Post-ERCP Acute PancreatitisNCT03098082
Urine Trypsinogen 2 Dipstick for the Early Detection of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
A study testing Actim Pancreatitis in people with Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common, serious complication of ERCP. More than 500,000 ERCP procedures are performed from which 25,000 cases of PEP occur in the U.S.A. annually. PEP accounts for significant morbidity and health care expenditures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
- What is being tested?
- Actim Pancreatitis
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 394 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 6 Jul 2017to 8 Apr 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of Age
- Undergoing Outpatient ERCP
Who cannot join
- Unwillingness or inability to consent for the study
- Acute pancreatitis on presentation or within 1 month
- Recent ERCP (i.e. within 1 month)
- Amylase or Lipase elevation greater than 2 x upper limit of normal within 7 days prior to ERCP
- Stage 3 or 4 renal disease and/or oliguria
- Inability to access the ampulla at ERCP attempt (e.g. gastric outlet obstruction)
- Unable to provide baseline urine sample
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common, serious complication of ERCP. More than 500,000 ERCP procedures are performed from which 25,000 cases of PEP occur in the U.S.A. annually. PEP accounts for significant morbidity and health care expenditures. While symptoms of PEP arise immediately after ERCP, they are non-specific. Consequently, unnecessary admissions of outpatients without PEP and inadvertent discharge of outpatients with PEP from ERCP recovery are common. An accurate, confirmatory test for diagnosis of PEP immediately after ERCP is lacking. Actim Pancreatitis (Medix Biochemica) is a urine trypsinogen-2 dipstick test (UTDT) that uses trypsinogen-2 as a biomarker for acute pancreatitis. Urine Trypisinogen-2 Dipstick test (UTDT) is a simple, inexpensive test with promising preliminary data for accuracy for immediate diagnosis of PEP. Prior studies of ITDT test characteristics lack rigorous scientific design. Investigators will enroll 1825 ERCP outpatients at our institution in a prospective cohort study. A pre-ERCP UTDT test and diagnostic UTDT 2 hours after the ERCP will be performed. Patients with a positive baseline UTDT will be followed clinically as part of this study without 2 hour testing. Care providers and study primary investigators will be blinded to the 2 hour UTDT results. Baseline, intra-procedure and recovery room clinical data will be recorded. Diagnosis of PEP will be made blinded to the UTDT result. Admission status for PEP will be assessed by review of records and phone/e-mail contact 5 days and 30 days after ERCP procedure. Sensitivity and specificity of 2 hour post ERCP UTDT for the diagnosis of PEP will be calculated.
Aims: 1) To determine the test characteristics of UTDT for the diagnosis of PEP 2 hours after completion of ERCP. 2) To identify and describe patients with baseline UTDT positivity, in whom this test offers limited utility.
Read more
Specific Aims:
Primary Aim 1.1 To determine the test characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) of the UTDT for the diagnosis of PEP:
Hypotheses:
- UTDT is a sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of PEP for patients undergoing ERCP.
- At a cutpoint for a negative test of <50ug/L, UTDT will be accurate at 2 hours post ERCP in patients whose baseline test is negative.
Read the detailed description
Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common, serious complication of ERCP. More than 500,000 ERCP procedures are performed from which 25,000 cases of PEP occur in the U.S.A. annually. PEP accounts for significant morbidity and health care expenditures. While symptoms of PEP arise immediately after ERCP, they are non-specific. Consequently, unnecessary admissions of outpatients without PEP and inadvertent discharge of outpatients with PEP from ERCP recovery are common. An accurate, confirmatory test for diagnosis of PEP immediately after ERCP is lacking. Actim Pancreatitis (Medix Biochemica) is a urine trypsinogen-2 dipstick test (UTDT) that uses trypsinogen-2 as a biomarker for acute pancreatitis. Urine Trypisinogen-2 Dipstick test (UTDT) is a simple, inexpensive test with promising preliminary data for accuracy for immediate diagnosis of PEP. Prior studies of ITDT test characteristics lack rigorous scientific design.
