Subacromial ImpingementNCT03109704

Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation Compared to Sham Manipulation in Individuals With Subacromial Pain Syndrome

A study testing Supine upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation and Seated upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation in people with Subacromial Impingement and Subacromial Impingement Syndrome, run by Sacred Heart University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Who is it for?: Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for: Subacromial Impingement, Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
What is being tested?: Supine upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation and Seated upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation
Type of treatment: Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?: Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people: 60 participants
Where: No sites listed yet
Study dates: 1 Feb 2016to 26 Oct 2016
Phase: Interventional
Are there results?: None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

Ages 18 to 65 years
All sexes
No healthy volunteers
Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

currently experiencing shoulder pain for less than 6 months
at least 3 of the following findings: 1) pain localized to the proximal anterolateral shoulder region, 2) positive Neer or Hawkins-Kennedy impingement test, 3) pain with active shoulder elevation (which may include a painful arc), 4) active shoulder abduction ROM of at least 90°, 5) passive shoulder external rotation ROM of at least 45°, and 6) pain with isometric resisted abduction or external rotation

Who cannot join

signs of a complete rotator cuff tear
significant loss of glenohumeral motion
acute inflammation
cervical spine-related symptoms including a primary complaint of neck pain, signs of central nervous system or cervical nerve root involvement, or reproduction of shoulder or arm pain with cervical rotation, axial compression, or Spurling test
previous neck or shoulder surgery
positive apprehension test or relocation test

Show all 10Show fewer

history of shoulder fracture or dislocation
history of nerve injury affecting upper extremity function
any contraindication for thrust manipulation to the thoracic spine including osteoporosis, fracture, malignancy, systemic arthritis, or infection
fear or unwillingness to undergo thoracic spine manipulation

About this study

Official title: The Immediate Effects of a Seated Versus Supine Upper Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation Compared to Sham Manipulation in Individuals With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study evaluates the immediate and short-term effects of a supine upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation, seated upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation, and sham manipulation for individuals with subacromial pain syndrome. The participants were randomized to receive one of the three interventions and baseline measures for the dependent variables were repeated immediately after the delivery of the intervention.

Read the detailed description

Thoracic spine thrust manipulation has been shown to be effective in reducing pain and improving function in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome (subacromial impingement). It remains unknown if individuals respond differently to different manipulation techniques. This study examines the immediate effects on pain and short-term effects on pain and function using the Penn Shoulder Score (PSS) as well as the immediate effects on scapular kinematics (upward rotation and posterior tilt, specifically), pectoralis minor muscle length, and scapulothoracic muscle force production for the middle trapezius, lower trapezius, and serratus anterior.

Conditions: Subacromial Impingement, Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Being tested: Supine upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation, Seated upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation, Sham manipulation
Keywords: scapular kinematics, thoracic spine, thrust manipulation
Medical subject headings: Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Supine upper thoracic spine thrust manipulationProcedure or surgery
The supine thrust manipulation will target the upper thoracic spine and will be performed as previously described. The patient will be asked to lace his or her fingers behind the neck and bring his or her elbows close together in front of the chest. The therapist will place one hand just below the targeted upper thoracic region (at either the T3 or T4 level) using a pistol grip or loose fist to make contact with both transverse processes of the T3 or T4 vertebrae. The therapist will then use his or her body to push down through the patient's upper arms to provide a high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust in the anterior-to-posterior direction.
Seated upper thoracic spine thrust manipulationProcedure or surgery
Also called C-T junction distraction manipulation
The seated thrust manipulation will target the cervicothoracic junction with the patient sitting with fingers laced behind the neck. The therapist will stand behind the patient and thread his or her arms through the patient's arms and clasp his or her hands near the C7-T1 level. The therapist will make contact with his or her chest against the patient's upper thoracic region to serve as a fulcrum. The patient will then be instructed to take a deep breath, and upon exhalation the therapist will apply a high-velocity, low-amplitude distraction thrust in a cephalad direction.
Sham manipulationProcedure or surgery
The sham manipulation will be performed with the patient and the examiner positioned in the same manner as for the seated manipulation, however the examiner will apply only minimal pressure to maintain physical contact and "skin lock" with the patient. The examiner will then move the patient through the same range of motion but deliver no manipulative thrust.

