AzTrials
AzTrials

ObesityPhase 4STRIVENCT03036800

Saxenda in Obesity Services (STRIVE Study)

A Phase 4 study testing Saxenda and Specialist Obesity Management Services in people with Obesity and Weight Loss, run by University of Leicester at 5 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A two year, parallel, two group, open-label, real-world randomised controlled trial (RCT) design for subjects with severe and complex obesity who are referred to a Tier 3 or equivalent specialist weight management/obesity service. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Obesity, Weight Loss, Diabetes Mellitus
What is being tested?
Saxenda and Specialist Obesity Management Services
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
392 participants
Where
5 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
28 Nov 2017to 25 Feb 2022
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • be aged between 18-75 years old (inclusive)
  • understand written and spoken English
  • be able to give in informed consent
  • a body mass index ≥35 kg/m2,
  • have been referred to Tier 3 weight management or equivalent service in one of the five participating sites,
  • have a stable body weight (less than 5kg self-reported change during the previous 12 weeks),
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Participant must be able to meet at least one of the inclusion criteria listed below:
  • prediabetes (defined as established diagnosis of impaired fasting glycaemia (IFG) from GP and/or established diagnosis of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) from GP and/or HbA1C 42-47 mmol/mol (6-6.4%) without glucose lowering medications, at a blood test during the last 6 months) and/or
  • type 2 diabetes [defined as established diagnosis of Type II diabetes from GP and/or HbA1C ≥48 mmol/mol (>6.5%) at a blood test during the last 6 months] being treated with any combination of lifestyle, metformin, sulphonylureas, thiazolidinediones (TZDs) or SGLT-2, and/or
  • hypertension treated (defined as being on antihypertensive treatment with or without a diagnosis of hypertension from GP) or untreated (defined as Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg at two consecutive visits at the Tier 3 clinic), and/or
  • obstructive sleep apnoea (on CPAP or established diagnosis of Apnoea Hypopnoea Index ≥15 at sleep studies during the last 12 months)

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes
  • Type 2 diabetes with treatment on DPP-IV or insulin currently
  • Treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists within the last 6 months and/or have a history of GLP-1 receptor agonist intolerance.
  • Treatment with anti-obesity drugs within the last 12 weeks prior to randomisation
  • eGFR ≤30ml/min/1.73m2 on serum testing over the last 26 weeks
  • Females referred to the clinic because of fertility problem
Show all 26Show fewer
  • Females of child bearing potential who are pregnant, breast-feeding or intend to become pregnant or are not using or willing to use adequate contraceptive methods during the study period
  • Have terminal illness
  • Are not primarily responsible for their own care
  • Not willing or able to give informed consent
  • Any other significant disease or disorder which in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the participants at risk or may influence the result of the study or the participant's ability to participate
  • Untreated or uncontrolled hypothyroidism/hyperthyroidism defined as thyroid- stimulating hormone >6 mIU/liter or <0.4 mIU/liter
  • Family or personal history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) or familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (FMTC)
  • Personal history of non-familial medullary thyroid carcinoma
  • History of chronic pancreatitis or idiopathic acute pancreatitis
  • Amylase levels three times higher than the upper normal range
  • Obesity induced by other endocrinologic disorders (e.g. Cushing's Syndrome)
  • Current or history of treatment with medications that may cause significant weight gain, within 12 weeks prior to screening, including systemic corticosteroids (except for a short course of treatment, i.e. 7-10 days), atypical antipsychotic and mood stabilizers (e.g. clozapine, olanzapine, valproic acid and its derivatives, and lithium)
  • History of major depressive episode during the last 2 years
  • History of initiation of antidepressants during the last 12 weeks
  • Simultaneous participation in other clinical trials of investigational drugs, lifestyle or physical activity interventions.
  • Previous surgical treatment for obesity (excluding liposuction if performed >1 year before trial entry)
  • History of other severe psychiatric disorders
  • History of known or suspected abuse of alcohol and/or narcotics
  • History of major depressive episode during the last 2 years
  • Simultaneous participation in other clinical trials of investigational drugs, lifestyle or physical activity interventions. Patients will only be able to take part following participation in a previous clinical trial after a wash-out period of 16 weeks.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 2 countries.

