Bladder Pain SyndromePhase 2NCT03076762
Comparative Study Suburothelial and Trigonal Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis
A Phase 2 study testing intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection in people with Bladder Pain Syndrome, run by Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
There is no consensus of the therapeutic efficacy and safety between suburothelial injection and trigonal injection of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) in treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) It is unmet to clarify which injection method is superior in clinical efficacy and patient safety. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bladder Pain Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- Mar 2015to Aug 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients have been diagnosed as IC/BPS based on characteristic symptoms and cystoscopic findings of glomerulations, petechia, or mucosal fissures after hydrodistention
- Patients have been treated with at least two types of treatment modalities including non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, oral PPS, intravesical instillation of heparin, hyaluronic acid, or tricyclic antidepressant for at least 6 months but the symptoms remained unchanged or relapsed.
- Patients who have bladder pain VAS of 3 or greater
Who cannot join
- Patients conditions not meeting the inclusion criteria of NIDDK
- Patients with Hunner's ulcer
- Patients with active urinary tract infection
- Patients who cannot keep a 3-day voiding diary prior to treatment
- Patients who do not sign informed consent form
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital
Hualien City, 970
Hann-Chorng Kuo, M.D., 886-3-8561825 ext. 2113, hck@tzuchi.com.tw
Tang, Miss, 886-3-8561825 ext. 2117, don_lin86@yahoo.com.tw
About this study
Official title: Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety Between Suburothelial and Trigonal Intravesical Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis Refractory to Conventional Treatment - A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial
There is no consensus of the therapeutic efficacy and safety between suburothelial injection and trigonal injection of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) in treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) It is unmet to clarify which injection method is superior in clinical efficacy and patient safety. This study was designed in a randomized, double-blind trial to test the therapeutic effects and adverse events between intravesical BoNTA injection into suburothelium and trigone. The results of this study might provide clinical evidence for a better therapeutic regimen of BoNT-A in the treatment of IC/PBS.
Read the detailed description
Introduction Interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS) is a debilitating chronic disease of unknown etiology characterized by urgency frequency and suprapubic pain at full bladder. Current treatments are usually unsuccessful in completely eradicating bladder pain and increasing bladder capacity. Intravesical resiniferatoxin once was considered to be effective but this has not been shown in a large scale multiple center trial. Several oral medication such as pentosanpolysulphate (PPS), amitryptynine, cyclosporin have been tried but the therapeutic efficacy have been proven ineffective. Intravesical treatment with heparin, hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulphate, bacillus Calmette-Guerin, dimethylsulphoxide, resiniferatoxin, or botulinum toxin A has been shown early effectiveness in some patients. However, the placebo effect should be weighed and randomized, double-blind trials should be undertaken to demonstrate the actual therapeutic effects of these therapeutic modalities.
Although botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) has been widely reported in its efficacy in the treatment of neurogenic and idiopathic detrusor overactivity (DO) with satisfactory results, there have only been few studies using BoNT-A in treatment of IC/PBS. In recent basic researches, BoNT-A has been shown to inhibit not only the release of acetylcholine and norepinephrine, but also that of nerve growth factor, adenosine triphosphate, substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide from the nerve fibers and urothelium. In clinical experiments, BoNT-A has been shown to reduce DO, impaired bladder sensation, and decrease visceral pain in chronic inflammatory diseases. These results suggest that BoNT-A treatment can modulate sensory transmission as well as reduce detrusor contractility. Although BoNT-A injection seems promising in treating symptoms of IC/PBS, long term results did not provide successful outcome. The limited successful result is possibly due to inadequate distribution of BoNT-A delivered to the bladder wall, inadequate dose of toxin, or lacking of some promoting factors to enhance the therapeutic effect of BoNT-A. Repeated intravesical BoNT-A injections was recently performed in refractory IC/PBS and the therapeutic effects seems promising. About 70% of the patients with non-ulcer type IC/PBS may benefit from repeated BoNT-A injections every 6 months. Immunohistochemistry study also confirmed the reduction of inflammatory biomarkers and pro-apoptotic proteins such as Bax and Bad expressions after repeated BoNT-A injections.
Concerning the injection sites of BoNT-A for IC/BPS bladders, there is no consensus. Suburothelial injection and Trigonal injection have all been used in treatment of IC/BPS and the short-term and long-term results are equivalent. It is unmet to clarify which injection method is superior in clinical efficacy and patient safety. This study was designed in a randomized, double-blind trial to test the therapeutic effects and adverse events between intravesical BoNTA injection into suburothelium and trigone. The results of this study might provide clinical evidence for a better therapeutic regimen of BoNT-A in the treatment of IC/PBS.
