Chronic PainTRIUMPHNCT03082261
Multi-center Prospective Study Determining the Sustainability of Pain Relief and Psychosocial and Functional Responses When Utilizing a Multiple Waveform Enabled Neurostimulator
A study testing Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG in people with Chronic Pain and Intractable Pain, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 22 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
The TRIUMPH study is a post-market, international, multicenter, interventional, prospective, single-arm study intended to evaluate the sustainability of pain control and psychosocial and functional responses utilizing a multiple-waveform enabled neurostimulator in subjects with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain, Intractable Pain
- What is being tested?
- Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 269 participants
- Where
- 22 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 3 Mar 2017to 26 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject has chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs, including unilateral or bilateral pain associated with the following: failed back surgery syndrome and intractable low back and leg pain.
- Subject has a score of 6 or higher on the numeric rating scale (NRS) for average pain specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated over the past 24 hours at the baseline visit.
- Subject is considered by the Investigator as a candidate for implantation of a spinal cord stimulator system according to the system Instructions For Use.
- Subject is 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment.
- Subject is willing to cooperate with the study requirements including compliance with the regimen and completion of all study visits.
- Subject has signed and received a copy of the Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board (EC/IRB) approved informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Subject currently has a spinal cord stimulation system implanted.
- Subject has previously failed spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy (either trial system evaluation or permanent implant).
- Subject has a primary diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), Angina Pectoris, or Chronic Migraine.
- Subject has or plans to have a Peripheral Nerve Stimulation system (PNS), Peripheral Nerve field Stimulation system (PNfS), Dorsal Root Ganglion system (DRG), or implantable infusion pump.
- Subject is currently participating in another clinical investigation with an active treatment arm.
- Subject unable to read and/or write.
Trial locations and contacts
22 sites in 7 countries.
22 sites in 7 countries
United States11 sites
St. Luke's Hospital & Health Network
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18951
Clinical Trials of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Chicago Anesthesia Associates, S.C.
Chicago, Illinois, 60657
Pacific Sports & Spine
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
Advanced Pain Management
Greenfield, Wisconsin, 53221
Carolinas Center for Advanced Management of Pain
Greenville, South Carolina, 29316
The CORE Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, 85351
Performance Spine and Sports Physicians, P.C.
Pottstown, Pennsylvania, 19403
Tory McJunkin MD
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85255
Pain Institute of Southern Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Azalea Orthopedics
Tyler, Texas, 75701
Spain4 sites
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
Majadahonda, 28222
Hospital Virgin de Rocio
Seville, Andalusia, 41013
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe
Valencia, 46026
Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, Aragon, 50009
Canada2 sites
CHA L'Enfant Jesus
Québec, G1J 1Z4
Royal University Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8
Italy2 sites
Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Instituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Milan, Lombardy, 20133
Azienda Ospedaliero Univsitaria Pisana
Pisa, Tuscany, 56126
Germany1 site
Neurochirurgische Praxis Neuss
Neuss, North Rhine-Westphalia, 41460
Switzerland1 site
Ensemble Hospitalier de la Cote, Hopital de Morges
Morges, 1110
About this study
The TRIUMPH study is a post-market, international, multicenter, interventional, prospective, single-arm study intended to evaluate the sustainability of pain control and psychosocial and functional responses utilizing a multiple-waveform enabled neurostimulator in subjects with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs.
Read the detailed description
TRIUMPH study will utilize the multiprogram trial stimulator or invisible trial system with BurstDR for the trial evaluation period and the Prodigy or Proclaim Elite family of neurostimulators with tonic or BurstDR waveform at permanent implant and follow-up for pain control and improvement of psychosocial function. The follow-up visits will be scheduled at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post permanent implant
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain, Intractable Pain
- Being tested
- Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
- Keywords
- Proclaim Elite 5, Proclaim Elite 7, Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, BurstDR Stimulation, Tonic Stimulation, Multiprogram trial stimulator, Invisible trial system
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain, Pain, Intractable
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPGDevice
Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| All enrolled subjects | Other | All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG). Receives: Device: Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Measured: Baseline to 6 Months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
EQ5D is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. A visual analog scale (VAS) for health is also included in the measure as a patient-reported estimate of overall health status. EQ5D Index scores range from - 0.594 (min) to 1 (max). An EQ-5D summary index is derived by applying a formula that attaches values (weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. Higher values represent better outcomes.
Measured: Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
The PCS is a validated scale that measures the magnitude of catastrophizing (negative thoughts and feelings while a patient is experiencing pain). Subjects answer questions about how they feel and what they think about when they are in pain (i.e., not at the current moment). The scale includes 13 statements concerning pain experiences that are rated on a scale between 0 'not at all' and 4 'always'. The scale is self-administered and takes 5 minutes to complete. A higher score indicated a higher level of catastrophizing. PCS total scores range from 0 (min) to 52 (max). Three sub-scales consists of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Rumination scores range from 0 (min) to 16 (max), Magnification scores range from 0 (min) to 12 (max), and helplessness scores range from 0 (min) to 24 (max). The total PCS score is the sum of the three subscales.
Measured: Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
The State-Trait Anxiety inventory is a self-administered screening for anxiety. The STAI has 40 items, 20 items allocated to each of the S-Anxiety and T-Anxiety subscales. All items are rated on a 4-point scale from 1 to 4. It clearly differentiates between the temporary condition of "state anxiety" and the more general and long-standing quality of "trait anxiety" by providing a score for each. Higher scores suggest greater levels of anxiety. The range of possible scores for the STAI varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80 on both the trait and state subscales. The total score is the sum of the two subscales. STAI total scores range from 40 to 160.
