AzTrials
AzTrials

Intracranial PressurePANDANCT03087981

Parameters Analysis in Neurosurgical Critical Patients Through Big Data Acquisition

An observational study of Intracranial Pressure and Neurosurgery, run by RenJi Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The PANDA trial is a multicenter prospective observational study designed to analyze various ICP derived parameters and clinical status in neurosurgical critical patients through a new big data acquisition system. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Oct 2017to Jul 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: patients with intracranial lesion

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-65 years old
  • Intracranial lesion underwent ICP sensor implantation
  • Informed consent obtained

Who cannot join

  • No consent
  • A life-threatening injury to an organ other than the brain
  • Known pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200127

    Guoyi Gao, M.D., +86-021-68383709, guoyigao@gmail.com

    Guoyi Gao, M.D.

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study to Analyze Various ICP Derived Parameters and Clinical Status in Neurosurgical Critical Patients Through Big Data Acquisition

The PANDA trial is a multicenter prospective observational study designed to analyze various ICP derived parameters and clinical status in neurosurgical critical patients through a new big data acquisition system.

Read the detailed description

Nowadays, intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is widely used as a way to evaluate intracranial status in neurosurgery department especially in neurosurgical critical patients. Most of us focus only on the mean ICP value while ignoring other ICP derived parameters, such ICP waveform, AMP, RAP, PRx, IAAC and so on. However, it is reported that these parameters can reflect the status of intracerebral circulation, cerebrospinal compensatory reserve and brain compliance and can often be indicative of impending neurological deterioration and even outcome of patients. The PANDA trial is a multicenter prospective observational study designed to investigate the relationship between these ICP derived parameters and clinical status and to uncover the mechanism behind it. We will use a brand-new automatic big data collecting and storing system to continuously acquire patients' physiological information such as blood pressure, ICP, ETCO2,EEG etc. before analysis. Hopefully, this trial will reveal what is happening in the cranial cavity through the natural history of different kinds of intracranial lesion.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS)

    Measured: within 3 months after enrollment

  2. Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS)

    Measured: within 3 months after enrollment

  3. Disability Rating Scale (DRS)

    Measured: within 3 months after enrollment

  4. Mean intracranial pressure(ICP) value

    Measured: throughout ICP monitoring, average 7 days

  5. Correlation between pulse amplitude and mean intracranial pressure(RAP)

    Measured: throughout ICP monitoring, average 7 days

  6. Pressure-reactivity index(PRx)

    Measured: throughout ICP monitoring, average 7 days

  7. Pulse amplitude of ICP(AMP)

    Measured: throughout ICP monitoring, average 7 days

  8. ICP-arterial blood pressure(ABP) wave amplitude correlation(IAAC)

    Measured: throughout ICP monitoring, average 7 days

  9. Cerebral perfusion pressure(CPP)

    Measured: throughout ICP monitoring, average 7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Mar 2017
  2. Study startOct 2017 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionApr 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03087981
Sponsor's protocol ID
Renjineuro-BDA(2017)
Acronym
PANDA
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
12 Mar 2017
Last updated
15 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Di Ieva A, Schmitz EM, Cusimano MD. Analysis of intracranial pressure: past, present, and future. Neuroscientist. 2013 Dec;19(6):592-603. doi: 10.1177/1073858412474845. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

    PubMed 23389057
  • Eide PK, Sorteberg A, Bentsen G, Marthinsen PB, Stubhaug A, Sorteberg W. Pressure-derived versus pressure wave amplitude-derived indices of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in relation to early clinical state and 12-month outcome following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2012 May;116(5):961-71. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.JNS111313. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

    PubMed 22324419
  • Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Timofeev I, Lavinio A, Guazzo E, Hutchinson P, Pickard JD. Intracranial pressure: more than a number. Neurosurg Focus. 2007 May 15;22(5):E10. doi: 10.3171/foc.2007.22.5.11.

    PubMed 17613228
  • Czosnyka M, Pickard JD. Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;75(6):813-21. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.033126.

    PubMed 15145991
  • Hamilton R, Xu P, Asgari S, Kasprowicz M, Vespa P, Bergsneider M, Hu X. Forecasting intracranial pressure elevation using pulse waveform morphology. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:4331-4. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5332749.

    PubMed 19963821

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Intracranial Pressure and Neurosurgery, run by RenJi Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Guoyi Gao, Dr. (+86-021-68383709, guoyigao@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS) (time frame: within 3 months after enrollment). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03087981, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in