Older AdultsD-SCOPENCT03168204
Evaluating the Efficacy of a Detection and Prevention Program for Frail Community-dwelling Older Adults
A study testing Tailored care and support in people with Older Adults, run by Vrije Universiteit Brussel at 3 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
The evaluation of a detection and prevention program which aims to create a continuum of care and support for frail community-dwelling older people (from early detection, over intervention, to follow-up). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Older Adults
- What is being tested?
- Tailored care and support
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 869 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2017to 30 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Sample 1: 150 older people per municipality (total: 3 municipalities) (inclusion criteria: at least one selection criterion)
- Gender: 75 men - 75 women
- Age: 25 older people aged between 60 and 70 years old - 125 older people older than 70 years
- Marital status: 50 older people with partner - 100 older people without partner
- Living situation: 100 older people who have not moved last 10 years - 50 older people who have moved last 10 years
- Migration background: 100 older people born in Belgium - 50 older people born elsewhere
Show all 9Show fewer
- Sample 2: 150 older people per municipality (total: 3 municipalities) (inclusion criteria: all selection criteria at once)
- 75 men, older than 70 years, living together/widowed/divorced/never married, moved last 10 years
- 75 women, older than 70 years, widowed/divorced/never married, moved last 10 years
Who cannot join
- Current institutionalization
- Current hospitalization
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Belgium3 sites
OCMW Gent
Ghent, 9000
OCMW Knokke-Heist
Knokke-Heist, 8300
OCMW Tienen
Tienen, 3300
About this study
Official title: Study Protocol of the D-SCOPE Project With a Randomized Controlled Trial, Evaluating the Efficacy of a Detection and Prevention Program for Frail Community-dwelling Older Adults
The evaluation of a detection and prevention program which aims to create a continuum of care and support for frail community-dwelling older people (from early detection, over intervention, to follow-up). First, the program aims to develop methods to easily, accurately and timely detect and prevent a negative frailty-balance in older people. Second, the study aims to improve the quality and efficacy of care and support given to frail community-dwelling older people.
- Conditions
- Older Adults
- Being tested
- Tailored care and support
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tailored care and supportBehavioural
Offering tailored care and support whereby the competences, strengths and resources of the older person are taken into account.The intervention will be an enhancement of usual care and will depend on the availability of the municipality, and could be formal (i.e., home care) or informal (e.g. activities of an older adult's association).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Risk of being frail experimental group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Tailored care and support |
| Risk of being frail control group | No intervention | Not described |
| No/low risk of being frail | No intervention | Not described |
| Risk of being frail care avoiders | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline Quality of Life at 6 months
One question from the WHOQOL-BREF will be used to measure the quality of life of participants (1 item). Older participants will also be asked to rate their quality of life on a scale from 0 to 10.
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Change from baseline Satisfaction with Life at 6 months
The Satisfaction with Life Scale will be administered to explore the life satisfaction of the participants (5 items)
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Change from baseline sense of mastery at 6 months
To assess the sense of mastery of older people, the current mastery questionnaire will be used and one self-constructed item will be added which will assess mastery in relation to others. Older participants will also be asked to rate their mastery on a scale from 0 to 10.
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Change from baseline Meaning in Life at 6 months
Meaning in life will be evaluated with 5 items from the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ). Older participants will also be asked to rate their meaning in life on a scale from 0 to 10.
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Change from baseline Community Inclusion at 6 months
Community inclusion will be measured using 1 item from the Community Integration Measure (CIM). Older participants will also be asked to rate their community inclusion on a scale from 0 to 10.
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Change from baseline aging well in place at 6 months
One self-constructed question (1 item) will assess if the older person lives at home in a qualitative manner
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Secondary outcomes (11)
Multidimensional frailty
The Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI) will be used to measure multidimensional frailty: physical, cognitive, psychological, social and environmental frailty
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Physical phenotype of frailty
The Fried's phenotype of frailty will be used to assess the physical phenotype of frailty as well as the questionnaire of Op het Veld
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Feeling frail
The subjective feeling of frailty will be assessed using 1 self-constructed question and will assess to what extent an older person feels frail
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Resilience
Resilience will be measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC2), which is an abbreviated 2-item version of the original scale
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Coping
Coping will be measured using 12 items from the BRIEF cope. Two items from active coping, positive reframing, religion, use of emotional support and self-distraction and one item from acceptance and behavioral disengagement will be used
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Help needed for activities in daily life
Older people will be asked if they need help with 8 activities of daily life, and to what extent the help they receive for these activities is sufficient. These questions are adapted from the questionnaire of the Belgian Ageing Studies (BAS)
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Informal and formal care
Older people will be asked if they receive care from 6 informal and 14 formal caregivers and if they are satisfied with the help they receive from these caregivers. These questions are adapted from the BAS-questionnaire.
