AzTrials
AzTrials

MonitoringSINATRANCT03074487

Evaluating Monitoring Techniques for Postoperative Spinal Cord Ischemia

An observational study of Monitoring and Postoperative, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

During open surgery of a thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysma (TAAA), diminished blood flow to the myelum can result in hypoxia, compromising proper function of the spinal cord. Intraoperatively, motor evoked potentials (MEP) are elicited to measure the functional integrity of the spinal cord. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Monitoring, Postoperative, Spinal Cord Ischemia
What is being tested?
Near-infrared spectroscopy and Long loop reflex measurements
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
Jan 2017to Apr 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients undergoing a thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair by either open surgical or endovascular procedures are eligible for inclusion. The study population will include patients undergoing TAAA repair in Maastricht (Netherlands), Aachen (Germany) and Bern, (Switzerland).

Who may be able to join

  • Thoraco-abdominal aneurysm (TAA) of the descending aorta: Crawford type I,II, III, IV or V
  • Repair using open surgical or endovascular procedure.
  • Undergoing monitoring by motor evoked potentials (MEP) as part of the standard surgical procedure.

Who cannot join

  • Aneurysm only in ascending part of the aorta
  • Standard contraindications for motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring.
  • Standard contraindications for electrode placement (skin wounds, etc.)
  • No informed consent can be obtained prior to the procedure

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • MaastrichtUMC

    Maastricht, Limburg

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Exploratory Study Regarding the Use of Neurophysiological Monitoring Techniques to Detect Spinal Cord Ischemia in Patients After Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

During open surgery of a thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysma (TAAA), diminished blood flow to the myelum can result in hypoxia, compromising proper function of the spinal cord.

Intraoperatively, motor evoked potentials (MEP) are elicited to measure the functional integrity of the spinal cord. MEPs have proven to be a reliable marker of spinal cord ischemia. Moreover, these potentials react within minutes, which facilitates interventions to restore the blood flow. Monitoring intraoperatively with this ancillary test has reduced the rate of paraparesis to < 5%. Unfortunately, in the early postoperative period, spinal cord vulnerability is high. Therefore, some patients develop paraparesis, not during the surgical procedure, but after the surgical procedure. Postoperatively, suboptimal blood flow may lead to critical loss of function. This inadequate perfusion results in "delayed paraparesis". In the postoperative patient, it is not possible to measure MEPs when sedation is decreased, due to the high intensity of the electrical stimulus, which is unacceptably painful in the unanesthetized or partially anesthetized patient. Therefore ancillary tests are needed which can detect spinal cord ischemia postoperatively early, thus preceding the phase with clinically overt paraparesis. The test should be reliable and easy to perform for an extended period of time (up to several days).

Read more

The purpose of this study is to explore the usefulness of various neurophysiological tests regarding accuracy and feasibility for the detection of spinal cord ischemia. In particular, to find a diagnostic test which is acceptable for the unanesthetized or partially anesthetized patient and therefore can also be performed postoperatively. These tests will be examined in fully sedated as well as partially sedated patients.

The following candidate tests will be examined:

  1. Long loop reflexes (LLR) consisting of F-waves.
  2. Oxygenation measurements of the paraspinal muscles using Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).
Being tested
Near-infrared spectroscopy, Long loop reflex measurements
Keywords
Spinal cord ischemia, Postoperative, Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm, Monitoring
Medical subject headings
Spinal Cord Ischemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Near-infrared spectroscopyDevice

    Also called NIRS

  • Long loop reflex measurementsDevice

    Also called F-waves

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. changes in MEP signals perioperative

    These signals will be recoded into categorical variables. To determine associations logistic regression analysis will be performed (univariate and multivariate adjusting for confounders). Screening test calculations (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, false-positive and false-negative rates) will be performed using standard contingency table methods. Agreement between the methods (vs MEP) will be estimated using the Cohen k statistic. The results will first be evaluated descriptively to fine-tune the cut-off values in de the definitive protocol.

