Low Back PainNCT03127826
Validation of the STarT Back Screening Tool in the Military
A study testing Risk Stratified Care in people with Low Back Pain and Lumbago, run by Brooke Army Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a trial to validate the use of the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) in the Military Health System for patients with low back pain presenting to primary care. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain, Lumbago, Radiculopathy
- What is being tested?
- Risk Stratified Care
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 290 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Apr 2017to 1 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Males and females who are between the ages of 18-50 years old
- Primary complaint of LBP for any duration, with or without associated radiculopathy
- Can speak and understand English
- Be willing and able to give full, informed written consent
Who cannot join
- Red Flags: Any potentially serious or systemic disorders (e.g., cauda equina compression, inflammatory arthritis, compression fracture, malignancy, infection, severe neurological progression), serious illness or comorbidity
- Spinal surgery in the past 24 months
- Current pregnancy (or within the last 6 months)
- Already receiving treatment (other than primary care) for this episode of LBP
- Inability to attend regular treatment sessions
- Pending litigation or a medical evaluation board
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Brooke Army Medical Center
San Antonio, Texas, 78219
About this study
Official title: Validation of the STarT Back Screening Tool in the Primary Care Management of Low Back Pain in the Military Health System: A Randomized Trial of Risk-stratified vs. Usual Care
This is a trial to validate the use of the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) in the Military Health System for patients with low back pain presenting to primary care.
Read the detailed description
Subjects with low back pain presenting to primary care will be enrolled in a study that aims to evaluate the utility of the SBST for providing risk-stratified care. The concept of this approach revolves around matching treatment to patients based on their risk for developing chronic disability from back pain. Those at low risk receive less treatment, and those at high risk need more specialized treatment, that includes psychosocially-focused and cognitive considerations. This approach will be compared to usual care, where general practitioners carry out the course of action they think best for each patient, without any other guidance. Patients will be followed for 1 year.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain, Lumbago, Radiculopathy, Intervertebral Disc Disorder
- Being tested
- Risk Stratified Care, Usual Care
- Keywords
- Low Back Pain, Risk-Stratified Care
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain, Radiculopathy, Intervertebral disc disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Risk Stratified CareProcedure or surgery
Physical therapists providing care will all have attended live training in PIPT principles and be involved in monthly continuing education on these principles. The use of specific principles is guided by the patient's risk stratification (as determined by the STarT Back Tool).
Medium Risk:
- Reassurance will be provided to address specific concerns related to their LBP and implications on work
High Risk:
- Physical therapy will be psychologically augmented with the assessment of biopsychosocial risk factors and the adoption of cognitive behavioral principles that explore patient concerns and address unhelpful beliefs and behaviors, including tailored education (e.g., stress management and pain neuroscience), graded exercise, \& graded exposure
Usual CareProcedure or surgery
Usual care at the general practitioner's discretion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Active comparator | * "Managing Low Back Pain" pamphlet from DoD/VA
* No specific guidance regarding physical therapy (PT) or other referrals, thus decision to refer or not will be made by the primary care manager (PCM) according to their preference Receives: Procedure: Usual Care |
| Risk Stratified Care | Experimental | * "Managing Low Back Pain" pamphlet from DoD/VA
* Self-management education and tools
* 2-item spinal manipulation screening/delivery if indicated
Low Risk:
* Home Exercise Program as indicated
* No referral for ongoing physical therapy
Medium Risk and High Risk
* Referral to physical therapy for ongoing care at physical therapists discretion
* Managed by a "psychologically informed physical therapy" trained physical therapist Receives: Procedure: Risk Stratified Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)
The RMDQ measures low back pain related disability by prompting the participant using 24 statements. The score ranges from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater disability
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Pain Interference
The PROMIS Pain Interference domain provides a T-score based on the population mean of 50 (standard deviation of 10), with higher scores indicating higher pain interference
Measured: 1 year
EuroQoL (EQ-5D)
The EQ-5D is a generic quality of life questionnaire lhat assesses quality of life on a scale that can be referenced to other disease conditions. The EQ-5D covers 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The tool provides a quality of life scores, which is measured by a utility score with 1 representing perfect health and 0 representing a state considered as bad as being dead.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Apr 2017
- Study start7 Apr 2017
- Primary completion26 Feb 2021
- Study completion1 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 290 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brooke Army Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dan Rhon, Brooke Army Medical Center
- Investigators
- Daniel Rhon, DPT, DSc, Principal investigator, Director of Clinical Outcomes Research, Center for the Intrepid
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03127826
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C.2016.047d
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Apr 2017
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data sharing must go through a Data Sharing Agreement via the Defense Health Agency
Publications
Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, Konstantinou K, Main CJ, Mason E, Somerville S, Sowden G, Vohora K, Hay EM. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
PubMed 21963002Beneciuk JM, Fritz JM, George SZ. The STarT Back Screening Tool for prediction of 6-month clinical outcomes: relevance of change patterns in outpatient physical therapy settings. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Sep;44(9):656-64. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5178. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
PubMed 25098194Main CJ, Sowden G, Hill JC, Watson PJ, Hay EM. Integrating physical and psychological approaches to treatment in low back pain: the development and content of the STarT Back trial's 'high-risk' intervention (StarT Back; ISRCTN 37113406). Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
PubMed 22507360Beneciuk JM, George SZ. Pragmatic Implementation of a Stratified Primary Care Model for Low Back Pain Management in Outpatient Physical Therapy Settings: Two-Phase, Sequential Preliminary Study. Phys Ther. 2015 Aug;95(8):1120-34. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140418. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
PubMed 25858972Saunders B, Bartlam B, Foster NE, Hill JC, Cooper V, Protheroe J. General Practitioners' and patients' perceptions towards stratified care: a theory informed investigation. BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Aug 31;17(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0511-2.