Materials and Methods
A total of 60 patients with IC/PBS who have failed previous treatments for at least 6 months will be enrolled in this study. A diagnosis of IC/PBS has been established based on characteristic symptoms and cystoscopic findings of glomerulations, petechia, or mucosal fissures after hydrodistention. All patients have been treated with at least two types of treatment modalities including non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, oral PPS, intravesical instillation of heparin, hyaluronic acid, or tricyclic antidepressant for at least 6 months but the symptoms remained unchanged or relapsed. They will be investigated thoroughly on enrollment and will be excluded if not meeting the inclusion criteria of NIDDK. However, in this study the patients with Hunner's ulcer will not be included because previous study has shown that ulcer type IC/BPS does not respond to intravesical BoNT-A injection.
Patients will be requested to keep a 3-day voiding diary prior to treatment to record the functional bladder capacity (FBC) and the number of urinary frequency and nocturnal. The IC symptoms will be assessed by the O'Leary-Sant symptom and problem indexes. The pain score will be reported by patient self-assessment using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) system. Videourodynamic study and potassium chloride (KCl) sensitivity test will be routinely performed and patients will be informed of the possible complications associated with BoNT-A injection such as generalized muscle weakness, difficult urination, transient urinary retention, or urinary tract infections.
Videourodynamic study will be performed by standard procedures using a 6 Fr dual channel catheter and an 8 Fr rectal balloon catheter. Cystometric study will be performed with normal saline at a filling rate of 20 ml/min. All descriptions and terminology in this report are in accordance with the recommendations of the International Continence Society. After the videourodynamic study, 40ml KCl solution of 0.4M will be infused slowly into the bladder and the test will be regarded as positive when painful (of ≧2 VAS score) or urgency sensation (urgency severity score increased by ≧1) is elicited compared to normal saline infusion during urodynamic study.
This study will be performed in Hualien Tzu chi General.The study should be approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and ethics committee of the university and will be registered in ClinicalTrial.gov. Each patient will be informed about the study rationale and procedures, and written, informed consent will be obtained before treatment.
Eligible patients will be admitted for the treatment. They will be randomly assigned to receive intravesical injection of 100U of BoNT-A (BOTOX, Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA) into the trigone (the treatment group) or suburothelium (the comparative group) immediately followed by cystoscopic hydrodistention under intravenous general anesthesia in the operation room. Blood (10ml) and urine samples (30ml) will be collected before intravesical injection and after bladder hydrodistention. Bladder wall biopsies will also be performed after hydrodistention. The patients will be allocated to treatment or control group by the permuted block randomization code which is centrally controlled by a clinical pharmacist who prepares the solution for injection. The intravesical injection was performed by a urology attending doctor without recording the injection mode in the medical chart. The principle investigator, patients, and study nurse did not know the injection mode to the patients' bladder to keep the study in a double-blind condition.
Each vial of BoNT-A will be diluted with 10 ml of normal saline, resulting in 10U BoNT-A per 1.0 ml. Patients assigned for suburothelial BoNT-A injections received 20 injections in the bladder body whereas those assigned trigonal injections will receive 10 sites injections at the trigonal area (5 injections behind interureteric ridge and 5 inside the trigone). The injection needle will be inserted about 1mm into the urothelium at the bladder wall, using a 23 gauge needle and rigid cystoscopic injection instrument (22 Fr, Richard Wolf, and Knittlingen, Germany). Cystoscopic hydrodistention will be performed to an intravesical pressure of 80 cm water for 15 minutes and the maximal bladder capacity (MBC) under hydrodistention will be recorded. Bladder biopsies will be taken at the four sites about 2cm lateral and posterior to the ureteral orifice after hydrodistention.
After the BoNT-A injections, a 14 Fr urethral Foley catheter will be indwelled for one night and patients will be discharged on the next day. Oral antibiotics will be prescribed for 7 days. Patients will be followed up in the outpatient clinic 2 weeks and 4 weeks later. Then the patients will be followed up at out-patient clinic at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks.