    Measured: 8 hours

  2. Presence of LLR (F-waves) perioperative

    These signals will be recoded into categorical variables. To determine associations logistic regression analysis will be performed (univariate and multivariate adjusting for confounders). Screening test calculations (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, false-positive and false-negative rates) will be performed using standard contingency table methods. Agreement between the methods (vs MEP) will be estimated using the Cohen k statistic. The results will first be evaluated descriptively to fine-tune the cut-off values in de the definitive protocol.

    Measured: 8 hours

  3. Oxygenation of the paraspinal muscle tissue measured by NIRS perioperative

    These signals will be recoded into categorical variables. To determine associations logistic regression analysis will be performed (univariate and multivariate adjusting for confounders). Screening test calculations (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, false-positive and false-negative rates) will be performed using standard contingency table methods. Agreement between the methods (vs MEP) will be estimated using the Cohen k statistic. The results will first be evaluated descriptively to fine-tune the cut-off values in de the definitive protocol.

    Measured: 8 hours

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. The occurrence of intra- and postoperative changes in LLR (F-waves)

    These signals will be recoded into categorical variables. To determine associations logistic regression analysis will be performed (univariate and multivariate adjusting for confounders). Screening test calculations (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, false-positive and false-negative rates) will be performed using standard contingency table methods. The results will first be evaluated descriptively to fine-tune the cut-off values in de the definitive protocol.

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. The occurrence intra- and postoperative changesNIRS of the paraspinal muscle tissue

    These signals will be recoded into categorical variables. To determine associations logistic regression analysis will be performed (univariate and multivariate adjusting for confounders). Screening test calculations (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, false-positive and false-negative rates) will be performed using standard contingency table methods. The results will first be evaluated descriptively to fine-tune the cut-off values in de the definitive protocol.

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2017
  2. Study startJan 2017
  3. Primary completionMar 2025
  4. Study completionApr 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03074487
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL58137.068.16
Acronym
SINATRA
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
21 Feb 2017
Last updated
1 Oct 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Jacobs MJ, Mess W, Mochtar B, Nijenhuis RJ, Statius van Eps RG, Schurink GW. The value of motor evoked potentials in reducing paraplegia during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.09.042.

    PubMed 16476594
  • Greiner A, Mess WH, Schmidli J, Debus ES, Grommes J, Dick F, Jacobs MJ. Cyber medicine enables remote neuromonitoring during aortic surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2012 May;55(5):1227-32; discussion 1232-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.121. Epub 2012 Feb 15.

    PubMed 22341581
  • Armstrong KL, Wood D. Can infant death from child abuse be prevented? Med J Aust. 1992 Feb 17;156(4):290. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1992.tb139757.x. No abstract available.

    PubMed 1738333
  • Etz CD, Di Luozzo G, Zoli S, Lazala R, Plestis KA, Bodian CA, Griepp RB. Direct spinal cord perfusion pressure monitoring in extensive distal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jun;87(6):1764-73; discussion 1773-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.101.

    PubMed 19463592
  • Jacobs MJ, Mess WH. The role of evoked potential monitoring in operative management of type I and type II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Oct;15(4):353-64. doi: 10.1053/s1043-0679(03)00084-4.

    PubMed 14710377
  • Etz CD, von Aspern K, Gudehus S, Luehr M, Girrbach FF, Ender J, Borger M, Mohr FW. Near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring of the collateral network prior to, during, and after thoracoabdominal aortic repair: a pilot study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;46(6):651-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

    PubMed 24099957
  • Moerman A, Van Herzeele I, Vanpeteghem C, Vermassen F, Francois K, Wouters P. Near-infrared spectroscopy for monitoring spinal cord ischemia during hybrid thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2011 Feb;18(1):91-5. doi: 10.1583/10-3224.1.

    PubMed 21314355
  • Boezeman RP, van Dongen EP, Morshuis WJ, Sonker U, Boezeman EH, Waanders FG, de Vries JP. Spinal near-infrared spectroscopy measurements during and after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a pilot study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;99(4):1267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.10.032. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

    PubMed 25596871

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Monitoring and Postoperative, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

changes in MEP signals perioperative (time frame: 8 hours). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03074487, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in