Stroke, IschemicIBOS-NVTNCT03160131
Rehabilitation of Visual Function After Brain Injury
A study testing Neuro Vision Technology in people with Stroke, Ischemic and Brain Injuries, run by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
In Denmark, about 120,000 people suffer from brain damage, of whom approx. 75,000 with brain damage after stroke. Serious and often lasting vision impairments affect 20% to 35% of people after stroke. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Ischemic, Brain Injuries, Stroke Hemorrhagic
- What is being tested?
- Neuro Vision Technology
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2017to 31 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 14 years or older with brain injury.
- Persons who experience significant vision impairment.
- Eye sight 6/18 or better.
- The time from symptoms onset to study inclusion is between 6 weeks and 9 months.
Who cannot join
- Cognitive dysfunction.
- Persons with anosognosia or severe neglect.
- Inability to move independently at least 35 meters with or without assistance, including wheelchairs.
- Inability to understand Danish or with communication disorders that prevent participation in tests.
- Terminal disorder, other progressive disorder.
- Significant abuse of alcohol or euphoric or narcotic drugs.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Serious disorders such as mental illness, especially severe depression.
- New brain injury or other significant disorders emerging after study inclusion.
- Impaired vision not due to brain damage, where the disorder is not considered to be permanent or where the field of vision does not cause significant disability.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The Institute for the Blind and Partially Sighted (IBOS)
Copenhagen, Hellerup, 2900
Nanna F Mikkelsen, OT, +45 45 39 45 23 85, F52E@sof.kk.dk
Nanna F Mikkelsen, OT
About this study
Official title: Rehabilitation of Visual Function After Brain Injury - Effect of Neuro Vision Technology (NVT)
In Denmark, about 120,000 people suffer from brain damage, of whom approx. 75,000 with brain damage after stroke. Serious and often lasting vision impairments affect 20% to 35% of people after stroke. Vision is the most important sense in humans, and even smaller permanent injuries can drastically reduce quality of life.
Vision impairments after brain damage inhibits rehabilitation and enhances other invalidating effects. Reduced vision results in impaired balance, increased risk of serious falls, increased support needs, reduced quality of life, and impaired ability to perform activities of daily living. Restoration of visual field impairments occur only to a small extent during the first month after brain damage, and therefore the time window for spontaneous improvements is very limited. Hence, brain-impaired persons with visual impairment will most likely experience chronically impaired vision already 4 weeks after brain injury and the need for visual compensatory rehabilitation is substantial.
Read more
Neuro Vision Technology (NVT) is an supervised training course where people with visual impairments are trained in compensatory techniques using special equipment. Through the NVT process, the individual's vision problems are carefully investigated and personal data is used to organize individual training sessions that practice the individual in coping with situations that cause problems in everyday life.
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether rehabilitation with NVT can cause significant and lasting improvement in functional capacity in persons with chronic visual impairments after brain injury. Improving eyesight is expected to increase both physical and mental functioning, thus improving the quality of life. Participants included in the project will be investigated in terms of both visual and mental functions, including quality of life, cognition and depression. Such an investigation has not been performed previously and can have a significant impact on vision rehabilitation both nationally and internationally.
Read the detailed description
Background and purpose
Stroke is the main cause of brain injury in Denmark, is the most common cause of invalidity among adults and affects 11,000 Danes annually. By comparison, the second most common cause of brain damage is traumatic brain injury, affecting 3,000 Danes annually. In total, approx. 22,000 children and adults annually experience brain injury in Denmark.
In Denmark, about 120,000 people suffer from brain damage, of whom approx. 75,000 with brain damage after stroke. Serious and often lasting vision impairments affect 20% to 35% of people with stroke. In general, vision is the most important sense in humans, thus even small permanent deficits can dramatically affect the quality of life.
