AzTrials
AzTrials

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmNCT03100409

Effect of a Low Residue Diet in Comparison to the Dietetic Recommendations From the INCan in Cervical Cancer Patients

A study testing Dietary modification in people with Uterine Cervical Neoplasm and Dietary Modification, run by National Institute of Cancerología at 1 site in Mexico.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In Mexico, cervical cancer (CC) ranks second in incidence and mortality among women. The National Institute of Cancer in Mexico (lNCan) receives annually about 500 patients with CC, 80% of which are diagnosed with locally advanced disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
Dietary modification
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
137 participants
Where
1 siteMexico
Study dates
1 Feb 2017to 1 Sep 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women 18 years of age and older.
  • Ability to understand the study and be able to sign the informed consent.
  • Functional stage ECOG 0 - 2.
  • Negative pregnancy test, null reproductive potential, or currently using an contraceptive method.
  • Willing and able to attend the programmed visits.
  • Diagnosed with cervical malignant tumors of epithelial origin in the neck of the uterus, clinical stages IB2-IVA.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Candidates to receive concomitant Chemo-Radiotherapy, followed by Brachytherapy.
  • In case of presence of diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension, without retinopathy or albuminuria <300 mg/dl.
  • In case of renal deterioration, a creatinine clearance >20 ml/min.
  • Hemoglobin >10 g/l.
  • Leucocytes > 4000/mm3.
  • Platelets >100000/mm3.

Who cannot join

  • Under a different nutritional treatment using a nutritional supplement.
  • Carrying other uncontrolled diseases, including cardiovascular insufficiency, arrhythmia, psychiatric illnesses.
  • Concomitant treatment with another experimental drug.
  • Active TB.
  • Infected with HIV.
  • History of LES and other rheumatologic diseases that involve renal deterioration.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Presence of vesicular-vaginal fistulae at moment of diagnosis.
  • Previous malignancy.
  • Study Discontinuation Criteria:
  • Loss of follow up for 21 days.
  • Evidence of disease progression.
  • At the request of patient.
  • By unacceptable toxicity.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Criteria must be followed punctually. If a patient were inappropriately included, she must be discontinued from the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Mexico1 site
  • National Cancer Institute of Mexico

    Mexico City, Tlalpan, 14080

Other trials in Mexico

About this study

Official title: Effect of a Low Residue Diet in Comparison to the Dietary Recommendations From the INCan: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess Malnutrition, Gastrointestinal Toxicity and Quality of Life of Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients (IB2-IVA)

In Mexico, cervical cancer (CC) ranks second in incidence and mortality among women. The National Institute of Cancer in Mexico (lNCan) receives annually about 500 patients with CC, 80% of which are diagnosed with locally advanced disease. The standard treatment for locally advanced disease consists in concomitant chemo-radiotherapy based on cisplatin (QT-RT), followed by brachytherapy, with an absolute benefit of 10%. Adverse effects include gastrointestinal toxicity, which is the most important factor limiting the dosage of pelvic radiation. Cancer treatment, in any modality, induces malnutrition, more so when combined treatments are administered. Radiation induced gastrointestinal toxicity is caused by different factors, among which are malabsorption of bile, fat and carbohydrates, decrease in brush border enzymes, diverticular disease, proctitis, and psychological factors. International guidelines for cancer patients recommend nutritional assessment in these patients before they start treatment, so nutritional risk can be detected and the patient may get started on dietary intervention to prevent malnutrition. Several authors have studied the dietary management that may help reduce the gastrointestinal effects in cancer patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy. To reduce diarrhea and prevent malnutrition the recommended dietary approach is a low residue diet consisting on 20-25% kcal from fat, 5g of lactose and 20g of fiber. Currently the INCan does not follow the nutrition care process for cervical cancer patients; written recommendations are given to the patients with a list of foods allowed or not allowed, with no further nutritional assessment or intervention. From previous studies, the investigators have demonstrated that the current recommendations do not help the patients maintain their nutritional status, during their treatment most patients become malnourished (81%, p<0.01). Therefore, the aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate a diet low in residue in CC patients, considering the necessary modifications for each patient if morbidities are present, in comparison with the current dietary recommendations used in the INCan.

