Zenker DiverticulumNCT03187925
Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction and Esophageal Diverticulum
An observational study of Zenker Diverticulum and Progressive Dysphagia, run by University of Cincinnati at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Patients undergoing open transcervical or endoscopic approach in which a laser or stapler is used to divide the common wall between the diverticulum and esophagus, or who are not surgical candidates but agree to follow-up. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Zenker Diverticulum, Progressive Dysphagia, Pharyngoesophageal Diverticulum
- What is being tested?
- open, transcervical versus rigid endoscopic treatment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Aug 2017to Jun 2027
- How long will I take part?
- 5 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: No intended gender or racial/ethnic distribution. Intended age range is 18-100 years of age. The vulnerable population (patients) will be protected from potential coercion or undue influence as this is an observational study with elective participation in follow-up patient surveys in which patient data will otherwise be deidentified upon inspection
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a diagnosis of cervical esophageal diverticulum, with Zenker's as most common, or CP bar (with diagnosis of early Zenker) as indicated on an esophagram who the participating institutions enroll regardless of surgical management and future treatments. Patients undergoing open transcervical or endoscopic approach in which a laser or stapler is used to divide the common wall between the diverticulum and esophagus, or who are not surgical candidates but agree to follow-up.
Who cannot join
- Patients who undergo division of the common wall between the diverticulum and esophagus using flexible endoscopy will not be included in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
UC Health Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
Becky Reinert, CRC, 513-558-1719, gibsonrk@uc.edu
Rebecca Howell, MD
About this study
Official title: A Complete Title Used for Approval Letters. Cervical Diverticulum Prospective, Multi-Institutional Study Proposal
Patients undergoing open transcervical or endoscopic approach in which a laser or stapler is used to divide the common wall between the diverticulum and esophagus, or who are not surgical candidates but agree to follow-up.
Read the detailed description
A prospective, multi-institutional study comparing the effectiveness of the above procedures will provide a large cohort using standardized diagnostic studies, diverticulum size measurements, treatment approaches, pre-operative and post-operative assessment of symptoms in order to both compare the effectiveness of the procedures and to stratify the patients in order to determine whether demographics such as age, pre-operative size, and/or peri-operative co-morbidities influence outcomes.
- Being tested
- open, transcervical versus rigid endoscopic treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Zenker Diverticulum
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
open, transcervical versus rigid endoscopic treatmentProcedure or surgery
Also called observation
The goal of the project is to perform the first prospective, multi-institutional long-term (5 year) study comparing the outcomes of open, transcervical versus rigid endoscopic treatment of cervical esophageal diverticulum and cricopharyngeal dysfunction in resolving associated symptoms, complications, and recurrence rates of dysphagia surgery. This study will also include cricopharyngeal bar as it pertains to an early Zenker's diverticulum.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Add to the paucity of dysphagia outcomes data after surgical treatment of Zenker's diverticulum.
Demographic data will be summarized for categorical and continuous measures. Continuous data will be compared between groups using student's t-test.
Measured: 5 years
Include dysphagia outcomes comparing both endoscopic and open repair of Zenker's diverticulum to develop preliminary evidence-based indications and long-term outcomes, exploring various relevant subset analyses.
Would standardize the above data and lend increased power due to its multi-institutional nature. The post-operative data will include the following surveys EAT-10, RSI, VHI in order to assess for post-operative resolution of symptoms as well as an esophagram at 12month
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2017
- Study start15 Aug 2017
- Primary completionJun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Zenker DiverticulumStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 5 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cincinnati
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rebecca Howell, University of Cincinnati
- Investigators
- Rebecca J Howell, MD, Principal investigator, University of Cincinnati
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03187925
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016-6955
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 13 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002 Jun;16(2):274-7. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00097-8.
PubMed 12150380Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Dec;117(12):919-24. doi: 10.1177/000348940811701210.
PubMed 19140539Bock JM, Van Daele DJ, Gupta N, Blumin JH. Management of Zenker's diverticulum in the endoscopic age: current practice patterns. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 Dec;120(12):796-806. doi: 10.1177/000348941112001205.
PubMed 22279951Leong SC, Wilkie MD, Webb CJ. Endoscopic stapling of Zenker's diverticulum: establishing national baselines for auditing clinical outcomes in the United Kingdom. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Aug;269(8):1877-84. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-1945-3. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
PubMed 22350426Parker NP, Misono S. Carbon dioxide laser versus stapler-assisted endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 May;150(5):750-3. doi: 10.1177/0194599814521554. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
PubMed 24496741Verdonck J, Morton RP. Systematic review on treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;272(11):3095-107. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3267-0. Epub 2014 Sep 7.
PubMed 25194579Wilken R, Whited C, Scher RL. Endoscopic staple diverticulostomy for Zenker's diverticulum: review of experience in 337 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015 Jan;124(1):21-9. doi: 10.1177/0003489414542421. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
PubMed 25026961Venkatesan NN, Evangelista LM, Kuhn MA, Belafsky PC. Normal fluoroscopic appearance status post-successful endoscopic Zenker diverticulotomy. Laryngoscope. 2017 Aug;127(8):1762-1766. doi: 10.1002/lary.26446. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
PubMed 28052332
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Complete Title Used for Approval Letters. Cervical Diverticulum Prospective, Multi-Institutional Study Proposal
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03187925
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016-6955
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CincinnatiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients undergoing open transcervical or endoscopic approach in which a laser or stapler is used to divide the common wall between the diverticulum and esophagus, or who are not surgical candidates but agree to follow-up.
