SuicideSAFERNCT03034863
SAFER: A Brief Intervention Involving Family Members in Suicide Safety Planning
A study testing Safe Actions for Families to Encourage Recovery and Individual Safety Planning Intervention in people with Suicide, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The management of suicide risk is a pressing national public health issue especially among Veterans, and there exist no guidelines of how best to involve family members in this effort. This proposal will integrate family and couples communication skills training with suicide safety planning. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 89 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Suicide
- What is being tested?
- Safe Actions for Families to Encourage Recovery and Individual Safety Planning Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 78 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 3 Jul 2017to 28 Feb 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 89 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligible Veterans must be identified as at moderate risk for suicide, defined as:
- evidence of current (within the past week) suicidal ideation
- plan or intent on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), but scoring less than or equal to 4 on the C-SSRS Behavior Scale, and without history of a lethal suicide attempt in the last 3 months.
- Inclusion criteria also include the availability of a consenting, qualifying family member or spouse/cohabiting partner.
- Family members/friends must meet at least three (two for nonrelatives) of five criteria:
- is a spouse, co-habiting significant other or parent
Show all 10Show fewer
- has more frequent contact than any other caregiver
- helps to support the patient financially
- is contacted by treatment staff for emergencies
- has been involved in the patient's treatment
Who cannot join
- untreated or un-medicated psychosis
- current alcohol or drug abuse or dependence defined by a Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) for Alcohol \& Drug Use
- for couples, "severe" intimate-partner violence as defined by the revised 20-item Conflict Tactics Scale Short Form (CTS2S)
- medical condition or life event, e.g.,
- participation in another family-based psychosocial intervention trial six months prior to study
- limited English proficiency. Participants will be screened for inclusion/exclusion as described above immediately after giving consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY
The Bronx, New York, 10468
About this study
The management of suicide risk is a pressing national public health issue especially among Veterans, and there exist no guidelines of how best to involve family members in this effort. This proposal will integrate family and couples communication skills training with suicide safety planning. The goal is for the sharing of Veteran suicide safety plans with family members and the construction of a parallel family member safety plan, in efforts to mobilize and support family involvement.
Read the detailed description
Psychological models of suicidality emphasize the role of social factors in the development and intensification of suicidal thoughts and behavior, including feeling like a burden on family and friends, feelings of isolation and not belonging, and perceptions of diminished support from one's family and social network. Despite the critical role of family factors in protecting against suicidality, families lack education on how their behavior can help avert or unwittingly aggravate suicidal thoughts/ behavior. Families worry about their relative but feel uncertain of how to help and need professional guidance. Family worries about suicidality are associated with compromised family physical and mental health and consequently, diminished ability to offer needed support. Because suicide safety plans rely on mobilizing support in times of crisis, families need to be equipped to provide needed support.
Family recommendations from the VA Behavioral Health Autopsy Program (BHAP) Annual Report 6/30/15 based on interviews with 114 family members highlighted the importance of:
- educating families about suicide warning signs:
- improving communication between the veteran and family member
- involving the family in the veterans' treatment to enhance support and trust
- providing families with coaching on how to assist their loved one to seek help.
Management of suicidal behavior is covered in comprehensive family psychoeducation programs, but there is an urgent need for a brief family-based intervention specifically focused on suicide prevention that can be used in conjunction with the currently mandated SSP and as a part of routine care.
Despite the enrichment of VA suicide prevention services and implementation of the national suicide hotline, Veteran suicide completions have risen to 22 per day and suicide attempts numbered over 15,000 in 2012. These data underscore the urgency of developing additional interventions targeting suicidal Veterans. One potential avenue to further suicide treatment and rehabilitation efforts is to develop strategies that maximize family support, however almost no family interventions exist for suicidal Veterans. The construction of a Suicide Safety Plan (SSP); a "best practice," is mandated throughout the VA system, and a vital component of the VA's coordinated effort at suicide prevention and recovery. The pilot data on patterns of SSP use in suicidal Veterans highlighted the importance of sharing the plan with family or close friends. However, respondents also noted significant obstacles in their ability to reach out to others when in distress. To the knowledge of Investigators, there are currently no recommended guidelines or mechanisms for involving family in safety planning, despite its inclusion as a step of the plan. "Safe Actions for Families to Encourage Recovery" (SAFER) a novel suicide safety planning family intervention has been designed to fill this critical gap and provide a mechanism to communicate about safety planning. SAFER, a 4-session, family intervention, combines education about suicide and suicide safety planning with communication skills training from evidence-based practices. The aim is to facilitate communication about suicide safety planning and to develop both a Veteran and family member safety plan.
