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Liepāja, LV-3414

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Riga, LV-1006

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Saldus Novads, LV-1002

Other trials in Latvia

Taiwan4 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    New Taipei City, 235

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Taichung, 40705

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Taipei, 10002

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Taipei, 11696

Other trials in Taiwan

Serbia3 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kamenitz, 21204

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kragujevac, 34000

Other trials in Serbia

Belgium2 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Brussels, 1020

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Brussels, 1070

Other trials in Belgium

Canada2 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H3A7

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7

Other trials in Canada

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Shionogi Research Site

    San Juan, 00921

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Clinical Study of S-649266 Compared With Meropenem for the Treatment of Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia, Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia, or Healthcare-associated Bacterial Pneumonia Caused by Gram-negative Pathogens

The primary objective of this study is to compare all-cause mortality at Day 14 in participants receiving cefiderocol with participants receiving the comparator, meropenem, in adults with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or healthcare-associated bacterial pneumonia (HCABP) caused by Gram-negative pathogens.

Being tested
Cefiderocol, Meropenem, Linezolid
Keywords
Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), S-649266, linezolid, meropenem, Healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), nosocomial pneumonia, Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), Gram-negative pathogens, pneumonia, cefiderocol
Medical subject headings
Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, Pneumonia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CefiderocolDrug

    Also called S-649266

    2000 mg intravenously every 8 hours for a period of 7 to14 days (dosage adjustment is necessary based on renal function)

  • MeropenemDrug

    Also called Merrem®

    2000 mg intravenously every 8 hours for a period of 7 to 14 days (dosage adjustment is necessary based on renal function)

  • LinezolidDrug

    Also called Zyvox®

    600 mg of linezolid administered intravenously over 30 minutes to 2 hours, every 12 hours.

Study groups in NCT03032380
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CefiderocolExperimentalParticipants will receive 2 g cefiderocol administered intravenously every 8 hours for 7 to 14 days and 600 mg linezolid administered intravenously every 12 hours for at least 5 days.
Receives: Drug: Cefiderocol; Drug: Linezolid
MeropenemActive comparatorParticipants will receive 2 g meropenem administered intravenously every 8 hours for 7 to 14 days and 600 mg linezolid administered intravenously every 12 hours for at least 5 days.
Receives: Drug: Meropenem; Drug: Linezolid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 14

    The all-cause mortality (ACM) rate at Day 14 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first infusion of study drug up to Day 14.

    The Modified Intent-to-Treat Population included all randomized participants who met either of the following criteria:

    • Evidence of Gram-negative infection of the lower respiratory tract based on a culture, Gram-stain, or other diagnostic test
    • Evidence of a lower respiratory tract infection but culture or other diagnostic tests did not provide a microbiologic diagnosis

    Measured: From first dose of study drug to Day 14

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Test of Cure (TOC)

    Lower respiratory tract specimens (eg, sputum, endotracheal aspiration [ETA], endobronchial culture specimens collected by bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL], or protected specimen brush [PSB], lung biopsy tissue, pleural effusions, etc) were sent to the local microbiology laboratory for isolation and identification of pathogens.

    Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at TOC was determined by the sponsor as either Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen.

    Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.

    Measured: Test of cure (7 days after end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure

    Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator as either Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate.

    Clinical Cure: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, including a reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no additional antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

    Measured: Test of cure (7 days after the end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21)

  3. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Early Assessment (EA)

    Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator as either Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate.

    Clinical Cure: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, including a reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no additional antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

    Measured: Early assessment (Day 3-4 after the start of treatment)

  4. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT)

    Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator as either Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate.

    Clinical Cure: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, including a reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no additional antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

    Measured: End of treatment (Day 7 to 14)

  5. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU)

    Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator at follow-up as either Sustained Clinical Cure, Relapse, or Indeterminate.

    Sustained Clinical Cure: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

    Measured: Follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment; Day 21 to 28)

  6. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Early Assessment

    Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at Early Assessment was determined by the sponsor as either Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen.

    Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.

    Measured: Early Assessment, Days 3 to 4

  7. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at End of Treatment

    Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at End of Treatment was determined by the sponsor as either: Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen.

    Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.

    Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

  8. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up

    Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at Follow-up was determined by the sponsor as either Sustained Eradication, Persistence, Recurrence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen.

    Sustained eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy) after TOC. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    Measured: Follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment, Days 21 to 28)

  9. All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 28

    The all-cause mortality (ACM) rate at Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first dose of study drug up to Day 28.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug to Day 28

  10. All-cause Mortality Rate at the End of Study

    The all-cause mortality rate during both the treatment and follow-up period (up to the end of study [EOS] visit) was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first infusion of study drug up to EOS. If a participant discontinued from the study before EOS and survival information was not available, then the survival status for this endpoint for the participant was considered unknown.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug through end of study (28 days after end of treatment, up to 42 days)

  11. Total Hospitalization Time

    The length of hospital stay attributable to the study-qualifying infection.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug to test of cure (7 days after end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and to follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment; Day 21 to 28)

  12. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded by the investigator according to the following definitions:

    • Mild: A finding or symptom is minor and does not interfere with usual daily activities.
    • Moderate: The event causes discomfort and interferes with usual daily activity or affects clinical status.
    • Severe: The event causes an interruption of the participant's usual daily activities or has a clinically significant effect.

    The relationship of each AE to the study treatment was determined by the investigator based on whether the AE could be reasonably explained as having been caused by the study drug (treatment related AE [TRAE]).

    An SAE is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes:

    • Death
    • Life-threatening condition
    • Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for treatment
    • Persistent or significant disability/incapacity
    • Congenital anomaly/birth defect
    • Other medically important condition

    Measured: From first dose of study drug through the end of study, up to 42 days.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start24 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion26 Feb 2019
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03032380
Sponsor's protocol ID
1615R2132
Other IDs
2016-003020-23, 2016
Acronym
APEKS-NP
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
17 Jan 2017
Last updated
13 Nov 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No
Expanded access
Available

Publications

  • Nordmann P, Shields RK, Doi Y, Takemura M, Echols R, Matsunaga Y, Yamano Y. Mechanisms of Reduced Susceptibility to Cefiderocol Among Isolates from the CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP Clinical Trials. Microb Drug Resist. 2022 Apr;28(4):398-407. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2021.0180. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

    PubMed 35076335
  • Skaar EP, Echols R, Matsunaga Y, Menon A, Portsmouth S. Iron serum levels and iron homeostasis parameters in patients with nosocomial pneumonia treated with cefiderocol: post hoc analysis of the APEKS-NP study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;41(3):467-476. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04399-9. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

    PubMed 35025025
  • Wenzler E, Butler D, Tan X, Katsube T, Wajima T. Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Dose Optimization of Cefiderocol during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Apr;61(4):539-552. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01086-y. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

    PubMed 34792787
  • Wunderink RG, Matsunaga Y, Ariyasu M, Clevenbergh P, Echols R, Kaye KS, Kollef M, Menon A, Pogue JM, Shorr AF, Timsit JF, Zeitlinger M, Nagata TD. Cefiderocol versus high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem for the treatment of Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia (APEKS-NP): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):213-225. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30731-3. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

    PubMed 33058798

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Cefiderocol, Meropenem and Linezolid in people with Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP) and Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), run by Shionogi at 119 sites in 19 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 119 sites in Russia, United States, Ukraine, Spain, Philippines and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Nov 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 14 (time frame: From first dose of study drug to Day 14). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03032380, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in