AgingSIMENONNCT03179722
Studying the Impact of a Medication Use Evaluation by the Community Pharmacist
A study testing Medication review and Additional data collection: questionnaires in people with Aging, run by Joke Wuyts.
Trial summary
In this intervention study, 75 Belgian community pharmacies each recruit 12 patients for an intermediate medication review. For each patient, the identified drug-related problems and subsequent interventions are registered using the PharmDisc classification. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 70 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Aging
- What is being tested?
- Medication review and Additional data collection: questionnaires
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 453 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 8 Nov 2016to 30 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 70 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients should be 70 years or older
- Use five or more drugs on a regular basis (prescription or non-prescription drugs)
- Live in the ambulatory setting
- Obtain his medication from this pharmacy on a regular basis
Who cannot join
- -
About this study
In this intervention study, 75 Belgian community pharmacies each recruit 12 patients for an intermediate medication review. For each patient, the identified drug-related problems and subsequent interventions are registered using the PharmDisc classification. In a subset of Dutch speaking patients, a pretest-posttest single group design is used to measure the impact of this review on patient related outcomes using questionnaires. The primary outcome is the medication related quality of life, measured via the living with medicines questionnaire. Other patient reported outcomes include adherence, self-management, patient satisfaction, fall incidents and use of emergency healthcare services. Medication records are also collected to objectively measure adherence before and after the intervention.
- Conditions
- Aging
- Being tested
- Medication review, Additional data collection: questionnaires
- Keywords
- Aging, Drug-related problems, Medication review, Community pharmacist, Medication use
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Medication reviewBehavioural
Also called Medication use review, Medication review type 2a, Intermediate medication review
The intervention consists of a medicines use review provided by community pharmacists in Belgium. A medicines use review is a medication review type 2a in which both a patient interview and dispensing data are used as information sources to identify drug-related problems with a specific focus on the medicines use of the patient.
Additional data collection: questionnairesBehavioural
Pre-post study design.
At three timepoints, data is collected:
- before the medication review (T-1week)
- during the review (Tweek 3)
- after the review (Tweek12) The questionnaire provide data for the outcomes: medication related quality of life, adherence questionnaire, service satisfaction, use of emergency health services, self-management
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group: Frenchspeaking patients | Experimental | Intervention: Medication review Receives: Behavioral: Medication review |
| Intervention group: Dutchspeaking patients | Experimental | Intervention: Medication review Intervention: Dutchspeaking patients are also invited to participate to Additional data collection: questionnaires Receives: Behavioral: Medication review; Behavioral: Additional data collection: questionnaires |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Drug-related problems & interventions
Using the validated PharmDisc classification tool
Measured: One timeframe: during the medication review
Change in medication related quality of life
using the Living with medicines questionnaire
Measured: Three timepoints: Before the review, during review (week 3), after the review (week 12)
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change in adherence
using dispensing data
Measured: 9 months before and after the intervention
Change in adherence
using the PROMAS questionnaire
Measured: Two timepoints: Before the review, after the review (week 12)
Change in self-management
using the PAM questionnaire
Measured: Two timepoints: Before the review, after the review (week 12)
Change in use of emergency healthcare services & fall incidents
using own questions
Measured: Two timepoints: Before the review, after the review (week 12)
Satisfaction with the new service
Using the PSPSQ2 questionnaire
Measured: One timepoint: during the review (week 3)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jun 2017
- Study start8 Nov 2016
- Primary completion11 Oct 2017
- Study completion30 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AgingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel group intervention study. In a subset of 140 patients, a pre-post study design is used.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 453 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Joke Wuyts
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Association of Belgian Pharmacies (APB)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Joke Wuyts, KU Leuven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03179722
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SIMENONv3
- Acronym
- SIMENON
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 1 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 24 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wuyts J, Maesschalck J, De Wulf I, Foubert K, Boussery K, De Lepeleire J, Foulon V. Studying the impact of a medication use evaluation for polymedicated older patients by the community pharmacist (SIMENON): study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 8;18(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3440-z.
