Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationNCT03112460
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training Program Based on Quality Control
An observational study of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, run by Hungarian Institute of Cardiology.
Trial summary
In a prospective, non-randomized study, all of the basic and advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitations would be analyzed. All resuscitation are planned to be performed by the above mentioned devices according to the recent protocols. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- What is being tested?
- cardiopulmonary resuscitation with Zoll R Series defibrillator and defibrillator pads with a real-time CPR feedback option and CodeReview case analysis software
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 May 2017to 31 Aug 2017
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Month
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: all patients who went through basic and advanced cardiopulmonary resusciations would be analyzed
inclusion criteria: all-cause circulatory arrest exclusion criteria: "do not resuscitate" code, age under 18
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training Program Based on Quality Control in Gottsegen György Hungarian Institute of Cardiology
In a prospective, non-randomized study, all of the basic and advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitations would be analyzed. All resuscitation are planned to be performed by the above mentioned devices according to the recent protocols. The continuous audio-visual feedback and all the data obtained during the resuscitation are intended to develop a better CPR training program in the future.
The downloading of data is planned to occur on the same day of CPR to a data card. After approximately one week all the participant medical persons would receive a detailed case analysis. Elimination of the typical errors is targeted.
Read more
Monitored quality indicators
Follow-up of CPR protocol:
elapsed time between turning on device and first chest compression elapsed time between turning on device and first delivered shock elapsed time between turning on device and first delivered shock in case of shockable rhythm compliance with 2 minutes long CPR period recognition of rhythm, recognition of adequate therapy, follow-up of the protocol concerning DC-shock recording the exact moment of the following procedures (with the use of Code Marker button on the defibrillator device) endotracheal intubation drug therapy obtaining intravenous access oxygen therapy
Quality of chest compressions:
depth frequency release compression fraction
Discontinuance of chest compression - cause anf time interval (Code Marker) endotracheal intubation ventilation rhythm analysis and defibrillation obtaining intravenous access
Other data (obtaining with manual recording):
cause of sudden cardiac death initial rhythm exact time of sudden death eyewitness records data of the patient monitoring system (only optional) description of place participant of CPR first detection medical documentation
Read the detailed description
Sudden cardiac death remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality and has public health importance. In recent decades, the pathophysiology became better known, however despite the development of medical devices and therapies, significant improvement in outcome was not observed, survival of patients remained low REF1-4.
The resuscitation protocols are based on universal algorithms REF5-6, are valid for all health care practitioners regardless of qualifications, skills. This reanimation paradigm focuses on the basic skills (chest compression, respiration) REF7-8. On the basis of investigations, the most important factors would be: continuous, high-quality chest compressions with the possibly of shortest interruptions REF9, however, the performance of this practice has significant difficulties to meet the expectations REF10.
Without relevant data, the meaningful assessment, follow-up and analysis of resuscitation are difficult, so a substantive case-based training is not feasible.
A reanimation training program on the basis of continuous audio-visual feedback, data and case report would be needed to improve the poor outcome.
A study proved that audio-visual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) feedback, case analysis and scenario-based training can improve significantly the parameters of basic life support (BLS) and can increase the odds of a better neurological survival status after sudden cardiac arrest outside a hospital - adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.7 REF11.
Another study REF12 demonstrated that this method in a hospital environment can improve CPR quality indicators. The so-called Advanced Resuscitation the framework program has also achieved a significant leap from the hospital survival (AOR 2.2, good neurological status AOR 3.0) with similar methods and technology REF13. These results show that an increase in the survival can be achieved with the improvement of resuscitation method and training.
Advanced life support (ALS) service in the Gottsegen György Hungarian Institute of Cardiology is provided by the medical staff of the Cardiology Intensive Care Unit (emergency medical team - EMT).
Our aim is to evolve a continuous quality improvement program with the usage of ZOLL R Series defibrillator device and defibrillator pads with a real-time CPR feedback option and CodeReview case analysis software, and to provide further execution of the program thereafter.
In a prospective, non-randomized study, all of the basic and advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitations would be analyzed. All resuscitation are planned to be performed by the above mentioned devices according to the recent protocols. The continuous audio-visual feedback and all the data obtained during the resuscitation are intended to develop a better CPR training program in the future.
The downloading of data is planned to occur on the same day of CPR to a data card. After approximately one week all the participant medical persons would receive a detailed case analysis. Elimination of the typical errors is targeted.
