PainPhase 3CHILI-OBNCT03153813
Capsaicin Patches In Knee Osteoarthritis In Obese Patients
A Phase 3 study testing capsaicin 8% patches (Qutenza) in people with Pain, run by Nadine ATTAL at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
To assess the efficacy and safety of high concentration capsaicin patches in pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in patients with obesity Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- capsaicin 8% patches (Qutenza)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Jul 2015to Dec 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Enrolled patients will be males or females,
- aged over 18 years,
- have pain for at least 3 months due to mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the knee (meeting American College of Rheumatology clinical and radiographic criteria), of at least moderate intensity (pain intensity score over the last 24 hours before enrolment ≥ 4/10),
- with a BMI above 30 kg/m²
- and no other pain conditions accounting for their disability.
- The skin will be intact and no blessed.
Show all 9Show fewer
- All female patients should take contraception during all study and at least 30 days after closer.
- All patients must sign informed consent.
- All patients will be recruited from the Department of Nutrition, Ambroise Paré University Hospital and treatment will be given during a dedicated day care clinic.
Who cannot join
- Patients necessitating surgery,
- with relative contraindications to capsaicin patches, particularly with unstable hypertension or cardiac condition,
- past history of capsaicin use will not be included.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
Hospital Ambroise Paré, Nutrition Department
Boulogne-Billancourt, 92100
About this study
Official title: Efficacy And Safety Of High Concentration Capsaicin Patches In Knee Osteoarthritis In Obese Patients: A Randomized Prospective Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study
To assess the efficacy and safety of high concentration capsaicin patches in pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in patients with obesity
Read the detailed description
Osteoarthritis is one of the leading causes of pain and disability. In France osteoarthritis of the knee, the most common form of osteoarthritis has been recently estimated to affect 4.7 % of men and 2.5 % of women .
One particularly exposed population to osteoarthritis is represented by obese patients. Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) above 30 kg/m², is considered to be one of the most important risk factors for osteoarthritis (OA) in knees. Numerous longitudinal studies show a strong association between obesity, and radiographic knee OA, e.g. in the Framingham Study, the Chingford Study, the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, the John Hopkins Precursors Study, and in longitudinal studies in UK and the Netherlands. Thus, the WHO initiative on counteracting obesity also accepts OA as a consequence of obesity . Each BMI increase by 1 kg/m² is associated with a 15% increased risk of OA. A number of recent studies involving the association between obesity and knee osteoarthritis have since been published. A large, population-based prospective study (n = 823) conducted by Toivanen et al. with a follow-up of 22 years found that the risk for knee osteoarthritis was 7 times greater for people with BMI ≥30 compared to the control of people with BMI <25. A prospective cohort study of the Norwegian population by Grotle et al. (10) that followed 1,675 patients reported that BMI >30 was significantly associated with osteoarthritis of the knee, with odds ratio of 2.81, and 95% CI of 1.32-5.96. Lohmander et al. found that in a large cohort study of 27,960 patients from the Swedish population, the relative risk for knee osteoarthritis (fourth quartile compared to first quartile) was 8.1, with a 95% CI of 5.3-12.4. Finally, a case-control study from Holliday et al. with 1,042 knee osteoarthritis patients and 1,121 matched controls reported that the adjusted odds ratio for knee osteoarthritis in patients with BMI >30 was 7.48 with 95% CI of 5.45-10.27.
Pain is one of the major comorbid conditions that may preclude effective weight management in these patients, particularly with regards to physical activity, since pain increases with effort and movement. Obese patients generally receive oral analgesics, such as weak opioids or tramadol, but due to a number of associated comorbidities, they generally do not tolerate, or have contraindications to, centrally acting analgesics. Furthermore an increasing number of obese patients are managed by malabsorbtive bariatric surgical procedures, exposing them at risk for inefficacity by oral analgesics, in regards to the malabsorptive effect.
Therefore alternative therapies, and in particular topical treatments, may be indicated in these patients as these drugs have less systemic side effects. The use of such treatments in patients with obesity should contribute to facilitate rehabilitation and hence contribute to weight loss, which may further help to reduce pain.
