Relapsed Hematologic MalignancyEXALTNCT03096821
Extended Analysis for Leukemia/Lymphoma Treatment
An observational study of Relapsed Hematologic Malignancy, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.
Trial summary
Patients with relapsed/ refractory acute leukemia and relapsed/ refractory aggressive lymphoma harboring an activating genetic alteration (gene mutation, gene fusion) or drug-able biomarker / activated signal transduction pathway and resistant to any approved treatment modality will be eligible for this study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Relapsed Hematologic Malignancy
- What is being tested?
- ngFDS selected treatment
- How many people
- 143 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustria
- Study dates
- Sep 2015to 30 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive hematological malignancy lacking further standard treatment.
Who may be able to join
- There are no further standard treatments available for the patient;
- The patient has undergone at least two lines of previous therapy;
- Cancer cell-containing biopsies are obtainable;
- Informed consent from the patient was given;
- candidate treatments identified by ngFDS are clinically available and considered safe given the patient health state.
Who cannot join
- Presence of further treatment options, as defined by NCCN guidelines or Austrian guidelines representing a possible further treatment-related response by conventional therapies according to generally accepted medical evidence.
- No fresh and viable tumor material available.
- Unresolved toxicity of National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0) Grade 2 or higher from previous anti-cancer therapy, except alopecia.
- Presence of active gastrointestinal disease or other condition that will interfere significantly with the absorption of drugs.
- A history of known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), or Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection.
- A history of known glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency.
Show all 12Show fewer
- History of other malignancy. Subjects who have been disease-free for 5 years, or subjects with a history of completely resected non-melanoma skin cancer or successfully treated in situ carcinoma are eligible.
- Uncontrolled medical conditions (i.e, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, etc), psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical conditions that do not permit compliance with the protocol; or unwillingness or inability to follow the procedures required in the protocol.
- Pregnant or lactating females.
- History of alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months prior to screening.
- No informed consent available.
- Exclusion criteria effective for respective treatment agents.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Investigator-initiated Translational Study Evaluating Individualized Treatment Regiments Based on Respective Biomarker Analyses for Refractory Leukemia and Lymphoma Patients
Patients with relapsed/ refractory acute leukemia and relapsed/ refractory aggressive lymphoma harboring an activating genetic alteration (gene mutation, gene fusion) or drug-able biomarker / activated signal transduction pathway and resistant to any approved treatment modality will be eligible for this study.
The investigators aim to combine DNA sequencing-based molecular profiling with an ex vivo high-throughput drug screening strategy. For the latter method, viable cells are obtained from the individual patient's lymphoma or leukemia in order to determine i)the expression of relevant therapeutic target molecules and ii)the ex vivo response of the patient's cancer cells to a panel of agents with anticancer activity. In addition, analysis of tumor stroma cells will provide information about the differential target expression and cellular sensitivity aiming at the evaluation of a therapeutic safety window. Thereby, biological material will have to be accessed within 4 weeks before onset of individualized treatment (real-time biopsy). Bioinformatic data-management based on a Bayesian statistical approach will support individualized treatment decisions in this controlled clinical approach.
Read the detailed description
Background and rationale for the trial Etiological concepts on cancer development, malignant growth and tumor propagation have led to the discovery of various molecular driver mechanisms. Based on these advances, medical oncology has started to enter an era of individualized medicine where treatment selection is becoming tailored to drug-able molecular pathways. This individualized treatment concept is mainly based on molecular and genetic characterization of the tumors including biomarker technology, which allow us to align the most appropriate treatment according to the patient's disease. Although there is a general acceptance towards such individualized approach thereby stratifying and subgrouping patients to improve the quality of clinical care in oncology, molecular profiling has just started to assist prediction of the drug's clinical benefit by identifying the most responsive patient subgroup. Recently, excellent demonstrations of the utility of prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers have emerged. Von Hoff and co-workers have recently demonstrated that molecular profiling of patients' tumors is an efficient approach to identify potential targets and select treatments for their treatment-refractory cancers(Von Hoff, Stephenson et al. 2010). Such a tailored treatment strategy revealed to be an effective approach to increase progression free survival (PFS), when compared to the patients' most recent standard treatment regimen. Another example for individualized treatment of patients is given by the recently published BATTLE trial (Biomarker-integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination), a prospective biomarker and biopsy driven trial in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (Kim, Herbst et al. 2011). By this Bayesian approach, the authors demonstrated that targeting individually analyzed molecules of the patient's tumor might represent an efficient therapeutic approach in the treatment of an incurable disease. While these examples suggest a benefit for individual tumor characterization for selection of a tailored treatment concept, currently novel targeted agents in the treatment of cancer are rather approved for a certain subtype of cancer, but not for patients based on the expression or activity of respective target lesions. Therefore, the need of an extension of clinical protocols focusing on molecular profile-based treatment decisions, rather than on anatomic cancer-subtypes is mandatory. Based on this concept the current protocol was designed. The investigators hypothesize that molecular profiling of a patient's tumor might not only predict treatment response, but also leads to an individualized treatment protocol resulting in clinical benefit for the individual patient. Therefore, this project aims to assess the feasibility of an individualized treatment concept for pre-defined patient's benefit.