Monitored quality indicators
Follow-up of CPR protocol:
elapsed time between turning on device and first chest compression elapsed time between turning on device and first delivered shock elapsed time between turning on device and first delivered shock in case of shockable rhythm compliance with 2 minutes long CPR period recognition of rhythm, recognition of adequate therapy, follow-up of the protocol concernig DC-shock recording the exact moment of the following procedures (with the use of Code Marker button on the defibrillatior device) endotracheal intubation drug therapy obtaining intravenous access oxygen therapy
Quality of chest compressions:
depth frequency release compression fraction
Discontinuance of chest compression - cause anf time interval (Code Marker) endotracheal intubation ventilation rhythm analysis and defibrillation obtaining intravenous access
Other data (obtaining with manual recording):
cause of sudden cardiac death initial rhythm exact time of sudden death eyewitness records data of the patient monitoring system (only optional) description of place participant of CPR first detection medical documentation
Participant of the study:
Péter ANDRÉKA Prof. MD, Head of Department, Principal Investigator of study Gábor UZONYI MD, Head of Intensive Care Unit Krisztina SZÜTS MD András CSEPREGI MD Attila KOVÁCS MD Péter TAKÁCS MD András BECK MD Csaba SÁRI MD, Coordinator of study Adrienn MANDZÁK MD Judit POLANECZKY Anna NAGYNÉ LŐKE
- Conditions
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Being tested
- cardiopulmonary resuscitation with Zoll R Series defibrillator and defibrillator pads with a real-time CPR feedback option and CodeReview case analysis software
- Keywords
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cardiopulmonary resuscitation with Zoll R Series defibrillator and defibrillator pads with a real-time CPR feedback option and CodeReview case analysis softwareDevice
cardiopulmonary resuscitation with Zoll R Series defibrillator and defibrillator pads with a real-time CPR feedback option and CodeReview case analysis software
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| all patients | all of patients who went through basic and advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitations would be analyzed Receives: Device: cardiopulmonary resuscitation with Zoll R Series defibrillator and defibrillator pads with a real-time CPR feedback option and CodeReview case analysis software |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Follow-up of CPR protocol
elapsed time between turning on device and first chest compression elapsed time between turning on device and first delivered shock elapsed time between turning on device and first delivered shock in case of shockable rythm compliance with 2 minutes long CPR period recognition of rythm, recognition of adequate therapy, follow-up of the protocol concernig DC-shock recording the exact moment of the following procedures (with the use of Code Marker button on the defibrillatior device)
Measured: period of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (up to 2 hours)
Quality of chest compressions
depth frequency release compression fraction
Measured: period of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (up to 2 hours)
Discontinuance of chest compression - cause anf time interval (Code Marker)
endotracheal intubation ventilation rythm analysis and defibrillation obtaning intravenous access
Measured: period of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (up to 2 hours)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Apr 2017
- Study start1 May 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Jul 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 1 Month
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hungarian Institute of Cardiology
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, ANDREKA PETER, Hungarian Institute of Cardiology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03112460
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CPRTPBQC
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 17 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 13 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Dans PE, Nevin KL, Seidman CE, McArthur JC, Kariya ST. Inhospital CPR 25 years later: why has survival decreased? South Med J. 1985 Oct;78(10):1174-8.
PubMed 4049035Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jan;3(1):63-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.889576. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
PubMed 20123673Nichol G, Thomas E, Callaway CW, Hedges J, Powell JL, Aufderheide TP, Rea T, Lowe R, Brown T, Dreyer J, Davis D, Idris A, Stiell I; Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators. Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome. JAMA. 2008 Sep 24;300(12):1423-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.12.1423.
PubMed 18812533Peberdy MA, Kaye W, Ornato JP, Larkin GL, Nadkarni V, Mancini ME, Berg RA, Nichol G, Lane-Trultt T. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: a report of 14720 cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2003 Sep;58(3):297-308. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00215-6.
