AzTrials
AzTrials

Eating DisorderNEUROPSY_TCANCT03160443

Impact of Neuropsychological Alteration of Decision-making Abilities on the Functioning of Patients With Eating Disorders

A study testing Ambulatory cares in a day-hospital (University Hospital of Montpellier) specialized in the evaluation of eating disorders in people with Eating Disorder, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Eating disorders are multifactorial disorders currently conceptualized in a biopsychosocial model, but pathophysiology remains relatively unknown, and robust etiological models to guide treatment are therefore lacking. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Eating Disorder
What is being tested?
Ambulatory cares in a day-hospital (University Hospital of Montpellier) specialized in the evaluation of eating disorders
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
340 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
3 May 2017to 30 Jul 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient with an eating disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manuel of Mental disorders-V (DSM-V) criteria
  • Patient aged from 15 to 65 years
  • Patient who performs the day-hospital evaluation
  • Patient affiliated to a French social security system
  • Patient able to understand the nature, the aim and the methodology of the study
  • For minor one of the legal guardians gave his consent

Who cannot join

  • Patient in an unstable somatic state (eg severe metabolic disorder making impossible or unreliable neuropsychological assessments)
  • Patient's refusal to participate
  • Patient on protective measures (guardianship or trusteeship)
  • Pregnant or nursing women. A dosage of beta human chorionic gonadotropin (βHCG) will be performed to ensure the absence of pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hôpital Lapeyronie

    Montpellier, 34295

Other trials in France

About this study

Eating disorders are multifactorial disorders currently conceptualized in a biopsychosocial model, but pathophysiology remains relatively unknown, and robust etiological models to guide treatment are therefore lacking. Different endophenotypes and neurocognitive vulnerability factors have been found in eating disorders including decision making abnormalities. The investigators hypothesize that decision making abnormalities are associated with a lower level of functioning and quality of life which could lead to social and interpersonal difficulties. The investigators also hypothesize that these anomalies are associated with a particular clinical profile (more restrictive profile, more hyperactivity, less insight on the disease and desire for care ...).

Read the detailed description

The investigators will recruit a total of 340 patients with an eating disorder in the university hospital of Montpellier.

  • Participation consists of a one-day visit with a multidisciplinary assessment. No action is specific to research. This is the usual management of patients with eating disorders addressed to our department.
  • An ancillary study will be proposed, if the patient is addressed by his general practitioner for an annual evaluation. This second visit will be exactly the same as the initial visit.
Conditions
Eating Disorder
Being tested
Ambulatory cares in a day-hospital (University Hospital of Montpellier) specialized in the evaluation of eating disorders
Keywords
Anorexia nervosa, Bulimia, Binge eating disorders, Neuropsychology, Neurocognition, Daily functioning
Medical subject headings
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia, Binge-Eating Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ambulatory cares in a day-hospital (University Hospital of Montpellier) specialized in the evaluation of eating disordersBehavioural

    All patients assessed in the day-hospital will performed the same evaluation :

    • Blood sampling
    • Calorimetry
    • Osteodensitometry
    • Psychiatric assessment
    • Endocrinologic assessment
    • Dietetic assessment
    • Neuropsychological assessment
    • Self-questionnaires

    With the patient agreement, a biological collection will be constituted. The objective is the subsequent study of biological factors involved in eating disorders (in particular genetic factors)

Study groups in NCT03160443
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ParticipantsOtherAll participants performed the same evaluation: clinical and neuropsychological assessment. All of them are patients with an eating disorder.
Receives: Behavioral: Ambulatory cares in a day-hospital (University Hospital of Montpellier) specialized in the evaluation of eating disorders

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Level of functional impairment assessed by the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)

    We aim to investigate the link between decision-making and daily functioning of patients with eating disorder.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Quality of life assessed by the Eating disorder quality of life (EDQOL) scale.

    We aim to investigate the link between quality of life and alteration of cognitive flexibility of patients with eating disorder.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Level of functional impairment assessed by the clinician with the Functional Assessment Staging Test (FAST) scale

    We aim to investigate the link between global functioning and alteration of cognitive flexibility of patients with eating disorder.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Quality of life assessed by the Eating disorder quality of life (EDQOL) scale.

    We aim to investigate the link between quality of life and alteration central coherence of patients with eating disorder.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Level of functional impairment assessed by the clinician with the FAST scale

    We aim to investigate the link between global functioning and alteration central coherence of patients with eating disorder.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Score to decision making test (Iowa gambling task)

    We aim to investigate the prognostic value of decision making abnormalities on the rates of recovery

    Measured: At 12 months if patient is included in the ancillary study

  6. Score to decision making test (Iowa gambling task)

    We aim to investigate the prognostic value of decision making abnormalities on weight recovery (for anorexic patients)

    Measured: At 12 months if patient is included in the ancillary study

  7. Score to decision making test (Iowa gambling task)

    We aim to investigate the prognostic value of decision making abnormalities on daily functioning

    Measured: At 12 months if patient is included in the ancillary study

  8. Score to decision making test (Iowa gambling task)

    We aim to investigate the prognostic value of decision making abnormalities on switch to another subtype of eating disorder

    Measured: At 12 months if patient is included in the ancillary study

  9. Score to decision making test (Iowa gambling task)

    We aim to investigate the impact of weight recovery on decision making abilities

    Measured: At 12 months if patient is included in the ancillary study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 May 2017
  2. Study start3 May 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Jul 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
340 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03160443
Sponsor's protocol ID
9804
Acronym
NEUROPSY_TCA
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
11 May 2017
Last updated
21 Dec 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Flaudias V, Gonthier C, Cornil A, Seneque M, Lakritz C, Iceta S, Guillaume S. Toward a triadic approach in eating disorders: investigating the contribution of the reflexive, affective and interoceptive systems in a clinical data cohort. J Eat Disord. 2026 Apr 15;14(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s40337-026-01602-0.

    PubMed 41987227

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ambulatory cares in a day-hospital (University Hospital of Montpellier) specialized in the evaluation of eating disorders in people with Eating Disorder, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Level of functional impairment assessed by the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03160443, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Dec 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in