Mesothelioma; PeritoneumNCT03034850
Thrombin Generation and Platelet Activation in CRS/HIPEC
An observational study of Mesothelioma; Peritoneum and Pseudomyxoma Peritonei, run by Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg.
Trial summary
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy (HIPEC), indicated for patients with peritoneal metastases from digestive or gynecological malignancies alike, demonstrates a considerable impact on hemostatic metabolism, both on platelet and on coagulation level. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Mesothelioma; Peritoneum, Pseudomyxoma Peritonei, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- What is being tested?
- CRS/HIPEC
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 27 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to Jul 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: This prospective observational pilot study, scheduled between April 2015 and July 2016, included 27 patients from the Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium, after approval by the local medical ethics committee (Eudract/B nr: B371201524199) and written informed consent.
Who may be able to join
- a confirmed histological diagnosis of peritoneal disease (e.g., mesothelioma; pseudomyxoma peritonei; colorectal, ovarian, or gastric peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal, ovarian, or gastric cancer origin; or abdominal sarcomatosis); and
- age <80 years; and
- a cardiac, renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function compatible with surgery; and
- informed written consent to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- inherited coagulation abnormalities,
- active systemic infections,
- interstitial lung disease,
- serious cardiac dysrhythmia or condition, New York Heart Association classification of III or IV, congestive cardiac failure, uncontrolled hypertension (diastolic blood pressure constantly >100 mm Hg, systolic blood pressure constantly > 180 mm Hg).
- inadequate bone marrow function at the beginning of the trial, defined as platelet count less than <150 GPT/L or neutrophil granulocyte count less than <1.5 GPT/L.
- inadequate renal function at the beginning of the trial, defined as GFR less than <60 ml/min,
Show all 9Show fewer
- inadequate liver function at the beginning of the trial, defined as bilirubin >1.5 times ULN (upper limit of normal), active hepatitis B or C infection,
- female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding
- participation in another therapeutic clinical trial.
About this study
Official title: Thrombin Generation and Platelet Activation in Cytoreductive Surgery Combined With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy (HIPEC), indicated for patients with peritoneal metastases from digestive or gynecological malignancies alike, demonstrates a considerable impact on hemostatic metabolism, both on platelet and on coagulation level. The potential hemostatic interference in CRS and HIPEC is phase dependent. This study demonstrates the combined use of ROTEM (rotational thromboelastometry), PACT (platelet activation test) and CAT (thrombin generation test) assays during CRS and HIPEC with a follow-up of 7 days postoperative.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess the impact of CRS and HIPEC, on various components of hemostasis. Routine laboratory assays such as activated clotting time, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, or platelet count might, as demonstrated previously, insufficiently provide specificity and/or sensitivity to assess coagulation and platelet disorders. Therefore, additionally thrombin generation (TG) was analyzed by the calibrated automated thrombogram assay (CAT). Also, platelet function was quantitatively assessed by the PAC-t-UB assay and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) was used to elucidate the contribution of platelets, intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation pathways in peri-operative bleeding. The hypothesis of this study was that the procedure exposed an increased thrombotic risk, resulting in a faster and increased TG and hyper platelet function?
- Being tested
- CRS/HIPEC
- Keywords
- cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy, platelet function, thrombin generation, thromboelastometry
- Medical subject headings
- Mesothelioma, Pseudomyxoma Peritonei, Peritoneal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CRS/HIPECProcedure or surgery
Also called oxaliplatinum, 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, cisplatinum
The generic surgical approach involved peritonectomy procedures and visceral resections called CRS as described by Sugarbaker (1995). Peritoneal disease burden was assessed using the perito- neal cancer index (PCI), which scores 13 intra-abdominal sites on a scale of 0 (no disease) to 3 (lesion size > 5 cm), thus giving a range of possible scores from 0 to 39. The same team performed the surgical procedure of all included patients. Before connection to the patient, the circuit was filled with dextrose 5% (2 L/m2 body surface area) and warmed to 37°C.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CRS/HIPEC | Patients with a confirmed histological diagnosis of peritoneal disease treated by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy (HIPEC). Receives: Procedure: CRS/HIPEC |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Blood loss
Blood loss and administration of red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma and platelets. Blood loss is quantitatively assessed based on surgical drainage volume measurements, recorded every hour. Once the surgical drains are removed (average 7 days), blood loss is quantified by hemodynamic instability and abrupt, significant decrease of hemoglobin concentration. Blood loss is assessed from the date of CRS/HIPEC surgery until 7 days postoperative or date of death from any cause, whichever came first.