Read the detailed description

In Mexico, cervical cancer (CC) is the second most frequent cause of death among women, with a mortality rate of 4000 women/year. Among the patients attended by the INCan, 80% are diagnosed with locally advanced CC and 30% of these present comorbidities. Hypertension may be present in 20% of patients, obesity in 18% and diabetes in 6.8%. These comorbidities affect the efficacy of treatment, increase the risk of malnutrition, of adverse events, hospitalization, increase hospital stay and worsen the quality of life, and even increase the risk of death. Furthermore, 10 to 20% of patients present kidney deterioration. The main reason for kidney disease is ureteral obstruction. The glomerular filtration rate deteriorates with age and many patients have comorbid medical illnesses that further compromise the kidneys. The standard treatment for CC is concomitant chemo-radiotherapy using cisplatin as a radiosensitizer, and brachytherapy at the end of treatment. Studies developed in the INCan described the acute toxicity symptoms in CC patients using this treatment: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, cystitis, radioepithelitis, leucopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia. Pelvic radiotherapy causes gastrointestinal toxicity, which is the most important limiting factor for the patients to complete their treatment. Cancer treatment, along with the tumor itself and other factors, causes malnutrition, and this confers a bad prognosis for the patient's response to treatment and survival. There is a nutritional risk in these patients at the moment of diagnosis, because of the metabolic alterations caused by the tumor, and the treatment-induced side effects. International guidelines for cancer patients recommend nutritional assessment in these patients before they start treatment, so nutritional risk can be detected and the patient may get started on dietary intervention to prevent malnutrition. Several authors have studied the dietary management that may help reduce the gastrointestinal effects in cancer patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy. To reduce diarrhea and prevent malnutrition the recommended dietary approach is a low residue diet consisting on 20-25% fat, 5g of lactose and 20g of fiber. Currently the INCan does not follow the nutrition care process for cervical cancer patients; written recommendations are given to the patients with a list of foods allowed or not allowed, with no further nutritional assessment or intervention. The investigators described the nutritional status of CC patients undergoing concomitant chemo-radiotherapy. It was observed that by the end of cancer treatment, a period of 9 weeks, 81.8% of patients became malnourished; 96% of patients lost weight, 78% of which had severe weight loss.

The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate a diet low in residue in CC patients, considering the necessary modifications for each patient if morbidities are present, in comparison with the current dietary recommendations used in the INCan. A thorough nutritional evaluation including anthropometric data, dietary data, gastrointestinal toxicity and quality of life evaluations, will be performed.

Particular objectives are the following:

  1. Identify the nutritional status of CC patients before, during and after treatment with chemo-radiotherapy, in intervention and control groups.
  2. Determine the association of malnutrition and gastrointestinal toxicity during and after treatment, in intervention and control groups.
  3. Evaluate the quality of life of patients before, during and after treatment, in both groups.
  4. Establish the association of nutritional status and response to treatment, in both groups.

The aim is based on the following hypothesis: Patients receiving the personalized nutritional intervention with the low residue diet will maintain a better nutritional status during treatment, reflected in fewer malnourished patients, compared to the control group.

Methods.

Study design. Randomized clinical trial, open, factorial 3X2. To evaluate the efficacy of a low residue diet on the nutritional status, gastrointestinal toxicity and quality of life of CC patients referring to the National Institute of Cancer in Mexico (INCan). 320 patients will be included, with cervical malignant tumors of epithelial origin in the neck of the uterus, candidates for chemo-radiotherapy.

Dietary intervention will consist on a low residue diet: 20% kcal from fat, 5g lactose/day, 20g fiber/day (5g from insoluble fiber).

Dietary intervention will be adapted to the patient's individual requirements, according to the presence of comorbidities or renal deterioration.

  1. No comorbidities. Energy: 20-30 kcal/kg of body weight/day. Protein: 1.3 g/kg of body weight/day.
  2. Comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension), or geriatric patient. Energy: 25-30 kcal/kg of body weight/day. Protein: 1.5 g/kg of body weight/day.
  3. Renal deterioration.

Energy: 30-35 kcal/kg of body weight/day.

Protein: 1 g/kg of body weight/day.

Sodium: 2000-2300 mg/day

Potassium: 1900-2730 mg/day

Phosphorus: 800-1000 mg/day

Control group will receive the standard written recommendations from the INCan, which enlist allowed foods and not allowed foods.

Sample size.

A sample space of 320 patients will be included if prior consent is acquired and if they meet the inclusion criteria. This clinical trial contemplates 3 strata with 2 levels.

Statistical analysis.