Lack of vision (anopia) after brain damage limits rehabilitation and enhances other invalidating effects. Impaired vision results in impaired balance, increased risk of serious falls, increased support needs, reduced quality of life and impaired ability to perform activities of daily living. Recovery of visual field deficits occurs primarily and only to a modest extent the first month after brain injury, and thus the time window for spontaneous improvements is very limited. Hence, brain-impaired persons with visual impairment will most likely experience chronically impaired vision already 4 weeks after brain injury, and the need for visual compensatory rehabilitation is substantial.
Neuro Vision Technology (NVT) is a supervised training course where people with visual field deficits are trained in compensatory and restorative techniques. The course includes a special computer program, a light panel and a special training program, and the course is conducted with Certified Orientation \& Mobility Instructors (O \& M instructors) with visual expertise. Through the NVT course, the individual's specific vision deficits are carefully identified through a five-step program. Personal data is used to organize individual training and thereby teaching the individual to cope with situations that cause problems in everyday life. In spite of reported positive results of NVT training among several individuals, there are currently few and insufficient scientific studies on whether rehabilitation with NVT results in lasting and clinically significant improvements in people with severe and chronic visual field impairments.
The purpose of this study is to test whether rehabilitation with NVT can lead to significant and lasting improvements in persons with chronic visual impairments after brain injury. Improving eyesight is expected to increase both physical and mental functioning, thus improving the quality of life. Study participants will be investigated in terms of both visual and mental functions, including quality of life, cognition and depression.
Design and methods
This study is designed as a controlled prospective study in which the same subject is examined before and after the intervention. These are subjects with chronic visual field impairments, who will not experience significant spontaneous remission or deterioration. These subjects have typically experienced a stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or traumatic brain injury. There is a high risk of injury worsening in persons with malignant or progressive tumors, making it difficult or impossible to document a beneficial effect of the intervention; People with such progressive diseases will be excluded from participation in the trial.
Intervention: NVT and Mobility
The term O \& M is understood as the ability to move safely in physical space and in the surrounding community. By controlling orientation and mobility techniques, a person with a restricted field of vision can be able to move not only safely, but also freely and independently. The Neuro Vision Technology method uses a special device in the form of light panels and neurological vision tests that give an overview of cognitive difficulties. This light panel is connected to a computer.
Static scanning is investigated using the special light panel with 24 light bulbs divided into two rows, the panel length corresponding to the 180 degrees that normal and well-functioning human eyes can see. Where it is considered relevant, the study participants are referred to the ophthalmologist, specialist optician, or a reading / visual clinic to ensure participants the optimal starting point for using his or her vision. Records are obtained in which the test results are stored.
At the start of the intervention, cognitive tests are performed as well as a standardized route training (mobility route training) that the subject must be able to perform independently. On the route there are a number of targets (stars) that study participants should try to locate. Investigators measure the time spent by study participants on the route, as well as the number of targets ignored by any participant.
Study participants are then placed at the light panel, where the scan pattern is automated and gradually transferred to indoor mobility routes.
When the procedures are automated, the exercise is done outdoors using progressively increasing complexity. Training also Involves the use of public transport and exercises in order to safely move in the traffic. A NVT course includes 3 hours of cognitive (baseline) testing, then a total of 22 hours of teaching given twice a week for 2½ to 3 months. A re-test of 3 hours duration is performed 6 weeks after the NVT course has been finished.
Blinding
Participants are randomized to intervention or control groups. As far as possible, it is ensured that the investigator who measures the subjects' functional level at the end of intervention has not previously had contact with, or knowledge of, the particular participant. Thus, the levels of function of the participants is evaluated by different persons before and after intervention to ensure impartial assessments.
Recruitment
Suitable subjects are consecutively included from the Institute for Blind and Partially Sighted (IBOS), Herlev University Hospital, especially Neurological Department, and other neurological departments. A screening will be performed to assess the suitability of a person to participate in the trial. Attendance is voluntary and all sessions are free for the participant.