Design, methodology, statistical considerations and organization The Medical University of Vienna will be clinical sponsor and clinical center of this investigator-initiated open-label single center single-arm, exploratory phase II study. The individualized treatment concept is determined to be biopsy-mandated and biomarker-based. Bio-data analysis will be supported by a software, which is generated by the Center of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems.
Study design and methodology Patients with relapsed/ refractory acute leukemia and relapsed/ refractory aggressive lymphoma harboring an activating genetic alteration (gene mutation, gene fusion) or drug-able biomarker / activated signal transduction pathway and resistant to any approved treatment modality will be eligible for this study.
The investigators aim to combine DNA sequencing-based molecular profiling with an ex vivo high-throughput drug screening strategy. For the latter method, viable cells are obtained from the individual patient's lymphoma or leukemia in order to determine i)the expression of relevant therapeutic target molecules and ii)the ex vivo response of the patient's cancer cells to a panel of agents with anticancer activity. In addition, analysis of tumor stroma cells will provide information about the differential target expression and cellular sensitivity aiming at the evaluation of a therapeutic safety window. Thereby, biological material will have to be accessed within 4 weeks before onset of individualized treatment (real-time biopsy). Bioinformatic data-management based on a Bayesian statistical approach will support individualized treatment decisions in this controlled clinical approach.
Number of patients. A sample size of 49 patients achieves ≥ 80% power to detect a difference of 15% between the null hypothesis proportion P0 (PFS ratio ≥ 1.3) = 10% and the alternative proportion P1(PFS ratio ≥ 1.3) = 25% using a one-sided exact binomial test at a significance level of 0.0250. The null hypothesis can be rejected, if at least 10 out of 50 patients treated show a PFS ratio ≥ 1.3. The investigators therefore aim to enroll 49 leukemia patients and 49 lymphoma patients.
Target population. Patients with relapsed/ refractory acute leukemia and relapsed/ refractory aggressive lymphoma after standard treatment. Standard treatment is defined according to actual National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp) and/or local guidelines. 49 acute leukemia subjects and 49 lymphoma subjects will be screened for enrolment in the trial. Deviations from inclusion criteria are not allowed because they can potentially jeopardize the scientific integrity of the study, regulatory acceptability or subject safety. Therefore, adherence to the criteria as specified in the protocol is essential. Inclusion criteria as well as exclusion criteria must be respected.
- Conditions
- Relapsed Hematologic Malignancy
- Being tested
- ngFDS selected treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Hematologic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ngFDS selected treatmentDrug
Also called Treatment based on ngFDS
Treatment based on next-generation functional drug screening (ngFDS). Treatment with commercially available treatments (per package insert instructions) selected by functional drug screening. For drug screening tumor cells from bone marrow aspirates, peripheral blood, pleural effusion, or excised lymph node samples are purified over Ficoll gradient (bone marrow, peripheral blood, pleural effusion) (GE healthcare) or homogenized and filtered (lymph tissue).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ngFDS selected treatment | Treatment with commercially available treatments (per package insert instructions) chosen via next-generation functional drug screening (ngFDS). Receives: Drug: ngFDS selected treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
progression-free survival
To compare progression-free survival using a treatment regimen selected by molecular profiling with progression-free survival for the most recent regimen the patient has progressed on. The treatment concept is deemed for clinical benefit for the individual patient who has a PSF ratio (PSF on molecular profiling-based therapy/PSF on prior therapy) of ≥ 1.3. For this purpose we will reject the null hypothesis, which is defined as follows: ≤ 15% of patients would have a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3. Thus, the individual patient is his own control. For tumor types with high numbers of patients per cohort, the overall response rate (ORR) will be evaluated.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
overall response rate
overall response rate (ORR: achieving either CR or PR). For lymphoma patients' responses were classified as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD) according to the criteria proposed by the International Workshop for malignant lymphoma. For leukemia patients, responses were assessed following the response criteria defined by the recommendations of the European Leukemia net.
