AzTrials
AzTrials

Induction of LaborDoubleCRIBNCT03045939

Cervical Ripening With the Double Balloon Device for 6 Hours Compared With 12 Hours

A study testing cervical ripening device in people with Induction of Labor and Unfavorable Cervix, run by Bnai Zion Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate the insertion of double balloon device (DBD) for cervical ripening for 12 h vs 6 hours. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Induction of Labor, Unfavorable Cervix
What is being tested?
cervical ripening device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
1 Mar 2017to 1 Mar 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Parous patients 18 years of age or older.
  • Diagnosed to be parous pregnant women with an indication for induction of labour.
  • Having a Bishop score of 5 or less.
  • Diagnosed as having a singleton pregnancy in a vertex presentation, with intact membranes, and no significant regular uterine contraction at gestational age of 37 completed gestational weeks or more.
  • Willingness to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study.
  • Have signed the informed consent.
  • -

Who cannot join

  • A non -vertex presentation
  • Placenta previa
  • Ruptured membranes
  • Documented labour
  • Foetal distress necessitating immediate intervention
  • Proven malignancy of the cervix
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Active inflammatory or purulent condition of the lower genital tract
  • Twin pregnancy
  • Any other contraindication for vaginal delivery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Inna Bleicher, Dr contact

+972506268345

innakreinin@gmail.com

Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Bnai Zion Mc

    Haifa

    INNA BLEICHER, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: Cervical Ripening With the Double Balloon Device for 6 Hours Compared With 12 Hours. A Randomized Multicenter Controlled Trial

This study will evaluate the insertion of double balloon device (DBD) for cervical ripening for 12 h vs 6 hours.

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled study is designed to:

  1. To assess and compare the Bishop score when removing the DBD 12 hours' vs 6hours' after insertion.
  2. To compare the efficacy (vaginal delivery rate and time to VD) in the two arm groups

200 women are expected to be randomized in to two arms. One will be randomized to DBD removal after 12 hours and the other to DBD removal after 6 hours.

Each patient will sign an informed consent.

The following screening will be completed: medical and gynecological history, general physical and gynecological examination, ultrasonography to exclude contraindication to vaginal delivery or insertion if the DBD and non stress test (NST) for baseline. Bishop score will be assessed.

After confirming eligibility for study, randomization into the following groups will take place.

Insertion of the DBD and removal 6 hours following its insertion. Insertion of the DBD and removal 12 hours following its insertion.

Being tested
cervical ripening device
Keywords
cervical ripening, labor induction, double balloon device, cervical ripening device, unfavorable cervix

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • cervical ripening deviceDevice

    Also called atad double balloon device

    insertion of the double balloon device for 12 hours (standard care) vs 6 hours, following oxytocin IV infusion according local protocol guidelines as mentioned above

Study groups in NCT03045939
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
12 hoursOtherThis arm is the standard management that includes insertion of the DBD into the cervical canal according to manufacture guidelines, removal after 12 hours followed by artificial rupture of membranes and oxytocin infusion according to departments protocol. (a total of 10 units of oxytocin is infused, initiated with 10 cc/h, increased by 10cc every 20-30 min until 3-5 contractions are present, total of not more than 120 cc\h)
Receives: Device: cervical ripening device
6 hoursActive comparatorRemoval of the DBD after 6 hours, followed by artificial rupture of membranes and oxytocin infusion according to departments protocol. (a total of 10 units of oxytocin is infused, initiated with 10 cc/h, increased by 10cc every 20-30 min until 3-5 contractions are present, total of not more than 120 cc\h)
Receives: Device: cervical ripening device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. time from insertion of the DBD to delivery

    the time from insertion of the DBD until delivery will be assessed for each patient from each arm by hours/minutes

    Measured: minutes or hours from insertion to delivery, assessed up to an estimated total of 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. rate of vaginal delivery

    calculation of the rate of vaginal delivery in each arm will be calculated by number of Vaginal deliveries in each arm and the percentage.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. maternal and neonatal adverse events

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Feb 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2019
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03045939
Sponsor's protocol ID
BNZ-0115-16
Acronym
DoubleCRIB
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
24 Jan 2017
Last updated
5 Mar 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Sammour R, Dikopoltsev E, Sagi S, Vitner D, Bleicher I. Cervical ripening with a double balloon device for 6 h in patients with a long cervix: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Mar;168(3):1055-1059. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15955. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

    PubMed 39445570
  • Bleicher I, Dikopoltsev E, Kadour-Ferro E, Sammour R, Gonen R, Sagi S, Eshel A, Nussam L, Vitner D. Double-Balloon Device for 6 Compared With 12 Hours for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;135(5):1153-1160. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003804.

    PubMed 32282603

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing cervical ripening device in people with Induction of Labor and Unfavorable Cervix, run by Bnai Zion Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Inna Bleicher, Dr (+972506268345, innakreinin@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

time from insertion of the DBD to delivery (time frame: minutes or hours from insertion to delivery, assessed up to an estimated total of 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03045939, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in