HemiplegiaTele-UPCATNCT03094455
AOT and ICT for Hemiplegia
A study testing Experimental group in people with Hemiplegia and Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy, run by IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
A new rehabilitative approach, called AOT, based on the recent discovery of mirror neuron system (MNS), has been used with promising results on the Upper Limb (UL) function in some studies in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP).The purpose of the present trial is to provide evidence by a RCT that AOT is an effective… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 20 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemiplegia, Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
- What is being tested?
- Experimental group
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 29 Mar 2017to 29 Nov 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 20 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- confirmed diagnosis of spastic UCP
- age between 15 and 20 years
- predominant spasticity at upper limb upper limb
- minimal ability to grasp and hold objects, also passively, with affected hand (House functional classification score 2 or more)
- sufficient cooperation, cognitive and communicative understanding to perform assessments and participate in the intervention
- subjects and parents able to commit to the intensive therapy program for a period of 3 weeks
Who cannot join
- Children who had sustained previous orthopedic surgery or botulinum toxin A injection in the UL within 6 months prior to study entry were excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Action-Observation Therapy (AOT) and Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) for Home Rehabilitation of Hemiplegia
A new rehabilitative approach, called AOT, based on the recent discovery of mirror neuron system (MNS), has been used with promising results on the Upper Limb (UL) function in some studies in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP).The purpose of the present trial is to provide evidence by a RCT that AOT is an effective rehabilitation tool in Children with Unilateral CP (UCP) and that its effects are greater than standard care. Assisting Hand Assessment is chosen as primary outcome measure and a sample size of 10 per group is required. The rehabilitation lasting 3 weeks will be provided at home by an ICT platform able to deliver, manage, monitor and measure a personalized AOT.
Read the detailed description
A waitlist control, evaluator-blinded, randomized trial (RCT) will be conducted according to CONSORT guidelines. Each participant will be randomized to either:
- Immediate intervention group (Experimental group). Children will receive immediately the system for 3 weeks.
- Waitlist delayed intervention (Control group). Children will continue standard care for 3 weeks and then will receive the system as the Experimental group.
As such, all participants will receive the AOT training. The system will provide an in-home, individualized, intensive treatment based on the AOT. The system will be delivered at home and the children will perform a 60-minute training session 5 days a week for 3 consecutive weeks. For the Immediate intervention group, follow-up assessment (outcome measures) will be conducted before (T0) and post-intervention at 3 weeks (T1), and then 8 and 24 weeks after T1(T2 and T3). For the Waitlist group, the assessments will be conducted before T0 and 3 weeks after (T1) the standard care, then they will follow the same timeline of the first group (T1 plus, after the AOT intervention) and 8 and 24 weeks after T1 Puls (T2 and T3). The primary endpoint will be T1. Clinical assessments will be administered by a therapist blind to group assignment in each center. Scoring of videotaped clinical outcome measures will be performed by therapists blind to group allocation and assessment order.
- Conditions
- Hemiplegia, Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
- Being tested
- Experimental group
- Keywords
- Tele-rehabilitation, Action Observation, Mirror neurons, ICT
- Medical subject headings
- Hemiplegia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental groupOther
Also called AOT
Observation of video sequences showing uni¬manual or bimanual goal-directed actions followed by the execution of the observed actions either with plegic upper limb for unimanual or with both upper limbs for bimanual actions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | AOT is based on the observation of meaningful actions followed by their execution Receives: Other: Experimental group |
| Control group | Other | Children will continue standard care for 3 weeks and then will receive the AOT as the Experimental group Receives: Other: Experimental group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in the Assisting Hand Assessment
This assessment measures upper limb function during bimanual activities. The test evaluates spontaneous use of assisting hand during a semi-structured session with specific toys or tasks with objects requiring bimanual handling
Measured: Baseline (T0, 1week before beginning of Study) ;T1 (within 1 week after the end of the training/control period); T1 plus (within 1 week after the end of training for waitlist group), T2 and T3 (8weeks after T1 or T1/plus) T3 (16 weeks after T2)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Changes in Box and Block Test
: it measures unilateral gross manual dexterity. It is a quick, simple and inexpensive test. It can be used with a wide range of populations from childhood to adults.