Measured: 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Mar 2017
- Study startSep 2015
- Primary completion30 Jan 2020
- Study completion30 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Relapsed Hematologic MalignancyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical University of ViennaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 143 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Philipp Staber, MD, PhD, Medical University of Vienna
- Investigators
- Philipp B Staber, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Medical University of Vienna, Department of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03096821
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EXALT1.1
- Other IDs
- 1830/2015
- Acronym
- EXALT
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 18 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 24 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Liebers N, Bruch PM, Terzer T, Hernandez-Hernandez M, Paramasivam N, Fitzgerald D, Altmann H, Roider T, Kolb C, Knoll M, Lenze A, Platzbecker U, Rollig C, Baldus C, Serve H, Bornhauser M, Hubschmann D, Muller-Tidow C, Stolzel F, Huber W, Benner A, Zenz T, Lu J, Dietrich S. Ex vivo drug response profiling for response and outcome prediction in hematologic malignancies: the prospective non-interventional SMARTrial. Nat Cancer. 2023 Dec;4(12):1648-1659. doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00645-5. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
PubMed 37783805Snijder B, Vladimer GI, Krall N, Miura K, Schmolke AS, Kornauth C, Lopez de la Fuente O, Choi HS, van der Kouwe E, Gultekin S, Kazianka L, Bigenzahn JW, Hoermann G, Prutsch N, Merkel O, Ringler A, Sabler M, Jeryczynski G, Mayerhoefer ME, Simonitsch-Klupp I, Ocko K, Felberbauer F, Mullauer L, Prager GW, Korkmaz B, Kenner L, Sperr WR, Kralovics R, Gisslinger H, Valent P, Kubicek S, Jager U, Staber PB, Superti-Furga G. Image-based ex-vivo drug screening for patients with aggressive haematological malignancies: interim results from a single-arm, open-label, pilot study. Lancet Haematol. 2017 Dec;4(12):e595-e606. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30208-9. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
PubMed 29153976
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Investigator-initiated Translational Study Evaluating Individualized Treatment Regiments Based on Respective Biomarker Analyses for Refractory Leukemia and Lymphoma Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03096821
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EXALT / EXALT1.1
- Conditions
- Relapsed Hematologic Malignancy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 143 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of ViennaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with relapsed/ refractory acute leukemia and relapsed/ refractory aggressive lymphoma harboring an activating genetic alteration (gene mutation, gene fusion) or drug-able biomarker / activated signal transduction pathway and resistant to any approved treatment modality will be eligible for this study.
The investigators aim to combine DNA sequencing-based molecular profiling with an ex vivo high-throughput drug screening strategy. For the latter method, viable cells are obtained from the individual patient's lymphoma or leukemia in order to determine i)the expression of relevant therapeutic target molecules and ii)the ex vivo response of the patient's cancer cells to a panel of agents with anticancer activity. In addition, analysis of tumor stroma cells will provide information about the differential target expression and cellular sensitivity aiming at the evaluation of a therapeutic safety window. Thereby, biological material will have to be accessed within 4 weeks before onset of individualized treatment (real-time biopsy). Bioinformatic data-management based on a Bayesian statistical approach will support individualized treatment decisions in this controlled clinical approach.