One promising topical treatment is represented by capsaicin. Capsaicin is an agonist of the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1), a non-selective cation channel. It is well established that capsaicin applied in high concentration to the skin can cause initial nociceptor sensitization through its agonistic effects on TRPV1 receptors then subsequently acts in the skin to attenuate cutaneous hypersensitivity and reduce pain by a process best described as "defunctionalisation" of nociceptor fibres (e.g. temporary loss of membrane potential, inability to transport neurotrophic factors leading to altered phenotype, and reversible retraction of epidermal and dermal nerve fibre terminals). Evidence suggests that the utility of topical capsaicin may extend beyond painful peripheral neuropathies, and that this treatment may be particularly relevant in patients with osteoarthritis pain. Thus TRPV1 is mainly expressed by nociceptive neurons in dorsal root and trigeminal ganglia. However, there is increasing evidence that TRPV1 is also expressed in various cell types including synovial fibroblasts (SF) from patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) and thus may play a role in non-neuronal mechanisms that might modulate nociception in symptomatic osteoarthritis.
An additional effect of high concentration of capsaicin, which does not involve TRPV1, is a direct inhibition of mitochondrial respiration. Furthermore, by using the approach of patch-clamp, capsaicinoids (capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin) have been shown to reversibly inhibit the currents of T-type voltage-dependent Ca2+channels, suggesting the effect of capsaicinoids on pain relief may also be related to the inhibition of T-type Ca2+ channels.
Capsaicin is metabolized rapidly by several cytochrome enzymes present in human liver, but in vitro studies shows that its metabolism in human skin is quite low. Capsaicin reside at the site of action (i.e. skin) relatively unchanged, whereas capsaicin which is transdermally absorbed is rapidly eliminated and does not have any systemic effect.
To date, repeated applications of low dose capsaicin cream at different concentrations (0.0125 to 0.25 %) have been found moderately effective in OA of the knee or hand, based on the basis of six double or single blind trials with sample sizes ranging from 14 to 200 patients. However repeated applications of capsaicin cream are difficult on the long term particularly because of the burning sensation induced by the cream and the necessity to repeat applications several times per day.
Recently high concentration capsaicin patches (8%) (Qutenza) have been developed for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. These treatments induce long lasting analgesic effects in these conditions lasting up to an average of 3 months after a 30 to 60 minutes application. The burning side effect related to the application of the patch is rapidly reversible and very few severe side effects have been reported with this procedure.
If the primary cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain lies deep within joints and topical capsaicin does not provide substantial transdermal delivery, then the apparent efficacy of topical capsaicin in lower back pain and OA could be postulated to be by CNS modulatory mechanisms. Another possibility is that alterations in, or sensitization of, cutaneous nociceptors could be a contributing factor. Such alterations might be driven by unusually high concentrations of cytokines or growth factors in joints which could either diffuse some distance away from the primary site of inflammation or promote excitatory phenotypes in nearby collateral axons. Furthermore there is increasing evidence that TRPV1 expression is not limited to primary afferent neurons but that the receptor is expressed in various cell types throughout the body. TRPV1 is present in synovial fibroblasts from symptomatic OA and RA (rheumatoid arthritis) patients and the receptor can be activated by stimulation with the vanilloid capsaicin. It is very likely that capsaicin stimulation does not only induce IL-6 production but also results in the release of other signalling molecules that may transfer the information to other non-neuronal or neuronal cells and thereby contribute to a modulation of nociception in the inflamed joint.
Based on the mechanisms described above, there are reasons to believe that Qutenza may also be effective in osteoarthritis pain. To date, there are strictly no data regarding potential efficacy and safety of this treatment in osteoarthritis pain in obese patients
- Conditions
- Pain
- Being tested
- capsaicin 8% patches (Qutenza), Placebo patches
- Keywords
- pain, knee osteoarthritis, obesity, capsaicin
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
capsaicin 8% patches (Qutenza)Drug
Placebo patchesOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Drug | Experimental | Up to 4 patches to cover a surface of 1200 cm2 will be applied to the painful area depending on the surface of pain during 60 minutes : capsaicin 8% patches (Qutenza) Receives: Drug: capsaicin 8% patches (Qutenza) |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Up to 4 patches will be applied to the painful area depending on the surface of pain during 60 minutes : placebo Receives: Other: Placebo patches |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Effects on self reported average pain intensity on pain diaries throughout the study (on NRS from 0 to 10)
The primary outcome measure will be the reduction of average pain intensity as assessed by the patients daily using a pain diary throughout the 3 months of the study. The comparison will be made with baseline pain values started 7 days before the treatment.