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Medical care
The participants will be asked if they needed to go to the hospital, to a residential setting and a rehabilitation center over the past 6 months (day case/overnight stay). These questions are adapted from the Health Interview Survey. In addition, the participants will be asked when they visited the general practitioner for the last time over the last 6 months.
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Leisure time
Leisure time will be measured by using an adapted question with 8 items derived from the BAS-questionnaire and will examine how often the participants perform the listed activities
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Neighborhood
Different dimensions of neighborhood will be assessed. First, the social environment will be administered by using 3 items from the social cohesion dimension of the Neighbourhood Scale. Second, the physical environment will be explored by using 4 items from the BAS-questionnaire as well as from the Neighbourhood Environment Walkability Scale. Finally, low-key participation will be examined by using 2 items from the questionnaire of Oswald \& Konopik.
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Life-events
A shortened version of the Geriatric Adverse Life Events Scale (GALES) will be adapted to assess to occurrence of life-events (11 items)
Measured: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 May 2017
- Study start1 Jun 2017
- Primary completion30 Apr 2018
- Study completion30 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Older AdultsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Vrije Universiteit BrusselThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 869 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hogeschool Gent, Universiteit Antwerpen, KU Leuven, Maastricht University, Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Liesbeth De Donder, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
- Investigators
- Liesbeth De Donder, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03168204
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D-SCOPE IWT 140027
- Acronym
- D-SCOPE
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 17 May 2017
- Last updated
- 25 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Van der Elst M, Schoenmakers B, Dierckx E, De Donder L, De Roeck E, Duppen D, Fret B, Schols JMGA, Kempen GIJM, De Lepeleire J. A search for relevant contextual factors in intervention studies: a stepwise approach with online information. BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 9;12(9):e057048. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057048.
PubMed 36691193Dierckx E, Duppen D, Hoens S, Switsers L, Smetcoren AS, De Donder L, D-Scope. Effectiveness, satisfaction and meaningfulness of a 6-step detection and prevention program for frail community-dwelling older adults: a mixed-method evaluation. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Dec 14;22(1):966. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03504-7.
PubMed 36517745Lambotte D, De Donder L, De Roeck EE, Hoeyberghs LJ, van der Vorst A, Duppen D, Van der Elst M, Fret B, Dury S, Smetcoren AS, Kardol MJM, Engelborghs S, De Deyn PP, De Witte N, Schols JMGA, Kempen GIJM, Zijlstra GAR, De Lepeleire J, Schoenmakers B, Verte D, Dierckx E. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate a prevention program for frail community-dwelling older adults: a D-SCOPE protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Aug 27;18(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0875-3.
PubMed 30149798
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study Protocol of the D-SCOPE Project With a Randomized Controlled Trial, Evaluating the Efficacy of a Detection and Prevention Program for Frail Community-dwelling Older Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03168204
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- D-SCOPE / D-SCOPE IWT 140027
- Conditions
- Older Adults
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 869 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vrije Universiteit BrusselUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hogeschool Gent, Universiteit Antwerpen, KU Leuven, Maastricht University, Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The evaluation of a detection and prevention program which aims to create a continuum of care and support for frail community-dwelling older people (from early detection, over intervention, to follow-up). First, the program aims to develop methods to easily, accurately and timely detect and prevent a negative frailty-balance in older people. Second, the study aims to improve the quality and efficacy of care and support given to frail community-dwelling older people.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Risk of being frail experimental group | Experimental | Behavioral: Tailored care and support |
| Risk of being frail control group | No intervention | – |
| No/low risk of being frail | No intervention | – |
| Risk of being frail care avoiders | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Sample 1: 150 older people per municipality (total: 3 municipalities) (inclusion criteria: at least one selection criterion)
- Gender: 75 men - 75 women
- Age: 25 older people aged between 60 and 70 years old - 125 older people older than 70 years
- Marital status: 50 older people with partner - 100 older people without partner
- Living situation: 100 older people who have not moved last 10 years - 50 older people who have moved last 10 years
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Current institutionalization
- Current hospitalization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tailored care and supportOffering tailored care and support whereby the competences, strengths and resources of the older person are taken into account.The intervention will be an enhancement of usual care and will depend on the availability of the municipality, and could be formal (i.e., home care) or informal (e.g. activities of an older adult's association). | Behavioural | Risk of being frail experimental group |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline Quality of Life at 6 months
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
One question from the WHOQOL-BREF will be used to measure the quality of life of participants (1 item). Older participants will also be asked to rate their quality of life on a scale from 0 to 10.