Data from the 3-day voiding diary and symptom inventory using the O'Leary-Sant symptom score, as well as information on FBC, daily urinary frequency, nocturia, and pain VAS will be recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. The largest voided volume in the 3-day voiding diary will be considered as a measure of FBC. At 8-week follow-up after the intravesical injection patients will be questioned of the current bladder condition and a urodynamics study with KCl test will be performed.
The urodynamic study will be performed at baseline and 12 weeks after intravesical treatment. The urodynamic parameters include first sensation of bladder filling (FSF), urge sensation (US), cystometric bladder capacity (CBC), detrusor pressure (Pdet), maximum flow rate (Qmax) during voiding and postvoid residual (PVR). KCl test will also be performed.
The primary end-point of this study is the reduction of bladder pain at 8-week follow-up. If patient has a reduction of VAS pain score of 2 or more, they will be considered as successfully treated. The treatment outcome will also be assessed by the global response assessment (GRA) to evaluate the overall perception of treatment result. The result will be considered as excellent when patients report improvement in the GRA by >2 or patients become free of bladder pain (VAS=0). The outcome will be considered improved if there is improvement in the GRA by =1. Patients with excellent and improved results will be considered as having subjectively successful result.
The results of voiding diary, urodynamic study, IC symptom score and pain VAS will be compared between baseline and 8-week end-point. Long-term successful results will be assessed by self-reported improved GRA and pain VAS at 6 months and further. Data will be compared between treatment and placebo groups. A p-value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
If patients still feel bladder pain and unsuccessful results at the end-point, repeated BoNT-A injection will be given at 3 months in the same procedure. At the same time, bladder biopsy, urine and blood samples will also be collected for further study. . If patient does not want to receive repeat BoNT-A injection, intravesical hyaluronic acid instillations will be proceeded.
- Conditions
- Bladder Pain Syndrome
- Being tested
- intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection
- Keywords
- interstitial cystitis, pain, intravesical injection, therapy, bladder
- Medical subject headings
- Cystitis, Interstitial, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injectionDrug
Also called BOTOX
Each vial of onabotulinumtoxinA will be diluted with 10 ml of normal saline, resulting in 10U onabotulinumtoxinA per 1.0 ml. Patients assigned for suburothelial BoNT-A injections received 20 injections in the bladder body whereas those assigned trigonal injections will receive 10 sites injections at the trigonal area (5 injections behind interureteric ridge and 5 inside the trigone).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intravesical suburothelial injection | Experimental | Patients assigned for suburothelial injections received 100 U of onabotulinumtoxinA in 20 sites injected in the bladder body on treatment day and follow-up Receives: Drug: intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection |
| Intravesical trigonal injection | Active comparator | Patients assigned trigonal injections will receive 100U of onabotulinumtoxinA at 10 sites injected at the trigonal area (5 injections behind interureteric ridge and 5 inside the trigone) on treatment day and follow-up. Receives: Drug: intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reduction of bladder pain visual analog scale (VAS)
Evaluation of the change of VAS from baseline to 8 weeks
Measured: baseline to 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Interstitial cystitis symptom index (ICSI)
Evaluation of the change of ICSI froim baseline to 8 weeks
Measured: baseline to 8 weeks
Functional bladder capacity
The change of maximal bladder capacity in voiding diary from baseline to 8 weeks
Measured: baseline to 8 weeks
Maximum flow rate (Qmax)
The change of Qmax from baseline to 8 weeks
Measured: baseline to 8 weeks
Voided volume
Thde change of voided volume from baseline to 8 weeks
Measured: baseline to 8 weeks
Postvoid residual volume
The change of postvoid residual volume from baseline to 8 weeks
Measured: baseline to 8 weeks
Interstitial cystitis problem index (ICPI)
Evaluation of the change of ICPI from baseline to 8 weeks
Measured: baseline to 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Mar 2017
- Study startMar 2015
- Primary completionAug 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bladder Pain SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive intravesical injection of 100U of BoNT-A (BOTOX, Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA) into the trigone (the treatment group) or suburothelium (the comparative group) immediately followed by cystoscopic hydrodistention under intravenous general anesthesia in the operation room.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hann-Chorng Kuo, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital
- Investigators
- Hann-Chorng HC Kuo, M.D., Principal investigator, Department of Urology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03076762
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BuddhistTCGH2003-01
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 1 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No plan to share IPD
Publications
Jiang YH, Jhang JF, Lee CL, Kuo HC. Comparative study of efficacy and safety between bladder body and trigonal intravesical onabotulinumtoxina injection in the treatment of interstitial cystitis refractory to conventional treatment-A prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Apr;37(4):1467-1473. doi: 10.1002/nau.23475. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
PubMed 29331031
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety Between Suburothelial and Trigonal Intravesical Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis Refractory to Conventional Treatment - A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03076762
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BuddhistTCGH2003-01
- Conditions
- Bladder Pain Syndrome
- Keywords
- interstitial cystitis, pain, intravesical injection, therapy, bladder
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Buddhist Tzu Chi General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is no consensus of the therapeutic efficacy and safety between suburothelial injection and trigonal injection of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) in treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) It is unmet to clarify which injection method is superior in clinical efficacy and patient safety. This study was designed in a randomized, double-blind trial to test the therapeutic effects and adverse events between intravesical BoNTA injection into suburothelium and trigone. The results of this study might provide clinical evidence for a better therapeutic regimen of BoNT-A in the treatment of IC/PBS.