Detailed description
A prospective, multi-institutional study comparing the effectiveness of the above procedures will provide a large cohort using standardized diagnostic studies, diverticulum size measurements, treatment approaches, pre-operative and post-operative assessment of symptoms in order to both compare the effectiveness of the procedures and to stratify the patients in order to determine whether demographics such as age, pre-operative size, and/or peri-operative co-morbidities influence outcomes.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 5 Years
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- No intended gender or racial/ethnic distribution. Intended age range is 18-100 years of age. The vulnerable population (patients) will be protected from potential coercion or undue influence as this is an observational study with elective participation in follow-up patient surveys in which patient data will otherwise be deidentified upon inspection
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with a diagnosis of cervical esophageal diverticulum, with Zenker's as most common, or CP bar (with diagnosis of early Zenker) as indicated on an esophagram who the participating institutions enroll regardless of surgical management and future treatments. Patients undergoing open transcervical or endoscopic approach in which a laser or stapler is used to divide the common wall between the diverticulum and esophagus, or who are not surgical candidates but agree to follow-up.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who undergo division of the common wall between the diverticulum and esophagus using flexible endoscopy will not be included in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| open, transcervical versus rigid endoscopic treatmentAlso: observationThe goal of the project is to perform the first prospective, multi-institutional long-term (5 year) study comparing the outcomes of open, transcervical versus rigid endoscopic treatment of cervical esophageal diverticulum and cricopharyngeal dysfunction in resolving associated symptoms, complications, and recurrence rates of dysphagia surgery. This study will also include cricopharyngeal bar as it pertains to an early Zenker's diverticulum. | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Add to the paucity of dysphagia outcomes data after surgical treatment of Zenker's diverticulum.
Time frame: 5 years
Demographic data will be summarized for categorical and continuous measures. Continuous data will be compared between groups using student's t-test.
Include dysphagia outcomes comparing both endoscopic and open repair of Zenker's diverticulum to develop preliminary evidence-based indications and long-term outcomes, exploring various relevant subset analyses.
Time frame: 5 years
Would standardize the above data and lend increased power due to its multi-institutional nature. The post-operative data will include the following surveys EAT-10, RSI, VHI in order to assess for post-operative resolution of symptoms as well as an esophagram at 12month
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Sep 2023.
- Background: PubMed 12150380Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002 Jun;16(2):274-7. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00097-8.
- Background: PubMed 19140539Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Dec;117(12):919-24. doi: 10.1177/000348940811701210.
- Background: PubMed 22279951Bock JM, Van Daele DJ, Gupta N, Blumin JH. Management of Zenker's diverticulum in the endoscopic age: current practice patterns. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 Dec;120(12):796-806. doi: 10.1177/000348941112001205.
- Background: PubMed 22350426Leong SC, Wilkie MD, Webb CJ. Endoscopic stapling of Zenker's diverticulum: establishing national baselines for auditing clinical outcomes in the United Kingdom. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Aug;269(8):1877-84. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-1945-3. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
- Background: PubMed 24496741Parker NP, Misono S. Carbon dioxide laser versus stapler-assisted endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 May;150(5):750-3. doi: 10.1177/0194599814521554. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
- Background: PubMed 25194579Verdonck J, Morton RP. Systematic review on treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;272(11):3095-107. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3267-0. Epub 2014 Sep 7.
- Background: PubMed 25026961Wilken R, Whited C, Scher RL. Endoscopic staple diverticulostomy for Zenker's diverticulum: review of experience in 337 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015 Jan;124(1):21-9. doi: 10.1177/0003489414542421. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
- Background: PubMed 28052332Venkatesan NN, Evangelista LM, Kuhn MA, Belafsky PC. Normal fluoroscopic appearance status post-successful endoscopic Zenker diverticulotomy. Laryngoscope. 2017 Aug;127(8):1762-1766. doi: 10.1002/lary.26446. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
Related trials for Zenker Diverticulum
RecruitingObservational study
Advanced Endo-therapeutic Procedure : Registry-based Observational Study
Zenker Diverticulum, Polyp of Colon
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders
Achalasia, Esophageal Spasm, Diffuse
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Gastro-esophageal Junction
Achalasia, Paraesophageal Hernia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Treatment of Zenker's Diverticulum (ZENKTUN)
Zenker Diverticulum
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Treatment for Zenker's Diverticulum
Zenker Diverticulum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Rebecca J Howell, MD principal investigator
University of Cincinnati
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Zenker Diverticulum and Progressive Dysphagia, run by University of Cincinnati at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Becky Reinert, CRC (513-558-1719, gibsonrk@uc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Add to the paucity of dysphagia outcomes data after surgical treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. (time frame: 5 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03187925, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2023.