Quality of LifeSPLENIQNCT03099798
Traumatic Splenic Injury and Management (SPLENIQ Study)
An observational study of Quality of Life and Spleen Injury, run by Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis at 10 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
OBJECTIVE: To determine the quality of life (QOL) and clinical outcome after conservative therapy, embolization (proximal versus distal) or surgery in patients with traumatic splenic injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Quality of Life, Spleen Injury, Trauma
- What is being tested?
- Questionnaires and MRI abdomen
- How many people
- 106 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2017to 31 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients with splenic injury after blunt abdominal trauma confirmed by ultrasound (US/FAST) and/or computed tomography (CT) at the primary trauma screening at the 5 selected hospitals between March 2017 and December 2018 will be asked to participate in this study as soon as they can talk and are lucid. Patients receive a verbal and written explanation about the study. The time for consideration is one week. When a patient is willing to participate he/she will be asked to sign a consent form. When patients agree to participate, they are included for follow-up.
Who may be able to join
- Splenic injury after blunt abdominal trauma (confirmed by FAST and/or CT)
- The patient underwent NOM/SAE/splenectomy for the management of traumatic splenic injury
- The treatment took place in the period from March 2017 to December 2018 at one of the five selected hospitals
- 18 years or older.
Who cannot join
- Insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language
- Patients who died during or after treatment are (of course) excluded for questionnaires and MRI, not for clinical outcomes
- Patients treated with SAE: patients who do not want to or are not able to undergo an MRI abdomen (for example pregnant women or other contraindications for MRI). Patients excluded for MRI still need to fill out the questionnaires. Also, their clinical outcomes will be processed in the database.
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
10 sites in 1 country
Netherlands10 sites
VU University Medical Center
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081 HV
Amphia Hospital
Breda, North Brabant, 4800 RL
Albert Schweitzer Hospital
Dordrecht, South Holland, 3300 AK
Medical Spectrum Twente
Enschede, Overijssel, 7512 KZ
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA
Radboud University Medical Center
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 GA
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3000 CA
Maasstad Hospital
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3007 AC
Elisabeth-Twee Steden Hospital
Tilburg, North Brabant, 5000 LC
Isala
Zwolle, Overijssel, 8025 AB
About this study
Official title: Traumatic Splenic Injury and Management (SPLENIQ Study) Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes of Treatment for Splenic Injury After Trauma
OBJECTIVE:
To determine the quality of life (QOL) and clinical outcome after conservative therapy, embolization (proximal versus distal) or surgery in patients with traumatic splenic injury. Secondary aims: (I) to examine therapy-related complications, (II) to establish the necessity of additional therapies, (III) the assessment of splenic function related to splenic morphology (MR imaging) after embolization and (IV) to find the prognostic factors for failure of non-operative management (NOM) in patients with splenic injuries. Finally, with the acquired data from this study a patient-oriented protocol will be provided for the management of traumatic splenic injury.
Read more
HYPOTHESIS:
The investigators expect that NOM is superior to surgery with regard to QOL, clinical outcome and splenic function. Embolization will need more additional therapies. Splenic morphology is related to splenic immune function. Expected prognostic factors are age above 40, ISS >25 and a splenic injury grade of 3 or higher.
STUDY DESIGN:
A combination of a retrospective and a prospective multicentre cohort study. This protocol involves the prospective part of the study.
STUDY POPULATION/DATASET:
Patients who enter the participating hospitals between March 2017 and December 2018 with splenic injury will be asked to participate. The follow-up period will be one year with regard to QOL, clinical symptoms and imaging.
INTERVENTION:
All patients will complete a number of questionnaires at different time points. The patients who were treated with splenic artery embolization (SAE) will undergo an MRI one month and one year after treatment.
OUTCOME MEASURES:
Primary outcome is QOL. Secondary outcomes are clinical symptoms and imaging.
SAMPLE SIZE:
Approximately 100 patients will be included per year during the inclusion phase.
DATA ANALYSIS:
With regard to the prospective data linear modelling will be performed.
COLLABORATION/CONNECTION:
Tilburg University, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Maasstad Hospital Rotterdam, Albert Schweitzer Hospital Dordrecht, Amphia hospital Breda, Leiden University Medical Center, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Medical Spectrum Twente, Radboud University Nijmegen, Isala Zwolle.
TIME SCHEDULE:
Year 1: literature search and conducting the retrospective study and analyses. Years 1-3: inclusion prospective study and follow-up of patients. Year 4: finishing follow-up data collection and analysing.
- Conditions
- Quality of Life, Spleen Injury, Trauma, Splenic Artery Embolization
- Being tested
- Questionnaires, MRI abdomen
- Medical subject headings
- Wounds and Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
QuestionnairesOther
All patients will complete a number of questionnaires at different time points.