5 sites in 2 countries

United Kingdom4 sites
  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital

    Glasgow

  • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester General Hospital

    Leicester

  • University Hospital Aintree

    Liverpool

  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

Ireland1 site
  • St Vincent's University Hospital

    Dublin

Other trials in Ireland

About this study

Official title: EFFECTIVENESS AND COST OF INTEGRATING A PROTOCOL WITH USE OF LIRAGLUTIDE 3.0 MG INTO AN OBESITY SERVICE: (STRIVE Study)

A two year, parallel, two group, open-label, real-world randomised controlled trial (RCT) design for subjects with severe and complex obesity who are referred to a Tier 3 or equivalent specialist weight management/obesity service. Participants will be randomised to receive 1) standard care (obesity-specialist care), or 2) targeted prescribing pathway (obesity-specialist care plus targeted use of Liraglutide 3.0mg [LIRA 3mg] with pre-specified stopping rules for the medication). The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness, budget impact, and cost-effectiveness between the two groups in a real-world setting among otherwise largely unselected patients.

Read the detailed description

Summary of Trial Design A two year, parallel, two group, open-label, real-world, RCT design for patients with severe and complex obesity who are referred to a Tier 3 obesity service (including patients who are referred to a Tier 3 service as part of the bariatric surgery pathway). The total duration of participation will be 104 weeks (+/-2 weeks).

The first 52 weeks of the study (after randomisation) will determine whether using the targeted prescribing pathway in a Tier 3 setting will result in more participants attaining ≥15% weight loss compared with standard care. The second 52 weeks of the study will assess whether patients who lose ≥15% of their baseline weight by the first 52 weeks are more likely to maintain ≥15% weight loss for another 52 weeks in the targeted prescribing pathway compared with standard care. Further, budget impact, cost-effectiveness, improvement in obesity-related co-morbidities, complementary aspects of safety, effectiveness, adherence, and treatment satisfaction of both treatment groups will be assessed and compared.

Participants will be randomised in a 2:1 fashion to either the intervention (targeted prescribing pathway + standard care) or control (standard care) group (2 intervention: 1 control). The control group will receive standard care in a specialist obesity service (Tier 3 or equivalent), according to the best practice in each site and can include total or partial meal replacement strategies. The intervention group will receive the same standard care as the control group (i.e. according to the best practice in each site) plus all participants will initially receive LIRA with pre-specified stopping rules. The targeted prescribing pathway: participants who do not meet the definition of a 'early and good responder' (defined as achieving ≥5% weight loss at 16 weeks, ≥10% weight loss at 32 weeks and ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks) will have their LIRA 3mg treatment stopped. It is important to note that all participants will be analysed in the group to which they are randomised; in particular, participants in the intervention group who stop receiving LIRA 3mg will remain in the intervention group and will continue to receive standard care for the remainder of the study as per the targeted prescribing pathway (albeit, the part of the pathway where LIRA 3mg is not prescribed; see Figure 1).

The study is intentionally designed to reflect a pragmatic "real-world" scenario and each Tier 3 provider may require a different number of visits for their programme. However, study appointments for data collection, titration reviews, application of the stopping rules of LIRA 3mg, and dispensing will be standardised for all of the five sites.

Intervention (Targeted Prescribing Pathway)

The NHS Weight Management pathway is divided into four distinct tiers:

Tier 1: health promotion Tier 2: lifestyle interventions Tier 3: specialist multidisciplinary weight management services Tier 4: bariatric surgery

Across the UK, each region has a specialist Tier 3 obesity and/or weight management service or equivalent, usually referred to as Tier 3. This includes a clinician led multidisciplinary team approach, potentially including a specialist physician, nurse, dietician, psychologist, physiotherapist, etc. From this point forwards, Tier 3 specialist weight management and/or equivalent services will be referred to as 'Tier 3' throughout the remainder of this protocol.