Data from this project will test the intervention's feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy in a Stage II small-scale randomized clinical trial in 39 moderate suicide risk Veterans and their supporting partners. The comparison condition will be safety planning without supporting partner involvement plus weekly check-in phone calls. Primary Veteran outcomes include reducing suicidal ideation/behavior. Secondary Veteran outcomes include reducing suicidal cognitions (hopelessness, perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness) and depression and improving subjective social support. Supporting Partner primary outcomes include reducing caregiver burden and secondary outcomes of improving suicide-related coping and family empowerment.
- Conditions
- Suicide
- Being tested
- Safe Actions for Families to Encourage Recovery, Individual Safety Planning Intervention
- Keywords
- Family Caregivers, Spouse Caregivers, Veterans, Suicide, Clinical Trial, Military Families, Military Psychology
- Medical subject headings
- Suicide
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Safe Actions for Families to Encourage RecoveryBehavioural
Also called SAFER
A novel, 5-session intervention to enhance currently mandated VA suicide safety planning by involving family members to support its implementation. Incorporation of education about suicide risk factors and teaching communication skills of active listening and making a positive request will supply Veterans and family members with the knowledge and tools needed to 1) identify potential warning signs, and 2) discuss Veteran ideation or family concerns with assurance that such requests will be listened to with validation and support, creating an ally for the suicidal Veteran in his struggle. As discussed above, research has demonstrated compellingly that suicidal desire is motivated by two interpersonal factors; perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness. SAFER aims to increase family support for the Veteran to directly mitigate Veteran loneliness and sense of being a burden to others.
Individual Safety Planning InterventionBehavioural
Also called I-SPI
The comparison condition will be an assessment-only enhanced treatment-as-usual intervention called the Individual Safety Planning Intervention (I-SPI).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SAFER | Experimental | SAFER (Safe Actions for Families to Encourage Recovery): A novel, 5-session intervention to enhance currently mandated VA suicide safety planning by involving supporting partners to support its implementation. Incorporation of education about suicide risk factors and teaching communication skills of active listening and making a positive request will supply Veterans and supporting partners with the knowledge and tools needed to 1) identify potential warning signs, and 2) discuss Veteran ideation or partner concerns with assurance that such requests will be listened to with validation and support, creating an ally for the suicidal Veteran in his struggle. As discussed above, research has demonstrated compellingly that suicidal desire is motivated by two interpersonal factors; perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness. SAFER aims to increase partner support for the Veteran to directly mitigate Veteran loneliness and sense of being a burden to others. Receives: Behavioral: Safe Actions for Families to Encourage Recovery |
| I-SPI | Active comparator | The comparison condition will be an assessment-only enhanced treatment-as-usual called the Individual Safety Planning Intervention (I-SPI), incorporating weekly scripted check-in phone calls to review mood symptoms and use of the safety plan, which will then be given as feedback to the Veteran's primary mental health provider. Receives: Behavioral: Individual Safety Planning Intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Veteran Suicidal Ideation
Suicidality will be measured using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale. The C-SSRS was used across time points to record level of ideation, lifetime suicide attempts, and recent suicide attempts. The follow-up version of C-SSRS measured suicidal ideation and behavior that had occurred since the last assessment. The scale has inter-rater reliability of .97 and has been used extensively in prospective suicide studies. The scale has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 5. Higher scores mean a worse outcome (more severe ideation).
Measured: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Supporting Partner Caregiver Burden
Caregiver burden will be evaluated by the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), a 24-item scale assessing caregiver burden in four areas: physical, social, emotional and time dependence burden. Investigators found a large effect size in the pilot multifamily group study on this scale (Cohen's d = 1.03). Items were averaged to create an overall measure of caregiver burden and showed excellent internal consistency in this study (α =.94). CBI scores range from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum). Higher scores mean a worse outcome (greater caregiver burden).
Measured: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Number of Veterans With at Least 1 Suicide Attempt
These are the number of Veterans who reported at least one or more behaviors coded as "actual suicide attempts" since last visit using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). The follow-up version of C-SSRS measured suicidal ideation and behavior that had occurred since the last assessment. The scale has inter-rater reliability of .97 and has been used extensively in prospective suicide studies. A behavior was considered an "actual suicide attempt" if it was a potentially self-injurious act with any intent to die associated with it.