PubMed 30089523
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Studying the Impact of a Medication Use Evaluation by the Community Pharmacist
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03179722
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SIMENON / SIMENONv3
- Conditions
- Aging
- Keywords
- Aging, Drug-related problems, Medication review, Community pharmacist, Medication use
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 453 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Joke WuytsUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Association of Belgian Pharmacies (APB)
- Study start
- 8 Nov 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this intervention study, 75 Belgian community pharmacies each recruit 12 patients for an intermediate medication review. For each patient, the identified drug-related problems and subsequent interventions are registered using the PharmDisc classification. In a subset of Dutch speaking patients, a pretest-posttest single group design is used to measure the impact of this review on patient related outcomes using questionnaires. The primary outcome is the medication related quality of life, measured via the living with medicines questionnaire. Other patient reported outcomes include adherence, self-management, patient satisfaction, fall incidents and use of emergency healthcare services. Medication records are also collected to objectively measure adherence before and after the intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel group intervention study. In a subset of 140 patients, a pre-post study design is used.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group: Frenchspeaking patients | Experimental | Behavioral: Medication reviewIntervention: Medication review |
| Intervention group: Dutchspeaking patients | Experimental | Behavioral: Medication review, Behavioral: Additional data collection: questionnairesIntervention: Medication review Intervention: Dutchspeaking patients are also invited to participate to Additional data collection: questionnaires |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 70 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients should be 70 years or older
- Use five or more drugs on a regular basis (prescription or non-prescription drugs)
- Live in the ambulatory setting
- Obtain his medication from this pharmacy on a regular basis
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Medication reviewAlso: Medication use review, Medication review type 2a, Intermediate medication reviewThe intervention consists of a medicines use review provided by community pharmacists in Belgium. A medicines use review is a medication review type 2a in which both a patient interview and dispensing data are used as information sources to identify drug-related problems with a specific focus on the medicines use of the patient. | Behavioural | Intervention group: Dutchspeaking patients, Intervention group: Frenchspeaking patients |
| Additional data collection: questionnairesPre-post study design. At three timepoints, data is collected: * before the medication review (T-1week) * during the review (Tweek 3) * after the review (Tweek12) The questionnaire provide data for the outcomes: medication related quality of life, adherence questionnaire, service satisfaction, use of emergency health services, self-management | Behavioural | Intervention group: Dutchspeaking patients |
Primary outcome
Drug-related problems & interventions
Time frame: One timeframe: during the medication review
Using the validated PharmDisc classification tool
Change in medication related quality of life
Time frame: Three timepoints: Before the review, during review (week 3), after the review (week 12)
using the Living with medicines questionnaire
5 secondary outcomes
Change in adherence
Time frame: 9 months before and after the intervention
Change in adherence
Time frame: Two timepoints: Before the review, after the review (week 12)
Change in self-management
Time frame: Two timepoints: Before the review, after the review (week 12)
Change in use of emergency healthcare services & fall incidents
Time frame: Two timepoints: Before the review, after the review (week 12)
Satisfaction with the new service
Time frame: One timepoint: during the review (week 3)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jul 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30089523Wuyts J, Maesschalck J, De Wulf I, Foubert K, Boussery K, De Lepeleire J, Foulon V. Studying the impact of a medication use evaluation for polymedicated older patients by the community pharmacist (SIMENON): study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 8;18(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3440-z.
- Protocol Abstract for the PCNE conference 2017 (DOI: 10.1007/s11096-017-0462-2)Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Aging
RecruitingObservational study
PET Imaging in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA)
Aging
Recruiting
Feasibility of A Smartphone Application Intervention in Community Settings: A Pretest-Posttest Pilot Study
Aging, Dementia
Recruiting
Fatty Acid Modulation of Brain Function in Older Adults
Aging
Recruiting
Effects of Breathing Exercises on Cognition in Older Adults
Older Adults (65 Years and Older), Cognition
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Vascular Aging and Microcirculation: Physiological Aspects of Vascular Aging in the Elderly Population (VAMP-Aging)
Aging Problems
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Medication review and Additional data collection: questionnaires in people with Aging, run by Joke Wuyts.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Drug-related problems & interventions (time frame: One timeframe: during the medication review). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03179722, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.