Participants in the intervention group will receive the same standard care as those in the control group, i.e. the best medical practice delivered by the Tier 3 service at each site. Additionally, at baseline, LIRA 3mg will be prescribed to all of the participants in the intervention group at a starting dose of 0.6mg daily. Dose escalation of Liraglutide will occur according to a pre-specified titration protocol, from 0.6mg to a maximum of 3.0mg daily. Liraglutide dose will be initiated at 0.6mg and then increased to 1.2mg in Week 2, 1.8mg in Week 3, 2.4mg in Week 4, and 3.0mg in Week 5. Participants in the intervention group will be aware that the LIRA 3mg treatment may be stopped at various time points throughout the duration of the study and that continued use of LIRA 3mg is based upon their response to the treatment in terms of them achieving pre-defined weight loss targets at 16, 32 and 52 weeks.. Specifically, participants in the intervention group will continue to be prescribed LIRA 3mg for the 104 week duration of the study, unless one of the following stopping rules applies:

  1. st stopping rule: After 16 weeks (± 14 days) on the medication, only those participants who have lost ≥5% of their baseline weight will be offered further treatment with LIRA 3mg for another 16 weeks. Participants who have not met this weight loss target will have their LIRA 3mg treatment stopped but will still continue in the targeted prescribing pathway but will receive standard care only during the remainder of the study.
  2. nd stopping rule: After 32 weeks (± 14 days) on the medication, only those participants who have lost ≥10% of their baseline weight and are still on treatment with LIRA 3mg will be offered another 20 weeks on LIRA 3mg. Participants who have not met this weight loss target will have their LIRA 3mg treatment stopped but will still continue in the targeted prescribing pathway but will receive standard care only during the remainder of the study.
  3. rd stopping rule: After the first year of treatment (week 52; ± 14 days), only those participants who have lost ≥15% of their baseline weight and are still on treatment with LIRA 3mg will be offered another 52 weeks on LIRA 3mg. Participants who have not met this weight loss target will have their LIRA 3mg treatment stopped but will still continue in the targeted prescribing pathway but will receive standard care only during the remainder of the study.

Participants who fail to reach the pre-defined weight-loss targets to continue LIRA 3mg treatment, or who choose to stop receiving LIRA 3mg, will continue to be offered the standard care provided by the Tier 3 service. These participants will still attend the Clinical Review Visits but not the additional visits for participants who are still on LIRA 3mg (e.g. Weeks 65 \& 91) because these visits will not be relevant to them; visits at Weeks 65 and 91 are intended to provide a new prescription of LIRA 3mg and to discuss adherence and any side effects;; see Appendices 2 \& 3).

Participants will remain routinely in the Tier 3 service in-line with NICE guidance throughout the duration of the research study. Participants may be offered treatment options within the duration of the study, including bariatric surgery, as per NICE guidance and according to the decision of the local Tier 3 Multidisciplinary Team. Participants who have undergone bariatric surgery after randomisation will only be included in the intention to treat (ITT) analysis. This decision was made because the proportion of participants undergoing bariatric surgery is likely to be unbalanced between the treatment groups (i.e. more participants in the control group are expected to have bariatric surgery than in the targeted prescribing pathway treatment group), and thus weight loss in these individuals could unduly influence the study results. Participants who have been prescribed and start anti-obesity medication (such as Orlistat) will be ineligible for LIRA 3mg treatment.

Control (Standard Care) Participants in the control group will follow the best medical care provided by the Tier 3 service at the relevant site. This typically involves dietary advice to reduce energy intake (and may include a period of partial or total meal replacement), accompanied - if available - by a physical activity programme, both supported by behavioural change techniques with regular professional contacts. The nature of the standard care will vary between the different Tier 3 services at each site, as this is a pragmatic 'real-world' study. Clinician input will include the medical assessment of participants for severe and complicated obesity and the prescription of anti-obesity drugs (such as Orlistat) as per local Tier 3 service policy. As with the LIRA 3mg group those patients taking antihypertensive or antidepressant medication will be assessed and it will be at the clinician's discretion as to whether these medications are changed. Participants will remain routinely in the Tier 3 service in-line with NICE guidance throughout the duration of the research study. Participants may be offered treatment options within the duration of the study, including bariatric surgery, as per NICE guidance and according to the decision of the local Tier 3 Multidisciplinary Team.