Measured: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Secondary outcomes (9)
Veteran Suicide Related Coping
Suicide-related coping will be evaluated by the Stanley Suicide-related Coping Scale (SRCS), a 21-item self-report measure developed by Stanley, Green, Holloway, Brenner \& Brown to evaluate appraisal of one's ability to cope with suicidal ideation and urges, as well as ability to use the Safety Plan. Examples of items are: "I am at the mercy of my suicidal thoughts", "I have several things I can do to get through a suicidal crisis". Scores were averaged so that higher scores represent greater confidence and breadth of approaches to coping with suicidal thoughts and feelings (better outcome). SRCS scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 4.
Measured: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Veteran Thwarted Belongingness
Thwarted belongingness will be evaluated by Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ-15). The INQ is has demonstrated acceptable internal consistency for thwarted belongingness in this sample (TB) (α =.79). Scores on each subscale were averaged so that higher scores represent a greater degree of their respective constructs. Thwarted belongingness scores range from 1 (minimum) to 6 (maximum). Higher scores mean a worse outcome (decreased feelings of belongingness).
Measured: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Partner Support of Suicide-Related Coping
We have developed a family counterpart to the Stanley Suicide-related Coping Scale for Veterans that taps family members' appraisal of their ability to participate effectively in Veteran safety planning. Items include, "I recognize the triggers and warning signs for suicidal ideation/urges for my Veteran" and "I know the numbers for the mobile crisis team to contact and nearest hospital or urgent care facility to accompany my Veteran to in a crisis." This measure will be validated against the more general Family Empowerment Scale. Items were rated on a 0 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree) scale and were averaged with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy when supporting the Veteran through suicidal crises (better outcome). Partner SRCS scores range from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum).
Measured: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Veteran Perceived Burdensomeness
Perceived burdensomeness will be evaluated by Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ-15). The INQ is has demonstrated excellent internal consistency for Perceived Burdensomeness (PB) (α= .95). Scores on each subscale were averaged so that higher scores represent a greater degree of their respective constructs. Perceived burdensomeness scores range from 1 (minimum) to 6 (maximum). Higher scores mean a worse outcome (greater perceived burdensomeness).
Measured: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Veteran Hopelessness
Veteran hopelessness will be evaluated by the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), a 20-item self-report measure with adequate reliability and validity which has been predictive of suicide in psychiatric inpatients. The BHS measures three aspects of hopelessness: feelings about the future, loss of motivation, and expectations. Items are true-false and are summed to get a total BHS score, ranging from 0 to 20. Higher scores reflect a worse outcome (greater hopelessness).
Measured: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Veteran Depression
Veteran depression will be evaluated by the widely-used Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) (Cronbach's = .92). The BDI-II contains 21 items assessing depressive symptoms, each with minimum scores of 0 and maximum scores of 3. Item scores were summed, leading to a total score range of 0-63. Higher scores mean a worse outcome (more severe depressive symptoms).
Measured: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Caregiver's Empowerment to Help Veteran
Caregiving self-efficacy/empowerment will be evaluated using the 12-item family subscale from the Family Empowerment Scale. This scale assesses the family's knowledge of mental health services and perceived ability to manage crises, and has demonstrated sensitivity to change in family intervention studies. Each item has a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5, and were averaged to create a total score range of 1-5. Higher scores mean a better outcome (greater empowerment).
Measured: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Veteran's Report of Family Problem Solving
Veterans' reports of family problem solving will be evaluated by the 5-item Problem Solving subscale of the Family Assessment Device (FAD). Subscales have acceptable internal consistency (α = .72 to .83). Each item has a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 4, and were averaged to create a total score range of 1-4. Higher scores reflect worse outcomes (lower problem solving ability).
Measured: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Veteran's Report of Family Communication
Veterans' reports of family communication will be evaluated by the 6-item Communication subscale of the Family Assessment Device (FAD). Subscales have acceptable internal consistency (α = .72 to .83). Each item has a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 4, and were averaged to create a total score range of 1-4. Higher scores reflect worse outcomes (worse communication).
Measured: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study start3 Jul 2017
- Primary completion31 Dec 2019
- Study completion28 Feb 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for SuicideStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by VA Office of Research and DevelopmentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants are assigned to one of two groups in parallel for the duration of the study.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marianne S. Goodman, MD, Principal investigator, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03034863
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D2432-R
- Other IDs
- RX002432-01
- Acronym
- SAFER
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 10 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- SAFER: A Brief Intervention Involving Family Members in Suicide Safety Planning
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03034863
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SAFER / D2432-R
- Conditions
- Suicide
- Keywords
- Family Caregivers, Spouse Caregivers, Veterans, Suicide, Clinical Trial, Military Families, Military Psychology
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUS federal agency
- Study start
- 3 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Dec 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The management of suicide risk is a pressing national public health issue especially among Veterans, and there exist no guidelines of how best to involve family members in this effort. This proposal will integrate family and couples communication skills training with suicide safety planning. The goal is for the sharing of Veteran suicide safety plans with family members and the construction of a parallel family member safety plan, in efforts to mobilize and support family involvement.