Measured: Baseline (T0, 1week before beginning of Study) ;T1 (within 1 week after the end of the training/control period); T1 plus (within 1 week after the end of training for waitlist group), T2 and T3 (8weeks after T1 or T1/plus) T3 (16 weeks after T2)
Changes in Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function
It is criterion-referenced test that measures unilateral upper extremity quality of movement in subjects with neurological impairments
Measured: Baseline (T0, 1week before beginning of Study) ;T1 (within 1 week after the end of the training/control period); T1 plus (within 1 week after the end of training for waitlist group), T2 and T3 (8weeks after T1 or T1/plus) T3 (16 weeks after T2)
Changes in ABILHAND-kids
a semi-structured item-response questionnaire that measures manual ability according to an caregiver's perceived difficulty performing daily bimanual tasks.
Measured: Baseline (T0, 1week before beginning of Study) ;T1 (within 1 week after the end of the training/control period); T1 plus (within 1 week after the end of training for waitlist group), T2 and T3 (8weeks after T1 or T1/plus) T3 (16 weeks after T2)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2017
- Study start29 Mar 2017
- Primary completion29 Oct 2018
- Study completion29 Nov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HemiplegiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- It will be a parallel RCT with a waitlist design
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- BioRobotics Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03094455
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GR-2011-02350053 AOT
- Acronym
- Tele-UPCAT
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 16 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 7 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Sgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, Guzzetta A, Biagi L, Tosetti M, Fogassi L, Cioni G. Upper limb children action-observation training (UP-CAT): a randomised controlled trial in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. BMC Neurol. 2011 Jun 28;11:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-80.
PubMed 21711525Sgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, Guzzetta A, Fogassi L, Cioni G. Randomized trial of observation and execution of upper extremity actions versus action alone in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Nov-Dec;27(9):808-15. doi: 10.1177/1545968313497101. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
PubMed 23886886Beani E, Menici V, Ferrari A, Cioni G, Sgandurra G. Feasibility of a Home-Based Action Observation Training for Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: An Explorative Study. Front Neurol. 2020 Feb 28;11:16. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00016. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32180754Sgandurra G, Cecchi F, Beani E, Mannari I, Maselli M, Falotico FP, Inguaggiato E, Perazza S, Sicola E, Feys H, Klingels K, Ferrari A, Dario P, Boyd RN, Cioni G. Tele-UPCAT: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial of a home-based Tele-monitored UPper limb Children Action observation Training for participants with unilateral cerebral palsy. BMJ Open. 2018 May 14;8(5):e017819. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017819.
PubMed 29764869
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Action-Observation Therapy (AOT) and Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) for Home Rehabilitation of Hemiplegia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03094455
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Tele-UPCAT / GR-2011-02350053 AOT
- Conditions
- Hemiplegia, Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
- Keywords
- Tele-rehabilitation, Action Observation, Mirror neurons, ICT
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- BioRobotics Institute
- Study start
- 29 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A new rehabilitative approach, called AOT, based on the recent discovery of mirror neuron system (MNS), has been used with promising results on the Upper Limb (UL) function in some studies in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP).The purpose of the present trial is to provide evidence by a RCT that AOT is an effective rehabilitation tool in Children with Unilateral CP (UCP) and that its effects are greater than standard care. Assisting Hand Assessment is chosen as primary outcome measure and a sample size of 10 per group is required. The rehabilitation lasting 3 weeks will be provided at home by an ICT platform able to deliver, manage, monitor and measure a personalized AOT.
Detailed description
A waitlist control, evaluator-blinded, randomized trial (RCT) will be conducted according to CONSORT guidelines. Each participant will be randomized to either:
- Immediate intervention group (Experimental group). Children will receive immediately the system for 3 weeks.
- Waitlist delayed intervention (Control group). Children will continue standard care for 3 weeks and then will receive the system as the Experimental group.
