DiabetesNCT03105011
Utilizing Off-the-shelf Technology to Improve Diabetes Management in a Rural Population
A study testing EpxDiabetes software in people with Diabetes, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is designed to see if rural patients with type II diabetes interacting with their clinic staff by providing daily updates of blood glucose levels will improve glucose control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- EpxDiabetes software
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Mar 2017to 5 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: 18-70 years of age
- Gender: Any gender
- Language: patients must use English as primary language
- Patient must be ambulatory patients at Mercy Family Practice Clinic in Rolla, Missouri
- Patient must have access to touch tone telephone or mobile phone with texting capability
- Patient must have documented type 2 diabetes mellitus with a treatment plan that includes measuring pre-prandial blood glucose levels each morning.
- HgbA1c between 7 and 9%
Who cannot join
- Patients that are identified by clinic staff who have demonstrated noncompliance
- Lack of access to mobile or landline telephone
- Hospitalized patients
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study is designed to see if rural patients with type II diabetes interacting with their clinic staff by providing daily updates of blood glucose levels will improve glucose control.
Read the detailed description
Hypothesis: Intervening in a rural primary care population with a clinically validated telehealth tool (Epharmix Diabetes) that algorithmically triages patients and facilitates patient-provider communication will result in a statistically significant improvement in the indicators of diabetes control.
Study Design
- Study Type: Experimental, non-controlled crossover study (intervention vs. standard of care for clinic)
- Primary aim: decrease average self-tested pre-prandial blood glucose level and HgbA1C
- Secondary aim: decreased number of disease-related emergency room (ER) visits, decreased number of self-reported blood glucose measurements outside of goal
- Duration: 3 months + 1 month enrollment period
- Safety: Protocol will be under direction of University of Missouri Institutional Review Board (IRB). All patients will be referred to emergency department if unsafe blood glucose levels are reported. All information is encrypted and HIPAA compliant.
- Sample Size: Clinic flow analysis estimates 61 patients eligible for study (5 providers, assuming 30% of eligible patients who meet inclusion criteria during 4-week enrollment period interested), with 50 patients likely to stay in study (80% retention rate).
- Power analysis: Based on pilot data and assuming an alpha error = 0.05, this study will have have greater than 80% statistical power of detecting differences in populations using only 20 patients with a minimum detectable effect size (decrease in HgbA1C) of 0.7%
Methodology
- The investigator will supply family practice clinics at Mercy with a one-page summary and advertisement of the intervention. At some point during a clinical encounter with a patient with an existing or new diagnosis of diabetes, providers will invite the patient to participate in this Community Integration Project. Providers will maintain a list of patients interested in the study with corresponding phone numbers and the investigator will regularly add patients to the study.
- Over a 3-month study period, patients will interact with the telehealth system twice a day, entering blood glucose levels when prompted. As recommended by physicians at Mercy, the investigator will message the physicians once a week with a digest of their patients at risk through the existing electronic medical record (EMR) inbox to more easily integrate with existing clinic flow.
- HgbA1c will be measured prior to starting intervention and will be measured within 7 days of completing intervention.
- Providers will be notified by the system when patients are triaged to be "high risk," that is, out of a pre-selected range of self-reported blood glucose levels. Providers can then be automatically connected with these patients to titrate blood glucose control.
- At the conclusion of study, new average self-reported blood glucose responses will be compared against those averages prior to intervention and to clinic averages for patients with diabetes. Additionally, HgbA1C levels will be compared pre and post -intervention.
- Results will be analyzed and conclusions will be presented to participating stakeholders in a poster session.
- Conditions
- Diabetes
- Being tested
- EpxDiabetes software
- Keywords
- Type 2 diabetes
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EpxDiabetes softwareBehavioural
Also called Epharmix Diabetes
Subjects will interact daily with a commercially available telemedicine product, Epharmix Diabetes (EpxDiabetes). They will each undergo a baseline blood draw to establish the control HgbA1C associated with standard of care. Three months later they will undergo an experimental blood draw to establish the HgbA1C associated with the use of EpxDiabetes. Between those procedures, the patient will interact with the intervention daily.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EpxDiabetes software | Experimental | Subjects will interact daily with a commercially available telemedicine product, Epharmix Diabetes (EpxDiabetes). Receives: Behavioral: EpxDiabetes software |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Absolute change in laboratory-measured HgbA1C
Patients will undergo two diagnostic blood collections to measure baseline and final HgbA1C.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Apr 2017
- Study start13 Mar 2017
- Primary completion31 Jul 2017
- Study completion5 Dec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Missouri-Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Morgan Carlile, University of Missouri-Columbia
- Investigators
- Morgan A Carlile, Principal investigator, University of Missouri-ColumbiaUzma Khan, MD, Principal investigator, University of Missouri-Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03105011
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2007269C
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2017
- Last updated
- 8 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Utilizing Off-the-shelf Technology to Improve Diabetes Management in a Rural Population
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03105011
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2007269C
- Conditions
- Diabetes
- Keywords
- Type 2 diabetes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Missouri-ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to see if rural patients with type II diabetes interacting with their clinic staff by providing daily updates of blood glucose levels will improve glucose control.
