AzTrials
AzTrials

Dietary ModificationNCT03066856

Dietary Intervention and BRCA Penetrance

A study testing Dietary intervention in people with Dietary Modification and BRCA1 Mutation, run by Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and other markers of insulin resistance (IRm) might modulate the penetrance of BRCA genes mutation. The investigators have designed a demonstration project with BRCA mutation carriers (with or without a previous diagnosis of breast cancer) to test: 1. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Dietary intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
502 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Dec 2015to 31 Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Eligible study subjects are women, aged 18-70, either unaffected or affected with BC, without metastases or previous ovarian cancer, who underwent genetic counselling and fulfilled high-risk selection criteria for genetic testing based on personal and/or family history and resulted carriers of deleterious BRCA mutations.

Who cannot join

  • Unaffected BRCA mutation carriers with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy are not included in the cohort or are censored at the time of surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori

    Milan

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Lifestyle and the Penetrance of BRCA Mutation

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and other markers of insulin resistance (IRm) might modulate the penetrance of BRCA genes mutation.

The investigators have designed a demonstration project with BRCA mutation carriers (with or without a previous diagnosis of breast cancer) to test:

Read more
  1. whether a lifestyle intervention significantly reduceIGF-I and the other IRm (randomized trial).
  2. whether mutation carriers with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer have higher IRm than carriers without breast cancer (case-controlstudy).
  3. whether IRm and their change over time affect subsequent breast cancer incidence and prognosis (cohort follow-up).

The investigators expect to significantly reduce IGF-I and IRm, to find that BRCA mutation carriers with a previous breast cancer have higher IRm levels, and, in the long term, that women with persistent higher IRm levels have higher penetrance and worst prognosis.

Confirming a significant reduction of IRm and the impact of their levels on prognosis would help to develop primary prevention recommendations for high risk families.

Read the detailed description

Abdominal obesity and high body weight are associated with a greater risk of breast cancer (BC) in women belonging to high risk families than in women without family history of BC. A case-control study showed that high energy intake, usually associated with higher bio-availability of growth factors, is associated with BC risk in BRCA mutation carriers. A multinational case-only study on 3000 young BC women suggested that patients with BRCA mutation had higher consumption of milk. Milk directly stimulates insulin production and release, and is associated with higher plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I).

In a case-control analysis on 308 high genetic risk women, investigators showed that high serum levels of IGF-I are associated with a significantly increased penetrance.

Consistently, mechanistic studies hypothesized a functional interaction between the BRCA genes and the IGF-I system.

The lifetime cumulative risk (penetrance) of BC associated with BRCA mutations is of the order of 50%, and a sizeable proportion of mutation carriers does not develop the disease. Therefore, the penetrance of the genetic trait may be regulated trough other genetic or environmental factors, including dietary, metabolic, and growth factors. The investigators hypothesized that markers of insulin resistance (IRm), such as plasma level of glucose, insulin, IGF-I and the presence of metabolic syndrome, which affect risk and prognosis of sporadic BC, are relevant also for hereditary BC.

The investigators have designed a demonstration project with BRCA mutation carriers (with or without a previous diagnosis of BC) to test:

  1. whether a lifestyle intervention significantly reduce IRm (randomized trial).
  2. whether mutation carriers with a previous diagnosis of BC have higher IRm than carriers without BC (case-control study).
  3. whether IRm and their change over time affect subsequent BC incidence and prognosis (cohort follow-up).

In a pilot phase the investigators have randomized 150 BRCA mutated women to a dietary intervention and a control group for a short term (6 months) trial to test the reduction of IRm levels. In the present study the investigators to recruit 600 BRCA mutation carriers to test if blood levels of IRm and their change over time influence the risk of BC and of BC relapse. All participants will receive the WCRF Decalogue for the prevention of cancer. Participants will be then randomized in an active lifestyle intervention group (6 full days of life-style intervention activities along the subsequent 6 months) and in a control group that will remain with the baseline recommendation. After 6 months also the control group will be invited to an active intervention.

The investigators expect to significantly reduce IRm, to find that BRCA mutation carriers with a previous BC have higher IRm levels, and, in the long term, that women with persistent higher IRm levels have higher penetrance and worst prognosis.