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Secondary outcomes (30)
Red blood cell count
EDTA-anticoagulated blood was used for cytometric analysis using a whole blood counter Sysmex XE 2100® (Sysmex,Kobe, Japan) to obtain a whole blood count. (million cells/mcL)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
White blood cell count
EDTA-anticoagulated blood was used for cytometric analysis using a whole blood counter Sysmex XE 2100® (Sysmex,Kobe, Japan) to obtain a whole blood count. (cells/mcL)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Platelet count
EDTA-anticoagulated blood was used for cytometric analysis using a whole blood counter Sysmex XE 2100® (Sysmex,Kobe, Japan) to obtain a whole blood count. (platelets/mcL)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Fibrinogen levels
Fibrinogen levels were determined with an ACL-9000 (Diamond Diagnostics, Holliston, MA) coagulation analyser. (g/dL)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Prothrombin Time (PT)
Prothrombin time was measured using an ACL-9000 coagulation analyser (sec).
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT)
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time was measured using an ACL-9000 coagulation analyser (sec).
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (Thrombin generation assay (CAT))
TG in plasma, measured with the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) . Briefly, 80 μl platelet poor plasma (PPP) was mixed with 20 μl of a mixture containing tissue factor (Dade-Behring) at a final concentration of 1 pM and phospholipid vesicles (f.c. 4 μM 20 mol% phosphatidylserine, 60 mol% phosphatidylcholine and 20 mol% phosphatidyl-ethanolamine, Avanti). To calibrator wells, 20 μl of calibrator (α2macroglobulin- thrombin complex) was added instead of TF and PL. After 10 minutes of incubation at 37°C, thrombin generation was initiated by the addition of 20 μl of the thrombin specific substrate, Z- Gly-Gly-Arg-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (f.c. 416 μM, Bachem) and CaCl2 (f.c. 16.7 mM). Fluorescence was measured with a Fluoroscan Ascent reader (Thermo Labsystems) and data were analyzed with dedicated software (Thrombinoscope, Stago) [20]. Endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) (nM*min)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Lag Time (Thrombin generation assay (CAT))
TG in plasma, measured with the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) . Briefly, 80 μl platelet poor plasma (PPP) was mixed with 20 μl of a mixture containing tissue factor (Dade-Behring) at a final concentration of 1 pM and phospholipid vesicles (f.c. 4 μM 20 mol% phosphatidylserine, 60 mol% phosphatidylcholine and 20 mol% phosphatidyl-ethanolamine, Avanti). To calibrator wells, 20 μl of calibrator (α2macroglobulin- thrombin complex) was added instead of TF and PL. After 10 minutes of incubation at 37°C, thrombin generation was initiated by the addition of 20 μl of the thrombin specific substrate, Z- Gly-Gly-Arg-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (f.c. 416 μM, Bachem) and CaCl2 (f.c. 16.7 mM). Fluorescence was measured with a Fluoroscan Ascent reader (Thermo Labsystems) and data were analyzed with dedicated software (Thrombinoscope, Stago) [20]. lagtime (LT)(min)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Time-to-Thrombin Peak (Thrombin generation assay (CAT))
TG in plasma, measured with the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) . Briefly, 80 μl platelet poor plasma (PPP) was mixed with 20 μl of a mixture containing tissue factor (Dade-Behring) at a final concentration of 1 pM and phospholipid vesicles (f.c. 4 μM 20 mol% phosphatidylserine, 60 mol% phosphatidylcholine and 20 mol% phosphatidyl-ethanolamine, Avanti). To calibrator wells, 20 μl of calibrator (α2macroglobulin- thrombin complex) was added instead of TF and PL. After 10 minutes of incubation at 37°C, thrombin generation was initiated by the addition of 20 μl of the thrombin specific substrate, Z- Gly-Gly-Arg-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (f.c. 416 μM, Bachem) and CaCl2 (f.c. 16.7 mM). Fluorescence was measured with a Fluoroscan Ascent reader (Thermo Labsystems) and data were analyzed with dedicated software (Thrombinoscope, Stago) [20]. Time-to-Thrombin Peak (TTP)(min)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Thrombin Peak (TP) (Thrombin generation assay (CAT))
TG in plasma, measured with the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) . Briefly, 80 μl platelet poor plasma (PPP) was mixed with 20 μl of a mixture containing tissue factor (Dade-Behring) at a final concentration of 1 pM and phospholipid vesicles (f.c. 4 μM 20 mol% phosphatidylserine, 60 mol% phosphatidylcholine and 20 mol% phosphatidyl-ethanolamine, Avanti). To calibrator wells, 20 μl of calibrator (α2macroglobulin- thrombin complex) was added instead of TF and PL. After 10 minutes of incubation at 37°C, thrombin generation was initiated by the addition of 20 μl of the thrombin specific substrate, Z- Gly-Gly-Arg-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (f.c. 416 μM, Bachem) and CaCl2 (f.c. 16.7 mM). Fluorescence was measured with a Fluoroscan Ascent reader (Thermo Labsystems) and data were analyzed with dedicated software (Thrombinoscope, Stago) [20]. Thrombin Peak (TP)(nM)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