Measured: Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
The PHQ9 is a multipurpose, validated instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. The questionnaire consists of 9 questions that rate the frequency of the symptoms of depression. A follow up non-scored question screens and assigns weight to the degree to which depressive problems have affected the patient's level of function. The responses range between 4 choices (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day). Higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of major depression. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 (min) to 27 (max).
Measured: Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
The TSK is a 11-item self-report checklist using a 4-point Likert scale that was developed from the original 17-item checklist (Miller, Kopri \& Todd, 1991) as a measure of fear or movement or (re)injury. The scale is based on the model of fear avoidance, fear of work related activities, fear of movement and fear of re-injury. The TSK has also been linked to elements of catastrophic thinking. The scale can be useful in measuring unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about pain in people with chronic pain. Total TSK-11 scores range from 11-44 points. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Measured: Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
The MOS sleep scale is intended to assess the extent of sleep problems and measures 6 dimensions of sleep, including initiation, maintenance, quantity, adequacy, drowsiness and respiratory impairments. It includes 12 questions with the first question assessing how long it takes the subject to fall asleep. The second question asks how many hours each night the subject slept. The remaining 10 questions have a range of 6 responses from 1="all of the time" to 6="none of the time". The scale is self-administered and validated. MOS Sleep scale scores range from 0 (min) to 100 (max). Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Measured: Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
The PROMIS Physical Function short form is an 8-item instrument designed to measure physical capability rather than actual performance of physical activities. The scale measures universal physical function rather than disease-specific impairment and assesses current function rather than function over a specified time period. Each question has five potential response options ranging in value from one to five to give a total score ranging from 8 to 40. Scores are converted into t-scores where the average for the general US population is 50 and the SD is 10. Higher scores indicate better physical function.
Measured: Baseline to 6 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Mar 2017
- Study start3 Mar 2017
- Primary completion24 Jan 2019
- Study completion26 Aug 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Abbott Medical DevicesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Post market, international, multicenter, interventional, prospective, single-arm study.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 269 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marie Fahey, Study director, Abbott
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03082261
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SJM-CIP-10145
- Acronym
- TRIUMPH
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 13 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 8 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Deer TR, Falowski SM, Moore GA, Hutcheson JK, Pena I, Candido K, Cornidez EG, Fraunberg VUZ, Blomme B, Capobianco RA. Passive Recharge Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation Provides Sustainable Improvements in Pain and Psychosocial Function: 2-year Results From the TRIUMPH Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Apr 1;47(7):548-556. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004283.
PubMed 34812195
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multi-center Prospective Study Determining the Sustainability of Pain Relief and Psychosocial and Functional Responses When Utilizing a Multiple Waveform Enabled Neurostimulator
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03082261
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TRIUMPH / SJM-CIP-10145
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain, Intractable Pain
- Keywords
- Proclaim Elite 5, Proclaim Elite 7, Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, BurstDR Stimulation, Tonic Stimulation, Multiprogram trial stimulator, Invisible trial system
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 269 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical DevicesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 3 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Aug 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 2 Jun 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The TRIUMPH study is a post-market, international, multicenter, interventional, prospective, single-arm study intended to evaluate the sustainability of pain control and psychosocial and functional responses utilizing a multiple-waveform enabled neurostimulator in subjects with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs.
Detailed description
TRIUMPH study will utilize the multiprogram trial stimulator or invisible trial system with BurstDR for the trial evaluation period and the Prodigy or Proclaim Elite family of neurostimulators with tonic or BurstDR waveform at permanent implant and follow-up for pain control and improvement of psychosocial function. The follow-up visits will be scheduled at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post permanent implant
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Post market, international, multicenter, interventional, prospective, single-arm study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| All enrolled subjects | Other | Device: Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPGAll subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subject has chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs, including unilateral or bilateral pain associated with the following: failed back surgery syndrome and intractable low back and leg pain.
- Subject has a score of 6 or higher on the numeric rating scale (NRS) for average pain specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated over the past 24 hours at the baseline visit.
- Subject is considered by the Investigator as a candidate for implantation of a spinal cord stimulator system according to the system Instructions For Use.
- Subject is 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment.
- Subject is willing to cooperate with the study requirements including compliance with the regimen and completion of all study visits.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subject currently has a spinal cord stimulation system implanted.
- Subject has previously failed spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy (either trial system evaluation or permanent implant).
- Subject has a primary diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), Angina Pectoris, or Chronic Migraine.
- Subject has or plans to have a Peripheral Nerve Stimulation system (PNS), Peripheral Nerve field Stimulation system (PNfS), Dorsal Root Ganglion system (DRG), or implantable infusion pump.
- Subject is currently participating in another clinical investigation with an active treatment arm.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPGSubjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG | Device | All enrolled subjects |
Primary outcome
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months
The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
7 secondary outcomes
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jul 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34812195Deer TR, Falowski SM, Moore GA, Hutcheson JK, Pena I, Candido K, Cornidez EG, Fraunberg VUZ, Blomme B, Capobianco RA. Passive Recharge Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation Provides Sustainable Improvements in Pain and Psychosocial Function: 2-year Results From the TRIUMPH Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Apr 1;47(7):548-556. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004283.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marie Fahey study director
Abbott
22 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG in people with Chronic Pain and Intractable Pain, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 22 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 22 sites in United States, Spain, Canada, Italy, Finland and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Jun 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (time frame: Baseline to 6 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03082261, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2021.