AzTrials
AzTrials

Hamstring InjuryCLRTHamNCT03044106

Cranial Laser Reflex Technique for Hamstring Function

A study testing CLRT in people with Hamstring Injury and Muscle Tone Increased, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Purpose: To conduct a pilot study of the effect of Cranial Laser Reflex Technique (CLRT) compared with sham laser on hamstring muscle flexibility, strength, and pain pressure threshold. Participants: Active, young adults ages 18 to 35. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
CLRT
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
4 Mar 2017to 31 Jul 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Between 18-35 years of age
  • All genders
  • Willing to complete two study visits over 2-3 weeks
  • Able to read and communicate in English

Who cannot join

  • Current lower back condition with pain, numbness or tingling that radiates down the legs
  • Active treatment for a major medical illness, such as heart disease, uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension, malignancy, autoimmune, or immune deficiency disorder
  • History of vasculitis, intracranial mass, clotting disorder (including medication-induced, e.g., warfarin)
  • Current skin malignancy on scalp
  • Cognitive dysfunction preventing informed consent
  • Pending or currently receiving benefits from personal injury litigation, including worker's compensation
  • Chronic long-term disability related to lumbosacral injury/symptoms
  • Epilepsy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UNC- Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Effects of Cranial Laser Reflex Technique on Hamstring Flexibility, Strength, and Pain Pressure Threshold: a Pilot Study

Purpose: To conduct a pilot study of the effect of Cranial Laser Reflex Technique (CLRT) compared with sham laser on hamstring muscle flexibility, strength, and pain pressure threshold.

Participants: Active, young adults ages 18 to 35.

Procedures: A two-visit, assessor and participant-blinded crossover study with 1-week washout. Subjects will complete three functional hamstring tests before and after CLRT and sham laser treatment. Subjects will also complete questionnaires to assess their expectations and perceptions of the interventions.

Read the detailed description

First Visit: Subjects who met the inclusion criteria and gave consent completed a brief questionnaire on their activity level, history of hamstring injuries, and perceived hamstring tightness and were randomized to one of the following for the first treatment period: 1) active CLRT; or 2) sham laser.

After randomization, subjects were asked to complete the three functional hamstring tests: 90-90 Knee Extension Angle (KEA) to assess flexibility, handheld dynamometry (HHD) for strength, and pain pressure threshold (PPT).

Assessments. KEA: The 90-90 Knee Extension Angle test is a functional assessment designed to assess lower extremity flexibility and is considered the gold standard for hamstring length. The participant began in the supine position on a treatment table. The tested extremity (the right leg in each subject) was placed in a 90° hip and 90° knee position with the contralateral lower extremity placed flat on the table. A digital inclinometer was consistently placed at the level of the medial malleoli and the superior pole of the patella. The examiner maintained 90° of hip flexion. Pelvic position was monitored by palpation of the anterior superior iliac spine and lumbar spinous processes to maintain a neutral pelvic position. The examiner passively extended the knee to the point of a ''strong, but tolerable stretch," as reported by the subject. The examiner read the angle of the inclinometer and recorded the mean value of three attempts. A greater angle indicates greater degree of flexibility.

Hand held Dynamometry (HHD) is currently considered a reliable and valid measurement of peak muscle contraction. The subject began prone on the table with right leg bent to 90°. The tester placed the dynamometer (microFET2; Hoggan Health Industries, Salt Lake City, UT) at the heel of the participant and applied force to the heel, gradually increasing in 3 to 5 seconds. Participants was instructed to resist the applied force and maximally contract the hamstring muscle against the HHD device. The test ended once they are no longer able to resist the force and the leg begins to move (break point). The investigator recorded the mean value of three attempts.

Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) is a reliable, accurate and valid method for measuring muscle pain sensitivity and response to treatment. The digital algometer (FDX, Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, CT) is a hand-held muscle tester with a range of 0-100 lbf that consists of a padded disc with a diameter of 0.5" attached to a microprocessor-control unit that measures peak force (pounds or kilograms). The unit has a digital readout for peak-applied pressure and provides a built-in calibration routine that verifies a valid calibration. In order to determine PPT, the researcher applied the tip of the algometer to a tender spot in the participant's hamstrings and increased the amount of pressure until the participant verbally informed the researcher when the sensation of pressure became pain. At this point the algometer was removed and the peak force recorded. The mean of three repeated measures was reported.

Intervention: Cranial Laser Reflex Technique (CLRT) is a novel complementary and alternative (CAM) medicine intervention for musculoskeletal conditions that incorporates principles of laser acupuncture with chiropractic cranial reflexology. Subjects wore protective eyewear. The hamstring reflexes are two lines on the posterior portion of the top of the head, approximately 2 cm long and 2 cm apart, running parallel to the sagittal suture. The posterior end of the reflexes can be located by finding the vertex, or CZ point in the standardized 10-20 EEG system, and moving laterally approximately 1 cm.

The aperture of the laser probe was placed at the posterior end of the reflex (b), turned on and moved anteriorly to point (a) at a speed of approximately 2 cm/s. The laser was turned off and quickly returned to the starting point, turned on and moved again. This was repeated for a total of 30 times. The probe skimmed the surface of the scalp, moving aside as much hair as possible.