Detailed description
Background and rationale for the trial Etiological concepts on cancer development, malignant growth and tumor propagation have led to the discovery of various molecular driver mechanisms. Based on these advances, medical oncology has started to enter an era of individualized medicine where treatment selection is becoming tailored to drug-able molecular pathways. This individualized treatment concept is mainly based on molecular and genetic characterization of the tumors including biomarker technology, which allow us to align the most appropriate treatment according to the patient's disease. Although there is a general acceptance towards such individualized approach thereby stratifying and subgrouping patients to improve the quality of clinical care in oncology, molecular profiling has just started to assist prediction of the drug's clinical benefit by identifying the most responsive patient subgroup. Recently, excellent demonstrations of the utility of prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers have emerged. Von Hoff and co-workers have recently demonstrated that molecular profiling of patients' tumors is an efficient approach to identify potential targets and select treatments for their treatment-refractory cancers(Von Hoff, Stephenson et al. 2010). Such a tailored treatment strategy revealed to be an effective approach to increase progression free survival (PFS), when compared to the patients' most recent standard treatment regimen. Another example for individualized treatment of patients is given by the recently published BATTLE trial (Biomarker-integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination), a prospective biomarker and biopsy driven trial in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (Kim, Herbst et al. 2011). By this Bayesian approach, the authors demonstrated that targeting individually analyzed molecules of the patient's tumor might represent an efficient therapeutic approach in the treatment of an incurable disease. While these examples suggest a benefit for individual tumor characterization for selection of a tailored treatment concept, currently novel targeted agents in the treatment of cancer are rather approved for a certain subtype of cancer, but not for patients based on the expression or activity of respective target lesions. Therefore, the need of an extension of clinical protocols focusing on molecular profile-based treatment decisions, rather than on anatomic cancer-subtypes is mandatory. Based on this concept the current protocol was designed. The investigators hypothesize that molecular profiling of a patient's tumor might not only predict treatment response, but also leads to an individualized treatment protocol resulting in clinical benefit for the individual patient. Therefore, this project aims to assess the feasibility of an individualized treatment concept for pre-defined patient's benefit.
Design, methodology, statistical considerations and organization The Medical University of Vienna will be clinical sponsor and clinical center of this investigator-initiated open-label single center single-arm, exploratory phase II study. The individualized treatment concept is determined to be biopsy-mandated and biomarker-based. Bio-data analysis will be supported by a software, which is generated by the Center of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems.
Study design and methodology Patients with relapsed/ refractory acute leukemia and relapsed/ refractory aggressive lymphoma harboring an activating genetic alteration (gene mutation, gene fusion) or drug-able biomarker / activated signal transduction pathway and resistant to any approved treatment modality will be eligible for this study.
The investigators aim to combine DNA sequencing-based molecular profiling with an ex vivo high-throughput drug screening strategy. For the latter method, viable cells are obtained from the individual patient's lymphoma or leukemia in order to determine i)the expression of relevant therapeutic target molecules and ii)the ex vivo response of the patient's cancer cells to a panel of agents with anticancer activity. In addition, analysis of tumor stroma cells will provide information about the differential target expression and cellular sensitivity aiming at the evaluation of a therapeutic safety window. Thereby, biological material will have to be accessed within 4 weeks before onset of individualized treatment (real-time biopsy). Bioinformatic data-management based on a Bayesian statistical approach will support individualized treatment decisions in this controlled clinical approach.
Number of patients. A sample size of 49 patients achieves ≥ 80% power to detect a difference of 15% between the null hypothesis proportion P0 (PFS ratio ≥ 1.3) = 10% and the alternative proportion P1(PFS ratio ≥ 1.3) = 25% using a one-sided exact binomial test at a significance level of 0.0250. The null hypothesis can be rejected, if at least 10 out of 50 patients treated show a PFS ratio ≥ 1.3. The investigators therefore aim to enroll 49 leukemia patients and 49 lymphoma patients.