As such, all participants will receive the AOT training. The system will provide an in-home, individualized, intensive treatment based on the AOT. The system will be delivered at home and the children will perform a 60-minute training session 5 days a week for 3 consecutive weeks. For the Immediate intervention group, follow-up assessment (outcome measures) will be conducted before (T0) and post-intervention at 3 weeks (T1), and then 8 and 24 weeks after T1(T2 and T3). For the Waitlist group, the assessments will be conducted before T0 and 3 weeks after (T1) the standard care, then they will follow the same timeline of the first group (T1 plus, after the AOT intervention) and 8 and 24 weeks after T1 Puls (T2 and T3). The primary endpoint will be T1. Clinical assessments will be administered by a therapist blind to group assignment in each center. Scoring of videotaped clinical outcome measures will be performed by therapists blind to group allocation and assessment order.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- It will be a parallel RCT with a waitlist design
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Other: Experimental groupAOT is based on the observation of meaningful actions followed by their execution |
| Control group | Other | Other: Experimental groupChildren will continue standard care for 3 weeks and then will receive the AOT as the Experimental group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 20 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- confirmed diagnosis of spastic UCP
- age between 15 and 20 years
- predominant spasticity at upper limb upper limb
- minimal ability to grasp and hold objects, also passively, with affected hand (House functional classification score 2 or more)
- sufficient cooperation, cognitive and communicative understanding to perform assessments and participate in the intervention
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children who had sustained previous orthopedic surgery or botulinum toxin A injection in the UL within 6 months prior to study entry were excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental groupAlso: AOTObservation of video sequences showing uni¬manual or bimanual goal-directed actions followed by the execution of the observed actions either with plegic upper limb for unimanual or with both upper limbs for bimanual actions. | Other | Control group, Experimental group |
Primary outcome
Changes in the Assisting Hand Assessment
Time frame: Baseline (T0, 1week before beginning of Study) ;T1 (within 1 week after the end of the training/control period); T1 plus (within 1 week after the end of training for waitlist group), T2 and T3 (8weeks after T1 or T1/plus) T3 (16 weeks after T2)
This assessment measures upper limb function during bimanual activities. The test evaluates spontaneous use of assisting hand during a semi-structured session with specific toys or tasks with objects requiring bimanual handling
3 secondary outcomes
Changes in Box and Block Test
Time frame: Baseline (T0, 1week before beginning of Study) ;T1 (within 1 week after the end of the training/control period); T1 plus (within 1 week after the end of training for waitlist group), T2 and T3 (8weeks after T1 or T1/plus) T3 (16 weeks after T2)
Changes in Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function
Time frame: Baseline (T0, 1week before beginning of Study) ;T1 (within 1 week after the end of the training/control period); T1 plus (within 1 week after the end of training for waitlist group), T2 and T3 (8weeks after T1 or T1/plus) T3 (16 weeks after T2)
Changes in ABILHAND-kids
Time frame: Baseline (T0, 1week before beginning of Study) ;T1 (within 1 week after the end of the training/control period); T1 plus (within 1 week after the end of training for waitlist group), T2 and T3 (8weeks after T1 or T1/plus) T3 (16 weeks after T2)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Aug 2019.
- Background: PubMed 21711525Sgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, Guzzetta A, Biagi L, Tosetti M, Fogassi L, Cioni G. Upper limb children action-observation training (UP-CAT): a randomised controlled trial in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. BMC Neurol. 2011 Jun 28;11:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-80.
- Background: PubMed 23886886Sgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, Guzzetta A, Fogassi L, Cioni G. Randomized trial of observation and execution of upper extremity actions versus action alone in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Nov-Dec;27(9):808-15. doi: 10.1177/1545968313497101. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32180754Beani E, Menici V, Ferrari A, Cioni G, Sgandurra G. Feasibility of a Home-Based Action Observation Training for Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: An Explorative Study. Front Neurol. 2020 Feb 28;11:16. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00016. eCollection 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29764869Sgandurra G, Cecchi F, Beani E, Mannari I, Maselli M, Falotico FP, Inguaggiato E, Perazza S, Sicola E, Feys H, Klingels K, Ferrari A, Dario P, Boyd RN, Cioni G. Tele-UPCAT: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial of a home-based Tele-monitored UPper limb Children Action observation Training for participants with unilateral cerebral palsy. BMJ Open. 2018 May 14;8(5):e017819. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017819.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hemiplegia
Not yet recruiting
Closed-Loop SCS-BCI for Post-Stroke Hemiplegia
Stroke, Motor Dysfunction
RecruitingObservational study
Studies of the Variable Phenotypic Presentations of Rapid-Onset Dystonia Parkinsonism and Other Movement Disorders
Dystonia, Parkinsonism
RecruitingObservational study
Functional Benefits of Multisite Upper Limb Surgery in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy (RETRO-CHIRc)
Cerebral Palsy, Hemiplegia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Post-Stroke Apraxia, Motor Function, Balance, and Gait
Stroke, Ideomotor Apraxia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ideomotor Apraxia and Robotic Gait Rehabilitation Outcomes After Stroke
Stroke, Ideomotor Apraxia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Experimental group in people with Hemiplegia and Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy, run by IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in the Assisting Hand Assessment (time frame: Baseline (T0, 1week before beginning of Study) ;T1 (within 1 week after the end of the training/control period); T1 plus (within 1 week after the end of training for waitlist group), T2 and T3 (8weeks after T1 or T1/plus) T3 (16 weeks after T2)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03094455, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2019.