Gastric CancerPhase 2CISCANCT03150628
Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Stomach CAncer: a Feasibility Study
A Phase 2 study testing Perioperative chemotherapy, Cytoreduction and HIPEC in people with Gastric Cancer and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, run by Richard van Hillegersberg at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Rationale: For patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment strategy. Several Asian and Western studies demonstrated hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and cytoreductive surgery (CS) to result in a prolonged survival compared to palliative… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Cancer, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, HIPEC
- What is being tested?
- Perioperative chemotherapy, Cytoreduction and HIPEC
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2017to 23 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach.
- Surgical resectable carcinoma (T1-4b, N1-3) (table 1)
- Pathological proven peritoneal metastases
- Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) ≤12
- WHO performance status 0,1 or 2 and ASA 1-3
- Age ≥ 18
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Distant metastases other than peritoneal metastases
- Siewert type I/II gastro-esophageal junction tumor 22.
- Peritoneal carcinomatosis as a presentation of recurrent disease
- Pregnancy
- Any contraindication to cisplatin, e.g.
- Hypersensitivity
Show all 10Show fewer
- HIV infection
- inadequate bone marrow function (ANC <1.5x109/L or Platelets <100x109/L)
- inadequate hepatic function (>1.5 x ULN, ALAT and ASAT >2.5 x ULN)
- inadequate renal function (Creatinine clearance <50 ml/min)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Rationale: For patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment strategy. Several Asian and Western studies demonstrated hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and cytoreductive surgery (CS) to result in a prolonged survival compared to palliative systemic treatment. Morbidity and mortality rates of HIPEC and CS appear to be acceptable. In the Netherlands, this treatment is not yet introduced, therefore patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin are precluded from surgery and will be treated with palliative chemotherapy or best support of care.
Objective: To assess the safety and feasibility of HIPEC and CS in Western patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer, in terms of morbidity and mortality. Secondary objective is to determine the effect on survival and recurrence.
Read more
Study design: Mono centre prospective phase II single-arm feasibility study.
Study population: Western patients diagnosed with resectable (cT1-4b, N1-3) gastric cancer with clinical or pathologically proven peritoneal metastases without distant metastases.
Intervention: Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) and Cytoreductive Surgery (CS) with Cisplatin.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome is the safety and feasibility of the intervention, measured by the percentage of overall surgical complications grade ≥3 as stated by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Secondary outcomes are intraoperative events, postoperative morbidity and mortality, postoperative recovery, including quality of life, and disease free- and overall survival.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The additional burden for the patient mainly consists of HIPEC and CS.Furthermore, patients will undergo additional staging in order to exclude unresectable disease, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen (3 drugs) instead of a palliative chemotherapy regimen (2 drugs). Postoperative care and outpatient visits are performed according to current protocols on HIPEC and CS for colon cancer and nation-wide protocols on gastric cancer surgery. The study is associated with a high risk classification. As there is a potential survival benefit, a small chance for curation and possibly a higher quality of life, we consider the additional burden and risks justified. This study is designed as a one group study, which eliminates group relatedness.
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, HIPEC
- Being tested
- Perioperative chemotherapy, Cytoreduction, HIPEC
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms, Peritoneal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Perioperative chemotherapyDrug
Perioperative chemotherapy
CytoreductionProcedure or surgery
Cytoreductive surgery
HIPECDrug
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with 100mg/m2 cisplatin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study population | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Perioperative chemotherapy; Procedure: Cytoreduction; Drug: HIPEC |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Morbidity
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ≥ grade 3
Measured: From the day of surgery to hospital discharge or 30 days postoperative, whichever is last
Mortality
Postoperative mortality
Measured: From the day of surgery to 30 days postoperative
Secondary outcomes (4)
Survival
Overall and disease free survival
Measured: Up to 5 years postoperative
Recovery
ICU stay, hospital stay
Measured: From the day of surgery to hospital discharge or 30 days postoperative, whichever is last
Quality of Life
EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-STO22
Measured: Up to 5 years postoperative
Readmissions
Readmissions after hospital discharge
Measured: Up to 30 days after hospital discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 May 2017
- Study start1 Aug 2017
- Primary completion23 Apr 2018
- Study completion23 Apr 2018
Why it stopped: Conflicting recruitment with PERISCOPE II study (NCT03348150)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Richard van Hillegersberg
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Richard van Hillegersberg, UMC Utrecht
- Investigators
- Richard van Hillegersberg, MD PhD, Principal investigator, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Dep. of SurgeryJelle P Ruurda, MD PhD, Principal investigator, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Dep. of Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03150628
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL58258.041.16
- Other IDs
- 2016-002595-27, 16-180/G-M, 2016
- Acronym
- CISCA
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2017
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Coccolini F, Cotte E, Glehen O, Lotti M, Poiasina E, Catena F, Yonemura Y, Ansaloni L. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;40(1):12-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.10.019. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
PubMed 24290371Chia CS, You B, Decullier E, Vaudoyer D, Lorimier G, Abboud K, Bereder JM, Arvieux C, Boschetti G, Glehen O; BIG RENAPE Group. Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Gastric Cancer Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Is Cure a Possibility? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(6):1971-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5081-3. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
PubMed 26753751Glehen O, Gilly FN, Arvieux C, Cotte E, Boutitie F, Mansvelt B, Bereder JM, Lorimier G, Quenet F, Elias D; Association Francaise de Chirurgie. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer: a multi-institutional study of 159 patients treated by cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Sep;17(9):2370-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1039-7. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
PubMed 20336386
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Stomach CAncer: a Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03150628
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CISCA / NL58258.041.16
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, HIPEC
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Conflicting recruitment with PERISCOPE II study (NCT03348150)
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Richard van HillegersbergUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rationale: For patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment strategy. Several Asian and Western studies demonstrated hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and cytoreductive surgery (CS) to result in a prolonged survival compared to palliative systemic treatment. Morbidity and mortality rates of HIPEC and CS appear to be acceptable. In the Netherlands, this treatment is not yet introduced, therefore patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin are precluded from surgery and will be treated with palliative chemotherapy or best support of care.