Study groups in NCT03109704
Study group	Role	What they receive
Supine thrust manipulation	Experimental	The supine upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be performed two times, regardless of joint cavitation. Receives: Procedure: Supine upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation
Seated thrust manipulation	Experimental	The seated upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be performed two times, regardless of joint cavitation. Receives: Procedure: Seated upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation
Sham manipulation	Sham comparator	The sham manipulation will be performed two times. Receives: Procedure: Sham manipulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

Change in Penn Shoulder Score (PSS) from baseline to 48 hours
The Penn Shoulder Score is a 100-point shoulder-specific questionnaire with three subscales: self-reported pain, function, and satisfaction with current use of the shoulder. The scores from the subscales are summed to determine the total score with the pain subscale score ranging from 0-30, function subscale score ranging from 0-60, and satisfaction subscale score ranging from 0-10. The total maximum score of 100 points indicates high function, low pain, and high satisfaction with the shoulder.
Measured: baseline and 48 hours after intervention
Change in pain
Pain will be measured using the verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS). Participants will be asked to rate their pain on a 0-10 scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable. This pain rating will be obtained during active elevation of the arm in the scapular plane.
Measured: baseline and 1 minute after intervention

Secondary outcomes (8)

Change in scapular upward rotation active range of motion (ROM)
The participant will start with the involved arm at the side of the body. The investigator will confirm the location of the scapular plane by placing the subject's arm at an angle 40 degrees anterior from the frontal plane as measured with a standard goniometer. The digital inclinometer will be zeroed on a horizontal surface and then placed along the scapular spine of the involved arm. The initial reading from the inclinometer on the scapular spine with the arm at the side of the body will be recorded. The subject will then be instructed to elevate the arm in the scapular plane as high as he/she can go. The final reading from the inclinometer will then be recorded at the end of the subject's maximal arm elevation. The total amount of scapular upward rotation will be calculated as the change score by taking the difference between the final and initial readings. Downward rotation would be recorded as negative values and upward rotation would be recorded as positive values.
Measured: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in scapular posterior tilt active ROM
The participant will start with the test arm at the side of the body. The digital inclinometer will be zeroed on a vertical surface and then placed vertically along the posterior surface of the medial border of the scapula, using the root of the scapular spine and the inferior angle of the scapula as landmarks as previously described. The initial reading from the inclinometer with the arm at the side of the body will be recorded. The subject will then be instructed to elevate the arm in the scapular plane as high as he/she can go. The final reading from the inclinometer will then be recorded at the end of the subject's maximal arm elevation. The total amount of scapular posterior tilt will be calculated as the change score by taking the difference between the final and initial readings. Anterior tilt would be recorded as negative values and posterior tilt would be recorded as positive values.
Measured: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in scapular upward rotation passive ROM
Measurements will be made with the subject in standing. The participant will start with the involved arm at the side of the body. The digital inclinometer will be zeroed and positioned as described for the measure of upward rotation active ROM. The initial reading from the inclinometer will be recorded. The examiner can then passively elevate the humerus in the scapular plane to end-range elevation, producing passive upward rotation of the scapula. The examiner will move the subject's arm through the full available elevation ROM passively for two consecutive trials. At the point of maximal passive arm elevation on the second repetition, the inclinometer will again be placed along the scapular spine to obtain a measurement of upward rotation passive ROM. The total amount of scapular upward rotation passive ROM will be calculated as the change score by taking the difference between the final and initial readings.