Sample Size Estimation
The primary endpoint is the ability to perform the mobility route test with the lowest possible number of errors. After trial start, 40% of the correct targets are expected to rise to 65% at the end of the trial. As a basis for power calculation, α = 0.05 and β = 0.5 are used. Sample size is calculated to 22 participants in each group. Due to age, difficulty in transport and the time-consuming intervention, up to 25% dropouts are expected, thus we aim to include 56 participants.
Study Participants
At least 56 people with permanent visual impairment after brain damage corresponding to hemianopia, quadrant hemianopia or scotoma resulting in functional impairment at activity or participation level.
Data collection
Data collection and databases are prepared for registration and data processing. Data at baseline include: Age, living single / cohabitant at home, in-home care services, mobility aids, social network, height, weight, smoking, alcohol consumption etc.
Statistical analysis
Due to the limited group sizes, data can not be assumed to be normally distributed and non-parametric statistics will be used. Mann-Whitney's test will be used for comparing two individual groups (unpaired observations), while Spearman's rankorder correlation test will be used for ranked pairs. Fisher's exact probability test will be used for categorical data comparisons resulting from classifying data in two different ways. Group-specific test score changes at baseline and after the NVT intervention will be evaluated using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test for paired observations.
Lack of data is acceptable as long as an assessment of the primary endpoint is still possible.
Data from participants that make it possible to assess the primary endpoint will be used as a minimum; However, we hope that data from all subjects can be used to evaluate secondary effect targets.
Ethics
The project is in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, has been assessed by the Scientific Ethics Committee, Protocol No.: H-17001534 and can be initiated. The law of protecting personal data will be uphold.
Adverse events
There are no invasive treatments, and no adverse events or risks are expected in the trial. Regardless of the reason, any subject may at any time cease to participate in the trial.
- Being tested
- Neuro Vision Technology
- Keywords
- Stroke, Visual impairment, Hemianopia, Neuro Vision Technology, Rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke, Brain Injuries, Hemorrhagic Stroke, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Stroke, Vision Disorders, Hemianopsia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Neuro Vision TechnologyDevice
Training using Neuro Vision Technology
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Active comparator | All participants receive NVT course training and are tested at baseline and at the end of the study for primary and secondary endpoints. Receives: Device: Neuro Vision Technology |
| Control | No intervention | All participants receive no NVT course training and are tested at baseline and at the end of the study for primary and secondary endpoints. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ability to complete a mobility route
Target identification and thus to compare how many targets are seen after the intervention.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (11)
Time to complete a mobility route
Time consumption and thus speed to complete the mobility route. Through the route there are a number of targets (stars) that study participants should try to locate. Investigators measure the time spent by study participants on the route, as well as the number of targets ignored by any participant. Measured in minutes and seconds.
Measured: 3 months
National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25)
Questionnaire dealing with vision problems and concerns associated with a person's visual function. Measured in points summing up several scales.
Measured: 3 months
Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)
Assessment of quality of life. Measured in points summing up several scales.
Measured: 3 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Cognitive screening test that provides an estimate of the intellectual functional level.
Measured: 3 months
Fatigue Severity Scale-7
Short fatigue test.
Measured: 3 months
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory 20 (MFI-20)
Fatigue test used to assess the occurrence of physical fatigue, mental fatigue, activity level, motivation and general fatigue.
Measured: 3 months
Test of Attentional Performance (TAP) Test 2.3: Visual Field
Test for field defects in which the subject will respond quickly to stimuli in the field of view.
Measured: 3 months
Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT)
Test of attention and vision.
Measured: 3 months
Rey-Osterrieth's complex figure test
Copying advanced visual figure (without recall).
Measured: 3 months
Modified Barthel-100 Index
Assessment of invalidity rate and ability to perform activities of daily living.