Detailed description
Introduction Interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS) is a debilitating chronic disease of unknown etiology characterized by urgency frequency and suprapubic pain at full bladder. Current treatments are usually unsuccessful in completely eradicating bladder pain and increasing bladder capacity. Intravesical resiniferatoxin once was considered to be effective but this has not been shown in a large scale multiple center trial. Several oral medication such as pentosanpolysulphate (PPS), amitryptynine, cyclosporin have been tried but the therapeutic efficacy have been proven ineffective. Intravesical treatment with heparin, hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulphate, bacillus Calmette-Guerin, dimethylsulphoxide, resiniferatoxin, or botulinum toxin A has been shown early effectiveness in some patients. However, the placebo effect should be weighed and randomized, double-blind trials should be undertaken to demonstrate the actual therapeutic effects of these therapeutic modalities.
Although botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) has been widely reported in its efficacy in the treatment of neurogenic and idiopathic detrusor overactivity (DO) with satisfactory results, there have only been few studies using BoNT-A in treatment of IC/PBS. In recent basic researches, BoNT-A has been shown to inhibit not only the release of acetylcholine and norepinephrine, but also that of nerve growth factor, adenosine triphosphate, substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide from the nerve fibers and urothelium. In clinical experiments, BoNT-A has been shown to reduce DO, impaired bladder sensation, and decrease visceral pain in chronic inflammatory diseases. These results suggest that BoNT-A treatment can modulate sensory transmission as well as reduce detrusor contractility. Although BoNT-A injection seems promising in treating symptoms of IC/PBS, long term results did not provide successful outcome. The limited successful result is possibly due to inadequate distribution of BoNT-A delivered to the bladder wall, inadequate dose of toxin, or lacking of some promoting factors to enhance the therapeutic effect of BoNT-A. Repeated intravesical BoNT-A injections was recently performed in refractory IC/PBS and the therapeutic effects seems promising. About 70% of the patients with non-ulcer type IC/PBS may benefit from repeated BoNT-A injections every 6 months. Immunohistochemistry study also confirmed the reduction of inflammatory biomarkers and pro-apoptotic proteins such as Bax and Bad expressions after repeated BoNT-A injections.
Concerning the injection sites of BoNT-A for IC/BPS bladders, there is no consensus. Suburothelial injection and Trigonal injection have all been used in treatment of IC/BPS and the short-term and long-term results are equivalent. It is unmet to clarify which injection method is superior in clinical efficacy and patient safety. This study was designed in a randomized, double-blind trial to test the therapeutic effects and adverse events between intravesical BoNTA injection into suburothelium and trigone. The results of this study might provide clinical evidence for a better therapeutic regimen of BoNT-A in the treatment of IC/PBS.
Materials and Methods
A total of 60 patients with IC/PBS who have failed previous treatments for at least 6 months will be enrolled in this study. A diagnosis of IC/PBS has been established based on characteristic symptoms and cystoscopic findings of glomerulations, petechia, or mucosal fissures after hydrodistention. All patients have been treated with at least two types of treatment modalities including non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, oral PPS, intravesical instillation of heparin, hyaluronic acid, or tricyclic antidepressant for at least 6 months but the symptoms remained unchanged or relapsed. They will be investigated thoroughly on enrollment and will be excluded if not meeting the inclusion criteria of NIDDK. However, in this study the patients with Hunner's ulcer will not be included because previous study has shown that ulcer type IC/BPS does not respond to intravesical BoNT-A injection.