P-selectin expression (Platelet activation test (PACT))
Platelet activation was quantitatively assessed in un-processed blood by the PACT (Platelet activation test). Addition of specific agonists to whole blood (granule release capacity and in the aggregation potential of platelets). (1) the protease activated receptor (PAR-1) agonist thrombin receptor activator peptide, (2) the glycoprotein VI (GPVI) agonist collagen-related peptide , and (3) the P2Y12 agonist ADP. The reaction mixtures also contain three antibodies directed against GPIb, activated αIIbβ3 and P-selectin. Flow cytometry was used to distinguish between platelets and other cells on forward and sideward scatter pattern and by gating on the CD42b positive cells. Fluorescent intensity in the FITC gate and PE gate was selected to determine activated αIIbβ3 and P-selectin density, respectively, and results are expressed as median fluorescent intensity (MFI). P-selectin expression(MFI, median fluorescent intensity)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
αIIbβ3 activation (Platelet activation test (PACT))
Platelet activation was quantitatively assessed in un-processed blood by the PACT (Platelet activation test). Addition of specific agonists to whole blood (granule release capacity and in the aggregation potential of platelets). (1) the protease activated receptor (PAR-1) agonist thrombin receptor activator peptide, (2) the glycoprotein VI (GPVI) agonist collagen-related peptide , and (3) the P2Y12 agonist ADP. The reaction mixtures also contain three antibodies directed against GPIb, activated αIIbβ3 and P-selectin. Flow cytometry was used to distinguish between platelets and other cells on forward and sideward scatter pattern and by gating on the CD42b positive cells. Fluorescent intensity in the FITC gate and PE gate was selected to determine activated αIIbβ3 and P-selectin density, respectively, and results are expressed as median fluorescent intensity (MFI). αIIbβ3 activation (MFI, median fluorescent intensity)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
A5 EXTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: EXTEM (ref.: 503-05, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands), A5: amplitude of clot firmness 5 min after CT (mm)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
A5 FIBTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: FIBTEM (ref.: 503-06, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands), All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. A5: amplitude of clot firmness 5 min after CT (mm)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
A5 HEPTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: HEPTEM (ref.: 503-09, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. A5: amplitude of clot firmness 5 min after CT (mm)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
A30 EXTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: EXTEM (ref.: 503-05, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. A30: amplitude of clot firmness 30 min after CT (mm)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
A30 FIBTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: FIBTEM (ref.: 503-06, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. A30: amplitude of clot firmness 30 min after CT (mm)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
A30 HEPTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: HEPTEM (ref.: 503-09, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. A30: amplitude of clot firmness 30 min after CT (mm)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Alpha EXTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: EXTEM (ref.: 503-05, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. Alpha (the angle between the baseline and a tangent to the clotting curve through the 2 mm point; degree)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Alpha FIBTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: FIBTEM (ref.: 503-06, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. Alpha (the angle between the baseline and a tangent to the clotting curve through the 2 mm point; degree)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Alpha HEPTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: HEPTEM (ref.: 503-09, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. Alpha (the angle between the baseline and a tangent to the clotting curve through the 2 mm point; degree)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Coagulation Time CT EXTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: EXTEM (ref.: 503-05, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. Coagulation Time (CT): test start until a clot firmness amplitude of 2 mm is reached; sec.