Change from baseline Satisfaction with Life at 6 months
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
The Satisfaction with Life Scale will be administered to explore the life satisfaction of the participants (5 items)
Change from baseline sense of mastery at 6 months
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
To assess the sense of mastery of older people, the current mastery questionnaire will be used and one self-constructed item will be added which will assess mastery in relation to others. Older participants will also be asked to rate their mastery on a scale from 0 to 10.
Change from baseline Meaning in Life at 6 months
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Meaning in life will be evaluated with 5 items from the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ). Older participants will also be asked to rate their meaning in life on a scale from 0 to 10.
Change from baseline Community Inclusion at 6 months
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Community inclusion will be measured using 1 item from the Community Integration Measure (CIM). Older participants will also be asked to rate their community inclusion on a scale from 0 to 10.
Change from baseline aging well in place at 6 months
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
One self-constructed question (1 item) will assess if the older person lives at home in a qualitative manner
11 secondary outcomes
Multidimensional frailty
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Physical phenotype of frailty
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Feeling frail
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Resilience
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Coping
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Help needed for activities in daily life
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Informal and formal care
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Medical care
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Leisure time
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Neighborhood
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Life-events
Time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Apr 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36691193Van der Elst M, Schoenmakers B, Dierckx E, De Donder L, De Roeck E, Duppen D, Fret B, Schols JMGA, Kempen GIJM, De Lepeleire J. A search for relevant contextual factors in intervention studies: a stepwise approach with online information. BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 9;12(9):e057048. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057048.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36517745Dierckx E, Duppen D, Hoens S, Switsers L, Smetcoren AS, De Donder L, D-Scope. Effectiveness, satisfaction and meaningfulness of a 6-step detection and prevention program for frail community-dwelling older adults: a mixed-method evaluation. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Dec 14;22(1):966. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03504-7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30149798Lambotte D, De Donder L, De Roeck EE, Hoeyberghs LJ, van der Vorst A, Duppen D, Van der Elst M, Fret B, Dury S, Smetcoren AS, Kardol MJM, Engelborghs S, De Deyn PP, De Witte N, Schols JMGA, Kempen GIJM, Zijlstra GAR, De Lepeleire J, Schoenmakers B, Verte D, Dierckx E. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate a prevention program for frail community-dwelling older adults: a D-SCOPE protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Aug 27;18(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0875-3.
Related trials for Older Adults
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Rituximab Combined With Reduced-dose Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Prednisone Regimen in the Treatment of Elderly Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter, Single-arm, Prospective Study
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of VAX-31 With Influenza Vaccine in Adults ≥ 50 Years of Age
Pneumococcal Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Targeting Muscle Strength Loss Due to Hospitalization in Older Adults by Blood-flow Restriction Combined With an Electromyography-driven Serious Game.
Hospital Associated Disability, Immobility
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Cannabidiol on Memory and Attention in Adults Aged 60-70: A Pilot Study
Healthy Aging, Cognition
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Feasibility of Vision-Language Models for Detecting Physical Assistance as an Observable Criterion Defining GMFCS Levels in Children Aged 2 to 6 Years With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Liesbeth De Donder, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tailored care and support in people with Older Adults, run by Vrije Universiteit Brussel at 3 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline Quality of Life at 6 months (time frame: Assessed during baseline testing + 6 months after inclusion). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03168204, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2019.