Device: The treatment device used in this study is a Class IIIB 810nm 200 milliwatts (mW) near-infrared diode laser (THOR Photomedicine Ltd, Great Britain) that is currently marketed in the US. The laser probe is FDA-cleared and classified as a non-significant risk device. The spot size is 0.0364 cm^2, and the treatment time is 30 seconds. Current best-practice recommendations for laser acupuncture recommend a dosage between 1-4 J/cm^2 per point. Since the CRP is a line of 2 cm, for the purposes of calculating dosage, it was treated as a series of 10 connected points each with a diameter of 2mm. With the scanning rate of 2cm/s, each "point" on the line received 1/10 of each pass, totaling 3s (out of 30s total) exposure time per point. The dose per point for this intervention is calculated to be approximately 1.65 J/cm^2.

There was a one-week washout and the subject will return for the second treatment period.

Primary Outcome: Hamstring flexibility (90-90 Knee Extension Angle, KEA) A clinically significant effect size is an increase of 5 degrees. The investigator recorded the mean value of three attempts. Hypothesis: CLRT will increase hamstring flexibility.

Secondary Outcomes:

  1. Hamstring Strength as assessed by Handheld Dynamometry. HHD . The investigator recorded the mean value of three attempts. Hypothesis: CLRT will have a neutral to positive effect on hamstring strength.
  2. Pain Pressure Threshold. The mean of three repeated measures was reported. An increase in PPT signifies an increase in pain tolerance. Hypothesis: CLRT will increase pain tolerance.
  3. Age, gender, activity level, perceived hamstring tightness, perceived hamstring flexibility and perceived hamstring strength were assessed at baseline and subsequent follow up visit. Results were stratified by these variables to assess interaction with treatment.

Sample Size and Power: Based on previously published results, a mean increase of 5º on the KEA (e.g., from 135º to 140º) is considered to be clinically meaningful, assuming a common standard deviation of 15º. It is also assumed that correlation between repeated measurements from the same individual will be at least 0.75 (likely a conservative assumption). Under these assumptions, enrolling 38 participants would provide at least 80% power using a two-sided test at the 0.05 level.

Being tested
CLRT
Keywords
hamstrings, flexibility, strength, pain pressure threshold, lllt, photobiomodulation, cranial reflex, cranial laser reflex technique, CLRT
Medical subject headings
Muscle Hypertonia, Myalgia, Muscle Weakness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CLRTDevice

    Also called Cranial Laser Reflex Technique

    CLRT is a novel method of laser stimulation on specific cranial reflex points that modulate muscle tone.

Study groups in NCT03044106
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CLRT, Then ShamActive comparatorSubjects performed the KEA, HHD, PPT functional tests on their right hamstring before and after the CLRT intervention.
Receives: Device: CLRT
Sham, Then CLRTSham comparatorThe Sham procedure was identical to CLRT except the laser device was placed in placebo mode: all device indicator lights and sounds will be functional but no laser light will be emitted from probe aperture.
Receives: Device: CLRT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 90-90 Knee Extension Angle Test

    Knee Extension Angle (KEA) test is a functional test designed to assess lower extremity flexibility and is considered the gold standard test for assessing hamstring length. Results will be recorded as degrees of knee flexion angle. A clinically significant effect size is an increase of 5 degrees.

    Measured: At baseline and immediately after intervention

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Handheld Dynamometry

    Handheld Dynamometry (HHD) is measures peak muscle contraction. The measurements will be recorded as kilograms (kg) and higher scores indicate higher muscle strength. The subject will be prone on the table with right leg bent to 90° and will maximally contract the hamstring muscle for 4-5 seconds against the HHD device. The investigator will record the mean value of three attempts. Higher scores indicate greater strength.

    Measured: At baseline and immediately after intervention

  2. Pain Pressure Threshold

    PPT is a reliable, accurate and valid method for measuring muscle pain sensitivity and response to treatment. In order to determine PPT, the researcher will apply the tip of the algometer to a tender spot in the participant's hamstrings and increase the amount of pressure until the participant verbally informs the researcher when the sensation of pressure became pain. At this point the algometer is removed and the peak force recorded. The mean of three repeated measures will be reported. An increase in PPT signifies an increase in pain tolerance and a decrease in pain sensitivity.

    Measured: At baseline and immediately after intervention

  3. Mean Difference Pre/Post KEA, Stratified by History of Prior Hamstring Strain

    Mean difference between active CLRT and Sham in hamstring flexibility (KEA) stratified by a history of prior hamstring injury. 8 participants reported prior injuries, 36 reported having no prior hamstring strain.

    Measured: At baseline and immediately after intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Feb 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start4 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2017
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Subjects who meet the inclusion criteria and give consent were randomized to one of the following for the first treatment period: 1) active CLRT; or 2) sham laser. At the first intervention visit, the research assistant entered the subject's assigned identification into an online computer program (selected by study biostatistician) to determine assignment to one of the two periods. The study biostatistician used computer-generated random numbers to generate the allocation sequence using random blocks of random sizes. A one-week washout period minimized carryover effects.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03044106
Sponsor's protocol ID
16-0898
Acronym
CLRTHam
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
2 Feb 2017
Last updated
12 Feb 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CLRT in people with Hamstring Injury and Muscle Tone Increased, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Jan 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

90-90 Knee Extension Angle Test (time frame: At baseline and immediately after intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in