Being tested
Saxenda, Specialist Obesity Management Services
Medical subject headings
Obesity, Weight Loss, Diabetes Mellitus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SaxendaDrug

    Also called Liraglutide 3mg

    standard care plus targeted use of Liraglutide (LIRA) 3mg when pre-specified stopping rules for the medication apply. Liraglutide (Saxenda) 6 mg/mL solution for injection in pre-filled pen, administered by subcutaneous injection. Dose escalation to 3.0 mg daily (or maximum tolerated dose)

  • Specialist Obesity Management ServicesOther

    Specialist Obesity Management Services standard of care

Study groups in NCT03036800
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Targeted Prescribing Pathway (LIRA 3mg + Standard Care)ExperimentalStandard care plus targeted use of the intervention Liraglutide (LIRA) 3mg when pre-specified stopping rules for the medication apply
Receives: Drug: Saxenda; Other: Specialist Obesity Management Services
Standard CareActive comparatorstandard Tier 3 obesity specialist service care
Receives: Other: Specialist Obesity Management Services

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants with severe and complicated obesity achieving weight loss of ≥15% at 52 weeks with the use of a targeted prescribing pathway (i.e. use of LIRA 3mg according to a pre-specified protocol in combination with standard care provided in Tier 3 services) versus standard care alone in a Tier 3 service.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  2. Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Intention to Treat)

    Proportion of participants with severe and complicated obesity achieving weight loss of ≥15% at 52 weeks with the use of a targeted prescribing pathway (i.e. use of LIRA 3mg according to a pre-specified protocol in combination with standard care provided in Tier 3 services) versus standard care alone in a Tier 3 service.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  3. Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Per Protocol)

    Proportion of participants with severe and complicated obesity achieving weight loss of ≥15% at 52 weeks with the use of a targeted prescribing pathway (i.e. use of LIRA 3mg according to a pre-specified protocol in combination with standard care provided in Tier 3 services) versus standard care alone in a Tier 3 service.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  4. Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Per Protocol Without Excluded Concomitant Medications)

    Proportion of participants with severe and complicated obesity achieving weight loss of ≥15% at 52 weeks with the use of a targeted prescribing pathway (i.e. use of LIRA 3mg according to a pre-specified protocol in combination with standard care provided in Tier 3 services) versus standard care alone in a Tier 3 service.

    Measured: 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes (77)
  1. Participant Attendance at Appointments (Intention to Treat)

    Attended at least 70% of scheduled Tier 3 appointments by 52 weeks

    Measured: 52 weeks

  2. Participant Attendance at Appointments (Intention to Treat)

    Attended at least 70% of scheduled Tier 3 appointments by 104 weeks

    Measured: 104 weeks

  3. Cessation of Treatment Due to Adverse Effects (Intention to Treat)

    Derived binary indicator showing whether participant stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg by 52 weeks because of adverse effects (i.e., the main reason for stopping was listed as 'adverse event' or 'unable to tolerate drug'). This number does not include people who stopped treatment due to a stopping rule or reason other than an adverse effect. Only defined for participants who were currently eligible for liraglutide 3mg treatment. Participants may have stopped treatment due to adverse effects at an earlier timepoint and so the total number of 'yes' and 'no' responses is higher than the number eligible for liraglutide 3mg at the analysis time-point, i.e. if a participant stopped at week 16 due to adverse events then they would still be included in the 'yes' response.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  4. Cessation of Treatment Due to Adverse Effects (Intention to Treat)