PubMed 12969608Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, Greif R, Maconochie IK, Nikolaou NI, Perkins GD, Soar J, Truhlar A, Wyllie J, Zideman DA; ERC Guidelines 2015 Writing Group. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:1-80. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Oct 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 26477410Perkins GD, Jacobs IG, Nadkarni VM, Berg RA, Bhanji F, Biarent D, Bossaert LL, Brett SJ, Chamberlain D, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Finn JC, Grasner JT, Hazinski MF, Iwami T, Koster RW, Lim SH, Ma MH, McNally BF, Morley PT, Morrison LJ, Monsieurs KG, Montgomery W, Nichol G, Okada K, Ong ME, Travers AH, Nolan JP; Utstein Collaborators. Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcome Reports: Update of the Utstein Resuscitation Registry Templates for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia); and the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:328-40. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
PubMed 25438254Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, Kronick SL, Shuster M, Callaway CW, Kudenchuk PJ, Ornato JP, McNally B, Silvers SM, Passman RS, White RD, Hess EP, Tang W, Davis D, Sinz E, Morrison LJ. Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S729-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970988.
PubMed 20956224Sayre MR, Koster RW, Botha M, Cave DM, Cudnik MT, Handley AJ, Hatanaka T, Hazinski MF, Jacobs I, Monsieurs K, Morley PT, Nolan JP, Travers AH; Adult Basic Life Support Chapter Collaborators. Part 5: Adult basic life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16 Suppl 2):S298-324. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970996. No abstract available.
PubMed 20956253Abella BS, Sandbo N, Vassilatos P, Alvarado JP, O'Hearn N, Wigder HN, Hoffman P, Tynus K, Vanden Hoek TL, Becker LB. Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2005 Feb 1;111(4):428-34. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000153811.84257.59.
PubMed 15687130Bobrow BJ, Vadeboncoeur TF, Stolz U, Silver AE, Tobin JM, Crawford SA, Mason TK, Schirmer J, Smith GA, Spaite DW. The influence of scenario-based training and real-time audiovisual feedback on out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;62(1):47-56.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
PubMed 23465553Crowe C, Bobrow BJ, Vadeboncoeur TF, Dameff C, Stolz U, Silver A, Roosa J, Page R, LoVecchio F, Spaite DW. Measuring and improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality inside the emergency department. Resuscitation. 2015 Aug;93:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.031. Epub 2015 May 8.
PubMed 25963706Davis DP, Graham PG, Husa RD, Lawrence B, Minokadeh A, Altieri K, Sell RE. A performance improvement-based resuscitation programme reduces arrest incidence and increases survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2015 Jul;92:63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
PubMed 25906942
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training Program Based on Quality Control in Gottsegen György Hungarian Institute of Cardiology
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03112460
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CPRTPBQC
- Conditions
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Keywords
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hungarian Institute of CardiologyOther government
- Study start
- 1 May 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In a prospective, non-randomized study, all of the basic and advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitations would be analyzed. All resuscitation are planned to be performed by the above mentioned devices according to the recent protocols. The continuous audio-visual feedback and all the data obtained during the resuscitation are intended to develop a better CPR training program in the future.
The downloading of data is planned to occur on the same day of CPR to a data card. After approximately one week all the participant medical persons would receive a detailed case analysis. Elimination of the typical errors is targeted.
Monitored quality indicators
Follow-up of CPR protocol:
elapsed time between turning on device and first chest compression elapsed time between turning on device and first delivered shock elapsed time between turning on device and first delivered shock in case of shockable rhythm compliance with 2 minutes long CPR period recognition of rhythm, recognition of adequate therapy, follow-up of the protocol concerning DC-shock recording the exact moment of the following procedures (with the use of Code Marker button on the defibrillator device) endotracheal intubation drug therapy obtaining intravenous access oxygen therapy
Quality of chest compressions:
depth frequency release compression fraction
Discontinuance of chest compression - cause anf time interval (Code Marker) endotracheal intubation ventilation rhythm analysis and defibrillation obtaining intravenous access
Other data (obtaining with manual recording):
cause of sudden cardiac death initial rhythm exact time of sudden death eyewitness records data of the patient monitoring system (only optional) description of place participant of CPR first detection medical documentation
Detailed description
Sudden cardiac death remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality and has public health importance. In recent decades, the pathophysiology became better known, however despite the development of medical devices and therapies, significant improvement in outcome was not observed, survival of patients remained low REF1-4.
The resuscitation protocols are based on universal algorithms REF5-6, are valid for all health care practitioners regardless of qualifications, skills. This reanimation paradigm focuses on the basic skills (chest compression, respiration) REF7-8. On the basis of investigations, the most important factors would be: continuous, high-quality chest compressions with the possibly of shortest interruptions REF9, however, the performance of this practice has significant difficulties to meet the expectations REF10.
