OsteopeniaNCT03195517
Effects of Physical Training on Bone Turnover and Quality of Life in Osteopenic Postmenopausal Women.
A study testing Physical exercise in people with Osteopenia and Bone Turnover Markers, run by University Of Perugia.
Trial summary
The aim of our research was to define both in vivo and in vitro whether and to what extent an high-impact exercise program would affect bone cell turnover and improve the QoL in osteopenic postmenopausal women. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 52 to 70 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteopenia, Bone Turnover Markers, Quality of Life
- What is being tested?
- Physical exercise
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2015to Mar 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 52 to 70 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- postmenopausal
- bone mineral density T-score less than -1 but more than -2.5 in the total hip or lumbar spine (L1-L4) by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
- be able to attend an exercise program 2 times per week over the 3-month period
- stated availability throughout the entire study period
Who cannot join
- secondary causes of bone loss such as osteomalacia, glucocorticoid medication
- co-morbidities that would interfere with participation in exercise such as severe heart or pulmonary disease, inflammatory joint disease, severe osteoarthritis, psychiatric condition
- physical or orthopaedic disabilities that would place the subject at risk or limit their ability to perform exercise
- a past vertebral fracture
- history of chronic diseases, such as renal, hepatic, cardiac, and rheumatic diseases
- current or prior use of drugs that could interfere with bone mass (i.e. glucocorticoids, antiresorptive drugs and hormonal replacement therapy)
About this study
Official title: Effects of a 3-month Weight-bearing and Resistance Exercise Training on Circulating Osteoprogenitor Cells and Bone Formation Markers in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass.
The aim of our research was to define both in vivo and in vitro whether and to what extent an high-impact exercise program would affect bone cell turnover and improve the QoL in osteopenic postmenopausal women.
Read the detailed description
Subjects were selected among those attending the "Bone and Mineral Metabolism Disorders" Clinic of Perugia University, Italy, since May 2nd 2015 and January 31st 2016. A total of 33 post-menopausal women volunteered to participate in the study.
- Conditions
- Osteopenia, Bone Turnover Markers, Quality of Life
- Being tested
- Physical exercise
- Keywords
- Osteopenia, Physical activity, Bone turnover markers, Osteoprogenitor cells, Quality of life
- Medical subject headings
- Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Physical exerciseOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Exercise | Experimental | The exercise program was performed at C.U.R.I.A.Mo. Institute of "Università degli Studi di Perugia". Twenty-four exercise sessions were provided, carried out twice a week for three months. Each session was supervised by two graduated trainers and two medical doctors with a maximum attendance of 5 patient/group.
Each session lasted 45 minutes divided into 15 minutes of aerobic activity and 30 minutes of weight-bearing and resistance activities.
This latter section was specifically projected for adults and older adults with increased risk of fractures and was intended to improve muscle strength and flexibility, balance and, as a result, to prevent the risk of falls. Receives: Other: Physical exercise |
| No additional physical exercise | No intervention | Usual recommendations for prevention of fractures in adults and elderly. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Variation in Serum Levels of Procollagen 1 N-terminal Peptide (P1NP)
P1NP is the most reliable serum marker of bone formation commercially available at the moment
Measured: Baseline - Week 4
Variation in Serum Levels of Procollagen 1 N-terminal Peptide (P1NP).
P1NP is the most reliable serum marker of bone formation, commercially available at the moment.
Measured: Week 4 - Week 12
Serum Sclerotin Levels
Sclerostin has been proposed as the check-point where physical activity (PA) acts to modulate bone metabolism.
Measured: Baseline - W4
Sclerostin
Sclerostin has been proposed as the check-point where PA acts to modulate bone metabolism.
Measured: Week 4 - Week 12
Variation in Serum Carboxy-terminal Telopeptide of Collagen Type I (sCTX)
Serum carboxy-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (sCTX) is one of the most sensitive and specific bone resorption markers of osteoclast-mediated collagen degradation
Measured: Baseline - Week 4
Variation of Serum Carboxy Terminal Telopeptide of Collagen Type I (sCTX)
Serum carboxy terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (sCTX) is one of the most sensitive and specific bone resorption markers of osteoclast-mediated collagen degradation.