    Derived binary indicator showing whether participant stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg by 104 weeks because of adverse effects (i.e., the main reason for stopping was listed as 'adverse event' or 'unable to tolerate drug'). This number does not include people who stopped treatment due to a stopping rule or reason other than an adverse effect. Only defined for participants who were currently eligible for liraglutide 3mg treatment. Participants may have stopped treatment due to adverse effects at an earlier timepoint and so the total number of 'yes' and 'no' responses is higher than the number eligible for liraglutide 3mg at the analysis time-point, i.e. if a participant stopped at week 16 due to adverse events then they would still be included in the 'yes' response.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  5. Participant Compliance With Treatment (Intention to Treat)

    Derived binary indicator showing whether participant was compliant with liraglutide 3mg treatment up to 52 weeks. This was defined using the questionnaire answers as detailed in Appendix 7 of the SAP, and so includes all participants (i.e., not only those who attended the visit) up to the point when they stopped treatment or withdrew from the study.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  6. Participant Compliance With Treatment (Intention to Treat)

    Derived binary indicator showing whether participant was compliant with liraglutide 3mg treatment up to 104 weeks. This was defined using the questionnaire answers as detailed in Appendix 7 of the SAP, and so includes all participants (i.e., not only those who attended the visit) up to the point when they stopped treatment or withdrew from the study.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  7. Patient Stopping of Treatment (Intention to Treat)

    Derived binary indicator showing whether participant had stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg at 16 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason, such as an adverse event despite passing the stopping rule). Only defined for participants who were on liraglutide 3mg treatment at the previous time-point.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  8. Patient Stopping of Treatment (Intention to Treat)

    Derived binary indicator showing whether participant had stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg at 32 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason, such as an adverse event despite passing the stopping rule). Only defined for participants who were on liraglutide 3mg treatment at the previous time-point.

    Measured: 32 weeks

  9. Patient Stopping of Treatment (Intention to Treat)

    Derived binary indicator showing whether participant had stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg at 52 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason, such as an adverse event despite passing the stopping rule). Only defined for participants who were on liraglutide 3mg treatment at the previous time-point.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  10. Completion of Tier 3 Despite Liraglutide Cessation by 16 Weeks (Intention to Treat)

    Derived binary indicator showing whether participant completed 52 weeks of the Tier 3 service programme despite stopping liraglutide 3mg at 16 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason). Only defined for participants who stopped liraglutide 3mg treatment at 16 weeks.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  11. Completion of Tier 3 Despite Liraglutide Cessation by 32 Weeks (Intention to Treat)

    Derived binary indicator showing whether participant completed 52 weeks of the Tier 3 service programme despite stopping liraglutide 3mg at 32 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason). Only defined for participants who stopped liraglutide 3mg treatment at 32 weeks.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  12. Started on Anti-obesity Drugs at 52 Weeks (Intention to Treat)

    Derived binary indicator showing whether participant started on anti-obesity drugs other than liraglutide (defined as a concomitant medication listing of Orlistat) at 52 weeks.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  13. Started on Anti-obesity Drugs at 104 Weeks (Intention to Treat)

    Derived binary indicator showing whether participant started on anti-obesity drugs other than liraglutide (defined as a concomitant medication listing of Orlistat) at 104 weeks.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  14. Referral to Other Obesity Interventions (Intention to Treat)

    Number of participants referred to Tier 4 for bariatric surgery over the 104 weeks study period

    Measured: 104 weeks

  15. Referral to Other Obesity Interventions by Site (Intention to Treat)

    Referrals for bariatric surgery by 104 weeks, stratified by study site.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  16. Bariatric Surgery Completion (Intention to Treat)

    Number of participants who underwent bariatric surgery by 104 weeks.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  17. Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline, at 16 weeks.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  18. Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline, at 32 weeks.

    Measured: 32 weeks

  19. Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline, at 52 weeks.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  20. Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline, at 104 weeks.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  21. Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline, at 16 weeks.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  22. Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline, at 32 weeks.