Proposed Study and Methods:
Investigators will enroll 1825 ERCP outpatients at our institution in a prospective cohort study. A pre-ERCP UTDT test and diagnostic UTDT 2 hours after the ERCP will be performed. Patients with a positive baseline UTDT will be followed clinically as part of this study without 2 hour testing. Care providers and study primary investigators will be blinded to the 2 hour UTDT results. Baseline, intra-procedure and recovery room clinical data will be recorded. Diagnosis of PEP will be made blinded to the UTDT result. Admission status for PEP will be assessed by review of records and phone/e-mail contact 5 days and 30 days after ERCP procedure. Sensitivity and specificity of 2 hour post ERCP UTDT for the diagnosis of PEP will be calculated.
Aims: 1) To determine the test characteristics of UTDT for the diagnosis of PEP 2 hours after completion of ERCP. 2) To identify and describe patients with baseline UTDT positivity, in whom this test offers limited utility.
Specific Aims:
Primary Aim 1.1 To determine the test characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) of the UTDT for the diagnosis of PEP:
Hypotheses:
- UTDT is a sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of PEP for patients undergoing ERCP.
- At a cutpoint for a negative test of <50ug/L, UTDT will be accurate at 2 hours post ERCP in patients whose baseline test is negative.
Secondary AIM:
1.1 To identify and describe patients with baseline UTDT positivity.
Hypothesis:
- A subgroup of patients will demonstrate baseline positivity for UTDT. Based on previous studies, the subgroup is likely to include patients with chronic inflammatory or obstructive conditions of the pancreatic duct (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, obstructive chronic pancreatitis)1 This subgroup will represent a minority (<6%) of outpatients presenting for ERCP. 1
Patients will be recruited in the pre-procedure area prior to ERCP. Only patients who would be offered ERCP as part of their previously outlined care plan will be included in this study. Patients will be screened according to inclusion/exclusion criteria described above.
Study Procedures
Informed Consent: Eligible patients will sign an IRB-approved, written informed consent to verify their willingness to participate in this study. Informed consent will be obtained on the day of their scheduled ERCP. Consent for the study will be obtained by one of the participating endoscopists and/or a research assistant. Patients will receive a copy of the signed and dated informed consent document. Original informed consent documents will be maintained on-file. A note may be made in the subject's medical record regarding participation in the research study. Once consented and enrolled into the trial, patients will be issued a unique identifier for the purposes of data entry.
Pre-Procedure data and sample collection: After obtaining informed consent, patients will be asked health questions prior to ERCP to assess and quantify current and prior alcohol use, current and prior tobacco use, quantification of narcotic use and quantification of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. Narcotic and NSAID use in the 7 days prior to ERCP will be recorded.
Pain scores will be collected at baseline and post ERCP. Subjects will be shown the study pain scale (appendix 1) and asked to pick a number on the scale to rate their pain at baseline and 2-3 hours (+ or - 15 minutes from time of Scope out) post ERCP.
Data will be collected on the indication of ERCP, history of acute pancreatitis, recurrent acute pancreatitis, or chronic pancreatitis, history of pancreatic surgery, presence of peri-pancreatic fluid collection and prior sphincterotomy. Prior imaging may be reviewed for the presence of pancreatic mass and/or pancreatic duct obstruction.
Baseline tests may be obtained prior to undergoing ERCP including serum pancreatic enzymes (amylase, lipase), serum liver enzymes, and coagulation profile as is the standard for our endoscopy unit. Available outpatient laboratory data within 48-72 hours of ERCP will be reviewed. Lack of baseline labs will not be a criterion for exclusion from the study.
Patients with baseline, pre-procedure positivity for UTDT (> or = 50ug/L) will undergo all study procedures as outlined below with the exception of 2 hour UTDT level.
Patients who are unable to provide a urine sample for post ERCP testing will still be included in the final analysis of baseline UTDT level. Subjects who are excluded due to the inability to access the ampulla at ERCP will also still be Included in the final analysis of baseline UTDT level.
Intra-procedural Data Collection: Patients will undergo ERCP as intended. All clinical decisions and endoscopic interventions prior to, during and after ERCP will be performed at the discretion of the treating physician. Data on duration of procedure, placement of pancreatic or biliary duct stents, ERCP maneuvers deployed for cannulation (e.g. needle knife), findings associated with chronic pancreatitis (e.g pancreatic duct stones), pancreatic duct leak, peri-procedural NSAIDs administration, amount of intraoperative IV fluids and any immediate complications including perforation, bleeding, or hemodynamic instability will be recorded.