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Coagulation Time CT FIBTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: FIBTEM (ref.: 503-06, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands), All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. Coagulation Time (CT): test start until a clot firmness amplitude of 2 mm is reached; sec.
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Coagulation Time CT HEPTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: HEPTEM (ref.: 503-09, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. Coagulation Time (CT): test start until a clot firmness amplitude of 2 mm is reached; sec.
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Clot Formation Time CFT EXTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: EXTEM (ref.: 503-05, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands), All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. CFT: in seconds indicates the time between 2 and 20 mm clot firmness amplitude is achieved (sec)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Clot Formation Time CFT FIBTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: FIBTEM (ref.: 503-06, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. CFT: in seconds indicates the time between 2 and 20 mm clot firmness amplitude is achieved (sec)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Clot Formation Time CFT HEPTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: HEPTEM (ref.: 503-09, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. CFT: in seconds indicates the time between 2 and 20 mm clot firmness amplitude is achieved (sec)
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Maximum Lysis (ML) EXTEM Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: EXTEM (ref.: 503-05, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. Maximum Lysis (ML; %): maximum lysis during runtime
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Maximum Lysis (ML) FIBTEM Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: FIBTEM (ref.: 503-06, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). All samples were measured within 1 h after blood collection. Maximum Lysis (ML; %): maximum lysis during runtime
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Maximum Lysis (ML) HEPTEM Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
Thrombus formation was measured by ROTEM (Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Standard assays were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations: HEPTEM (ref.: 503-09, Tem International GmbH c/o Dutch Affiliate, Tilburg, The Netherlands). Maximum Lysis (ML; %): maximum lysis during runtime
Measured: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completionJul 2016
- Study completionJul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mesothelioma; PeritoneumStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sven Van Poucke, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
- Investigators
- Sven Van Poucke, MD, Principal investigator, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03034850
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B37120154199
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All de-identified data will be available 6 months after inclusion of the last patient by contacting the principle investigator (svanpoucke@gmail.com). Once the results of the study are available and published, all data will be part of the publication.
Publications
Sugarbaker PH. Peritonectomy procedures. Ann Surg. 1995 Jan;221(1):29-42. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199501000-00004.
PubMed 7826158Elias DM, Ouellet JF. Intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia: rationale, technique, indications, and results. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2001 Oct;10(4):915-33, xi.
PubMed 11641098Van der Speeten K, Govaerts K, Stuart OA, Sugarbaker PH. Pharmacokinetics of the perioperative use of cancer chemotherapy in peritoneal surface malignancy patients. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:378064. doi: 10.1155/2012/378064. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
PubMed 22778722Urano M, Ling CC. Thermal enhancement of melphalan and oxaliplatin cytotoxicity in vitro. Int J Hyperthermia. 2002 Jul-Aug;18(4):307-15. doi: 10.1080/02656730210123534.
PubMed 12079586Perez-Ruixo C, Valenzuela B, Peris JE, Bretcha-Boix P, Escudero-Ortiz V, Farre-Alegre J, Perez-Ruixo JJ. Population pharmacokinetics of hyperthermic intraperitoneal oxaliplatin in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis after cytoreductive surgery. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;71(3):693-704. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-2060-2. Epub 2012 Dec 30.