Without relevant data, the meaningful assessment, follow-up and analysis of resuscitation are difficult, so a substantive case-based training is not feasible.
A reanimation training program on the basis of continuous audio-visual feedback, data and case report would be needed to improve the poor outcome.
A study proved that audio-visual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) feedback, case analysis and scenario-based training can improve significantly the parameters of basic life support (BLS) and can increase the odds of a better neurological survival status after sudden cardiac arrest outside a hospital - adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.7 REF11.
Another study REF12 demonstrated that this method in a hospital environment can improve CPR quality indicators. The so-called Advanced Resuscitation the framework program has also achieved a significant leap from the hospital survival (AOR 2.2, good neurological status AOR 3.0) with similar methods and technology REF13. These results show that an increase in the survival can be achieved with the improvement of resuscitation method and training.
Advanced life support (ALS) service in the Gottsegen György Hungarian Institute of Cardiology is provided by the medical staff of the Cardiology Intensive Care Unit (emergency medical team - EMT).
Our aim is to evolve a continuous quality improvement program with the usage of ZOLL R Series defibrillator device and defibrillator pads with a real-time CPR feedback option and CodeReview case analysis software, and to provide further execution of the program thereafter.
In a prospective, non-randomized study, all of the basic and advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitations would be analyzed. All resuscitation are planned to be performed by the above mentioned devices according to the recent protocols. The continuous audio-visual feedback and all the data obtained during the resuscitation are intended to develop a better CPR training program in the future.
The downloading of data is planned to occur on the same day of CPR to a data card. After approximately one week all the participant medical persons would receive a detailed case analysis. Elimination of the typical errors is targeted.
Monitored quality indicators
Follow-up of CPR protocol:
elapsed time between turning on device and first chest compression elapsed time between turning on device and first delivered shock elapsed time between turning on device and first delivered shock in case of shockable rhythm compliance with 2 minutes long CPR period recognition of rhythm, recognition of adequate therapy, follow-up of the protocol concernig DC-shock recording the exact moment of the following procedures (with the use of Code Marker button on the defibrillatior device) endotracheal intubation drug therapy obtaining intravenous access oxygen therapy
Quality of chest compressions:
depth frequency release compression fraction
Discontinuance of chest compression - cause anf time interval (Code Marker) endotracheal intubation ventilation rhythm analysis and defibrillation obtaining intravenous access
Other data (obtaining with manual recording):
cause of sudden cardiac death initial rhythm exact time of sudden death eyewitness records data of the patient monitoring system (only optional) description of place participant of CPR first detection medical documentation
Participant of the study:
Péter ANDRÉKA Prof. MD, Head of Department, Principal Investigator of study Gábor UZONYI MD, Head of Intensive Care Unit Krisztina SZÜTS MD András CSEPREGI MD Attila KOVÁCS MD Péter TAKÁCS MD András BECK MD Csaba SÁRI MD, Coordinator of study Adrienn MANDZÁK MD Judit POLANECZKY Anna NAGYNÉ LŐKE
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Month
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| all patients | – | Device: cardiopulmonary resuscitation with Zoll R Series defibrillator and defibrillator pads with a real-time CPR feedback option and CodeReview case analysis softwareall of patients who went through basic and advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitations would be analyzed |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- all patients who went through basic and advanced cardiopulmonary resusciations would be analyzed
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cardiopulmonary resuscitation with Zoll R Series defibrillator and defibrillator pads with a real-time CPR feedback option and CodeReview case analysis softwarecardiopulmonary resuscitation with Zoll R Series defibrillator and defibrillator pads with a real-time CPR feedback option and CodeReview case analysis software | Device | all patients |
Primary outcome
Follow-up of CPR protocol
Time frame: period of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (up to 2 hours)
elapsed time between turning on device and first chest compression elapsed time between turning on device and first delivered shock elapsed time between turning on device and first delivered shock in case of shockable rythm compliance with 2 minutes long CPR period recognition of rythm, recognition of adequate therapy, follow-up of the protocol concernig DC-shock recording the exact moment of the following procedures (with the use of Code Marker button on the defibrillatior device)
Quality of chest compressions
Time frame: period of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (up to 2 hours)
depth frequency release compression fraction
Discontinuance of chest compression - cause anf time interval (Code Marker)
Time frame: period of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (up to 2 hours)
endotracheal intubation ventilation rythm analysis and defibrillation obtaning intravenous access
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Apr 2017.