Measured: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in scapular posterior tilt passive ROM
Measurements will be made with the subject standing. The digital inclinometer will be zeroed and positioned as described for the measure of posterior tilt active ROM. The initial reading from the inclinometer will be recorded with the subject's arm at the side of the body. The examiner can then passively elevate the humerus in the scapular plane to end-range elevation, producing passive posterior tilt of the scapula. The examiner will move the subject's arm through the full, available elevation ROM passively for two consecutive trials. At the point of maximal passive arm elevation on the second repetition, the inclinometer will again be placed along the posterior surface of the medial border of the scapula to obtain a measurement of posterior tilt passive ROM. The total amount of scapular posterior tilt passive ROM will be calculated as the change score by taking the difference between the final and initial readings.
Measured: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in pectoralis minor muscle length
Performed as described previously by Borstad. A tape measure will be used to measure the linear distance in cm between the anterior-inferior edge of the 4th rib one finger width lateral to the sternum and the medial-inferior aspect of the coracoid process of the scapula. This measurement will be completed while the subject is standing in their usual resting position.
Measured: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in middle trapezius force production
A handheld dynamometer (HHD) (Hoggan MicroFET2) will be used to assess force production in standard manual muscle test (MMT) position using a "make test" as previously described. The "make test" will require the examiner to instruct the subject to slowly push into the HHD and increase their force production to a maximal level over a 5-second period of time. Prior to maximal isometric testing, a sub-maximal (50%) effort trial will be performed to minimize learning effects. Two maximal effort trials will be performed with a 30-second rest between trials and the average of the trials (recorded in kg) will be used for data analysis. Additionally, subject body weight in kg will be recorded to allow for normalization of strength measures by dividing by subject body weight.
Measured: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in lower trapezius force production
A handheld dynamometer (HHD) (Hoggan MicroFET2) will be used to assess force production in standard MMT position using a "make test" as previously described. The "make test" will require the examiner to instruct the subject to slowly push into the HHD and increase their force production to a maximal level over a 5-second period of time. Prior to maximal isometric testing, a sub-maximal (50%) effort trial will be performed to minimize learning effects. Two maximal effort trials will be performed with a 30-second rest between trials and the average of the trials (recorded in kg) will be used for data analysis. Additionally, subject body weight in kg will be recorded to allow for normalization of strength measures by dividing by subject body weight.
Measured: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in serratus anterior force production
A handheld dynamometer (HHD) (Hoggan MicroFET2) will be used to assess force production in standard MMT position using a "make test" as previously described. The "make test" will require the examiner to instruct the subject to slowly push into the HHD and increase their force production to a maximal level over a 5-second period of time. Prior to maximal isometric testing, a sub-maximal (50%) effort trial will be performed to minimize learning effects. Two maximal effort trials will be performed with a 30-second rest between trials and the average of the trials (recorded in kg) will be used for data analysis. Additionally, subject body weight in kg will be recorded to allow for normalization of strength measures by dividing by subject body weight.
Measured: baseline and 1 minute after intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