Patients will be requested to keep a 3-day voiding diary prior to treatment to record the functional bladder capacity (FBC) and the number of urinary frequency and nocturnal. The IC symptoms will be assessed by the O'Leary-Sant symptom and problem indexes. The pain score will be reported by patient self-assessment using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) system. Videourodynamic study and potassium chloride (KCl) sensitivity test will be routinely performed and patients will be informed of the possible complications associated with BoNT-A injection such as generalized muscle weakness, difficult urination, transient urinary retention, or urinary tract infections.
Videourodynamic study will be performed by standard procedures using a 6 Fr dual channel catheter and an 8 Fr rectal balloon catheter. Cystometric study will be performed with normal saline at a filling rate of 20 ml/min. All descriptions and terminology in this report are in accordance with the recommendations of the International Continence Society. After the videourodynamic study, 40ml KCl solution of 0.4M will be infused slowly into the bladder and the test will be regarded as positive when painful (of ≧2 VAS score) or urgency sensation (urgency severity score increased by ≧1) is elicited compared to normal saline infusion during urodynamic study.
This study will be performed in Hualien Tzu chi General.The study should be approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and ethics committee of the university and will be registered in ClinicalTrial.gov. Each patient will be informed about the study rationale and procedures, and written, informed consent will be obtained before treatment.
Eligible patients will be admitted for the treatment. They will be randomly assigned to receive intravesical injection of 100U of BoNT-A (BOTOX, Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA) into the trigone (the treatment group) or suburothelium (the comparative group) immediately followed by cystoscopic hydrodistention under intravenous general anesthesia in the operation room. Blood (10ml) and urine samples (30ml) will be collected before intravesical injection and after bladder hydrodistention. Bladder wall biopsies will also be performed after hydrodistention. The patients will be allocated to treatment or control group by the permuted block randomization code which is centrally controlled by a clinical pharmacist who prepares the solution for injection. The intravesical injection was performed by a urology attending doctor without recording the injection mode in the medical chart. The principle investigator, patients, and study nurse did not know the injection mode to the patients' bladder to keep the study in a double-blind condition.
Each vial of BoNT-A will be diluted with 10 ml of normal saline, resulting in 10U BoNT-A per 1.0 ml. Patients assigned for suburothelial BoNT-A injections received 20 injections in the bladder body whereas those assigned trigonal injections will receive 10 sites injections at the trigonal area (5 injections behind interureteric ridge and 5 inside the trigone). The injection needle will be inserted about 1mm into the urothelium at the bladder wall, using a 23 gauge needle and rigid cystoscopic injection instrument (22 Fr, Richard Wolf, and Knittlingen, Germany). Cystoscopic hydrodistention will be performed to an intravesical pressure of 80 cm water for 15 minutes and the maximal bladder capacity (MBC) under hydrodistention will be recorded. Bladder biopsies will be taken at the four sites about 2cm lateral and posterior to the ureteral orifice after hydrodistention.
After the BoNT-A injections, a 14 Fr urethral Foley catheter will be indwelled for one night and patients will be discharged on the next day. Oral antibiotics will be prescribed for 7 days. Patients will be followed up in the outpatient clinic 2 weeks and 4 weeks later. Then the patients will be followed up at out-patient clinic at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks.
Data from the 3-day voiding diary and symptom inventory using the O'Leary-Sant symptom score, as well as information on FBC, daily urinary frequency, nocturia, and pain VAS will be recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. The largest voided volume in the 3-day voiding diary will be considered as a measure of FBC. At 8-week follow-up after the intravesical injection patients will be questioned of the current bladder condition and a urodynamics study with KCl test will be performed.
The urodynamic study will be performed at baseline and 12 weeks after intravesical treatment. The urodynamic parameters include first sensation of bladder filling (FSF), urge sensation (US), cystometric bladder capacity (CBC), detrusor pressure (Pdet), maximum flow rate (Qmax) during voiding and postvoid residual (PVR). KCl test will also be performed.
The primary end-point of this study is the reduction of bladder pain at 8-week follow-up. If patient has a reduction of VAS pain score of 2 or more, they will be considered as successfully treated. The treatment outcome will also be assessed by the global response assessment (GRA) to evaluate the overall perception of treatment result. The result will be considered as excellent when patients report improvement in the GRA by >2 or patients become free of bladder pain (VAS=0). The outcome will be considered improved if there is improvement in the GRA by =1. Patients with excellent and improved results will be considered as having subjectively successful result.