Immediate Postoperative Care, Data and Sample collection: At our institution, patients typically remain in the recovery area for 2-3 hours after completion of the ERCP. This time interval in part is related to two-phase recovery after general anesthesia, which is the standard sedation approach for ERCP outpatients. Patients will remain for recovery after ERCP for at least two hours for a post procedure observation period and collection of UTDT result. During this time, a urine sample for UTDT testing will be collected at 2 -3 hours (+ or - 15 minutes from time of Scope out) after ERCP by the study research technician. Patients, study investigators, ERCP care team, nursing staff will be blinded to the results. The statistician will be blinded to the urine trypsinogen-2 test during statistical analysis.
The decision to admit/monitor the patient will be left to the discretion of the endoscopist / ERCP care team and will occur blinded to the UTDT results. Data regarding symptoms (e.g. nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain scores), narcotic administered for pain symptoms, duration in recovery, volume of IV fluids administered in recovery and decision to admit or discharge will be recorded.
Patients will receive a risk assessment for post-ERCP pancreatitis. This will calculated and tracked for the purposes of this study.
Follow Up Data Collection: Patients who are hospitalized will have serum amylase and lipase drawn after the ERCP procedure per standard clinical protocol timelines. Patients who are discharged to home/other after ERCP will be contacted by telephone and/or email 5 days (+ 4 days or - 2 days) and 30 days ( + or - 10 days) after the ERCP by a study team member to determine whether PEP occurred and was managed outside of our institution. Patients will be asked about ERCP procedure complications such as infection, bleeding, perforation and death. This contact may be made by phone, email or text message. Subjects will be asked for their preferred method of contact at study enrollment. Records confirming post ERCP pancreatitis will be requested if the patient is admitted and/or initially managed at an outside institution for PEP. Patients without hospitalization for symptoms attributable to post ERCP pancreatitis will be classified as not having developed PEP. Records pertaining to any ERCP procedure complications will also be requested.
PEP will be defined by the primary ERCP team. The ERCP team will be blinded to the UTDT result when determining PEP.
Clinical data regarding volume of IV fluids administered at 24, 48 hours of admission and severity of pancreatitis (based on Cotton criteria, Modified Marshall Score and graded presence of necrosis) will be assessed recorded for all patients admitted with PEP.
- Conditions
- Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
- Being tested
- Actim Pancreatitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Actim PancreatitisDevice
Actim Pancreatitis (Medix Biochemica) is a urine trypsinogen-2 dipstick test (UTDT) that uses trypsinogen-2 as a biomarker for acute pancreatitis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Actim Pancreatitis Dipstick Test | Other | All enrolled subjects who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria will have the Urine Trypsinogen 2 Dipstick test done. Receives: Device: Actim Pancreatitis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity and Specificity of Urine Trypsinogen-2 Dipstick Testing for the Diagnosis of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
The urine Trypsinogen result will be codified as positive (indicative of a urine level cutpoint >50ug/L) or negative for post ERCP pancreatitis (indicative of a urine cutpoint level of <50ug/L) . This will be measured against the consensus criteria diagnosis for post ERCP pancreatitis (admission for abdominal pain symptoms of pancreatitis and serum amylase or lipase >3 times the upper limit of normal at 24 hours after ERCP).
