AzTrials
AzTrials

Major Depressive DisorderPhase 4SCENCT03131050

Effectiveness Study of Scopolamine Combined With Escitalopram in Patients With MDD

A Phase 4 study testing Scopolamine, Escitalopram and Saline in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by Capital Medical University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Despite the availability of a wide range of antidepressant drugs, clinical trials indicate that 30% to 40% of patients with major depression fail to respond to first-line antidepressant treatment, despite adequate dosage, duration, and compliance. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years
Conditions the study is for
Major Depressive Disorder
What is being tested?
Scopolamine, Escitalopram and Saline
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
66 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
15 Mar 2017to 8 Mar 2018
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Has given written informed consent.
  • Male or female outpatients aged at least 18 years and not more than 45 years.
  • Has a diagnosis of major depressive disorder by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria.
  • Current HAMD-17 score ≥ 20 and the duration of the index episode is greater than or equal to four weeks.

Who cannot join

  • Currently enrolled in, or discontinued within the last 30 days from, a clinical trial involving an off-label use of an investigational drug.
  • Current Axis I primary psychiatric diagnosis other than major depressive disorder.
  • Organic mental disease, including mental retardation.
  • History of clinically significant disease, including any cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, hematologic, endocrinologic, or neurologic disease, or clinically significant laboratory abnormality that is not stabilized or is anticipated to require treatment during the study.
  • Subjects receiving an investigational agent (including different formulation and generic agents of investigational drug) in the previous 3 months prior to screening.
  • Women in pregnancy or lactation, or female of child bearing potential without appropriate birth control measures.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Use of antipsychotics or mood stabilizers within 5 days prior to screening.
  • Has received depot antipsychotic medication within one cycle prior to screening.
  • Known allergy or lack of response to mirtazapine.
  • Has received ECT or MECT within 3 months prior to screening.
  • History of anticholinergic drug allergy or complications (allergic reaction, skin rash, urticaria and other allergic reactions which caused by drugs).
  • Smokers.
  • Significant risk of suicidal and/or self-harm behaviors

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Beijing Anding Hospital

    Beijing

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Double-blind, Controlled, Randomized Study Comparing Escitalopram Combined With Scopolamine or Escitalopram in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

Despite the availability of a wide range of antidepressant drugs, clinical trials indicate that 30% to 40% of patients with major depression fail to respond to first-line antidepressant treatment, despite adequate dosage, duration, and compliance. Moreover, in those patients who do experience symptomatic relief following conventional anti-depressant treatment, clinical improvement is not evident for 3-4 weeks. Thus, there is a clear need to develop novel and improved therapeutics for unipolar depression.

A previous study showed that the intravenous administration of scopolamine produces antidepressant effects. This study is designed to determine if scopolamine combine with Escitalopram produce antidepressant effects at an early stage.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Sixty-six outpatients (ages 18-45) with severe major depressive disorder (MDD) (17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score greater than or equal to 20) are enrolled from Beijing Anding Hospital. All participants receive oral escitalopram 10 mg/d throughout the total of 4 weeks treatment. Meanwhile, they are randomized equally to one of three add-on treatment arms during the first three days: (1) intramuscular injection (i.m.) with saline (1 ml) at 9 am and 3 pm per day; (2) scopolamine (0.3 mg in 1ml saline, i.m.) at 9 am and saline (1 ml, i.m.) at 3 pm per day; (3) scopolamine (0.3 mg in 1ml saline, i.m.) at 9 am and 3 pm per day, respectively. Patients were assessed at baseline, day 2, day 3, day 4, day 7, day 14, and day 28 using 17-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(HAMD-17), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS), Young Mania Rating Scale(YMRS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7(GAD-7), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-report 16(QIDS-SR16) and Clinical Global Impression(CGI) by assessors masked to treatment assignments. The primary outcome measure was the time from randomization (baseline) to early improvement (at least 20% reduction in HAMD-17 score ). The second outcome measures were response rates (at least 50% decrease in the HAMD-17 at any visit from baseline), remission rate (HAMD-17 score≤7) at day 28, change in HAMD-17 score ,MADRS score, QIDS-SR16 score, GAD7 score and YMRS score from baseline to any visit, change in CGI-S from baseline to the end of the trial, and CGI-I score at any visit.