The results of voiding diary, urodynamic study, IC symptom score and pain VAS will be compared between baseline and 8-week end-point. Long-term successful results will be assessed by self-reported improved GRA and pain VAS at 6 months and further. Data will be compared between treatment and placebo groups. A p-value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
If patients still feel bladder pain and unsuccessful results at the end-point, repeated BoNT-A injection will be given at 3 months in the same procedure. At the same time, bladder biopsy, urine and blood samples will also be collected for further study. . If patient does not want to receive repeat BoNT-A injection, intravesical hyaluronic acid instillations will be proceeded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive intravesical injection of 100U of BoNT-A (BOTOX, Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA) into the trigone (the treatment group) or suburothelium (the comparative group) immediately followed by cystoscopic hydrodistention under intravenous general anesthesia in the operation room.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intravesical suburothelial injection | Experimental | Drug: intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injectionPatients assigned for suburothelial injections received 100 U of onabotulinumtoxinA in 20 sites injected in the bladder body on treatment day and follow-up |
| Intravesical trigonal injection | Active comparator | Drug: intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injectionPatients assigned trigonal injections will receive 100U of onabotulinumtoxinA at 10 sites injected at the trigonal area (5 injections behind interureteric ridge and 5 inside the trigone) on treatment day and follow-up. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients have been diagnosed as IC/BPS based on characteristic symptoms and cystoscopic findings of glomerulations, petechia, or mucosal fissures after hydrodistention
- Patients have been treated with at least two types of treatment modalities including non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, oral PPS, intravesical instillation of heparin, hyaluronic acid, or tricyclic antidepressant for at least 6 months but the symptoms remained unchanged or relapsed.
- Patients who have bladder pain VAS of 3 or greater
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients conditions not meeting the inclusion criteria of NIDDK
- Patients with Hunner's ulcer
- Patients with active urinary tract infection
- Patients who cannot keep a 3-day voiding diary prior to treatment
- Patients who do not sign informed consent form
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injectionAlso: BOTOXEach vial of onabotulinumtoxinA will be diluted with 10 ml of normal saline, resulting in 10U onabotulinumtoxinA per 1.0 ml. Patients assigned for suburothelial BoNT-A injections received 20 injections in the bladder body whereas those assigned trigonal injections will receive 10 sites injections at the trigonal area (5 injections behind interureteric ridge and 5 inside the trigone). | Drug | Intravesical suburothelial injection, Intravesical trigonal injection |
Primary outcome
Reduction of bladder pain visual analog scale (VAS)
Time frame: baseline to 8 weeks
Evaluation of the change of VAS from baseline to 8 weeks
6 secondary outcomes
Interstitial cystitis symptom index (ICSI)
Time frame: baseline to 8 weeks
Functional bladder capacity
Time frame: baseline to 8 weeks
Maximum flow rate (Qmax)
Time frame: baseline to 8 weeks
Voided volume
Time frame: baseline to 8 weeks
Postvoid residual volume
Time frame: baseline to 8 weeks
Interstitial cystitis problem index (ICPI)
Time frame: baseline to 8 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Apr 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29331031Jiang YH, Jhang JF, Lee CL, Kuo HC. Comparative study of efficacy and safety between bladder body and trigonal intravesical onabotulinumtoxina injection in the treatment of interstitial cystitis refractory to conventional treatment-A prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Apr;37(4):1467-1473. doi: 10.1002/nau.23475. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No plan to share IPD
Related trials for Bladder Pain Syndrome
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Migraine Medication Effects on Urinary Symptoms
Overactive Bladder, Bladder Pain Syndrome
Recruiting
EPPIC: Easing Pelvic Pain Interventions Clinical Research Program
Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (UCPPS), Interstitial Cystitis
Recruiting
Investigation of PEMF Therapy for Female Patients With IC/BPS
Interstitial Cystitis, Chronic Interstitial Cystitis
Recruiting
Aerobic Exercise and Connective Tissue Massage in Painful Bladder Syndrome
Bladder Pain Syndrome, Painful Bladder Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Amniotic Membrane Therapy for Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome
Interstitial Cystitis, Painful Bladder Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hann-Chorng HC Kuo, M.D. principal investigator
Department of Urology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection in people with Bladder Pain Syndrome, run by Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hann-Chorng HC Kuo, M.D. (886-3-8561825 ext. 2113, hck@tzuchi.com.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reduction of bladder pain visual analog scale (VAS) (time frame: baseline to 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03076762, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2017.