Detailed description
Psychological models of suicidality emphasize the role of social factors in the development and intensification of suicidal thoughts and behavior, including feeling like a burden on family and friends, feelings of isolation and not belonging, and perceptions of diminished support from one's family and social network. Despite the critical role of family factors in protecting against suicidality, families lack education on how their behavior can help avert or unwittingly aggravate suicidal thoughts/ behavior. Families worry about their relative but feel uncertain of how to help and need professional guidance. Family worries about suicidality are associated with compromised family physical and mental health and consequently, diminished ability to offer needed support. Because suicide safety plans rely on mobilizing support in times of crisis, families need to be equipped to provide needed support.
Family recommendations from the VA Behavioral Health Autopsy Program (BHAP) Annual Report 6/30/15 based on interviews with 114 family members highlighted the importance of:
- educating families about suicide warning signs:
- improving communication between the veteran and family member
- involving the family in the veterans' treatment to enhance support and trust
- providing families with coaching on how to assist their loved one to seek help.
Management of suicidal behavior is covered in comprehensive family psychoeducation programs, but there is an urgent need for a brief family-based intervention specifically focused on suicide prevention that can be used in conjunction with the currently mandated SSP and as a part of routine care.
Despite the enrichment of VA suicide prevention services and implementation of the national suicide hotline, Veteran suicide completions have risen to 22 per day and suicide attempts numbered over 15,000 in 2012. These data underscore the urgency of developing additional interventions targeting suicidal Veterans. One potential avenue to further suicide treatment and rehabilitation efforts is to develop strategies that maximize family support, however almost no family interventions exist for suicidal Veterans. The construction of a Suicide Safety Plan (SSP); a "best practice," is mandated throughout the VA system, and a vital component of the VA's coordinated effort at suicide prevention and recovery. The pilot data on patterns of SSP use in suicidal Veterans highlighted the importance of sharing the plan with family or close friends. However, respondents also noted significant obstacles in their ability to reach out to others when in distress. To the knowledge of Investigators, there are currently no recommended guidelines or mechanisms for involving family in safety planning, despite its inclusion as a step of the plan. "Safe Actions for Families to Encourage Recovery" (SAFER) a novel suicide safety planning family intervention has been designed to fill this critical gap and provide a mechanism to communicate about safety planning. SAFER, a 4-session, family intervention, combines education about suicide and suicide safety planning with communication skills training from evidence-based practices. The aim is to facilitate communication about suicide safety planning and to develop both a Veteran and family member safety plan.
Data from this project will test the intervention's feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy in a Stage II small-scale randomized clinical trial in 39 moderate suicide risk Veterans and their supporting partners. The comparison condition will be safety planning without supporting partner involvement plus weekly check-in phone calls. Primary Veteran outcomes include reducing suicidal ideation/behavior. Secondary Veteran outcomes include reducing suicidal cognitions (hopelessness, perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness) and depression and improving subjective social support. Supporting Partner primary outcomes include reducing caregiver burden and secondary outcomes of improving suicide-related coping and family empowerment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants are assigned to one of two groups in parallel for the duration of the study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SAFER | Experimental | Behavioral: Safe Actions for Families to Encourage RecoverySAFER (Safe Actions for Families to Encourage Recovery): A novel, 5-session intervention to enhance currently mandated VA suicide safety planning by involving supporting partners to support its implementation. Incorporation of education about suicide risk factors and teaching communication skills of active listening and making a positive request will supply Veterans and supporting partners with the knowledge and tools needed to 1) identify potential warning signs, and 2) discuss Veteran ideation or partner concerns with assurance that such requests will be listened to with validation and support, creating an ally for the suicidal Veteran in his struggle. As discussed above, research has demonstrated compellingly that suicidal desire is motivated by two interpersonal factors; perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness. SAFER aims to increase partner support for the Veteran to directly mitigate Veteran loneliness and sense of being a burden to others. |
| I-SPI | Active comparator | Behavioral: Individual Safety Planning InterventionThe comparison condition will be an assessment-only enhanced treatment-as-usual called the Individual Safety Planning Intervention (I-SPI), incorporating weekly scripted check-in phone calls to review mood symptoms and use of the safety plan, which will then be given as feedback to the Veteran's primary mental health provider. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 89 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Eligible Veterans must be identified as at moderate risk for suicide, defined as:
- Inclusion criteria also include the availability of a consenting, qualifying family member or spouse/cohabiting partner.