Keywords
BRCA genes, Mutation carriers, IGF-I, Diet
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dietary interventionOther

    The main aim of the trial is to reduce serum levels of IGF-I and IRm with a a low- calorie and low-protein diet. In humans, calorie restriction alone does not seem to significantly lower IGF-I; protein restriction is also required. In detail, recommendations for participants included in the intervention arm include:

    • reducing protein intake, mainly milk and animal protein (except fish), down to 10-12% of total calorie intake.
    • reducing high glycemic index food and high insulinemic foods.
    • reducing sources of saturated fat (red and processed meat, milk and dairy products).
    • eating mostly food of plant origin, with a wide variety of seasonal products.
Study groups in NCT03066856
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalAfter baseline examinations, participants are randomized to an active dietary intervention group.The intervention group is invited to attend six full days of life-style intervention activities over the next six months. These activities include six cookery courses followed by lunch, six physical activity sessions (walking for 45 minutes) and six conferences. The intervention and control groups both complete questionnaires on adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MEDAS) at baseline and at the end of the study, and are asked for at least two 24-hour recalls of the previous day's food intake, and details of their physical exercise during the six-month intervention.
Receives: Other: Dietary intervention
ControlNo interventionAll participants receive general recommendations for the dietary prevention of cancer. After baseline examinations, women randomized in the control group carry on following the baseline recommendations.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reduction of serum levels of IGF-I (ng/mL) (intervention trial).

    Final analyses will be performed by intention to treat. By assuming that:

    1. the planned lifestyle interventions may reduce IGF-I levels by 10%, b) alpha error = 0.05, the investigators shall have 96% power to compare 300 women included in the intervention group versus 300 in the control group.

    Measured: 6 months of dietary intervention

  2. Case-control analysis: comparison of the affected versus the unaffected BRCA mutation carriers for the baseline IRm levels baseline serum levels of IGF-I and IRm.

    By classifying the exposure status according to the IGF-I median level and by assuming that :

    1. the probability of exposure among controls is 50 %,
    2. a case/control ratio of 2/1 (as in a pilot study): 400 women with a previous diagnosis of BC and 200 unaffected,
    3. the true odds ratio for BC in exposed versus unexposed subjects ranging between 1.5 to 2 (the lower confidence interval of a pilot study), the investigators will be able to reject the null hypothesis ( that this odds ratio equals 1) with a power ranging from 64% to 97% at the alpha level of 0.05.

    Measured: 3 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Survival analysis: evaluation of the association between IGF-I and IGF-I changes and subsequent BC incidence and BC prognosis (BC incidence for unaffected women and ipsilateral or contralateral BC and BC recurrences for affected women).

    This secondary aim requires the follow-up of the BRCA mutation carriers cohort. By assuming : a) equal number of exposed (IGF-I level>median) and unexposed subjects of 300, b) 85% probability of event-free after 48 months of follow-up c) the true hazard ratio of exposed subjects relative to unexposed subjects ranging between 1.5 to 2, the investigators will be able to reject the null hypothesis that exposed and unexposed survival curves are equal with a power ranging from 41% to 78% at the alpha level of 0.05. Further follow-up will increase the power.

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Mar 2017
  2. Study start1 Dec 2015
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2018
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
BRCA mutation carriers, with or without breast cancer, aged 18-70 years and without metastases are eligible. After the baseline examinations, women are randomized to an active dietary intervention or to a control group. The intervention group should attend six full days of activities over the next six months.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
502 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03066856
Sponsor's protocol ID
106/13
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
20 Feb 2017
Last updated
4 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data are not available to other researchers. The data software is blinded and protected.

Publications

  • Bruno E, Oliverio A, Paradiso A, Daniele A, Tommasi S, Terribile DA, Filippone A, Digennaro M, Pilato B, Danza K, Guarino D, Rossi C, Rossi MM, Venturelli E, Giussani M, Peissel B, Pasanisi P. Lifestyle Characteristics in Women Carriers of BRCA Mutations: Results From an Italian Trial Cohort. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021 Jun;21(3):e168-e176. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

    PubMed 33357965

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dietary intervention in people with Dietary Modification and BRCA1 Mutation, run by Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reduction of serum levels of IGF-I (ng/mL) (intervention trial). (time frame: 6 months of dietary intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03066856, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in