A univariate analysis will be performed to describe the study population. Descriptive statistics will be used to obtain measures of central tendency and dispersion, as well as frequency of distribution for qualitative variables. Percentage change of nutritional status will be calculated using the Friedman test. Chi square test will be used to compare basal vs final assessment, and chi square test will be used to compare among study groups. All confidence intervals will be constructed with a confidence of 95% (α=0.05). The interpretation of the study results will be responsibility of researchers. Data processing and analysis will be performed with the SPSS package (version 19.0®) for Microsoft.

Efficacy analysis.

Efficacy will be evaluated in patients that qualify to be included in the protocol analysis. To evaluate efficacy, nutritional diagnosis through the clinical course will be analyzed in both, intervention and control, groups. Also, toxicity and quality of life responses will be obtained.

Procedures.

Treatment. Anticancer treatment will consist of Cisplatin as a radiosensitizer, at a dosage of 40 mg/m2/week for 6 weeks. For patients with renal deterioration Gemcitabine will be used instead of Cisplatin, at a dosage of 300 mg/m2/week for 6 weeks. Concomitantly, external pelvic radiotherapy will be applied at a total dosage of 50.4 Gy divided by 28 fractions, 1.8 Gy/day/5 days a week, for 6 weeks. After completing concomitant chemo-radiotherapy, intracavitary brachytherapy will be administered at low dosage (30 Gy of Cesium 137) or high dosage (Iridium). Before initiating chemo-radiotherapy, a complete evaluation will be applied as mentioned.

Once eligibility criteria are verified, patients will be randomly assigned to intervention group or control group.

Visits during the study. After signing the informed consent, the patient will be informed when she will begin participating in the study (screening visit). If the patient complies with the inclusion criteria, a total of 5 visits will be scheduled: (1) at week -2, 2 weeks before treatment; (2) at week 0, on initiation of treatment; (3) at week 3, on the 3rd cycle of chemotherapy; (4) at week 9, by the end of brachytherapy; and (5) at week 21, 3 months after treatment completion.

Monitoring.

A thorough evaluation on each visit will be performed using the following tools:

  • Patient generated subjective global assessment.
  • Anthropometric data: weight, height, waist circumference, hip circumference, arm circumference.
  • Body mass index.
  • Waist to hip ratio.
  • Body composition (bioelectrical impedance).
  • % weight loss.
  • Hand dynamometry.
  • Dietary data: 24 hour recall and frequency of food intake questionnaires.
  • % recommended energy intake.
  • Biochemical markers: serum albumin, number of lymphocytes.
  • Gastrointestinal toxicity using the CTCAE v4.03.
  • Quality of life using the QLQ-C30 and CxC24.

Sample collection. No tissue or additional blood samples will be obtained, other than the blood samples used as part of the routine clinical laboratory tests.

Informed consent acquisition. On the screening visit, the written consent will be read and explained to the patient, clarifying the risks and benefits involved in the study. Two witnesses, independent from the study, will be present. The patient will have the choice to not participate or withdraw from the study at any time, her decision will not affect the quality of care and treatment that the attending physician will provide. The researcher will be governed by the ethical principles established in the Helsinki Accord. The physician will adequately respond all the matters of interest to the patient.

Ethical considerations.

The Research Committee and the Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Cancer in Mexico has approved the protocol and the informed consent document.

Patients participating in this study will be informed, through the informed consent, of all the details concerning this trial. The patients who agree to participate in the trial will express their willingness by signing the informed consent document, being clarified that they can leave the trial at any time, if they wish to do so.

Regulatory considerations.

This study abides by the ethical principles established by the international community, in accordance to the Good Clinical Practices, the Nüremberg Code, the Helsinki Accord, the Statement of Compliance with International Conference on Harmonization Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice, and the Regulations of the General Law of Health in the matter of research for health.

Being tested
Dietary modification
Keywords
Cervical cancer
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Radiation Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dietary modificationOther

    Dietary intervention will consist on a low residue diet: 20% kcal from fat, 5g lactose/day, 20g fiber/day (5g from insoluble fiber).

    Dietary intervention will be adapted to the patient's individual requirements, according to the presence of comorbidities or renal deterioration.