Objective: To assess the safety and feasibility of HIPEC and CS in Western patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer, in terms of morbidity and mortality. Secondary objective is to determine the effect on survival and recurrence.
Study design: Mono centre prospective phase II single-arm feasibility study.
Study population: Western patients diagnosed with resectable (cT1-4b, N1-3) gastric cancer with clinical or pathologically proven peritoneal metastases without distant metastases.
Intervention: Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) and Cytoreductive Surgery (CS) with Cisplatin.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome is the safety and feasibility of the intervention, measured by the percentage of overall surgical complications grade ≥3 as stated by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Secondary outcomes are intraoperative events, postoperative morbidity and mortality, postoperative recovery, including quality of life, and disease free- and overall survival.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The additional burden for the patient mainly consists of HIPEC and CS.Furthermore, patients will undergo additional staging in order to exclude unresectable disease, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen (3 drugs) instead of a palliative chemotherapy regimen (2 drugs). Postoperative care and outpatient visits are performed according to current protocols on HIPEC and CS for colon cancer and nation-wide protocols on gastric cancer surgery. The study is associated with a high risk classification. As there is a potential survival benefit, a small chance for curation and possibly a higher quality of life, we consider the additional burden and risks justified. This study is designed as a one group study, which eliminates group relatedness.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study population | Experimental | Drug: Perioperative chemotherapy, Procedure: Cytoreduction, Drug: HIPEC |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach.
- Surgical resectable carcinoma (T1-4b, N1-3) (table 1)
- Pathological proven peritoneal metastases
- Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) ≤12
- WHO performance status 0,1 or 2 and ASA 1-3
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Distant metastases other than peritoneal metastases
- Siewert type I/II gastro-esophageal junction tumor 22.
- Peritoneal carcinomatosis as a presentation of recurrent disease
- Pregnancy
- Any contraindication to cisplatin, e.g.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Perioperative chemotherapyPerioperative chemotherapy | Drug | Study population |
| CytoreductionCytoreductive surgery | Procedure or surgery | Study population |
| HIPECHyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with 100mg/m2 cisplatin | Drug | Study population |
Primary outcome
Morbidity
Time frame: From the day of surgery to hospital discharge or 30 days postoperative, whichever is last
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ≥ grade 3
Mortality
Time frame: From the day of surgery to 30 days postoperative
Postoperative mortality
4 secondary outcomes
Survival
Time frame: Up to 5 years postoperative
Recovery
Time frame: From the day of surgery to hospital discharge or 30 days postoperative, whichever is last
Quality of Life
Time frame: Up to 5 years postoperative
Readmissions
Time frame: Up to 30 days after hospital discharge
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Conflicting recruitment with PERISCOPE II study (NCT03348150)). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Apr 2019.
- Background: PubMed 24290371Coccolini F, Cotte E, Glehen O, Lotti M, Poiasina E, Catena F, Yonemura Y, Ansaloni L. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;40(1):12-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.10.019. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
- Background: PubMed 26753751Chia CS, You B, Decullier E, Vaudoyer D, Lorimier G, Abboud K, Bereder JM, Arvieux C, Boschetti G, Glehen O; BIG RENAPE Group. Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Gastric Cancer Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Is Cure a Possibility? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(6):1971-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5081-3. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
- Background: PubMed 20336386Glehen O, Gilly FN, Arvieux C, Cotte E, Boutitie F, Mansvelt B, Bereder JM, Lorimier G, Quenet F, Elias D; Association Francaise de Chirurgie. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer: a multi-institutional study of 159 patients treated by cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Sep;17(9):2370-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1039-7. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
GK01 Cell Therapy in Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis
Gastric Cancer (GC)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Neoadjuvant-adjuvant Durvalumab and FLOT Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Durvalumab in Chinese Patients With Resectable GC/GEJC.
Gastric, Esophagogastric Junction
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Richard van Hillegersberg, MD PhD principal investigator
UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Dep. of Surgery
Jelle P Ruurda, MD PhD principal investigator
UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Dep. of Surgery
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Perioperative chemotherapy, Cytoreduction and HIPEC in people with Gastric Cancer and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, run by Richard van Hillegersberg at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Conflicting recruitment with PERISCOPE II study (NCT03348150)). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Morbidity (time frame: From the day of surgery to hospital discharge or 30 days postoperative, whichever is last). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03150628, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2019.