Lower Back Pain ChronicNCT03143959
Functional Improvement With Abdominoplasty
An observational study of Lower Back Pain Chronic and Urinary Incontinence, run by The Caps Clinic.
Trial summary
The study investigates the impact of abdominoplasty in the post partum population on the symptoms of back pain and urinary incontinence. Patients presenting for abdominoplasty fill out validated questionnaires for both back pain (Oswestry Disability Index) and urinary incontinence (ICIQ-UI short form). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 70 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Lower Back Pain Chronic, Urinary Incontinence, Recti Diastasis
- How many people
- 214 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2014to 30 Sep 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 70 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Any post partum female presenting for abominoplasty regardless of whether they have functional symptoms or not.
Who may be able to join
- Post Partum Females presenting for abdominoplasty
Who cannot join
- Males and non post partum females presenting for abdominoplasty
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Study of the Impact of Abdominoplasty on the Symptoms of Back Pain and Urinary Incontinence in the Post Partum Population.
The study investigates the impact of abdominoplasty in the post partum population on the symptoms of back pain and urinary incontinence. Patients presenting for abdominoplasty fill out validated questionnaires for both back pain (Oswestry Disability Index) and urinary incontinence (ICIQ-UI short form). They complete the same questionnaires 6 weeks and 6 months post op. The prospectively gathered data gives an insight into the incidence of functional symptoms in this post partum group preop as well as the degree of improvement gained postop. This is a multicenter trial with 9 surgeons submitting patients to the study, which ran for 19 months.
Read the detailed description
Abdominoplasty has long been considered a cosmetic procedure, improving the shape of the abdomen by excess skin removal, liposuction and rectus muscle plication. Performed chiefly on the post-partum and weight loss population, there have been reports of improvement in the functional symptoms of back pain and incontinence following abdominoplasty with rectus plication but there has been no prospective multicentre study to investigate the issue.
The incidence of chronic back pain greater than two years following pregnancy has been reported between 5% to 21.1%. Persistent urinary incontinence rates 10 to 12 years after pregnancy range between 25% to 37.9%. Vaginal delivery is associated with a higher incidence of long term stress incontinence. The Australian female population is approximately 11m. With a 24% rate of childlessness up to 1.67m Australian women are suffering chronic back pain and 3.2m stress incontinence. Both these conditions negatively affect the quality of life and are usually under reported.
This is a multicentre prospective study on the impact of abdominoplasty on back pain and urinary incontinence in the post-partum population. All post-partum patients presenting for abdominoplasty were enrolled to give an indication of incidence of symptoms in this population as well as the magnitude of improvement or deterioration.
The prospective study utilised validated questionnaires. For back pain the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was selected as it is an excellent measure of a patient's functional disability and has been in use for nearly 40 years. The Index is a multiple choice questionnaire, divided into 10 sections assessing Pain Intensity, Personal Care, Lifting, Walking, Sitting, Standing, Sleeping, Social Life, Travelling and the impact on Employment and House making. Each section is scored from 0 to 5, the maximum score is 50. The score is then doubled to become a percentage disability index. Urinary Incontinence was measured with the International Consultation On Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence - Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF). This is also a multiple-choice questionnaire asking the patient to score the frequency of urine leakage, how much they think leaks and on a scale of one to ten how much it interferes with daily life. It is not a disability index like the Oswestry. A maximum score is 21 with urine leaking all the time, large amounts and interfering with life a great deal.
Patients completed the questionnaires pre abdominoplasty and at 6 weeks and 6 months post operation. Demographic information was collected; Age, Parity, Age Range of Children (the years between the oldest and youngest), Method of Birth (Vaginal or Caesarean) and BMI preoperatively. Surgical data was also obtained; Method of Abdominoplasty, Weight Removed, Volume of Liposuction, Width of Diastasis and the presence of a Hernia. No data on postoperative complications was collected. Patients signed an informed consent form to participate after reading an information pamphlet and the study was approved by the ACT Health Human Research Ethics Committee.
A presentation at the 37th Annual Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons conference in August 2014 recruited surgeons to the study. Nine surgeons agreed to take part and were given packs of questionnaires, patient information brochures, consent forms, demographic forms and a surgeons information sheet. The nine participants were individual private practitioners, four from Sydney NSW and one each from Canberra ACT, Toowoomba QLD, Brisbane QLD, Gold Coast QLD and Newcastle NSW, a mix of capital city and smaller regional centres along the east coast of Australia.
The objective was to study both the incidence of functional symptoms in the population presenting for abdominoplasty as well as the outcome. Study surgeons were instructed to enrol all post-partum abdominoplasty patients. Nulliparous weight loss patients were excluded as were males. The completed forms were posted back to the study author who compiled the results. Statistical analysis was performed by Datalytics (Bruce ACT).