Measured: Week 4 - Week 12
Variation in Circulating Osteoprogenitor Cells (OPCs)
Measurements of circulating OPCs with stem cell characteristics (CD34+) and express bone-specific proteins such as alkaline phosphatase (AP +) and osteocalcin (OCN +).
Measured: Baseline - Week 4
Variation in Circulating Osteoprogenitor Cells (OPCs).
Measurements of circulating OPCs with stem cell characteristics (CD34+) and express bone-specific proteins such as alkaline phosphatase (AP +) and osteocalcin (OCN +).
Measured: Week 4 - Week 12
Secondary outcomes (2)
Variation in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL)
Health-related Quality of Life evaluated using the Quality of Life questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). The score ranges from 0, corresponding to the best QoL, to 100, corresponding to the worst QoL. Total score is the average value of 5 sub scores, corresponding to pain, physical function, mental function, social function and general health perception.
Measured: Baseline - Week 4
Variation in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL).
Health-related Quality of Life evaluated using the Quality of Life questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). The score ranges from 0, corresponding to the best QoL, to 100, corresponding to the worst QoL. Total score is the average value of 5 sub scores, corresponding to pain, physical function, mental function, social function and general health perception.
Measured: Week 4 - Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jun 2017
- Study startMay 2015
- Primary completionMar 2016
- Study completionMar 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteopeniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- This was an interventional, single group assignment study in which the subjects were first assigned to the control group and, after 1-month interval with no physical training, were shifted into the 3-months exercise intervention group. Thus, the subjects acted as their own control at the end of the study.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Of Perugia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rita Lombardini, University Of Perugia
- Investigators
- Lombardini, Principal investigator, University Of Perugia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03195517
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OPCuriamo-1
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 15 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 11 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Turner CH, Robling AG. Mechanisms by which exercise improves bone strength. J Bone Miner Metab. 2005;23 Suppl:16-22. doi: 10.1007/BF03026318.
PubMed 15984409Pasqualini L, Leli C, Ministrini S, Schillaci G, Zappavigna RM, Lombardini R, Scarponi AM, Mannarino E. Relationships between global physical activity and bone mineral density in a group of male and female students. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Mar;57(3):238-243. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06054-0. Epub 2016 May 31.
PubMed 27244129Martyn-St James M, Carroll S. A meta-analysis of impact exercise on postmenopausal bone loss: the case for mixed loading exercise programmes. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Dec;43(12):898-908. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052704. Epub 2008 Nov 3.
PubMed 18981037Robling AG, Niziolek PJ, Baldridge LA, Condon KW, Allen MR, Alam I, Mantila SM, Gluhak-Heinrich J, Bellido TM, Harris SE, Turner CH. Mechanical stimulation of bone in vivo reduces osteocyte expression of Sost/sclerostin. J Biol Chem. 2008 Feb 29;283(9):5866-75. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705092200. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
PubMed 18089564Li WC, Chen YC, Yang RS, Tsauo JY. Effects of exercise programmes on quality of life in osteoporotic and osteopenic postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Oct;23(10):888-96. doi: 10.1177/0269215509339002. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
PubMed 19717503Pirro M, Leli C, Fabbriciani G, Manfredelli MR, Callarelli L, Bagaglia F, Scarponi AM, Mannarino E. Association between circulating osteoprogenitor cell numbers and bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2010 Feb;21(2):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0968-0. Epub 2009 May 30.
PubMed 19484167Lips P, Leplege A (2000). Development and validation of quality of life questionnaire for patients with vertebral fractures: Qualeffo-41. Quality of Life Research 9(6a):763-766.