    1. No comorbidities. Energy: 20-30 kcal/kg of body weight/day. Protein: 1.3 g/kg of body weight/day.
    2. Comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension), or geriatric patient. Energy: 25-30 kcal/kg of body weight/day. Protein: 1.5 g/kg of body weight/day.
    3. Renal deterioration. Energy: 30-35 kcal/kg of body weight/day. Protein: 1 g/kg of body weight/day. Sodium: 2000-2300 mg/day. Potassium: 1900-2730 mg/day. Phosphorus: 800-1000 mg/day.
Study groups in NCT03100409
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dietary modificationExperimentalPersonalized dietary intervention, low residue diet
Receives: Other: Dietary modification
ControlNo interventionDietary recommendations currently used in the INCan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Gastrointestinal toxicity symptoms grading scale using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4)

    Evaluation of the gastrointestinal symptoms according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4).

    A grading scale is provided for each adverse event (AE) term. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline:

    Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated.

    Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living.

    Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care activities of daily living.

    Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to AE.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .

  2. Changes in nutritional status

    Evaluation the change of the nutritional status by the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment.

    The Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment is a questionnaire that comprises 7 sections: weight, intake, symptoms, functional capacity, disease and its relationship to nutritional requirements, metabolic demand and physical evaluation. Based on the previous results the interviewer will define which of the following three groups the individual surveyed belongs to:

    A: well nourished. B: moderately or suspiciously undernourished. C: severely malnourished.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .

  3. Changes in food intake

    Change in food intake assessed by 24-hour reminder This method consists of questioning the subject to find out everything he or she ingested the day before. It includes three lists of foods to help the interviewee remember, the first is a quick list that contains drinks and foods, the second list contains foods that are commonly forgotten and the interview closes with a detailed description of everything that was consumed

    Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Changes in body weight

    Evaluation the changes of the body weight (kilograms) The measurement will be done on a hospital scale SECA brand.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .

  2. Changes in body composition (phase angle)

    Evaluation the changes of the phase angle (grades) by the bioelectrical impedance Biolelectrical impedances will be evaluated by body composition analyzer Quantun IV The phase angle is a nutritional indicator which evaluates the distribution of intracellular and extracellular fluid, therefore, it has been described as an indicator of the quality of the cell membrane

    Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .

  3. Changes in handgrip strength measures

    Evaluation the change of the handgrip strength (kilograms)

    Handgript strength will be evaluated by a dinamometer Takei Hand strength is a simple measure, it has been used to estimate total muscle strength and has been described as a marker of nutritional status, in addition, it is related to mortality and morbidity (56).

    The instrument for measuring hand force is the dynamometer, and the cut-off points for making a diagnosis of sarcopenia in women is a result ﹤de 20 kg, while in men it is ﹤de 30 kg

    Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .

  4. Change in quality of life summary score using the the quality of life questionnaire specifically developed for cancer patients (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30 v3))

    Quality of life questionnaire developed and validated for cancer patients ((European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30 v3)) will be applied, and the change in summary score will be evaluated.

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire evaluates the quality of life in oncological population, is composed of both multi-item and single-item measures. It has 30 items, including nine scales: five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea / vomiting) and one global health status/QoL scale. Six single items are also included (Dyspnea, Insomnia, Appetite loss, Constipation, Diarrhea and Financial difficulties). A high score for all functional and global health/QoL scales represents a high/healthy level of functioning/high QoL, whereas a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptoms/problems.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .

  5. Change in quality of life for cervical cancer patients: (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cervical cancer module- EORTC QLQ-CX 24)

    Change in quality of life summary score and subescales using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Cervical Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-CX24). The EORTC QLQ-CX24 is the supplementary module of the QLQ-C30 aimed to evaluate quality of life of cervical cancer patients.

    The EORTC QLQ-CX24 is the supplementary module of the QLQ-C30 aimed to evaluate quality of life of cervical cancer patients. It consists of 24 items divided in three multi-item scales to assess symptoms experience (gastrointestinal and genitourinary), body image and sexual/vaginal functioning, and six single items to assess lymphedema, peripheral neuropathy, menopausal symptoms, sexual worry, sexual activity and sexual enjoyment. The last five questions are answered only by patients with an active sex life. Higher scores are equivalent to worse or more symptoms, except for items 49 and 54 (higher score indicates better quality of life).

    Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Apr 2017
  2. Study start1 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2021

Why it stopped: The study was closed prematurely because the interim analysis found that subjects in the experimental group had less gastrointestinal toxicity.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
137 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03100409
Sponsor's protocol ID
CEI/1125/17
Other IDs
INCAN
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
24 Mar 2017
Last updated
22 Sep 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Argiles JM. Cancer-associated malnutrition. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2005;9 Suppl 2:S39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.09.006.