Target population. Patients with relapsed/ refractory acute leukemia and relapsed/ refractory aggressive lymphoma after standard treatment. Standard treatment is defined according to actual National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp) and/or local guidelines. 49 acute leukemia subjects and 49 lymphoma subjects will be screened for enrolment in the trial. Deviations from inclusion criteria are not allowed because they can potentially jeopardize the scientific integrity of the study, regulatory acceptability or subject safety. Therefore, adherence to the criteria as specified in the protocol is essential. Inclusion criteria as well as exclusion criteria must be respected.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ngFDS selected treatment | – | Drug: ngFDS selected treatmentTreatment with commercially available treatments (per package insert instructions) chosen via next-generation functional drug screening (ngFDS). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive hematological malignancy lacking further standard treatment.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- There are no further standard treatments available for the patient;
- The patient has undergone at least two lines of previous therapy;
- Cancer cell-containing biopsies are obtainable;
- Informed consent from the patient was given;
- candidate treatments identified by ngFDS are clinically available and considered safe given the patient health state.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Presence of further treatment options, as defined by NCCN guidelines or Austrian guidelines representing a possible further treatment-related response by conventional therapies according to generally accepted medical evidence.
- No fresh and viable tumor material available.
- Unresolved toxicity of National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0) Grade 2 or higher from previous anti-cancer therapy, except alopecia.
- Presence of active gastrointestinal disease or other condition that will interfere significantly with the absorption of drugs.
- A history of known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), or Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ngFDS selected treatmentAlso: Treatment based on ngFDSTreatment based on next-generation functional drug screening (ngFDS). Treatment with commercially available treatments (per package insert instructions) selected by functional drug screening. For drug screening tumor cells from bone marrow aspirates, peripheral blood, pleural effusion, or excised lymph node samples are purified over Ficoll gradient (bone marrow, peripheral blood, pleural effusion) (GE healthcare) or homogenized and filtered (lymph tissue). | Drug | ngFDS selected treatment |
Primary outcome
progression-free survival
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months
To compare progression-free survival using a treatment regimen selected by molecular profiling with progression-free survival for the most recent regimen the patient has progressed on. The treatment concept is deemed for clinical benefit for the individual patient who has a PSF ratio (PSF on molecular profiling-based therapy/PSF on prior therapy) of ≥ 1.3. For this purpose we will reject the null hypothesis, which is defined as follows: ≤ 15% of patients would have a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3. Thus, the individual patient is his own control. For tumor types with high numbers of patients per cohort, the overall response rate (ORR) will be evaluated.
1 secondary outcome
overall response rate
Time frame: 4 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Feb 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37783805Liebers N, Bruch PM, Terzer T, Hernandez-Hernandez M, Paramasivam N, Fitzgerald D, Altmann H, Roider T, Kolb C, Knoll M, Lenze A, Platzbecker U, Rollig C, Baldus C, Serve H, Bornhauser M, Hubschmann D, Muller-Tidow C, Stolzel F, Huber W, Benner A, Zenz T, Lu J, Dietrich S. Ex vivo drug response profiling for response and outcome prediction in hematologic malignancies: the prospective non-interventional SMARTrial. Nat Cancer. 2023 Dec;4(12):1648-1659. doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00645-5. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29153976Snijder B, Vladimer GI, Krall N, Miura K, Schmolke AS, Kornauth C, Lopez de la Fuente O, Choi HS, van der Kouwe E, Gultekin S, Kazianka L, Bigenzahn JW, Hoermann G, Prutsch N, Merkel O, Ringler A, Sabler M, Jeryczynski G, Mayerhoefer ME, Simonitsch-Klupp I, Ocko K, Felberbauer F, Mullauer L, Prager GW, Korkmaz B, Kenner L, Sperr WR, Kralovics R, Gisslinger H, Valent P, Kubicek S, Jager U, Staber PB, Superti-Furga G. Image-based ex-vivo drug screening for patients with aggressive haematological malignancies: interim results from a single-arm, open-label, pilot study. Lancet Haematol. 2017 Dec;4(12):e595-e606. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30208-9. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
- Publication of InterimsanalysisLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Relapsed Hematologic Malignancy
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cemsidomide + Dexamethasone in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingObservational study
A Long-term Follow-up Study of Patients With ARD103 CAR-T Cell Therapies
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, in Relapse, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, in Relapsed or Refractory
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Assess Safety and Tolerability of OPN-6602 in Subjects With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma, Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Effects of Cemsidomide in Combination With Elranatamab in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Subjects
Multiple Myeloma (MM)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Mezigdomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (MEZIVd) Versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philipp B Staber, MD, PhD principal investigator
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Relapsed Hematologic Malignancy, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
progression-free survival (time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03096821, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2021.