Adami S, Gatti D, Viapiana O, Fiore CE, Nuti R, Luisetto G, Ponte M, Rossini M; BONTURNO Study Group. Physical activity and bone turnover markers: a cross-sectional and a longitudinal study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2008 Dec;83(6):388-92. doi: 10.1007/s00223-008-9184-8. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
PubMed 18949504Pasqualini L, Ministrini S, Lombardini R, Bagaglia F, Paltriccia R, Pippi R, Collebrusco L, Reginato E, Sbroma Tomaro E, Marini E, D'Abbondanza M, Scarponi AM, De Feo P, Pirro M. Effects of a 3-month weight-bearing and resistance exercise training on circulating osteogenic cells and bone formation markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Osteoporos Int. 2019 Apr;30(4):797-806. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04908-9. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
PubMed 30809725
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of a 3-month Weight-bearing and Resistance Exercise Training on Circulating Osteoprogenitor Cells and Bone Formation Markers in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03195517
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPCuriamo-1
- Conditions
- Osteopenia, Bone Turnover Markers, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- Osteopenia, Physical activity, Bone turnover markers, Osteoprogenitor cells, Quality of life
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Of PerugiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2015
- Primary completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 11 Feb 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of our research was to define both in vivo and in vitro whether and to what extent an high-impact exercise program would affect bone cell turnover and improve the QoL in osteopenic postmenopausal women.
Detailed description
Subjects were selected among those attending the "Bone and Mineral Metabolism Disorders" Clinic of Perugia University, Italy, since May 2nd 2015 and January 31st 2016. A total of 33 post-menopausal women volunteered to participate in the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This was an interventional, single group assignment study in which the subjects were first assigned to the control group and, after 1-month interval with no physical training, were shifted into the 3-months exercise intervention group. Thus, the subjects acted as their own control at the end of the study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Exercise | Experimental | Other: Physical exerciseThe exercise program was performed at C.U.R.I.A.Mo. Institute of "Università degli Studi di Perugia". Twenty-four exercise sessions were provided, carried out twice a week for three months. Each session was supervised by two graduated trainers and two medical doctors with a maximum attendance of 5 patient/group. Each session lasted 45 minutes divided into 15 minutes of aerobic activity and 30 minutes of weight-bearing and resistance activities. This latter section was specifically projected for adults and older adults with increased risk of fractures and was intended to improve muscle strength and flexibility, balance and, as a result, to prevent the risk of falls. |
| No additional physical exercise | No intervention | –Usual recommendations for prevention of fractures in adults and elderly. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 52 to 70 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- postmenopausal
- bone mineral density T-score less than -1 but more than -2.5 in the total hip or lumbar spine (L1-L4) by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
- be able to attend an exercise program 2 times per week over the 3-month period
- stated availability throughout the entire study period
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- secondary causes of bone loss such as osteomalacia, glucocorticoid medication
- co-morbidities that would interfere with participation in exercise such as severe heart or pulmonary disease, inflammatory joint disease, severe osteoarthritis, psychiatric condition
- physical or orthopaedic disabilities that would place the subject at risk or limit their ability to perform exercise
- a past vertebral fracture
- history of chronic diseases, such as renal, hepatic, cardiac, and rheumatic diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Physical exercise | Other | Physical Exercise |
Primary outcome
Variation in Serum Levels of Procollagen 1 N-terminal Peptide (P1NP)
Time frame: Baseline - Week 4
P1NP is the most reliable serum marker of bone formation commercially available at the moment
Variation in Serum Levels of Procollagen 1 N-terminal Peptide (P1NP).
Time frame: Week 4 - Week 12
P1NP is the most reliable serum marker of bone formation, commercially available at the moment.
Serum Sclerotin Levels
Time frame: Baseline - W4
Sclerostin has been proposed as the check-point where physical activity (PA) acts to modulate bone metabolism.
Sclerostin
Time frame: Week 4 - Week 12
Sclerostin has been proposed as the check-point where PA acts to modulate bone metabolism.
Variation in Serum Carboxy-terminal Telopeptide of Collagen Type I (sCTX)
Time frame: Baseline - Week 4
Serum carboxy-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (sCTX) is one of the most sensitive and specific bone resorption markers of osteoclast-mediated collagen degradation
Variation of Serum Carboxy Terminal Telopeptide of Collagen Type I (sCTX)
Time frame: Week 4 - Week 12
Serum carboxy terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (sCTX) is one of the most sensitive and specific bone resorption markers of osteoclast-mediated collagen degradation.
Variation in Circulating Osteoprogenitor Cells (OPCs)
Time frame: Baseline - Week 4
Measurements of circulating OPCs with stem cell characteristics (CD34+) and express bone-specific proteins such as alkaline phosphatase (AP +) and osteocalcin (OCN +).