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Back pain
Reduction in back pain following abdominoplasty measured by questionnaire
Measured: 6 months
Urinary incontinence
reduction in urinary incontinence following abdominoplasty measured by questionnaire
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 May 2017
- Study start1 Sep 2014
- Primary completion31 Mar 2016
- Study completion30 Sep 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lower Back Pain ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 214 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Caps Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alastair Taylor, The Caps Clinic
- Investigators
- Alastair Taylor, FRACS, Principal investigator, The Caps Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03143959
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FuncAbdo
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 4 May 2017
- Last updated
- 9 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Noren L, Ostgaard S, Johansson G, Ostgaard HC. Lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy: a 3-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2002 Jun;11(3):267-71. doi: 10.1007/s00586-001-0357-7. Epub 2001 Dec 8.
PubMed 12107796Ostgaard HC, Zetherstrom G, Roos-Hansson E. Back pain in relation to pregnancy: a 6-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24):2945-50. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00018.
PubMed 9431631To WW, Wong MW. Factors associated with back pain symptoms in pregnancy and the persistence of pain 2 years after pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Dec;82(12):1086-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-0412.2003.00235.x.
PubMed 14616251Altman D, Ekstrom A, Gustafsson C, Lopez A, Falconer C, Zetterstrom J. Risk of urinary incontinence after childbirth: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;108(4):873-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000233172.96153.ad.
PubMed 17012448Viktrup L, Rortveit G, Lose G. Risk of stress urinary incontinence twelve years after the first pregnancy and delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;108(2):248-54. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000226860.01127.0e.
PubMed 16880292MacArthur C, Wilson D, Herbison P, Lancashire RJ, Hagen S, Toozs-Hobson P, Dean N, Glazener C; Prolong study group. Urinary incontinence persisting after childbirth: extent, delivery history, and effects in a 12-year longitudinal cohort study. BJOG. 2016 May;123(6):1022-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13395. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
PubMed 258468167. Australian Bureau of Statistics 2000, Births, Australia, 2000, cat no. 3301.0, ABS, Canberra
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
PubMed 11074683Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther. 2002 Jan;82(1):8-24. doi: 10.1093/ptj/82.1.8.
PubMed 11784274Timmermans L, Falez F, Melot C, Wespes E. Validation of use of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) for impairment rating: a transversal retrospective study of 120 patients. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Sep;32(7):974-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.22363. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
PubMed 23281067
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Study of the Impact of Abdominoplasty on the Symptoms of Back Pain and Urinary Incontinence in the Post Partum Population.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03143959
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FuncAbdo
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 214 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Caps ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study investigates the impact of abdominoplasty in the post partum population on the symptoms of back pain and urinary incontinence. Patients presenting for abdominoplasty fill out validated questionnaires for both back pain (Oswestry Disability Index) and urinary incontinence (ICIQ-UI short form). They complete the same questionnaires 6 weeks and 6 months post op. The prospectively gathered data gives an insight into the incidence of functional symptoms in this post partum group preop as well as the degree of improvement gained postop. This is a multicenter trial with 9 surgeons submitting patients to the study, which ran for 19 months.
Detailed description
Abdominoplasty has long been considered a cosmetic procedure, improving the shape of the abdomen by excess skin removal, liposuction and rectus muscle plication. Performed chiefly on the post-partum and weight loss population, there have been reports of improvement in the functional symptoms of back pain and incontinence following abdominoplasty with rectus plication but there has been no prospective multicentre study to investigate the issue.
The incidence of chronic back pain greater than two years following pregnancy has been reported between 5% to 21.1%. Persistent urinary incontinence rates 10 to 12 years after pregnancy range between 25% to 37.9%. Vaginal delivery is associated with a higher incidence of long term stress incontinence. The Australian female population is approximately 11m. With a 24% rate of childlessness up to 1.67m Australian women are suffering chronic back pain and 3.2m stress incontinence. Both these conditions negatively affect the quality of life and are usually under reported.
This is a multicentre prospective study on the impact of abdominoplasty on back pain and urinary incontinence in the post-partum population. All post-partum patients presenting for abdominoplasty were enrolled to give an indication of incidence of symptoms in this population as well as the magnitude of improvement or deterioration.
The prospective study utilised validated questionnaires. For back pain the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was selected as it is an excellent measure of a patient's functional disability and has been in use for nearly 40 years. The Index is a multiple choice questionnaire, divided into 10 sections assessing Pain Intensity, Personal Care, Lifting, Walking, Sitting, Standing, Sleeping, Social Life, Travelling and the impact on Employment and House making. Each section is scored from 0 to 5, the maximum score is 50. The score is then doubled to become a percentage disability index. Urinary Incontinence was measured with the International Consultation On Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence - Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF). This is also a multiple-choice questionnaire asking the patient to score the frequency of urine leakage, how much they think leaks and on a scale of one to ten how much it interferes with daily life. It is not a disability index like the Oswestry. A maximum score is 21 with urine leaking all the time, large amounts and interfering with life a great deal.