- SF-12, WHOQoL-Bref, EQ-5D-5L, iPCQ, iMCQ
- 1 week, 1 month, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment
MRI abdomenDiagnostic test
Patients who were treated with splenic artery embolization will also undergo an MRI one month and one year after treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Non-Operative Management (NOM)/Observational | Patients "treated" observationally for (traumatic) spleen injury. Receives: Other: Questionnaires | |
| Splenic Artery Embolization | Patients treated with splenic artery embolization for (traumatic) spleen injury. Receives: Other: Questionnaires; Diagnostic Test: MRI abdomen | |
| Surgery | Patients treated surgically for (traumatic) spleen injury. Receives: Other: Questionnaires |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of Life: baseline (within 1 week after treatment)
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire, SF-12 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires
Measured: One week after treatment
Quality of life: 1 month follow-up
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
Measured: One month after treatment
Quality of life: 3 months follow-up
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
Measured: Three months after treatment
Quality of life: 6 months follow-up
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
Measured: Six months after treatment
Quality of life: one year follow-up
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
Measured: One year after treatment
Change in health status: SF-12
SF-12 questionnaire
Measured: One week, 1 month and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment
Change in health related quality of life: EQ-5D-5L
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Measured: One week, 1 month and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment
Secondary outcomes (6)
Clinical Outcome
Data obtained from the patient records (e.g. complications, need for re-intervention, hospital stay, return to daily activities)
Measured: One year follow-up
Cost-effectiveness
The overall cost-effectiveness will be assessed with the iPCQ and iMCQ questionnaires, completed at different time points
Measured: One year follow-up
Imaging Outcome after Embolization (one month after treatment)
Splenic morphological characteristics (e.g. volume, necrosis, splenosis, calcifications or chronic infarction morphology)
Measured: One month after embolization
Imaging Outcome after Embolization (one year after treatment)
Splenic morphological characteristics (e.g.volume, necrosis, splenosis, calcifications or chronic infarction morphology)
Measured: One year after embolization
Splenic Artery Embolization characteristics
Difference between proximal versus distal embolization
Measured: One year follow-up
Prognostic factors for failure of Non-Operative Management
A recent study suggests that there are prognostic factors for failure of NOM in the treatment of adults with (blunt) splenic injury. Strong evidence exists for: age of 40 years or above, Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 25 or greater and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) splenic injury grade of 3 or greater.
Measured: One year follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Apr 2017
- Study start1 Mar 2017
- Primary completion31 Dec 2020
- Study completion31 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Quality of LifeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Center, Maasstad Hospital, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Amphia Hospital, Tilburg University, Leiden University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Radboud University Medical Center, Isala
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jolanda de Vries, Prof. dr., Principal investigator, Project leader (ETZ Tilburg, Tilburg University)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03099798
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL54542.028.16 / P1609
- Acronym
- SPLENIQ
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Raaijmakers CP, Lohle PN, Lodder P, de Vries J. Quality of Life and Clinical Outcome After Traumatic Spleen Injury (SPLENIQ Study): Protocol for an Observational Retrospective and Prospective Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 26;8(5):e12391. doi: 10.2196/12391.
PubMed 31066709
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Traumatic Splenic Injury and Management (SPLENIQ Study) Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes of Treatment for Splenic Injury After Trauma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03099798
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPLENIQ / NL54542.028.16 / P1609
- Conditions
- Quality of Life, Spleen Injury, Trauma, Splenic Artery Embolization
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden ZiekenhuisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Center, Maasstad Hospital, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Amphia Hospital, Tilburg University, Leiden University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Radboud University Medical Center, Isala
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
OBJECTIVE:
To determine the quality of life (QOL) and clinical outcome after conservative therapy, embolization (proximal versus distal) or surgery in patients with traumatic splenic injury. Secondary aims: (I) to examine therapy-related complications, (II) to establish the necessity of additional therapies, (III) the assessment of splenic function related to splenic morphology (MR imaging) after embolization and (IV) to find the prognostic factors for failure of non-operative management (NOM) in patients with splenic injuries. Finally, with the acquired data from this study a patient-oriented protocol will be provided for the management of traumatic splenic injury.
HYPOTHESIS:
The investigators expect that NOM is superior to surgery with regard to QOL, clinical outcome and splenic function. Embolization will need more additional therapies. Splenic morphology is related to splenic immune function. Expected prognostic factors are age above 40, ISS >25 and a splenic injury grade of 3 or higher.
STUDY DESIGN:
A combination of a retrospective and a prospective multicentre cohort study. This protocol involves the prospective part of the study.
STUDY POPULATION/DATASET:
Patients who enter the participating hospitals between March 2017 and December 2018 with splenic injury will be asked to participate. The follow-up period will be one year with regard to QOL, clinical symptoms and imaging.
INTERVENTION:
All patients will complete a number of questionnaires at different time points. The patients who were treated with splenic artery embolization (SAE) will undergo an MRI one month and one year after treatment.