Detailed description
Hypothesis: Intervening in a rural primary care population with a clinically validated telehealth tool (Epharmix Diabetes) that algorithmically triages patients and facilitates patient-provider communication will result in a statistically significant improvement in the indicators of diabetes control.
Study Design
- Study Type: Experimental, non-controlled crossover study (intervention vs. standard of care for clinic)
- Primary aim: decrease average self-tested pre-prandial blood glucose level and HgbA1C
- Secondary aim: decreased number of disease-related emergency room (ER) visits, decreased number of self-reported blood glucose measurements outside of goal
- Duration: 3 months + 1 month enrollment period
- Safety: Protocol will be under direction of University of Missouri Institutional Review Board (IRB). All patients will be referred to emergency department if unsafe blood glucose levels are reported. All information is encrypted and HIPAA compliant.
- Sample Size: Clinic flow analysis estimates 61 patients eligible for study (5 providers, assuming 30% of eligible patients who meet inclusion criteria during 4-week enrollment period interested), with 50 patients likely to stay in study (80% retention rate).
- Power analysis: Based on pilot data and assuming an alpha error = 0.05, this study will have have greater than 80% statistical power of detecting differences in populations using only 20 patients with a minimum detectable effect size (decrease in HgbA1C) of 0.7%
Methodology
- The investigator will supply family practice clinics at Mercy with a one-page summary and advertisement of the intervention. At some point during a clinical encounter with a patient with an existing or new diagnosis of diabetes, providers will invite the patient to participate in this Community Integration Project. Providers will maintain a list of patients interested in the study with corresponding phone numbers and the investigator will regularly add patients to the study.
- Over a 3-month study period, patients will interact with the telehealth system twice a day, entering blood glucose levels when prompted. As recommended by physicians at Mercy, the investigator will message the physicians once a week with a digest of their patients at risk through the existing electronic medical record (EMR) inbox to more easily integrate with existing clinic flow.
- HgbA1c will be measured prior to starting intervention and will be measured within 7 days of completing intervention.
- Providers will be notified by the system when patients are triaged to be "high risk," that is, out of a pre-selected range of self-reported blood glucose levels. Providers can then be automatically connected with these patients to titrate blood glucose control.
- At the conclusion of study, new average self-reported blood glucose responses will be compared against those averages prior to intervention and to clinic averages for patients with diabetes. Additionally, HgbA1C levels will be compared pre and post -intervention.
- Results will be analyzed and conclusions will be presented to participating stakeholders in a poster session.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EpxDiabetes software | Experimental | Behavioral: EpxDiabetes softwareSubjects will interact daily with a commercially available telemedicine product, Epharmix Diabetes (EpxDiabetes). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age: 18-70 years of age
- Gender: Any gender
- Language: patients must use English as primary language
- Patient must be ambulatory patients at Mercy Family Practice Clinic in Rolla, Missouri
- Patient must have access to touch tone telephone or mobile phone with texting capability
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients that are identified by clinic staff who have demonstrated noncompliance
- Lack of access to mobile or landline telephone
- Hospitalized patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EpxDiabetes softwareAlso: Epharmix DiabetesSubjects will interact daily with a commercially available telemedicine product, Epharmix Diabetes (EpxDiabetes). They will each undergo a baseline blood draw to establish the control HgbA1C associated with standard of care. Three months later they will undergo an experimental blood draw to establish the HgbA1C associated with the use of EpxDiabetes. Between those procedures, the patient will interact with the intervention daily. | Behavioural | EpxDiabetes software |
Primary outcome
Absolute change in laboratory-measured HgbA1C
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months
Patients will undergo two diagnostic blood collections to measure baseline and final HgbA1C.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jan 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study on the Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Guominkang in the Treatment of Diabetic Kidney Disease
Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD), Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Clinical Application of Stem Cell Educator Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes
Recruiting
Culturally Tailored Program for Food-Insecure Adults: SPICE-D
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D)
RecruitingPhase 2
CAlcium and VAsopressin Following Injury Early Resuscitation (CAVALIER) Trial
Trauma, Hemorrhage
RecruitingObservational study
Study of High Density Lipoprotein Function in Type 1 Diabetic Patients With Nephropathy
Type 1 Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Morgan A Carlile principal investigator
University of Missouri-Columbia
Uzma Khan, MD principal investigator
University of Missouri-Columbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EpxDiabetes software in people with Diabetes, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Absolute change in laboratory-measured HgbA1C (time frame: Baseline, 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2018.