Being tested
Scopolamine, Escitalopram, Saline
Keywords
Scopolamine
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Major

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ScopolamineDrug

    Intramuscular injection with scopolamine (0.3 mg/1ml,QD or Bid) during the first three days;

  • EscitalopramDrug

    Oral escitalopram 10 mg/d throughout the total of 4 weeks treatment

  • SalineDrug

    Intramuscular injection with saline (1ml, QD or Bid) during the first three days;

Study groups in NCT03131050
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High-dose scopolamine add-on therapyExperimentalScopolamine (0.3 mg/1 ml, i.m.) Bid; escitalopram (10 mg/d p.o.)QD
Receives: Drug: Scopolamine; Drug: Escitalopram
Low-dose scopolamine add-on therapyExperimentalScopolamine (0.3 mg/1 ml, i.m.) QD; placebo (1 ml saline, i.m.) QD; escitalopram (10 mg/d p.o.)QD
Receives: Drug: Scopolamine; Drug: Escitalopram; Drug: Saline
Placebo add-on therapyPlacebo comparatorPlacebo (1 ml saline, i.m.) Bid; escitalopram (10 mg/d p.o.)QD
Receives: Drug: Escitalopram; Drug: Saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The time of early onset

    The time from randomization (baseline) to early improvement (at least 20% reduction in HAMD-17 score )

    Measured: From randomization (base line) to endpoint(Week 4)

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Response rate of patients receiving scopolamine

    The proportion of subjects with at least 50% decrease in the HAMD-17 at any visit from baseline.Response was defined as ≥50% decrease in the baseline HAMD-17 total scores.

    Measured: From randomization (base line) to endpoint(Week 4)

  2. The proportion of subjects at endpoint with HAMD-17≤7

    Remission was defined as the HAMD total score ≤7

    Measured: endpoint(Week 4)

  3. Change in 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) scores

    Change in HAMD-17 scores measured by the difference between baseline HAMD-17 score and HAMD-17 score at endpoint.

    Measured: From randomization (base line) to endpoint(Week 4)

  4. Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS)

    Change in MADRS scores measured by the difference between baseline MADRS score and MADRS score at endpoint.

    Measured: From randomization (base line) to endpoint(Week 4)

  5. Change in QIDS-SR16 score

    Change in QIDS-SR16 score measured by the difference between baseline QIDS-SR16 score and QIDS-SR16 score at endpoint.

    Measured: From randomization (base line) to endpoint(Week 4)

  6. Change in GAD7 score

    Change in GAD7 score measured by the difference between baseline GAD7 score and GAD7 score at endpoint.

    Measured: From randomization (base line) to endpoint(Week 4)

  7. Change in YMRS score

    Change in YMRS score measured by the difference between baseline YMRS score and YMRS score at endpoint.

    Measured: From randomization (base line) to endpoint(Week 4)

  8. Change in CGI-S score

    Change in CGI-S score measured by the difference between baseline CGI-S score and CGI-S score at endpoint.

    Measured: From randomization (base line) to endpoint(Week 4)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Apr 2017
  2. Study start15 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completion8 Feb 2018
  4. Study completion8 Mar 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
GROUP 1: The patients received intramuscular injection treatment of scopolamine (0.3 mg/ml) at 9 am and 0.9% saline treatment at 3pm. GROUP 2: The patients received intramuscular injection treatment of scopolamine (0.3 mg/ml) at 9 am and 3 PM. GROUP 3: The patients received intramuscular injection treatment of 0.9% saline (1 ml) at 9 am and 3 PM.
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
66 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03131050
Sponsor's protocol ID
Scopolamine i.m.
Acronym
SCE
Status last verified
Dec 2018
First submitted
18 Apr 2017
Last updated
26 Dec 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Furey ML, Drevets WC. Antidepressant efficacy of the antimuscarinic drug scopolamine: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;63(10):1121-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.10.1121.

    PubMed 17015814
  • Zhou J, Yang J, Zhu X, Zghoul T, Feng L, Chen R, Wang G. The effects of intramuscular administration of scopolamine augmentation in moderate to severe major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jul 1;10:2045125320938556. doi: 10.1177/2045125320938556. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32655854
  • Zhou J, Wang W, Yang J, Zhu X, Feng L, Xiao L, Wang G. Scopolamine augmentation of a newly initiated escitalopram treatment for major depressive disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Jan 9;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3132-3.

    PubMed 30626409

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Scopolamine, Escitalopram and Saline in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by Capital Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The time of early onset (time frame: From randomization (base line) to endpoint(Week 4)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03131050, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Dec 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in