Measured: 3 months
Hemisphere differences
As part of the study, it will be assessed whether persons with lesion of right hemisphere, ie left-field hemianopia may be more likely to be disorientated and due to neglect will overlook more details - this is done by comparing trial participants with right vs. left hemispheric lesions.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 May 2017
- Study start1 Aug 2017
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stroke, IschemicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Institute for the Blind and Partially Sighted (IBOS), Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rune Skovgaard Rasmussen, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
- Investigators
- Karsten Overgaard, MD, Study chair, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03160131
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-17001534
- Acronym
- IBOS-NVT
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 10 May 2017
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rasmussen RS, Schaarup AMH, Overgaard K. Therapist-Assisted Rehabilitation of Visual Function and Hemianopia after Brain Injury: Intervention Study on the Effect of the Neuro Vision Technology Rehabilitation Program. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Feb 27;7(2):e65. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8334.
PubMed 29487042
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Rehabilitation of Visual Function After Brain Injury - Effect of Neuro Vision Technology (NVT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03160131
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IBOS-NVT / H-17001534
- Keywords
- Stroke, Visual impairment, Hemianopia, Neuro Vision Technology, Rehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Institute for the Blind and Partially Sighted (IBOS), Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In Denmark, about 120,000 people suffer from brain damage, of whom approx. 75,000 with brain damage after stroke. Serious and often lasting vision impairments affect 20% to 35% of people after stroke. Vision is the most important sense in humans, and even smaller permanent injuries can drastically reduce quality of life.
Vision impairments after brain damage inhibits rehabilitation and enhances other invalidating effects. Reduced vision results in impaired balance, increased risk of serious falls, increased support needs, reduced quality of life, and impaired ability to perform activities of daily living. Restoration of visual field impairments occur only to a small extent during the first month after brain damage, and therefore the time window for spontaneous improvements is very limited. Hence, brain-impaired persons with visual impairment will most likely experience chronically impaired vision already 4 weeks after brain injury and the need for visual compensatory rehabilitation is substantial.
Neuro Vision Technology (NVT) is an supervised training course where people with visual impairments are trained in compensatory techniques using special equipment. Through the NVT process, the individual's vision problems are carefully investigated and personal data is used to organize individual training sessions that practice the individual in coping with situations that cause problems in everyday life.
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether rehabilitation with NVT can cause significant and lasting improvement in functional capacity in persons with chronic visual impairments after brain injury. Improving eyesight is expected to increase both physical and mental functioning, thus improving the quality of life. Participants included in the project will be investigated in terms of both visual and mental functions, including quality of life, cognition and depression. Such an investigation has not been performed previously and can have a significant impact on vision rehabilitation both nationally and internationally.
Detailed description
Background and purpose
Stroke is the main cause of brain injury in Denmark, is the most common cause of invalidity among adults and affects 11,000 Danes annually. By comparison, the second most common cause of brain damage is traumatic brain injury, affecting 3,000 Danes annually. In total, approx. 22,000 children and adults annually experience brain injury in Denmark.
In Denmark, about 120,000 people suffer from brain damage, of whom approx. 75,000 with brain damage after stroke. Serious and often lasting vision impairments affect 20% to 35% of people with stroke. In general, vision is the most important sense in humans, thus even small permanent deficits can dramatically affect the quality of life.
Lack of vision (anopia) after brain damage limits rehabilitation and enhances other invalidating effects. Impaired vision results in impaired balance, increased risk of serious falls, increased support needs, reduced quality of life and impaired ability to perform activities of daily living. Recovery of visual field deficits occurs primarily and only to a modest extent the first month after brain injury, and thus the time window for spontaneous improvements is very limited. Hence, brain-impaired persons with visual impairment will most likely experience chronically impaired vision already 4 weeks after brain injury, and the need for visual compensatory rehabilitation is substantial.
Neuro Vision Technology (NVT) is a supervised training course where people with visual field deficits are trained in compensatory and restorative techniques. The course includes a special computer program, a light panel and a special training program, and the course is conducted with Certified Orientation \& Mobility Instructors (O \& M instructors) with visual expertise. Through the NVT course, the individual's specific vision deficits are carefully identified through a five-step program. Personal data is used to organize individual training and thereby teaching the individual to cope with situations that cause problems in everyday life. In spite of reported positive results of NVT training among several individuals, there are currently few and insufficient scientific studies on whether rehabilitation with NVT results in lasting and clinically significant improvements in people with severe and chronic visual field impairments.