PubMed 23274396Schmidt C, Creutzenberg M, Piso P, Hobbhahn J, Bucher M. Peri-operative anaesthetic management of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Anaesthesia. 2008 Apr;63(4):389-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05380.x.
PubMed 18336490Desantis M, Bernard JL, Casanova V, Cegarra-Escolano M, Benizri E, Rahili AM, Benchimol D, Bereder JM. Morbidity, mortality, and oncological outcomes of 401 consecutive cytoreductive procedures with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Jan;400(1):37-48. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1253-z. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
PubMed 25319432Kajdi ME, Beck-Schimmer B, Held U, Kofmehl R, Lehmann K, Ganter MT. Anaesthesia in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: retrospective analysis of a single centre three-year experience. World J Surg Oncol. 2014 May 1;12:136. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-136.
PubMed 24886171Bell JC, Rylah BG, Chambers RW, Peet H, Mohamed F, Moran BJ. Perioperative management of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery combined with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal surface malignancy: a multi-institutional experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4244-51. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2496-y. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
PubMed 22805865Cooksley TJ, Haji-Michael P. Post-operative critical care management of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). World J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec 19;9:169. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-169.
PubMed 22182345Korakianitis O, Daskalou T, Alevizos L, Stamou K, Mavroudis C, Iatrou C, Vogiatzaki T, Eleftheriadis S, Tentes AA. Lack of significant intraoperative coagulopathy in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) indicates that epidural anaesthesia is a safe option. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31(8):857-62. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1075606. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
PubMed 26446799Falcon Arana L, Fuentes-Garcia D, Roca Calvo MJ, Hernandez-Palazon J, Gil Martinez J, Cascales Campos PA, Acosta Villegas FJ, Parrilla Paricio P. Alterations in hemostasis during cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cir Esp. 2015 Oct;93(8):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Apr 14. English, Spanish.
PubMed 25882334Kusamura S, Moran BJ, Sugarbaker PH, Levine EA, Elias D, Baratti D, Morris DL, Sardi A, Glehen O, Deraco M; Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). Multicentre study of the learning curve and surgical performance of cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei. Br J Surg. 2014 Dec;101(13):1758-65. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9674. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
PubMed 25329419Canda AE, Sokmen S, Terzi C, Arslan C, Oztop I, Karabulut B, Ozzeybek D, Sarioglu S, Fuzun M. Complications and toxicities after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Apr;20(4):1082-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2853-x. Epub 2013 Mar 2.
PubMed 23456387Newton AD, Bartlett EK, Karakousis GC. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a review of factors contributing to morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Feb;7(1):99-111. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.100.
PubMed 26941988
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Thrombin Generation and Platelet Activation in Cytoreductive Surgery Combined With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03034850
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B37120154199
- Keywords
- cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy, platelet function, thrombin generation, thromboelastometry
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2015
- Primary completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy (HIPEC), indicated for patients with peritoneal metastases from digestive or gynecological malignancies alike, demonstrates a considerable impact on hemostatic metabolism, both on platelet and on coagulation level. The potential hemostatic interference in CRS and HIPEC is phase dependent. This study demonstrates the combined use of ROTEM (rotational thromboelastometry), PACT (platelet activation test) and CAT (thrombin generation test) assays during CRS and HIPEC with a follow-up of 7 days postoperative.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess the impact of CRS and HIPEC, on various components of hemostasis. Routine laboratory assays such as activated clotting time, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, or platelet count might, as demonstrated previously, insufficiently provide specificity and/or sensitivity to assess coagulation and platelet disorders. Therefore, additionally thrombin generation (TG) was analyzed by the calibrated automated thrombogram assay (CAT). Also, platelet function was quantitatively assessed by the PAC-t-UB assay and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) was used to elucidate the contribution of platelets, intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation pathways in peri-operative bleeding. The hypothesis of this study was that the procedure exposed an increased thrombotic risk, resulting in a faster and increased TG and hyper platelet function?