1 Feb 201626 Oct 2016

First posted12 Apr 2017
Study start1 Feb 2016
Primary completion24 Oct 2016
Study completion26 Oct 2016

Resources

Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
Other trials for Subacromial ImpingementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design

Study type: Interventional
Phase: Phase N/A
Primary purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomised
Intervention model: Parallel groups
Model description: randomized controlled trial, 3 groups which includes a sham comparator
Masking: Single blind
Who is masked: Participant
Enrolment: 60 participants (actual)

IDs, dates and publications

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03109704
Sponsor's protocol ID: 151119A
Status last verified: Mar 2019
First submitted: 29 Mar 2017
Last updated: 3 Apr 2019
Results posted: No
Data monitoring committee: No
FDA-regulated drug: No
FDA-regulated device: No
Individual data sharing: Undecided: data regarding scapular kinematics during upper extremity elevation, pectoralis minor muscle length in standing, and force production in MMT positions for middle trapezius, lower trapezius, and serratus anterior; request for data should be made by email to: grimesj@sacredheart.edu

Publications

Haik MN, Alburquerque-Sendin F, Silva CZ, Siqueira-Junior AL, Ribeiro IL, Camargo PR. Scapular kinematics pre- and post-thoracic thrust manipulation in individuals with and without shoulder impingement symptoms: a randomized controlled study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jul;44(7):475-87. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4760. Epub 2014 May 22.
PubMed 24853923
Muth S, Barbe MF, Lauer R, McClure PW. The effects of thoracic spine manipulation in subjects with signs of rotator cuff tendinopathy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Dec;42(12):1005-16. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.4142. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
PubMed 22951537
Kardouni JR, Pidcoe PE, Shaffer SW, Finucane SD, Cheatham SA, Sousa CO, Michener LA. Thoracic Spine Manipulation in Individuals With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome Does Not Immediately Alter Thoracic Spine Kinematics, Thoracic Excursion, or Scapular Kinematics: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Jul;45(7):527-38. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5647. Epub 2015 May 21.
PubMed 25996365
Boyles RE, Ritland BM, Miracle BM, Barclay DM, Faul MS, Moore JH, Koppenhaver SL, Wainner RS. The short-term effects of thoracic spine thrust manipulation on patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. Man Ther. 2009 Aug;14(4):375-80. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
PubMed 18703377
Strunce JB, Walker MJ, Boyles RE, Young BA. The immediate effects of thoracic spine and rib manipulation on subjects with primary complaints of shoulder pain. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(4):230-6. doi: 10.1179/106698109791352102.
PubMed 20140154
Mintken PE, Cleland JA, Carpenter KJ, Bieniek ML, Keirns M, Whitman JM. Some factors predict successful short-term outcomes in individuals with shoulder pain receiving cervicothoracic manipulation: a single-arm trial. Phys Ther. 2010 Jan;90(1):26-42. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090095. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
PubMed 19959652
Leggin BG, Michener LA, Shaffer MA, Brenneman SK, Iannotti JP, Williams GR Jr. The Penn shoulder score: reliability and validity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Mar;36(3):138-51. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.3.138.
PubMed 16596890
Johnson MP, McClure PW, Karduna AR. New method to assess scapular upward rotation in subjects with shoulder pathology. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001 Feb;31(2):81-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.2.81.
PubMed 11232742
Scibek JS, Carcia CR. Validation of a new method for assessing scapular anterior-posterior tilt. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Oct;9(5):644-56.
PubMed 25328827
Watson L, Balster SM, Finch C, Dalziel R. Measurement of scapula upward rotation: a reliable clinical procedure. Br J Sports Med. 2005 Sep;39(9):599-603. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.013243.
PubMed 16118295
Borstad JD. Measurement of pectoralis minor muscle length: validation and clinical application. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Apr;38(4):169-74. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2723. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
PubMed 18434665
Michener LA, Boardman ND, Pidcoe PE, Frith AM. Scapular muscle tests in subjects with shoulder pain and functional loss: reliability and construct validity. Phys Ther. 2005 Nov;85(11):1128-38.
PubMed 16253043
Michener LA, Kardouni JR, Sousa CO, Ely JM. Validation of a sham comparator for thoracic spinal manipulation in patients with shoulder pain. Man Ther. 2015 Feb;20(1):171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
PubMed 25261090

Want to know more?

The sponsor has not listed a contact. The official record may have more details.

Talk to your doctor first and take this page with you. Only the study team can confirm whether you can join.

Questions to ask the study team

What is the study trying to find out?
What would I need to do, and how often would I visit?
Could I receive a placebo instead of the treatment?
What are the possible risks and benefits for me?
Will it cost me anything? Are travel or time paid for?
Can I keep seeing my own doctor during the study?
What happens when the study ends?

Official record

Not yet recruiting
Effects of Different Kinesio Taping Methods in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Nociplastic Pain in Patients Diagnosed With Subacromial Pain Syndrome (SAPS)
Subacromial Pain Syndrome, Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotype and Response to Corticosteroid Injection in Patients With Subacromial Pain Syndrome (SAPS)
Subacromial Pain Syndrome, Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain
Recruiting
Latissimus Dorsi Strengthening Exercises in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain, Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
RecruitingObservational study
Acromial Morphology: Reliability of CT-based Assessment and Relationship With Age in a Series of 420 Patients
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Acromial Morphology

All Subacromial Impingement trials

Study at a glance

From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.

Official title: The Immediate Effects of a Seated Versus Supine Upper Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation Compared to Sham Manipulation in Individuals With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03109704
Acronym / sponsor ID: 151119A
Conditions: Subacromial Impingement, Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Keywords: scapular kinematics, thoracic spine, thrust manipulation
Study type: Interventional
Recruitment status: Completed
Enrolment: 60 participants (actual)
Lead sponsor: Sacred Heart UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
Collaborators: Nova Southeastern University
Study start: 1 Feb 2016 (actual)
Primary completion: 24 Oct 2016 (actual)
Study completion: 26 Oct 2016 (actual)
First posted: 12 Apr 2017 (actual)
Results: Not posted in the source record

Clinical summary

The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.

