AzTrials
AzTrials

Scarring AlopeciaNCT03044782

Barriers to Care and QOL for CCCA Patients

An observational study of Scarring Alopecia and Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the current project is twofold; first to determine what personal, historical, logistical, and environmental factors preclude women from obtaining medical care for CCCA hair loss. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
53-Item Survey
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2016to Sep 2017
How long will I take part?
1 Year
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Women diagnosed with CCCA who have been seen at Northwestern Dermatology between 10/1/15 and 9/30/17.

Who may be able to join

  • Evaluated in the Northwestern Dermatology Department between October 1, 2015 and September 30, 2017.
  • Evaluated by any faculty physician.
  • Diagnosed with CCCA.
  • Age 18 or older.
  • All subjects must have given signed informed consent prior to participation in study.

Who cannot join

  • Non-English speakers (interpreters not available)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Northwestern University Department of Dermatology

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Barriers to Healthcare and Quality of Life for Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia Patients

The purpose of the current project is twofold; first to determine what personal, historical, logistical, and environmental factors preclude women from obtaining medical care for CCCA hair loss. Because damage from CCCA is irreversible, early identification and treatment is paramount to limiting the negative ramifications of the disease. Second, to investigate how CCCA hair loss, a common occurrence in the Black population, can be a significant psychological impediment to lives of affected Black women. Based on previous research on the psychosocial impact of generalized hair loss in Black women, it is fair to consider that CCCA hair loss also leads to problems with self-esteem and participation in daily life activities. This research, the first of its kind, will add to existing knowledge of CCCA by investigating the quality of life and barriers to care of patients with this condition. The goal of this study is to illuminate what stands in the way of secondary and tertiary prevention of CCCA patients and tailor treatment strategies to address their needs. The results of this study will be instrumental in modifying dermatology resident training, adding to existing dermatology management guidelines, and even developing public health advocacy programming.

Being tested
53-Item Survey
Medical subject headings
Alopecia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 53-Item SurveyOther

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quantified Barriers to Care Survey Responses

    Measured: Duration of study-approximately 2 years

  2. Quantified Quality of Life Survey Responses

    Measured: Duration of study-approximately 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Feb 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2016
  3. Primary completionSep 2017
  4. Study completionSep 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
Target duration
1 Year
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03044782
Sponsor's protocol ID
SP070316
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
16 Dec 2016
Last updated
13 Dec 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Dlova NC, Forder M. Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia: possible familial aetiology in two African families from South Africa. Int J Dermatol. 2012 Nov;51 Suppl 1:17-20, 20-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05557.x. No abstract available. English, French.

    PubMed 23210944
  • Gathers RC, Jankowski M, Eide M, Lim HW. Hair grooming practices and central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Apr;60(4):574-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.10.064.

    PubMed 19293007
  • Gathers RC, Mahan MG. African american women, hair care, and health barriers. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2014 Sep;7(9):26-9.

    PubMed 25276273
  • Halder RM, Grimes PE, McLaurin CI, Kress MA, Kenney JA Jr. Incidence of common dermatoses in a predominantly black dermatologic practice. Cutis. 1983 Oct;32(4):388, 390.

    PubMed 6226496
  • Mkentane K, Maneli M, Khumalo NP, Davids LM, Freedom G. Relaxers damage hair and increase fragility. Int J Dermatol. 2014 Mar;53(3):e200-2. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12283. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24571594
  • Summers P, Kyei A, Bergfeld W. Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia - an approach to diagnosis and management. Int J Dermatol. 2011 Dec;50(12):1457-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.05098.x.

    PubMed 22097988
  • Kyei A, Bergfeld WF, Piliang M, Summers P. Medical and environmental risk factors for the development of central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia: a population study. Arch Dermatol. 2011 Aug;147(8):909-14. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.66. Epub 2011 Apr 11.

    PubMed 21482861
  • LoPresti P, Papa CM, Kligman AM. Hot comb alopecia. Arch Dermatol. 1968 Sep;98(3):234-8. No abstract available.

    PubMed 5673883
  • Ogunleye TA, McMichael A, Olsen EA. Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia: what has been achieved, current clues for future research. Dermatol Clin. 2014 Apr;32(2):173-81. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

    PubMed 24680004
  • McMichael AJ. Ethnic hair update: past and present. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S127-33. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2003.278.

    PubMed 12789165
  • Sperling LC, Cowper SE. The histopathology of primary cicatricial alopecia. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2006 Mar;25(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.sder.2006.01.006.

    PubMed 16616302
  • Sperling LC, Sau P. The follicular degeneration syndrome in black patients. 'Hot comb alopecia' revisited and revised. Arch Dermatol. 1992 Jan;128(1):68-74.

    PubMed 1739290
  • Sperling LC, Solomon AR, Whiting DA. A new look at scarring alopecia. Arch Dermatol. 2000 Feb;136(2):235-42. doi: 10.1001/archderm.136.2.235. No abstract available.

    PubMed 10677100
  • Mukherjee N, Morrell DS, Duvic M, Stewart PW, Goldsmith LA. Attitudes of dermatologists in the southeastern United States regarding treatment of alopecia areata: a cross-sectional survey study. BMC Dermatol. 2009 Nov 12;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-5945-9-11.

    PubMed 19909522

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Scarring Alopecia and Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quantified Barriers to Care Survey Responses (time frame: Duration of study-approximately 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03044782, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in