Variation in Circulating Osteoprogenitor Cells (OPCs).
Time frame: Week 4 - Week 12
Measurements of circulating OPCs with stem cell characteristics (CD34+) and express bone-specific proteins such as alkaline phosphatase (AP +) and osteocalcin (OCN +).
2 secondary outcomes
Variation in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL)
Time frame: Baseline - Week 4
Variation in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL).
Time frame: Week 4 - Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Feb 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 15984409Turner CH, Robling AG. Mechanisms by which exercise improves bone strength. J Bone Miner Metab. 2005;23 Suppl:16-22. doi: 10.1007/BF03026318.
- Background: PubMed 27244129Pasqualini L, Leli C, Ministrini S, Schillaci G, Zappavigna RM, Lombardini R, Scarponi AM, Mannarino E. Relationships between global physical activity and bone mineral density in a group of male and female students. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Mar;57(3):238-243. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06054-0. Epub 2016 May 31.
- Background: PubMed 18981037Martyn-St James M, Carroll S. A meta-analysis of impact exercise on postmenopausal bone loss: the case for mixed loading exercise programmes. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Dec;43(12):898-908. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052704. Epub 2008 Nov 3.
- Background: PubMed 18089564Robling AG, Niziolek PJ, Baldridge LA, Condon KW, Allen MR, Alam I, Mantila SM, Gluhak-Heinrich J, Bellido TM, Harris SE, Turner CH. Mechanical stimulation of bone in vivo reduces osteocyte expression of Sost/sclerostin. J Biol Chem. 2008 Feb 29;283(9):5866-75. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705092200. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
- Background: PubMed 19717503Li WC, Chen YC, Yang RS, Tsauo JY. Effects of exercise programmes on quality of life in osteoporotic and osteopenic postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Oct;23(10):888-96. doi: 10.1177/0269215509339002. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
- Background: PubMed 19484167Pirro M, Leli C, Fabbriciani G, Manfredelli MR, Callarelli L, Bagaglia F, Scarponi AM, Mannarino E. Association between circulating osteoprogenitor cell numbers and bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2010 Feb;21(2):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0968-0. Epub 2009 May 30.
- BackgroundLips P, Leplege A (2000). Development and validation of quality of life questionnaire for patients with vertebral fractures: Qualeffo-41. Quality of Life Research 9(6a):763-766.
- Background: PubMed 18949504Adami S, Gatti D, Viapiana O, Fiore CE, Nuti R, Luisetto G, Ponte M, Rossini M; BONTURNO Study Group. Physical activity and bone turnover markers: a cross-sectional and a longitudinal study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2008 Dec;83(6):388-92. doi: 10.1007/s00223-008-9184-8. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30809725Pasqualini L, Ministrini S, Lombardini R, Bagaglia F, Paltriccia R, Pippi R, Collebrusco L, Reginato E, Sbroma Tomaro E, Marini E, D'Abbondanza M, Scarponi AM, De Feo P, Pirro M. Effects of a 3-month weight-bearing and resistance exercise training on circulating osteogenic cells and bone formation markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Osteoporos Int. 2019 Apr;30(4):797-806. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04908-9. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
Related trials for Osteopenia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Melatonin in Posterior Mandible Extraction Socket
Bone Loss
Active, not recruitingObservational study
CFTR Modulator Effects on Bone and Muscle in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis
Cystic Fibrosis, Bone Loss
Active, not recruiting
AI-Supported Mobile High-Impact and Strengthening Exercise Program in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Density
Osteopenia
Active, not recruiting
L-PRF Block vs Composite Graft for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Resorption After Extraction, Alveolar Bone Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Study of Bone Complications in People With Post-menopausal Breast Cancer Who Have Stopped Treatment With Denosumab and Aromatase Inhibitors
Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lombardini principal investigator
University Of Perugia
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Physical exercise in people with Osteopenia and Bone Turnover Markers, run by University Of Perugia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Feb 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Variation in Serum Levels of Procollagen 1 N-terminal Peptide (P1NP) (time frame: Baseline - Week 4). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03195517, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2019.