Detailed description

Study design

Primary purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomised
Intervention model: Parallel groups
Masking: Single blind (participant)
Number of arms: 3
Model description: randomized controlled trial, 3 groups which includes a sham comparator

Arm	Type	Receives
Supine thrust manipulation	Experimental	Procedure: Supine upper thoracic spine thrust manipulationThe supine upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be performed two times, regardless of joint cavitation.
Seated thrust manipulation	Experimental	Procedure: Seated upper thoracic spine thrust manipulationThe seated upper thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be performed two times, regardless of joint cavitation.
Sham manipulation	Sham comparator	Procedure: Sham manipulationThe sham manipulation will be performed two times.

Who may qualify

Ages: 18 to 65 years
Sex: All
Healthy volunteers: Not accepted
Age groups: Adult, Older adult

Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)

currently experiencing shoulder pain for less than 6 months
at least 3 of the following findings: 1) pain localized to the proximal anterolateral shoulder region, 2) positive Neer or Hawkins-Kennedy impingement test, 3) pain with active shoulder elevation (which may include a painful arc), 4) active shoulder abduction ROM of at least 90°, 5) passive shoulder external rotation ROM of at least 45°, and 6) pain with isometric resisted abduction or external rotation

Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)

signs of a complete rotator cuff tear
significant loss of glenohumeral motion
acute inflammation
cervical spine-related symptoms including a primary complaint of neck pain, signs of central nervous system or cervical nerve root involvement, or reproduction of shoulder or arm pain with cervical rotation, axial compression, or Spurling test
previous neck or shoulder surgery

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Interventions

Intervention	Type	Arms
Supine upper thoracic spine thrust manipulationThe supine thrust manipulation will target the upper thoracic spine and will be performed as previously described. The patient will be asked to lace his or her fingers behind the neck and bring his or her elbows close together in front of the chest. The therapist will place one hand just below the targeted upper thoracic region (at either the T3 or T4 level) using a pistol grip or loose fist to make contact with both transverse processes of the T3 or T4 vertebrae. The therapist will then use his or her body to push down through the patient's upper arms to provide a high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust in the anterior-to-posterior direction.	Procedure or surgery	Supine thrust manipulation
Seated upper thoracic spine thrust manipulationAlso: C-T junction distraction manipulationThe seated thrust manipulation will target the cervicothoracic junction with the patient sitting with fingers laced behind the neck. The therapist will stand behind the patient and thread his or her arms through the patient's arms and clasp his or her hands near the C7-T1 level. The therapist will make contact with his or her chest against the patient's upper thoracic region to serve as a fulcrum. The patient will then be instructed to take a deep breath, and upon exhalation the therapist will apply a high-velocity, low-amplitude distraction thrust in a cephalad direction.	Procedure or surgery	Seated thrust manipulation
Sham manipulationThe sham manipulation will be performed with the patient and the examiner positioned in the same manner as for the seated manipulation, however the examiner will apply only minimal pressure to maintain physical contact and "skin lock" with the patient. The examiner will then move the patient through the same range of motion but deliver no manipulative thrust.	Procedure or surgery	Sham manipulation

Primary outcome

Change in Penn Shoulder Score (PSS) from baseline to 48 hours
Time frame: baseline and 48 hours after intervention
The Penn Shoulder Score is a 100-point shoulder-specific questionnaire with three subscales: self-reported pain, function, and satisfaction with current use of the shoulder. The scores from the subscales are summed to determine the total score with the pain subscale score ranging from 0-30, function subscale score ranging from 0-60, and satisfaction subscale score ranging from 0-10. The total maximum score of 100 points indicates high function, low pain, and high satisfaction with the shoulder.
Change in pain
Time frame: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Pain will be measured using the verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS). Participants will be asked to rate their pain on a 0-10 scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable. This pain rating will be obtained during active elevation of the arm in the scapular plane.