The purpose of this study is to test whether rehabilitation with NVT can lead to significant and lasting improvements in persons with chronic visual impairments after brain injury. Improving eyesight is expected to increase both physical and mental functioning, thus improving the quality of life. Study participants will be investigated in terms of both visual and mental functions, including quality of life, cognition and depression.
Design and methods
This study is designed as a controlled prospective study in which the same subject is examined before and after the intervention. These are subjects with chronic visual field impairments, who will not experience significant spontaneous remission or deterioration. These subjects have typically experienced a stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or traumatic brain injury. There is a high risk of injury worsening in persons with malignant or progressive tumors, making it difficult or impossible to document a beneficial effect of the intervention; People with such progressive diseases will be excluded from participation in the trial.
Intervention: NVT and Mobility
The term O \& M is understood as the ability to move safely in physical space and in the surrounding community. By controlling orientation and mobility techniques, a person with a restricted field of vision can be able to move not only safely, but also freely and independently. The Neuro Vision Technology method uses a special device in the form of light panels and neurological vision tests that give an overview of cognitive difficulties. This light panel is connected to a computer.
Static scanning is investigated using the special light panel with 24 light bulbs divided into two rows, the panel length corresponding to the 180 degrees that normal and well-functioning human eyes can see. Where it is considered relevant, the study participants are referred to the ophthalmologist, specialist optician, or a reading / visual clinic to ensure participants the optimal starting point for using his or her vision. Records are obtained in which the test results are stored.
At the start of the intervention, cognitive tests are performed as well as a standardized route training (mobility route training) that the subject must be able to perform independently. On the route there are a number of targets (stars) that study participants should try to locate. Investigators measure the time spent by study participants on the route, as well as the number of targets ignored by any participant.
Study participants are then placed at the light panel, where the scan pattern is automated and gradually transferred to indoor mobility routes.
When the procedures are automated, the exercise is done outdoors using progressively increasing complexity. Training also Involves the use of public transport and exercises in order to safely move in the traffic. A NVT course includes 3 hours of cognitive (baseline) testing, then a total of 22 hours of teaching given twice a week for 2½ to 3 months. A re-test of 3 hours duration is performed 6 weeks after the NVT course has been finished.
Blinding
Participants are randomized to intervention or control groups. As far as possible, it is ensured that the investigator who measures the subjects' functional level at the end of intervention has not previously had contact with, or knowledge of, the particular participant. Thus, the levels of function of the participants is evaluated by different persons before and after intervention to ensure impartial assessments.
Recruitment
Suitable subjects are consecutively included from the Institute for Blind and Partially Sighted (IBOS), Herlev University Hospital, especially Neurological Department, and other neurological departments. A screening will be performed to assess the suitability of a person to participate in the trial. Attendance is voluntary and all sessions are free for the participant.
Sample Size Estimation
The primary endpoint is the ability to perform the mobility route test with the lowest possible number of errors. After trial start, 40% of the correct targets are expected to rise to 65% at the end of the trial. As a basis for power calculation, α = 0.05 and β = 0.5 are used. Sample size is calculated to 22 participants in each group. Due to age, difficulty in transport and the time-consuming intervention, up to 25% dropouts are expected, thus we aim to include 56 participants.
Study Participants
At least 56 people with permanent visual impairment after brain damage corresponding to hemianopia, quadrant hemianopia or scotoma resulting in functional impairment at activity or participation level.
Data collection
Data collection and databases are prepared for registration and data processing. Data at baseline include: Age, living single / cohabitant at home, in-home care services, mobility aids, social network, height, weight, smoking, alcohol consumption etc.