    PubMed 16437757
  • Arrieta O, Michel Ortega RM, Villanueva-Rodriguez G, Serna-Thome MG, Flores-Estrada D, Diaz-Romero C, Rodriguez CM, Martinez L, Sanchez-Lara K. Association of nutritional status and serum albumin levels with development of toxicity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with paclitaxel-cisplatin chemotherapy: a prospective study. BMC Cancer. 2010 Feb 21;10:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-50.

    PubMed 20170547
  • Bantle JP, Wylie-Rosett J, Albright AL, Apovian CM, Clark NG, Franz MJ, Hoogwerf BJ, Lichtenstein AH, Mayer-Davis E, Mooradian AD, Wheeler ML. Nutrition recommendations and interventions for diabetes--2006: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2006 Sep;29(9):2140-57. doi: 10.2337/dc06-9914. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16936169
  • Beale RJ, Bryg DJ, Bihari DJ. Immunonutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review of clinical outcome. Crit Care Med. 1999 Dec;27(12):2799-805. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199912000-00032.

    PubMed 10628629
  • Bye A, Kaasa S, Ose T, Sundfor K, Trope C. The influence of low fat, low lactose diet on diarrhoea during pelvic radiotherapy. Clin Nutr. 1992 Jun;11(3):147-53. doi: 10.1016/0261-5614(92)90075-2.

    PubMed 16839990
  • Calder PC, Kew S. The immune system: a target for functional foods? Br J Nutr. 2002 Nov;88 Suppl 2:S165-77. doi: 10.1079/BJN2002682.

    PubMed 12495459
  • Capra S, Ferguson M, Ried K. Cancer: impact of nutrition intervention outcome--nutrition issues for patients. Nutrition. 2001 Sep;17(9):769-72. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(01)00632-3.

    PubMed 11527676
  • Chandra RK. Nutrition and the immune system: an introduction. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Aug;66(2):460S-463S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/66.2.460S.

    PubMed 9250133
  • Rock CL, Moskowitz A, Huizar B, Saenz CC, Clark JT, Daly TL, Chin H, Behling C, Ruffin MT 4th. High vegetable and fruit diet intervention in premenopausal women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001 Oct;101(10):1167-74. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00286-3.

    PubMed 11678487
  • Coia LR, Myerson RJ, Tepper JE. Late effects of radiation therapy on the gastrointestinal tract. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar 30;31(5):1213-36. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00419-L.

    PubMed 7713784
  • Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Zamboni M; European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010 Jul;39(4):412-23. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq034. Epub 2010 Apr 13.

    PubMed 20392703
  • Pia de la Maza M, Agudelo GM, Yudin T, Gattas V, Barrera G, Bunout D, Hirsch S. Long-term nutritional and digestive consequences of pelvic radiation. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004 Apr;23(2):102-7. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2004.10719349.

    PubMed 15047675
  • Pia de la Maza M, Gotteland M, Ramirez C, Araya M, Yudin T, Bunout D, Hirsch S. Acute nutritional and intestinal changes after pelvic radiation. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Dec;20(6):637-42. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2001.10719161.

    PubMed 11771680
  • Shin DW, Nam JH, Kwon YC, Park SY, Bae DS, Park CT, Cho CH, Lee JM, Park SM, Yun YH. Comorbidity in disease-free survivors of cervical cancer compared with the general female population. Oncology. 2008;74(3-4):207-15. doi: 10.1159/000151368. Epub 2008 Aug 20.

    PubMed 18714169
  • Duenas-Gonzalez A, Lopez-Graniel C, Gonzalez-Enciso A, Cetina L, Rivera L, Mariscal I, Montalvo G, Gomez E, de la Garza J, Chanona G, Mohar A. A phase II study of multimodality treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer: neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant cisplatin chemoradiation. Ann Oncol. 2003 Aug;14(8):1278-84. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg333.

    PubMed 12881393

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dietary modification in people with Uterine Cervical Neoplasm and Dietary Modification, run by National Institute of Cancerología at 1 site in Mexico.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: The study was closed prematurely because the interim analysis found that subjects in the experimental group had less gastrointestinal toxicity.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Gastrointestinal toxicity symptoms grading scale using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4) (time frame: Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03100409, which also lists 56 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in