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CRS/HIPEC | – | Procedure: CRS/HIPECPatients with a confirmed histological diagnosis of peritoneal disease treated by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy (HIPEC). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This prospective observational pilot study, scheduled between April 2015 and July 2016, included 27 patients from the Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium, after approval by the local medical ethics committee (Eudract/B nr: B371201524199) and written informed consent.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- a confirmed histological diagnosis of peritoneal disease (e.g., mesothelioma; pseudomyxoma peritonei; colorectal, ovarian, or gastric peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal, ovarian, or gastric cancer origin; or abdominal sarcomatosis); and
- age <80 years; and
- a cardiac, renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function compatible with surgery; and
- informed written consent to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- inherited coagulation abnormalities,
- active systemic infections,
- interstitial lung disease,
- serious cardiac dysrhythmia or condition, New York Heart Association classification of III or IV, congestive cardiac failure, uncontrolled hypertension (diastolic blood pressure constantly >100 mm Hg, systolic blood pressure constantly > 180 mm Hg).
- inadequate bone marrow function at the beginning of the trial, defined as platelet count less than <150 GPT/L or neutrophil granulocyte count less than <1.5 GPT/L.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CRS/HIPECAlso: oxaliplatinum, 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, cisplatinumThe generic surgical approach involved peritonectomy procedures and visceral resections called CRS as described by Sugarbaker (1995). Peritoneal disease burden was assessed using the perito- neal cancer index (PCI), which scores 13 intra-abdominal sites on a scale of 0 (no disease) to 3 (lesion size > 5 cm), thus giving a range of possible scores from 0 to 39. The same team performed the surgical procedure of all included patients. Before connection to the patient, the circuit was filled with dextrose 5% (2 L/m2 body surface area) and warmed to 37°C. | Procedure or surgery | CRS/HIPEC |
Primary outcome
Blood loss
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Blood loss and administration of red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma and platelets. Blood loss is quantitatively assessed based on surgical drainage volume measurements, recorded every hour. Once the surgical drains are removed (average 7 days), blood loss is quantified by hemodynamic instability and abrupt, significant decrease of hemoglobin concentration. Blood loss is assessed from the date of CRS/HIPEC surgery until 7 days postoperative or date of death from any cause, whichever came first.
30 secondary outcomes
Red blood cell count
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
White blood cell count
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Platelet count
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Fibrinogen levels
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Prothrombin Time (PT)
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT)
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (Thrombin generation assay (CAT))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Lag Time (Thrombin generation assay (CAT))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Time-to-Thrombin Peak (Thrombin generation assay (CAT))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Thrombin Peak (TP) (Thrombin generation assay (CAT))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
P-selectin expression (Platelet activation test (PACT))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
αIIbβ3 activation (Platelet activation test (PACT))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
A5 EXTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
A5 FIBTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
A5 HEPTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
A30 EXTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
A30 FIBTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
A30 HEPTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Alpha EXTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Alpha FIBTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Alpha HEPTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Coagulation Time CT EXTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Coagulation Time CT FIBTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Coagulation Time CT HEPTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM))
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Clot Formation Time CFT EXTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Clot Formation Time CFT FIBTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Clot Formation Time CFT HEPTEM (Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Maximum Lysis (ML) EXTEM Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Maximum Lysis (ML) FIBTEM Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Maximum Lysis (ML) HEPTEM Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
Time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2017.
- Background: PubMed 7826158Sugarbaker PH. Peritonectomy procedures. Ann Surg. 1995 Jan;221(1):29-42. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199501000-00004.
- Background: PubMed 11641098Elias DM, Ouellet JF. Intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia: rationale, technique, indications, and results. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2001 Oct;10(4):915-33, xi.