- True positive: Positive dipstick, post ERCP pancreatitis diagnosis by consensus criteria
- True negative: negative dipstick testing, no diagnosis of post ERCP pancreatitis by consensus criteria
- False positive: positive urine dipstick test, no diagnosis of post-ERCP pancreatitis by consensus criteria
- False negative: negative urine dipstick test. diagnosis of post-ERCP pancreatitis by consensus criteria
Measured: Urine dipstick testing assessed 2-3 hours following ERCP, for post ERCP pancreaitits.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Mar 2017
- Study start6 Jul 2017
- Primary completion8 Apr 2020
- Study completion8 Apr 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Post-ERCP Acute PancreatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Indiana UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- All enrolled subjects who meet study inclusion /exclusion will have the Urine Trypsinogen dip stick test
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 394 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jeffrey Easler, Indiana University
- Investigators
- Jeffrey Easler, MD, Principal investigator, Indiana University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03098082
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1701950933
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 13 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: No plan to share data with other researchers
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Urine Trypsinogen 2 Dipstick for the Early Detection of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03098082
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1701950933
- Conditions
- Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 394 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 26 Jun 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common, serious complication of ERCP. More than 500,000 ERCP procedures are performed from which 25,000 cases of PEP occur in the U.S.A. annually. PEP accounts for significant morbidity and health care expenditures. While symptoms of PEP arise immediately after ERCP, they are non-specific. Consequently, unnecessary admissions of outpatients without PEP and inadvertent discharge of outpatients with PEP from ERCP recovery are common. An accurate, confirmatory test for diagnosis of PEP immediately after ERCP is lacking. Actim Pancreatitis (Medix Biochemica) is a urine trypsinogen-2 dipstick test (UTDT) that uses trypsinogen-2 as a biomarker for acute pancreatitis. Urine Trypisinogen-2 Dipstick test (UTDT) is a simple, inexpensive test with promising preliminary data for accuracy for immediate diagnosis of PEP. Prior studies of ITDT test characteristics lack rigorous scientific design. Investigators will enroll 1825 ERCP outpatients at our institution in a prospective cohort study. A pre-ERCP UTDT test and diagnostic UTDT 2 hours after the ERCP will be performed. Patients with a positive baseline UTDT will be followed clinically as part of this study without 2 hour testing. Care providers and study primary investigators will be blinded to the 2 hour UTDT results. Baseline, intra-procedure and recovery room clinical data will be recorded. Diagnosis of PEP will be made blinded to the UTDT result. Admission status for PEP will be assessed by review of records and phone/e-mail contact 5 days and 30 days after ERCP procedure. Sensitivity and specificity of 2 hour post ERCP UTDT for the diagnosis of PEP will be calculated.
Aims: 1) To determine the test characteristics of UTDT for the diagnosis of PEP 2 hours after completion of ERCP. 2) To identify and describe patients with baseline UTDT positivity, in whom this test offers limited utility.
Specific Aims:
Primary Aim 1.1 To determine the test characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) of the UTDT for the diagnosis of PEP:
Hypotheses:
- UTDT is a sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of PEP for patients undergoing ERCP.
- At a cutpoint for a negative test of <50ug/L, UTDT will be accurate at 2 hours post ERCP in patients whose baseline test is negative.
Detailed description
Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common, serious complication of ERCP. More than 500,000 ERCP procedures are performed from which 25,000 cases of PEP occur in the U.S.A. annually. PEP accounts for significant morbidity and health care expenditures. While symptoms of PEP arise immediately after ERCP, they are non-specific. Consequently, unnecessary admissions of outpatients without PEP and inadvertent discharge of outpatients with PEP from ERCP recovery are common. An accurate, confirmatory test for diagnosis of PEP immediately after ERCP is lacking. Actim Pancreatitis (Medix Biochemica) is a urine trypsinogen-2 dipstick test (UTDT) that uses trypsinogen-2 as a biomarker for acute pancreatitis. Urine Trypisinogen-2 Dipstick test (UTDT) is a simple, inexpensive test with promising preliminary data for accuracy for immediate diagnosis of PEP. Prior studies of ITDT test characteristics lack rigorous scientific design.
Proposed Study and Methods:
Investigators will enroll 1825 ERCP outpatients at our institution in a prospective cohort study. A pre-ERCP UTDT test and diagnostic UTDT 2 hours after the ERCP will be performed. Patients with a positive baseline UTDT will be followed clinically as part of this study without 2 hour testing. Care providers and study primary investigators will be blinded to the 2 hour UTDT results. Baseline, intra-procedure and recovery room clinical data will be recorded. Diagnosis of PEP will be made blinded to the UTDT result. Admission status for PEP will be assessed by review of records and phone/e-mail contact 5 days and 30 days after ERCP procedure. Sensitivity and specificity of 2 hour post ERCP UTDT for the diagnosis of PEP will be calculated.
Aims: 1) To determine the test characteristics of UTDT for the diagnosis of PEP 2 hours after completion of ERCP. 2) To identify and describe patients with baseline UTDT positivity, in whom this test offers limited utility.
Specific Aims:
Primary Aim 1.1 To determine the test characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) of the UTDT for the diagnosis of PEP:
Hypotheses:
- UTDT is a sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of PEP for patients undergoing ERCP.
- At a cutpoint for a negative test of <50ug/L, UTDT will be accurate at 2 hours post ERCP in patients whose baseline test is negative.