PubMed 27582134Greenlee TA, George SZ, Pickens B, Rhon DI. Risk-stratified Care Improves Pain-related Knowledge and Reduces Psychological Distress for Low Back Pain: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):607-620. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003351. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
PubMed 39842027Rhon DI, Greenlee TA, Poehlein E, Beneciuk JM, Green CL, Hando BR, Childs JD, George SZ. Effect of Risk-Stratified Care on Disability Among Adults With Low Back Pain Treated in the Military Health System: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2321929. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21929.
PubMed 37410465
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation of the STarT Back Screening Tool in the Primary Care Management of Low Back Pain in the Military Health System: A Randomized Trial of Risk-stratified vs. Usual Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03127826
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C.2016.047d
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain, Lumbago, Radiculopathy, Intervertebral Disc Disorder
- Keywords
- Low Back Pain, Risk-Stratified Care
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 290 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brooke Army Medical CenterUS federal agency
- Study start
- 7 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 24 Jun 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a trial to validate the use of the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) in the Military Health System for patients with low back pain presenting to primary care.
Detailed description
Subjects with low back pain presenting to primary care will be enrolled in a study that aims to evaluate the utility of the SBST for providing risk-stratified care. The concept of this approach revolves around matching treatment to patients based on their risk for developing chronic disability from back pain. Those at low risk receive less treatment, and those at high risk need more specialized treatment, that includes psychosocially-focused and cognitive considerations. This approach will be compared to usual care, where general practitioners carry out the course of action they think best for each patient, without any other guidance. Patients will be followed for 1 year.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Procedure: Usual Care* "Managing Low Back Pain" pamphlet from DoD/VA * No specific guidance regarding physical therapy (PT) or other referrals, thus decision to refer or not will be made by the primary care manager (PCM) according to their preference |
| Risk Stratified Care | Experimental | Procedure: Risk Stratified Care* "Managing Low Back Pain" pamphlet from DoD/VA * Self-management education and tools * 2-item spinal manipulation screening/delivery if indicated Low Risk: * Home Exercise Program as indicated * No referral for ongoing physical therapy Medium Risk and High Risk * Referral to physical therapy for ongoing care at physical therapists discretion * Managed by a "psychologically informed physical therapy" trained physical therapist |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Males and females who are between the ages of 18-50 years old
- Primary complaint of LBP for any duration, with or without associated radiculopathy
- Can speak and understand English
- Be willing and able to give full, informed written consent
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Red Flags: Any potentially serious or systemic disorders (e.g., cauda equina compression, inflammatory arthritis, compression fracture, malignancy, infection, severe neurological progression), serious illness or comorbidity
- Spinal surgery in the past 24 months
- Current pregnancy (or within the last 6 months)
- Already receiving treatment (other than primary care) for this episode of LBP
- Inability to attend regular treatment sessions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Stratified CarePhysical therapists providing care will all have attended live training in PIPT principles and be involved in monthly continuing education on these principles. The use of specific principles is guided by the patient's risk stratification (as determined by the STarT Back Tool). Medium Risk: - Reassurance will be provided to address specific concerns related to their LBP and implications on work High Risk: - Physical therapy will be psychologically augmented with the assessment of biopsychosocial risk factors and the adoption of cognitive behavioral principles that explore patient concerns and address unhelpful beliefs and behaviors, including tailored education (e.g., stress management and pain neuroscience), graded exercise, \& graded exposure | Procedure or surgery | Risk Stratified Care |
| Usual CareUsual care at the general practitioner's discretion | Procedure or surgery | Usual Care |
Primary outcome
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)
Time frame: 1 year
The RMDQ measures low back pain related disability by prompting the participant using 24 statements. The score ranges from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater disability
2 secondary outcomes
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Pain Interference
Time frame: 1 year
EuroQoL (EQ-5D)
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 21963002Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, Konstantinou K, Main CJ, Mason E, Somerville S, Sowden G, Vohora K, Hay EM. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 25098194Beneciuk JM, Fritz JM, George SZ. The STarT Back Screening Tool for prediction of 6-month clinical outcomes: relevance of change patterns in outpatient physical therapy settings. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Sep;44(9):656-64. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5178. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
- Background: PubMed 22507360Main CJ, Sowden G, Hill JC, Watson PJ, Hay EM. Integrating physical and psychological approaches to treatment in low back pain: the development and content of the STarT Back trial's 'high-risk' intervention (StarT Back; ISRCTN 37113406). Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 25858972Beneciuk JM, George SZ. Pragmatic Implementation of a Stratified Primary Care Model for Low Back Pain Management in Outpatient Physical Therapy Settings: Two-Phase, Sequential Preliminary Study. Phys Ther. 2015 Aug;95(8):1120-34. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140418. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
- Background: PubMed 27582134Saunders B, Bartlam B, Foster NE, Hill JC, Cooper V, Protheroe J. General Practitioners' and patients' perceptions towards stratified care: a theory informed investigation. BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Aug 31;17(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0511-2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39842027Greenlee TA, George SZ, Pickens B, Rhon DI. Risk-stratified Care Improves Pain-related Knowledge and Reduces Psychological Distress for Low Back Pain: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):607-620. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003351. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37410465Rhon DI, Greenlee TA, Poehlein E, Beneciuk JM, Green CL, Hando BR, Childs JD, George SZ. Effect of Risk-Stratified Care on Disability Among Adults With Low Back Pain Treated in the Military Health System: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2321929. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21929.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data sharing must go through a Data Sharing Agreement via the Defense Health Agency
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel Rhon, DPT, DSc principal investigator
Director of Clinical Outcomes Research, Center for the Intrepid
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Risk Stratified Care in people with Low Back Pain and Lumbago, run by Brooke Army Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03127826, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2026.