Measured: Over the 3 months of the study
Secondary outcomes (2)
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, function and stiffness
WOMAC pain and function index
Measured: at each follow up period 1, 2 and 3 months as compared to baseline values
safety as assessed by side effects during and after application
Measured: during and immeditaly after application and at each follow up period 1, 2 and 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 May 2017
- Study startJul 2015
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completionDec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nadine ATTAL
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Nadine ATTAL, Hospital Ambroise Paré Paris
- Investigators
- Claire Carette, Principal investigator, Hospital Ambroise Pare Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03153813
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHILI-OB
- Acronym
- CHILI-OB
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 4 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy And Safety Of High Concentration Capsaicin Patches In Knee Osteoarthritis In Obese Patients: A Randomized Prospective Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03153813
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHILI-OB / CHILI-OB
- Conditions
- Pain
- Keywords
- pain, knee osteoarthritis, obesity, capsaicin
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nadine ATTALUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To assess the efficacy and safety of high concentration capsaicin patches in pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in patients with obesity
Detailed description
Osteoarthritis is one of the leading causes of pain and disability. In France osteoarthritis of the knee, the most common form of osteoarthritis has been recently estimated to affect 4.7 % of men and 2.5 % of women .
One particularly exposed population to osteoarthritis is represented by obese patients. Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) above 30 kg/m², is considered to be one of the most important risk factors for osteoarthritis (OA) in knees. Numerous longitudinal studies show a strong association between obesity, and radiographic knee OA, e.g. in the Framingham Study, the Chingford Study, the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, the John Hopkins Precursors Study, and in longitudinal studies in UK and the Netherlands. Thus, the WHO initiative on counteracting obesity also accepts OA as a consequence of obesity . Each BMI increase by 1 kg/m² is associated with a 15% increased risk of OA. A number of recent studies involving the association between obesity and knee osteoarthritis have since been published. A large, population-based prospective study (n = 823) conducted by Toivanen et al. with a follow-up of 22 years found that the risk for knee osteoarthritis was 7 times greater for people with BMI ≥30 compared to the control of people with BMI <25. A prospective cohort study of the Norwegian population by Grotle et al. (10) that followed 1,675 patients reported that BMI >30 was significantly associated with osteoarthritis of the knee, with odds ratio of 2.81, and 95% CI of 1.32-5.96. Lohmander et al. found that in a large cohort study of 27,960 patients from the Swedish population, the relative risk for knee osteoarthritis (fourth quartile compared to first quartile) was 8.1, with a 95% CI of 5.3-12.4. Finally, a case-control study from Holliday et al. with 1,042 knee osteoarthritis patients and 1,121 matched controls reported that the adjusted odds ratio for knee osteoarthritis in patients with BMI >30 was 7.48 with 95% CI of 5.45-10.27.
Pain is one of the major comorbid conditions that may preclude effective weight management in these patients, particularly with regards to physical activity, since pain increases with effort and movement. Obese patients generally receive oral analgesics, such as weak opioids or tramadol, but due to a number of associated comorbidities, they generally do not tolerate, or have contraindications to, centrally acting analgesics. Furthermore an increasing number of obese patients are managed by malabsorbtive bariatric surgical procedures, exposing them at risk for inefficacity by oral analgesics, in regards to the malabsorptive effect.
Therefore alternative therapies, and in particular topical treatments, may be indicated in these patients as these drugs have less systemic side effects. The use of such treatments in patients with obesity should contribute to facilitate rehabilitation and hence contribute to weight loss, which may further help to reduce pain.
One promising topical treatment is represented by capsaicin. Capsaicin is an agonist of the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1), a non-selective cation channel. It is well established that capsaicin applied in high concentration to the skin can cause initial nociceptor sensitization through its agonistic effects on TRPV1 receptors then subsequently acts in the skin to attenuate cutaneous hypersensitivity and reduce pain by a process best described as "defunctionalisation" of nociceptor fibres (e.g. temporary loss of membrane potential, inability to transport neurotrophic factors leading to altered phenotype, and reversible retraction of epidermal and dermal nerve fibre terminals). Evidence suggests that the utility of topical capsaicin may extend beyond painful peripheral neuropathies, and that this treatment may be particularly relevant in patients with osteoarthritis pain. Thus TRPV1 is mainly expressed by nociceptive neurons in dorsal root and trigeminal ganglia. However, there is increasing evidence that TRPV1 is also expressed in various cell types including synovial fibroblasts (SF) from patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) and thus may play a role in non-neuronal mechanisms that might modulate nociception in symptomatic osteoarthritis.