- Background: PubMed 4049035Dans PE, Nevin KL, Seidman CE, McArthur JC, Kariya ST. Inhospital CPR 25 years later: why has survival decreased? South Med J. 1985 Oct;78(10):1174-8.
- Background: PubMed 20123673Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jan;3(1):63-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.889576. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
- Background: PubMed 18812533Nichol G, Thomas E, Callaway CW, Hedges J, Powell JL, Aufderheide TP, Rea T, Lowe R, Brown T, Dreyer J, Davis D, Idris A, Stiell I; Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators. Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome. JAMA. 2008 Sep 24;300(12):1423-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.12.1423.
- Background: PubMed 12969608Peberdy MA, Kaye W, Ornato JP, Larkin GL, Nadkarni V, Mancini ME, Berg RA, Nichol G, Lane-Trultt T. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: a report of 14720 cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2003 Sep;58(3):297-308. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00215-6.
- Background: PubMed 26477410Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, Greif R, Maconochie IK, Nikolaou NI, Perkins GD, Soar J, Truhlar A, Wyllie J, Zideman DA; ERC Guidelines 2015 Writing Group. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:1-80. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Oct 15. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 25438254Perkins GD, Jacobs IG, Nadkarni VM, Berg RA, Bhanji F, Biarent D, Bossaert LL, Brett SJ, Chamberlain D, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Finn JC, Grasner JT, Hazinski MF, Iwami T, Koster RW, Lim SH, Ma MH, McNally BF, Morley PT, Morrison LJ, Monsieurs KG, Montgomery W, Nichol G, Okada K, Ong ME, Travers AH, Nolan JP; Utstein Collaborators. Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcome Reports: Update of the Utstein Resuscitation Registry Templates for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia); and the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:328-40. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
- Background: PubMed 20956224Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, Kronick SL, Shuster M, Callaway CW, Kudenchuk PJ, Ornato JP, McNally B, Silvers SM, Passman RS, White RD, Hess EP, Tang W, Davis D, Sinz E, Morrison LJ. Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S729-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970988.
- Background: PubMed 20956253Sayre MR, Koster RW, Botha M, Cave DM, Cudnik MT, Handley AJ, Hatanaka T, Hazinski MF, Jacobs I, Monsieurs K, Morley PT, Nolan JP, Travers AH; Adult Basic Life Support Chapter Collaborators. Part 5: Adult basic life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16 Suppl 2):S298-324. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970996. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 15687130Abella BS, Sandbo N, Vassilatos P, Alvarado JP, O'Hearn N, Wigder HN, Hoffman P, Tynus K, Vanden Hoek TL, Becker LB. Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2005 Feb 1;111(4):428-34. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000153811.84257.59.
- Background: PubMed 23465553Bobrow BJ, Vadeboncoeur TF, Stolz U, Silver AE, Tobin JM, Crawford SA, Mason TK, Schirmer J, Smith GA, Spaite DW. The influence of scenario-based training and real-time audiovisual feedback on out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;62(1):47-56.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
- Background: PubMed 25963706Crowe C, Bobrow BJ, Vadeboncoeur TF, Dameff C, Stolz U, Silver A, Roosa J, Page R, LoVecchio F, Spaite DW. Measuring and improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality inside the emergency department. Resuscitation. 2015 Aug;93:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.031. Epub 2015 May 8.
- Background: PubMed 25906942Davis DP, Graham PG, Husa RD, Lawrence B, Minokadeh A, Altieri K, Sell RE. A performance improvement-based resuscitation programme reduces arrest incidence and increases survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2015 Jul;92:63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Not yet recruiting
The OXY-VENT Study
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)
Recruiting
Augmented Reality-Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Support for Pediatric Resuscitation
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Pediatric Cardiac Arrest (Simulated)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The CPR, Pre-hospital ECPR and Early Reperfusion Study: A Target Trial Emulation
Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
RecruitingObservational study
PERCEPTION - Super-Early Neuroprognostication in eCPR Patients
Resuscitation, Extra Corporeal Life Support
Recruiting
Compression Only CPR Versus Standard CPR in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - A Randomized Survival Study
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Cardiac Arrest
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, run by Hungarian Institute of Cardiology.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Csaba Sári, MD (0036704508501, saricsaba@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Follow-up of CPR protocol (time frame: period of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (up to 2 hours)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03112460, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.