Patients completed the questionnaires pre abdominoplasty and at 6 weeks and 6 months post operation. Demographic information was collected; Age, Parity, Age Range of Children (the years between the oldest and youngest), Method of Birth (Vaginal or Caesarean) and BMI preoperatively. Surgical data was also obtained; Method of Abdominoplasty, Weight Removed, Volume of Liposuction, Width of Diastasis and the presence of a Hernia. No data on postoperative complications was collected. Patients signed an informed consent form to participate after reading an information pamphlet and the study was approved by the ACT Health Human Research Ethics Committee.
A presentation at the 37th Annual Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons conference in August 2014 recruited surgeons to the study. Nine surgeons agreed to take part and were given packs of questionnaires, patient information brochures, consent forms, demographic forms and a surgeons information sheet. The nine participants were individual private practitioners, four from Sydney NSW and one each from Canberra ACT, Toowoomba QLD, Brisbane QLD, Gold Coast QLD and Newcastle NSW, a mix of capital city and smaller regional centres along the east coast of Australia.
The objective was to study both the incidence of functional symptoms in the population presenting for abdominoplasty as well as the outcome. Study surgeons were instructed to enrol all post-partum abdominoplasty patients. Nulliparous weight loss patients were excluded as were males. The completed forms were posted back to the study author who compiled the results. Statistical analysis was performed by Datalytics (Bruce ACT).
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 70 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Any post partum female presenting for abominoplasty regardless of whether they have functional symptoms or not.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Post Partum Females presenting for abdominoplasty
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Males and non post partum females presenting for abdominoplasty
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Back pain
Time frame: 6 months
Reduction in back pain following abdominoplasty measured by questionnaire
Urinary incontinence
Time frame: 6 months
reduction in urinary incontinence following abdominoplasty measured by questionnaire
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 May 2017.
- Background: PubMed 12107796Noren L, Ostgaard S, Johansson G, Ostgaard HC. Lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy: a 3-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2002 Jun;11(3):267-71. doi: 10.1007/s00586-001-0357-7. Epub 2001 Dec 8.
- Background: PubMed 9431631Ostgaard HC, Zetherstrom G, Roos-Hansson E. Back pain in relation to pregnancy: a 6-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24):2945-50. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00018.
- Background: PubMed 14616251To WW, Wong MW. Factors associated with back pain symptoms in pregnancy and the persistence of pain 2 years after pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Dec;82(12):1086-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-0412.2003.00235.x.
- Background: PubMed 17012448Altman D, Ekstrom A, Gustafsson C, Lopez A, Falconer C, Zetterstrom J. Risk of urinary incontinence after childbirth: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;108(4):873-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000233172.96153.ad.
- Background: PubMed 16880292Viktrup L, Rortveit G, Lose G. Risk of stress urinary incontinence twelve years after the first pregnancy and delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;108(2):248-54. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000226860.01127.0e.
- Background: PubMed 25846816MacArthur C, Wilson D, Herbison P, Lancashire RJ, Hagen S, Toozs-Hobson P, Dean N, Glazener C; Prolong study group. Urinary incontinence persisting after childbirth: extent, delivery history, and effects in a 12-year longitudinal cohort study. BJOG. 2016 May;123(6):1022-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13395. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
- Background7. Australian Bureau of Statistics 2000, Births, Australia, 2000, cat no. 3301.0, ABS, Canberra
- Background: PubMed 11074683Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
- Background: PubMed 11784274Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther. 2002 Jan;82(1):8-24. doi: 10.1093/ptj/82.1.8.
- Background: PubMed 23281067Timmermans L, Falez F, Melot C, Wespes E. Validation of use of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) for impairment rating: a transversal retrospective study of 120 patients. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Sep;32(7):974-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.22363. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lower Back Pain Chronic
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Veterans' Intervention Blending NeuRomodulation and YogA for Chronic Low BackPaiN Treatment: VIBRANT
Chronic Low Back Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Psilocybin-Assisted Physical Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP), Physical Therapy
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
PRP Versus NP Injections for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
Discogenic Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Dual-Task Core Stabilization Training in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Gamified Home-Based Core Neuromuscular Training for Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Core Muscles
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alastair Taylor, FRACS principal investigator
The Caps Clinic
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lower Back Pain Chronic and Urinary Incontinence, run by The Caps Clinic.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Back pain (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03143959, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2017.