- Family members/friends must meet at least three (two for nonrelatives) of five criteria:
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- untreated or un-medicated psychosis
- current alcohol or drug abuse or dependence defined by a Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) for Alcohol \& Drug Use
- for couples, "severe" intimate-partner violence as defined by the revised 20-item Conflict Tactics Scale Short Form (CTS2S)
- medical condition or life event, e.g.,
- participation in another family-based psychosocial intervention trial six months prior to study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Safe Actions for Families to Encourage RecoveryAlso: SAFERA novel, 5-session intervention to enhance currently mandated VA suicide safety planning by involving family members to support its implementation. Incorporation of education about suicide risk factors and teaching communication skills of active listening and making a positive request will supply Veterans and family members with the knowledge and tools needed to 1) identify potential warning signs, and 2) discuss Veteran ideation or family concerns with assurance that such requests will be listened to with validation and support, creating an ally for the suicidal Veteran in his struggle. As discussed above, research has demonstrated compellingly that suicidal desire is motivated by two interpersonal factors; perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness. SAFER aims to increase family support for the Veteran to directly mitigate Veteran loneliness and sense of being a burden to others. | Behavioural | SAFER |
| Individual Safety Planning InterventionAlso: I-SPIThe comparison condition will be an assessment-only enhanced treatment-as-usual intervention called the Individual Safety Planning Intervention (I-SPI). | Behavioural | I-SPI |
Primary outcome
Veteran Suicidal Ideation
Time frame: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Suicidality will be measured using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale. The C-SSRS was used across time points to record level of ideation, lifetime suicide attempts, and recent suicide attempts. The follow-up version of C-SSRS measured suicidal ideation and behavior that had occurred since the last assessment. The scale has inter-rater reliability of .97 and has been used extensively in prospective suicide studies. The scale has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 5. Higher scores mean a worse outcome (more severe ideation).
Supporting Partner Caregiver Burden
Time frame: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Caregiver burden will be evaluated by the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), a 24-item scale assessing caregiver burden in four areas: physical, social, emotional and time dependence burden. Investigators found a large effect size in the pilot multifamily group study on this scale (Cohen's d = 1.03). Items were averaged to create an overall measure of caregiver burden and showed excellent internal consistency in this study (α =.94). CBI scores range from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum). Higher scores mean a worse outcome (greater caregiver burden).
Number of Veterans With at Least 1 Suicide Attempt
Time frame: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
These are the number of Veterans who reported at least one or more behaviors coded as "actual suicide attempts" since last visit using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). The follow-up version of C-SSRS measured suicidal ideation and behavior that had occurred since the last assessment. The scale has inter-rater reliability of .97 and has been used extensively in prospective suicide studies. A behavior was considered an "actual suicide attempt" if it was a potentially self-injurious act with any intent to die associated with it.
9 secondary outcomes
Veteran Suicide Related Coping
Time frame: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Veteran Thwarted Belongingness
Time frame: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Partner Support of Suicide-Related Coping
Time frame: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Veteran Perceived Burdensomeness
Time frame: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Veteran Hopelessness
Time frame: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Veteran Depression
Time frame: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Caregiver's Empowerment to Help Veteran
Time frame: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Veteran's Report of Family Problem Solving
Time frame: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Veteran's Report of Family Communication
Time frame: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Dec 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Suicide
Not yet recruiting
A Pre-post Study of a Lethal Means Safety Planning Intervention for Youth at Elevated Suicide Risk in the Emergency Department
Suicidal Ideas, Suicidal Ideation
RecruitingObservational study
Student Precarity and Psychiatry
Depressive Disorder, Major, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Not yet recruiting
SERENE Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Cognitive Control
Suicidal Ideation, Cognitive Control
Not yet recruiting
A MRT to Optimize a JITAI for Alcohol Craving and Suicide Ideation
Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), Suicide Ideation
Enrolling by invitation
Pilot Study of a Modified Safety Planning Intervention for Elementary School-Aged Children - Main Study
Suicidal Ideation, Suicidal Behaviors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marianne S. Goodman, MD principal investigator
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Safe Actions for Families to Encourage Recovery and Individual Safety Planning Intervention in people with Suicide, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Dec 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Veteran Suicidal Ideation (time frame: POST TREATMENT ASSESSMENT- After completing intervention (Range 0.30-7.47 months; Mean=2.84 months from baseline); EXTENDED FOLLOWUP- 3-months after providing follow-up up to 1 year from enrollment (Range 3.10-11.43 months; Mean=6.32 months from baseline)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2021.