- Background: PubMed 22778722Van der Speeten K, Govaerts K, Stuart OA, Sugarbaker PH. Pharmacokinetics of the perioperative use of cancer chemotherapy in peritoneal surface malignancy patients. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:378064. doi: 10.1155/2012/378064. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
- Background: PubMed 12079586Urano M, Ling CC. Thermal enhancement of melphalan and oxaliplatin cytotoxicity in vitro. Int J Hyperthermia. 2002 Jul-Aug;18(4):307-15. doi: 10.1080/02656730210123534.
- Background: PubMed 23274396Perez-Ruixo C, Valenzuela B, Peris JE, Bretcha-Boix P, Escudero-Ortiz V, Farre-Alegre J, Perez-Ruixo JJ. Population pharmacokinetics of hyperthermic intraperitoneal oxaliplatin in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis after cytoreductive surgery. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;71(3):693-704. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-2060-2. Epub 2012 Dec 30.
- Background: PubMed 18336490Schmidt C, Creutzenberg M, Piso P, Hobbhahn J, Bucher M. Peri-operative anaesthetic management of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Anaesthesia. 2008 Apr;63(4):389-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05380.x.
- Background: PubMed 25319432Desantis M, Bernard JL, Casanova V, Cegarra-Escolano M, Benizri E, Rahili AM, Benchimol D, Bereder JM. Morbidity, mortality, and oncological outcomes of 401 consecutive cytoreductive procedures with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Jan;400(1):37-48. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1253-z. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
- Background: PubMed 24886171Kajdi ME, Beck-Schimmer B, Held U, Kofmehl R, Lehmann K, Ganter MT. Anaesthesia in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: retrospective analysis of a single centre three-year experience. World J Surg Oncol. 2014 May 1;12:136. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-136.
- Background: PubMed 22805865Bell JC, Rylah BG, Chambers RW, Peet H, Mohamed F, Moran BJ. Perioperative management of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery combined with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal surface malignancy: a multi-institutional experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4244-51. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2496-y. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
- Background: PubMed 22182345Cooksley TJ, Haji-Michael P. Post-operative critical care management of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). World J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec 19;9:169. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-169.
- Background: PubMed 26446799Korakianitis O, Daskalou T, Alevizos L, Stamou K, Mavroudis C, Iatrou C, Vogiatzaki T, Eleftheriadis S, Tentes AA. Lack of significant intraoperative coagulopathy in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) indicates that epidural anaesthesia is a safe option. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31(8):857-62. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1075606. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
- Background: PubMed 25882334Falcon Arana L, Fuentes-Garcia D, Roca Calvo MJ, Hernandez-Palazon J, Gil Martinez J, Cascales Campos PA, Acosta Villegas FJ, Parrilla Paricio P. Alterations in hemostasis during cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cir Esp. 2015 Oct;93(8):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Apr 14. English, Spanish.
- Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All de-identified data will be available 6 months after inclusion of the last patient by contacting the principle investigator (svanpoucke@gmail.com). Once the results of the study are available and published, all data will be part of the publication.
Related trials for Mesothelioma; Peritoneum
RecruitingPhase 2
Chemotherapy With or Without Immunotherapy for Peritoneal Mesothelioma
Peritoneal Malignant Mesothelioma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
First-line Treatment With Dual Immunotherapy Combined With Anti-angiogenesis for Unresectable Advanced Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma
Peritoneal Mesothelioma, First-line Therapy
RecruitingPhase 1
Anti-Mesothelin TNaive/SCM hYP218 (TNhYP218) CAR T Cells in Participants With Mesothelin-Expressing Solid Tumors Including Mesothelioma
Mesothelioma, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1
Individual Response to Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Peritoneal Mesothelioma or Atypical Mesothelial Proliferation or From Ovarian, Colorectal, or Appendiceal Histologies
Peritoneal Mesothelioma, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of Mesothelin-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy in People With Esophagogastric Cancer or Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma
Mesothelin Positive, Mesothelin-Expressing Tumors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sven Van Poucke, MD principal investigator
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Mesothelioma; Peritoneum and Pseudomyxoma Peritonei, run by Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Blood loss (time frame: From surgical incision to 7 days postoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03034850, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2017.