Secondary AIM:
1.1 To identify and describe patients with baseline UTDT positivity.
Hypothesis:
- A subgroup of patients will demonstrate baseline positivity for UTDT. Based on previous studies, the subgroup is likely to include patients with chronic inflammatory or obstructive conditions of the pancreatic duct (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, obstructive chronic pancreatitis)1 This subgroup will represent a minority (<6%) of outpatients presenting for ERCP. 1
Patients will be recruited in the pre-procedure area prior to ERCP. Only patients who would be offered ERCP as part of their previously outlined care plan will be included in this study. Patients will be screened according to inclusion/exclusion criteria described above.
Study Procedures
Informed Consent: Eligible patients will sign an IRB-approved, written informed consent to verify their willingness to participate in this study. Informed consent will be obtained on the day of their scheduled ERCP. Consent for the study will be obtained by one of the participating endoscopists and/or a research assistant. Patients will receive a copy of the signed and dated informed consent document. Original informed consent documents will be maintained on-file. A note may be made in the subject's medical record regarding participation in the research study. Once consented and enrolled into the trial, patients will be issued a unique identifier for the purposes of data entry.
Pre-Procedure data and sample collection: After obtaining informed consent, patients will be asked health questions prior to ERCP to assess and quantify current and prior alcohol use, current and prior tobacco use, quantification of narcotic use and quantification of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. Narcotic and NSAID use in the 7 days prior to ERCP will be recorded.
Pain scores will be collected at baseline and post ERCP. Subjects will be shown the study pain scale (appendix 1) and asked to pick a number on the scale to rate their pain at baseline and 2-3 hours (+ or - 15 minutes from time of Scope out) post ERCP.
Data will be collected on the indication of ERCP, history of acute pancreatitis, recurrent acute pancreatitis, or chronic pancreatitis, history of pancreatic surgery, presence of peri-pancreatic fluid collection and prior sphincterotomy. Prior imaging may be reviewed for the presence of pancreatic mass and/or pancreatic duct obstruction.
Baseline tests may be obtained prior to undergoing ERCP including serum pancreatic enzymes (amylase, lipase), serum liver enzymes, and coagulation profile as is the standard for our endoscopy unit. Available outpatient laboratory data within 48-72 hours of ERCP will be reviewed. Lack of baseline labs will not be a criterion for exclusion from the study.
Patients with baseline, pre-procedure positivity for UTDT (> or = 50ug/L) will undergo all study procedures as outlined below with the exception of 2 hour UTDT level.
Patients who are unable to provide a urine sample for post ERCP testing will still be included in the final analysis of baseline UTDT level. Subjects who are excluded due to the inability to access the ampulla at ERCP will also still be Included in the final analysis of baseline UTDT level.
Intra-procedural Data Collection: Patients will undergo ERCP as intended. All clinical decisions and endoscopic interventions prior to, during and after ERCP will be performed at the discretion of the treating physician. Data on duration of procedure, placement of pancreatic or biliary duct stents, ERCP maneuvers deployed for cannulation (e.g. needle knife), findings associated with chronic pancreatitis (e.g pancreatic duct stones), pancreatic duct leak, peri-procedural NSAIDs administration, amount of intraoperative IV fluids and any immediate complications including perforation, bleeding, or hemodynamic instability will be recorded.
Immediate Postoperative Care, Data and Sample collection: At our institution, patients typically remain in the recovery area for 2-3 hours after completion of the ERCP. This time interval in part is related to two-phase recovery after general anesthesia, which is the standard sedation approach for ERCP outpatients. Patients will remain for recovery after ERCP for at least two hours for a post procedure observation period and collection of UTDT result. During this time, a urine sample for UTDT testing will be collected at 2 -3 hours (+ or - 15 minutes from time of Scope out) after ERCP by the study research technician. Patients, study investigators, ERCP care team, nursing staff will be blinded to the results. The statistician will be blinded to the urine trypsinogen-2 test during statistical analysis.
The decision to admit/monitor the patient will be left to the discretion of the endoscopist / ERCP care team and will occur blinded to the UTDT results. Data regarding symptoms (e.g. nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain scores), narcotic administered for pain symptoms, duration in recovery, volume of IV fluids administered in recovery and decision to admit or discharge will be recorded.