8 secondary outcomes

Change in scapular upward rotation active range of motion (ROM)
Time frame: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in scapular posterior tilt active ROM
Time frame: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in scapular upward rotation passive ROM
Time frame: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in scapular posterior tilt passive ROM
Time frame: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in pectoralis minor muscle length
Time frame: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in middle trapezius force production
Time frame: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in lower trapezius force production
Time frame: baseline and 1 minute after intervention
Change in serratus anterior force production
Time frame: baseline and 1 minute after intervention

Results and safety

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

Research links

Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2019.
Background: PubMed 24853923Haik MN, Alburquerque-Sendin F, Silva CZ, Siqueira-Junior AL, Ribeiro IL, Camargo PR. Scapular kinematics pre- and post-thoracic thrust manipulation in individuals with and without shoulder impingement symptoms: a randomized controlled study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jul;44(7):475-87. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4760. Epub 2014 May 22.
Background: PubMed 22951537Muth S, Barbe MF, Lauer R, McClure PW. The effects of thoracic spine manipulation in subjects with signs of rotator cuff tendinopathy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Dec;42(12):1005-16. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.4142. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
Background: PubMed 25996365Kardouni JR, Pidcoe PE, Shaffer SW, Finucane SD, Cheatham SA, Sousa CO, Michener LA. Thoracic Spine Manipulation in Individuals With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome Does Not Immediately Alter Thoracic Spine Kinematics, Thoracic Excursion, or Scapular Kinematics: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Jul;45(7):527-38. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5647. Epub 2015 May 21.
Background: PubMed 18703377Boyles RE, Ritland BM, Miracle BM, Barclay DM, Faul MS, Moore JH, Koppenhaver SL, Wainner RS. The short-term effects of thoracic spine thrust manipulation on patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. Man Ther. 2009 Aug;14(4):375-80. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
Background: PubMed 20140154Strunce JB, Walker MJ, Boyles RE, Young BA. The immediate effects of thoracic spine and rib manipulation on subjects with primary complaints of shoulder pain. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(4):230-6. doi: 10.1179/106698109791352102.
Background: PubMed 19959652Mintken PE, Cleland JA, Carpenter KJ, Bieniek ML, Keirns M, Whitman JM. Some factors predict successful short-term outcomes in individuals with shoulder pain receiving cervicothoracic manipulation: a single-arm trial. Phys Ther. 2010 Jan;90(1):26-42. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090095. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
Background: PubMed 16596890Leggin BG, Michener LA, Shaffer MA, Brenneman SK, Iannotti JP, Williams GR Jr. The Penn shoulder score: reliability and validity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Mar;36(3):138-51. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.3.138.
Background: PubMed 11232742Johnson MP, McClure PW, Karduna AR. New method to assess scapular upward rotation in subjects with shoulder pathology. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001 Feb;31(2):81-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.2.81.
Background: PubMed 25328827Scibek JS, Carcia CR. Validation of a new method for assessing scapular anterior-posterior tilt. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Oct;9(5):644-56.
Background: PubMed 16118295Watson L, Balster SM, Finch C, Dalziel R. Measurement of scapula upward rotation: a reliable clinical procedure. Br J Sports Med. 2005 Sep;39(9):599-603. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.013243.
Background: PubMed 18434665Borstad JD. Measurement of pectoralis minor muscle length: validation and clinical application. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Apr;38(4):169-74. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2723. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
Background: PubMed 16253043Michener LA, Boardman ND, Pidcoe PE, Frith AM. Scapular muscle tests in subjects with shoulder pain and functional loss: reliability and construct validity. Phys Ther. 2005 Nov;85(11):1128-38.
Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. data regarding scapular kinematics during upper extremity elevation, pectoralis minor muscle length in standing, and force production in MMT positions for middle trapezius, lower trapezius, and serratus anterior; request for data should be made by email to: grimesj@sacredheart.edu

Related trials for Subacromial Impingement

Not yet recruiting
Effects of Different Kinesio Taping Methods in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Nociplastic Pain in Patients Diagnosed With Subacromial Pain Syndrome (SAPS)
Subacromial Pain Syndrome, Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotype and Response to Corticosteroid Injection in Patients With Subacromial Pain Syndrome (SAPS)
Subacromial Pain Syndrome, Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain
Recruiting
Latissimus Dorsi Strengthening Exercises in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain, Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
RecruitingObservational study
Acromial Morphology: Reliability of CT-based Assessment and Relationship With Age in a Series of 420 Patients
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Acromial Morphology

Referral and contact

AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.

Jason K Grimes, PhD principal investigator

Sacred Heart University

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Penn Shoulder Score (PSS) from baseline to 48 hours (time frame: baseline and 48 hours after intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03109704, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2019.