OUTCOME MEASURES:
Primary outcome is QOL. Secondary outcomes are clinical symptoms and imaging.
SAMPLE SIZE:
Approximately 100 patients will be included per year during the inclusion phase.
DATA ANALYSIS:
With regard to the prospective data linear modelling will be performed.
COLLABORATION/CONNECTION:
Tilburg University, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Maasstad Hospital Rotterdam, Albert Schweitzer Hospital Dordrecht, Amphia hospital Breda, Leiden University Medical Center, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Medical Spectrum Twente, Radboud University Nijmegen, Isala Zwolle.
TIME SCHEDULE:
Year 1: literature search and conducting the retrospective study and analyses. Years 1-3: inclusion prospective study and follow-up of patients. Year 4: finishing follow-up data collection and analysing.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Non-Operative Management (NOM)/Observational | – | Other: QuestionnairesPatients "treated" observationally for (traumatic) spleen injury. |
| Splenic Artery Embolization | – | Other: Questionnaires, Diagnostic Test: MRI abdomenPatients treated with splenic artery embolization for (traumatic) spleen injury. |
| Surgery | – | Other: QuestionnairesPatients treated surgically for (traumatic) spleen injury. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients with splenic injury after blunt abdominal trauma confirmed by ultrasound (US/FAST) and/or computed tomography (CT) at the primary trauma screening at the 5 selected hospitals between March 2017 and December 2018 will be asked to participate in this study as soon as they can talk and are lucid. Patients receive a verbal and written explanation about the study. The time for consideration is one week. When a patient is willing to participate he/she will be asked to sign a consent form. When patients agree to participate, they are included for follow-up.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Splenic injury after blunt abdominal trauma (confirmed by FAST and/or CT)
- The patient underwent NOM/SAE/splenectomy for the management of traumatic splenic injury
- The treatment took place in the period from March 2017 to December 2018 at one of the five selected hospitals
- 18 years or older.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language
- Patients who died during or after treatment are (of course) excluded for questionnaires and MRI, not for clinical outcomes
- Patients treated with SAE: patients who do not want to or are not able to undergo an MRI abdomen (for example pregnant women or other contraindications for MRI). Patients excluded for MRI still need to fill out the questionnaires. Also, their clinical outcomes will be processed in the database.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| QuestionnairesAll patients will complete a number of questionnaires at different time points. * SF-12, WHOQoL-Bref, EQ-5D-5L, iPCQ, iMCQ * 1 week, 1 month, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment | Other | Non-Operative Management (NOM)/Observational, Splenic Artery Embolization, Surgery |
| MRI abdomenPatients who were treated with splenic artery embolization will also undergo an MRI one month and one year after treatment. | Diagnostic test | Splenic Artery Embolization |
Primary outcome
Quality of Life: baseline (within 1 week after treatment)
Time frame: One week after treatment
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire, SF-12 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires
Quality of life: 1 month follow-up
Time frame: One month after treatment
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
Quality of life: 3 months follow-up
Time frame: Three months after treatment
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
Quality of life: 6 months follow-up
Time frame: Six months after treatment
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
Quality of life: one year follow-up
Time frame: One year after treatment
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
Change in health status: SF-12
Time frame: One week, 1 month and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment
SF-12 questionnaire
Change in health related quality of life: EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: One week, 1 month and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
6 secondary outcomes
Clinical Outcome
Time frame: One year follow-up
Cost-effectiveness
Time frame: One year follow-up
Imaging Outcome after Embolization (one month after treatment)
Time frame: One month after embolization
Imaging Outcome after Embolization (one year after treatment)
Time frame: One year after embolization
Splenic Artery Embolization characteristics
Time frame: One year follow-up
Prognostic factors for failure of Non-Operative Management
Time frame: One year follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Apr 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31066709Raaijmakers CP, Lohle PN, Lodder P, de Vries J. Quality of Life and Clinical Outcome After Traumatic Spleen Injury (SPLENIQ Study): Protocol for an Observational Retrospective and Prospective Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 26;8(5):e12391. doi: 10.2196/12391.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Quality of Life
Recruiting
rTMS for Postoperative Brain Tumor Patients
Brain Tumors, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Not yet recruiting
Development and Testing of Nutritional Algorithms (NACHO)
Nutrition Poor, Nutritional Deficiency
Recruiting
Structural Heat Adaptation and Education in Urban Setting
Heat Illness, Quality of Life
RecruitingObservational study
Changes in Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) During Full Arch Implant Treatment
Edentulous Mouth, Quality of Life
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of a Chinese Quality of Life Scale for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), Quality of Life
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jolanda de Vries, Prof. dr. principal investigator
Project leader (ETZ Tilburg, Tilburg University)
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Quality of Life and Spleen Injury, run by Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis at 10 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of Life: baseline (within 1 week after treatment) (time frame: One week after treatment). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03099798, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.