Statistical analysis
Due to the limited group sizes, data can not be assumed to be normally distributed and non-parametric statistics will be used. Mann-Whitney's test will be used for comparing two individual groups (unpaired observations), while Spearman's rankorder correlation test will be used for ranked pairs. Fisher's exact probability test will be used for categorical data comparisons resulting from classifying data in two different ways. Group-specific test score changes at baseline and after the NVT intervention will be evaluated using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test for paired observations.
Lack of data is acceptable as long as an assessment of the primary endpoint is still possible.
Data from participants that make it possible to assess the primary endpoint will be used as a minimum; However, we hope that data from all subjects can be used to evaluate secondary effect targets.
Ethics
The project is in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, has been assessed by the Scientific Ethics Committee, Protocol No.: H-17001534 and can be initiated. The law of protecting personal data will be uphold.
Adverse events
There are no invasive treatments, and no adverse events or risks are expected in the trial. Regardless of the reason, any subject may at any time cease to participate in the trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Active comparator | Device: Neuro Vision TechnologyAll participants receive NVT course training and are tested at baseline and at the end of the study for primary and secondary endpoints. |
| Control | No intervention | –All participants receive no NVT course training and are tested at baseline and at the end of the study for primary and secondary endpoints. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 14 years or older with brain injury.
- Persons who experience significant vision impairment.
- Eye sight 6/18 or better.
- The time from symptoms onset to study inclusion is between 6 weeks and 9 months.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Cognitive dysfunction.
- Persons with anosognosia or severe neglect.
- Inability to move independently at least 35 meters with or without assistance, including wheelchairs.
- Inability to understand Danish or with communication disorders that prevent participation in tests.
- Terminal disorder, other progressive disorder.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Neuro Vision TechnologyTraining using Neuro Vision Technology | Device | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Ability to complete a mobility route
Time frame: 3 months
Target identification and thus to compare how many targets are seen after the intervention.
11 secondary outcomes
Time to complete a mobility route
Time frame: 3 months
National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25)
Time frame: 3 months
Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)
Time frame: 3 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time frame: 3 months
Fatigue Severity Scale-7
Time frame: 3 months
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory 20 (MFI-20)
Time frame: 3 months
Test of Attentional Performance (TAP) Test 2.3: Visual Field
Time frame: 3 months
Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT)
Time frame: 3 months
Rey-Osterrieth's complex figure test
Time frame: 3 months
Modified Barthel-100 Index
Time frame: 3 months
Hemisphere differences
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29487042Rasmussen RS, Schaarup AMH, Overgaard K. Therapist-Assisted Rehabilitation of Visual Function and Hemianopia after Brain Injury: Intervention Study on the Effect of the Neuro Vision Technology Rehabilitation Program. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Feb 27;7(2):e65. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8334.
- Therapist-Assisted Rehabilitation of Visual Function and Hemianopia after Brain Injury: Intervention Study on the Effect of the Neuro Vision Technology Rehabilitation ProgramLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke, Ischemic
RecruitingPhase 3
Probucol for Symptomatic Intracranial and Extracranial Artery Stenosis
Ischemic Stroke, TIA
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Anti-inflammatory and Anti-thrombotic Therapy With colcHicine and Low Dose Rivaroxaban for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Reduction in Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Testing How Well the Drug Extract of Ginkgo Biloba Leaves Tablets Works for People With Memory or Thinking Problems After a Stroke When Added to Standard Treatment
Ischemic Stroke Hospitalized, Impairment, Cognitive
Recruiting
Connectomic Alterations Following Acute Ischemic Stroke in the MCA Territory
Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
INTRA-ARTERIAL MeVO TREATMENT (IMP-ACT) Within the ACT-GLOBAL Adaptive Platform Trial-NCT06352632
Stroke, Acute Ischemic, Medium Vessel Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Karsten Overgaard, MD study chair
Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Neuro Vision Technology in people with Stroke, Ischemic and Brain Injuries, run by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Nanna F Mikkelsen, OT (+45 39 45 23 85, F52E@sof.kk.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ability to complete a mobility route (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03160131, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.