An additional effect of high concentration of capsaicin, which does not involve TRPV1, is a direct inhibition of mitochondrial respiration. Furthermore, by using the approach of patch-clamp, capsaicinoids (capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin) have been shown to reversibly inhibit the currents of T-type voltage-dependent Ca2+channels, suggesting the effect of capsaicinoids on pain relief may also be related to the inhibition of T-type Ca2+ channels.
Capsaicin is metabolized rapidly by several cytochrome enzymes present in human liver, but in vitro studies shows that its metabolism in human skin is quite low. Capsaicin reside at the site of action (i.e. skin) relatively unchanged, whereas capsaicin which is transdermally absorbed is rapidly eliminated and does not have any systemic effect.
To date, repeated applications of low dose capsaicin cream at different concentrations (0.0125 to 0.25 %) have been found moderately effective in OA of the knee or hand, based on the basis of six double or single blind trials with sample sizes ranging from 14 to 200 patients. However repeated applications of capsaicin cream are difficult on the long term particularly because of the burning sensation induced by the cream and the necessity to repeat applications several times per day.
Recently high concentration capsaicin patches (8%) (Qutenza) have been developed for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. These treatments induce long lasting analgesic effects in these conditions lasting up to an average of 3 months after a 30 to 60 minutes application. The burning side effect related to the application of the patch is rapidly reversible and very few severe side effects have been reported with this procedure.
If the primary cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain lies deep within joints and topical capsaicin does not provide substantial transdermal delivery, then the apparent efficacy of topical capsaicin in lower back pain and OA could be postulated to be by CNS modulatory mechanisms. Another possibility is that alterations in, or sensitization of, cutaneous nociceptors could be a contributing factor. Such alterations might be driven by unusually high concentrations of cytokines or growth factors in joints which could either diffuse some distance away from the primary site of inflammation or promote excitatory phenotypes in nearby collateral axons. Furthermore there is increasing evidence that TRPV1 expression is not limited to primary afferent neurons but that the receptor is expressed in various cell types throughout the body. TRPV1 is present in synovial fibroblasts from symptomatic OA and RA (rheumatoid arthritis) patients and the receptor can be activated by stimulation with the vanilloid capsaicin. It is very likely that capsaicin stimulation does not only induce IL-6 production but also results in the release of other signalling molecules that may transfer the information to other non-neuronal or neuronal cells and thereby contribute to a modulation of nociception in the inflamed joint.
Based on the mechanisms described above, there are reasons to believe that Qutenza may also be effective in osteoarthritis pain. To date, there are strictly no data regarding potential efficacy and safety of this treatment in osteoarthritis pain in obese patients
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Drug | Experimental | Drug: capsaicin 8% patches (Qutenza)Up to 4 patches to cover a surface of 1200 cm2 will be applied to the painful area depending on the surface of pain during 60 minutes : capsaicin 8% patches (Qutenza) |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo patchesUp to 4 patches will be applied to the painful area depending on the surface of pain during 60 minutes : placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Enrolled patients will be males or females,
- aged over 18 years,
- have pain for at least 3 months due to mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the knee (meeting American College of Rheumatology clinical and radiographic criteria), of at least moderate intensity (pain intensity score over the last 24 hours before enrolment ≥ 4/10),
- with a BMI above 30 kg/m²
- and no other pain conditions accounting for their disability.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients necessitating surgery,
- with relative contraindications to capsaicin patches, particularly with unstable hypertension or cardiac condition,
- past history of capsaicin use will not be included.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| capsaicin 8% patches (Qutenza) | Drug | Drug |
| Placebo patches | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Effects on self reported average pain intensity on pain diaries throughout the study (on NRS from 0 to 10)
Time frame: Over the 3 months of the study
The primary outcome measure will be the reduction of average pain intensity as assessed by the patients daily using a pain diary throughout the 3 months of the study. The comparison will be made with baseline pain values started 7 days before the treatment.
2 secondary outcomes
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, function and stiffness
Time frame: at each follow up period 1, 2 and 3 months as compared to baseline values
safety as assessed by side effects during and after application
Time frame: during and immeditaly after application and at each follow up period 1, 2 and 3 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Apr 2019.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Claire Carette principal investigator
Hospital Ambroise Pare Paris
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing capsaicin 8% patches (Qutenza) in people with Pain, run by Nadine ATTAL at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Effects on self reported average pain intensity on pain diaries throughout the study (on NRS from 0 to 10) (time frame: Over the 3 months of the study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2019.