Patients will receive a risk assessment for post-ERCP pancreatitis. This will calculated and tracked for the purposes of this study.
Follow Up Data Collection: Patients who are hospitalized will have serum amylase and lipase drawn after the ERCP procedure per standard clinical protocol timelines. Patients who are discharged to home/other after ERCP will be contacted by telephone and/or email 5 days (+ 4 days or - 2 days) and 30 days ( + or - 10 days) after the ERCP by a study team member to determine whether PEP occurred and was managed outside of our institution. Patients will be asked about ERCP procedure complications such as infection, bleeding, perforation and death. This contact may be made by phone, email or text message. Subjects will be asked for their preferred method of contact at study enrollment. Records confirming post ERCP pancreatitis will be requested if the patient is admitted and/or initially managed at an outside institution for PEP. Patients without hospitalization for symptoms attributable to post ERCP pancreatitis will be classified as not having developed PEP. Records pertaining to any ERCP procedure complications will also be requested.
PEP will be defined by the primary ERCP team. The ERCP team will be blinded to the UTDT result when determining PEP.
Clinical data regarding volume of IV fluids administered at 24, 48 hours of admission and severity of pancreatitis (based on Cotton criteria, Modified Marshall Score and graded presence of necrosis) will be assessed recorded for all patients admitted with PEP.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- All enrolled subjects who meet study inclusion /exclusion will have the Urine Trypsinogen dip stick test
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Actim Pancreatitis Dipstick Test | Other | Device: Actim PancreatitisAll enrolled subjects who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria will have the Urine Trypsinogen 2 Dipstick test done. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 18 years of Age
- Undergoing Outpatient ERCP
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Unwillingness or inability to consent for the study
- Acute pancreatitis on presentation or within 1 month
- Recent ERCP (i.e. within 1 month)
- Amylase or Lipase elevation greater than 2 x upper limit of normal within 7 days prior to ERCP
- Stage 3 or 4 renal disease and/or oliguria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Actim PancreatitisActim Pancreatitis (Medix Biochemica) is a urine trypsinogen-2 dipstick test (UTDT) that uses trypsinogen-2 as a biomarker for acute pancreatitis. | Device | Actim Pancreatitis Dipstick Test |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity and Specificity of Urine Trypsinogen-2 Dipstick Testing for the Diagnosis of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Time frame: Urine dipstick testing assessed 2-3 hours following ERCP, for post ERCP pancreaitits.
The urine Trypsinogen result will be codified as positive (indicative of a urine level cutpoint >50ug/L) or negative for post ERCP pancreatitis (indicative of a urine cutpoint level of <50ug/L) . This will be measured against the consensus criteria diagnosis for post ERCP pancreatitis (admission for abdominal pain symptoms of pancreatitis and serum amylase or lipase >3 times the upper limit of normal at 24 hours after ERCP). 1. True positive: Positive dipstick, post ERCP pancreatitis diagnosis by consensus criteria 2. True negative: negative dipstick testing, no diagnosis of post ERCP pancreatitis by consensus criteria 3. False positive: positive urine dipstick test, no diagnosis of post-ERCP pancreatitis by consensus criteria 4. False negative: negative urine dipstick test. diagnosis of post-ERCP pancreatitis by consensus criteria
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No plan to share data with other researchers
Related trials for Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
Not yet recruiting
Cold Water Papillary Irrigation Plus Rectal NSAIDs vs Rectal NSAIDs Alone for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (COLD)
Post ERCP Pancreatitis, Acute Pancreatitis (AP)
Not yet recruiting
Prophylactic Sphincterotomy in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Patients Unfit for Surgery
Acute Biliary Pancreatitis
Recruiting
Cold and NSAID Trial for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis, Acute
RecruitingObservational study
An European Multi-centre Cohort Study for Unravelling Pharmacokinetic and Genetic Factors Underlying Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Indomethacin for Biliary ERCP Patients
Pancreatitis Biliary, Pancreatitis Acute Biliary
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeffrey Easler, MD principal investigator
Indiana University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Actim Pancreatitis in people with Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jun 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity and Specificity of Urine Trypsinogen-2 Dipstick Testing for the Diagnosis of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (time frame: Urine dipstick testing assessed 2-3 hours following ERCP, for post ERCP pancreaitits.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2023.