    Measured: 32 weeks

  23. Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline, at 52 weeks.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  24. Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline, at 104 weeks.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  25. Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 16 weeks.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  26. Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 32 weeks.

    Measured: 32 weeks

  27. Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 104 weeks.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  28. Maintenance of ≥15% Weight Loss Until 104 Weeks (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants maintaining weight loss of ≥15% among those who lost ≥15% at 52 weeks

    Measured: 104 weeks

  29. Absolute Weight Change (Complete Cases)

    Absolute change in weight (kg) from baseline

    Measured: 16 weeks

  30. Absolute Weight Change (Complete Cases)

    Absolute change in weight (kg) from baseline

    Measured: 32 weeks

  31. Absolute Weight Change (Complete Cases)

    Absolute change in weight (kg) from baseline

    Measured: 52 weeks

  32. Absolute Weight Change (Complete Cases)

    Absolute change in weight (kg) from baseline

    Measured: 104 weeks

  33. Percentage Weight Change (Complete Cases)

    Percentage change in weight from baseline

    Measured: 16 weeks

  34. Percentage Weight Change (Complete Cases)

    Percentage change in weight from baseline

    Measured: 32 weeks

  35. Percentage Weight Change (Complete Cases)

    Percentage change in weight from baseline

    Measured: 52 weeks

  36. Percentage Weight Change (Complete Cases)

    Percentage change in weight from baseline

    Measured: 104 weeks

  37. Absolute BMI Change (Complete Cases)

    Absolute change in BMI (kg/m2) from baseline

    Measured: 52 weeks

  38. Absolute BMI Change (Complete Cases)

    Absolute change in BMI (kg/m2) from baseline

    Measured: 104 weeks

  39. Absolute Waist Circumference Change (Complete Cases)

    Absolute change in waist circumference (cm) from baseline

    Measured: 52 weeks

  40. Absolute Waist Circumference Change (Complete Cases)

    Absolute change in waist circumference (cm) from baseline

    Measured: 104 weeks

  41. Kings College Obesity Staging (KCOS) Score (Complete Cases)

    Kings College Obesity Staging (KCOS) score; range 0 to 3. A higher value corresponds with higher complications and worse outcomes.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  42. Kings College Obesity Staging (KCOS) Score (Complete Cases)

    Kings College Obesity Staging (KCOS) score; range 0 to 3. A higher value corresponds with higher complications and worse outcomes.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  43. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Complete Cases)

    Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score; range 0 to 27. A higher value corresponds with higher complications and worse outcomes.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  44. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Complete Cases)

    Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score; range 0 to 27. A higher value corresponds with higher complications and worse outcomes.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  45. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (Complete Cases)

    Epworth sleepiness scale, used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea; scale 0 to 24.

    A higher value corresponds with a worse outcome.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  46. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (Complete Cases)

    Epworth sleepiness scale, used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea; scale 0 to 24.

    A higher value corresponds with a worse outcome.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  47. Stop Bang Questionnaire (Complete Cases)

    Stop Bang questionnaire, used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea; scale 0 to 8.

    A higher value corresponds with a worse outcome.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  48. Stop Bang Questionnaire (Complete Cases)

    Stop Bang questionnaire, used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea; scale 0 to 8.

    A higher value corresponds with a worse outcome.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  49. Glycaemic Status (Complete Cases)

    Glycaemic status, as determined by plasma glucose concentration. The glycaemic status definition states that a participant cannot be categorised as 'diabetes remission' if they are currently using liraglutide 3mg, which means that the absence of diabetes remission cases at follow-up in the intervention group is partly by definition of glycaemic status.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  50. Glycaemic Status (Complete Cases)

    Glycaemic status, as determined by plasma glucose concentration. The glycaemic status definition states that a participant cannot be categorised as 'diabetes remission' if they are currently using liraglutide 3mg, which means that the absence of diabetes remission cases at follow-up in the intervention group is partly by definition of glycaemic status.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  51. HbA1c ≤7% for Those With Diabetes at Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants HbA1c ≤7% at 52 weeks, among those with diabetes at baseline.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  52. HbA1c ≤7% for Those With Diabetes at Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants HbA1c ≤7% at 104 weeks, among those with diabetes at baseline.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  53. HbA1c ≤6.5% for Those With Diabetes at Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants HbA1c ≤6.5% at 52 weeks, among those with diabetes at baseline.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  54. HbA1c ≤6.5% for Those With Diabetes at Baseline (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants HbA1c ≤6.5% at 104 weeks, among those with diabetes at baseline.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  55. Hypertension (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants with hypertension at 52 weeks.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  56. Hypertension (Complete Cases)

    Proportion of participants with hypertension at 104 weeks.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  57. Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Responder Population)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline at 16 weeks.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  58. Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Responder Population)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline at 32 weeks.

    Measured: 32 weeks

  59. Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Responder Population)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline at 52 weeks.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  60. Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Responder Population)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline at 104 weeks.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  61. Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Responder Population)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline at 16 weeks.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  62. Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Responder Population)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline at 32 weeks.

    Measured: 32 weeks

  63. Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Responder Population)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline at 52 weeks.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  64. Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Responder Population)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline at 104 weeks.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  65. Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Responder Population)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 16 weeks.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  66. Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Responder Population)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 32 weeks.

    Measured: 32 weeks

  67. Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Responder Population)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 52 weeks.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  68. Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Responder Population)

    Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 104 weeks.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  69. Maintenance of ≥15% Weight Loss Until 104 Weeks (Responder Population)

    Proportion of participants who maintained weight loss of ≥15% among those who lost ≥15% at 52 weeks.

    Measured: 104 weeks

  70. Percentage Weight Change (Responder Population)

    Percentage change in weight from baseline

    Measured: 16 weeks

  71. Percentage Weight Change (Responder Population)

    Percentage change in weight from baseline

    Measured: 32 weeks

  72. Percentage Weight Change (Responder Population)

    Percentage change in weight from baseline

    Measured: 52 weeks

  73. Percentage Weight Change (Responder Population)

    Percentage change in weight from baseline

    Measured: 104 weeks

  74. Absolute BMI Change (Responder Population)

    Absolute change in BMI (kg/m2) from baseline

    Measured: 52 weeks

  75. Absolute BMI Change (Responder Population)

    Absolute change in BMI (kg/m2) from baseline

    Measured: 104 weeks

  76. Absolute Waist Circumference Change (Responder Population)

    Absolute change in waist circumference (cm) from baseline

    Measured: 52 weeks

  77. Absolute Waist Circumference Change (Responder Population)

    Absolute change in waist circumference (cm) from baseline

    Measured: 104 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start28 Nov 2017
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2021
  4. Study completion25 Feb 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
392 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03036800
Sponsor's protocol ID
0626
Acronym
STRIVE
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
20 Dec 2016
Last updated
13 Aug 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Papamargaritis D, Al-Najim W, Lim JZM, Crane J, Bodicoat DH, Barber S, Lean M, McGowan B, O'Shea D, Webb DR, Wilding JPH, le Roux CW, Davies MJ. Effectiveness of integrating a pragmatic pathway for prescribing liraglutide 3.0 mg in weight management services (STRIVE study): a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Feb 9;39:100853. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100853. eCollection 2024 Apr.

    PubMed 38803628
  • Papamargaritis D, Al-Najim W, Lim J, Crane J, Lean M, le Roux C, McGowan B, O'Shea D, Webb D, Wilding J, Davies MJ. Effectiveness and cost of integrating a pragmatic pathway for prescribing liraglutide 3.0 mg in obesity services (STRIVE study): study protocol of an open-label, real-world, randomised, controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 13;10(2):e034137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034137.

    PubMed 32060156

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Saxenda and Specialist Obesity Management Services in people with Obesity and Weight Loss, run by University of Leicester at 5 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United Kingdom, Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Aug 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Complete Cases) (time frame: 52 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03036800, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Saxenda in Obesity Services (STRIVE Study) | AzTrials