Respiratory FailurePROTECTIONNCT03201263
Sigh in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
A study testing Sigh in people with Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico at 19 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
Mortality of intubated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients remains considerably high (around 40%) (Bellani 2016). Early implementation of a specific mechanical ventilation mode that enhances lung protection in patients with mild to moderate AHRF and ARDS… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Ventilator Lung
- What is being tested?
- Sigh
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 258 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 20 Dec 2017to 9 May 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients intubated since >24 hours and ≤7 days,
- undergoing PSV since >4 and ≤24 hours,
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤300 mmHg (measured at clinical positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] and FiO2 values)
- clinical PEEP ≥5 cmH2O,
- Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) value of -2 to 0
Who cannot join
- patients with PEEP ≥15 cmH2O;
- PaCO2 >60 mmHg;
- Arterial pH <7.30;
- Age <18 year-old;
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤100 mmHg (measured at clinical PEEP and FiO2 values);
- central nervous system or neuromuscular disorders;
Show all 15Show fewer
- history of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or fibrosis;
- AHRF fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload (e.g., left ventricle ejection fraction ≤40% with no other risk factor);
- impossibility to titrate sedation to desired RASS value of -2 to 0;
- evidence of active air leak from the lung (e.g., pneumothorax);
- cardiovascular instability (e.g., systolic blood pressure [SBP] <90 mmHg despite vasopressors);
- clinical suspect of elevated intracranial pressure;
- extracorporeal support;
- moribund status;
- refusal by the attending physician.
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 7 countries.
19 sites in 7 countries
Italy9 sites
Ospedale di Catanzaro Pugliese Ciaccio
Catanzaro
Arcispedale Sant'Anna
Ferrara
Ospedale San Martino
Genova
Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Cà Granda
Milan, 20122
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Milan
Ospedale L. Sacco
Milan
Ospedale Niguarda
Milan
Ospedale San Gerardo
Monza
Ospedale Gemelli
Rome
France4 sites
CHU Angers
Angers
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand
Hospital de la croix rousse
Lyon
GH Sud Ile-de-France
Melun
About this study
Official title: PRessure suppOrT vEntilation + Sigh in aCuTe hypoxemIc respiratOry Failure patieNts (PROTECTION): a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Mortality of intubated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients remains considerably high (around 40%) (Bellani 2016). Early implementation of a specific mechanical ventilation mode that enhances lung protection in patients with mild to moderate AHRF and ARDS on spontaneous breathing may have a tremendous impact on clinical practice.
Previous studies showed that the addition of cyclic short recruitment maneuvers (Sigh) to assisted mechanical ventilation: improves oxygenation without increasing ventilation pressures and FiO2; decreases the tidal volumes by decreasing the patient's inspiratory drive; increases the EELV by regional alveolar recruitment; decreases regional heterogeneity of lung parenchyma; decreases patients' inspiratory efforts limiting transpulmonary pressure; improves regional compliances. Thus, physiologic studies generated the hypothesis that addition of Sigh to pressure support ventilation (PSV, the most common assisted mechanical ventilation mode) might decrease ventilation pressures and FiO2, and limit regional lung strain and stress through various synergic mechanisms potentially yielding decreased risk of VILI, faster weaning and improved clinical outcomes.
Read more
The investigators conceived a pilot RCT to verify clinical feasibility of the addition of Sigh to PSV in comparison to standard PSV.
The investigators will enrol 258 intubated spontaneously breathing patients with mild to moderate AHRF and ARDS admitted to the ICU.
Patients will be randomized through an online automatic centralized and computerized system to the following study groups (1:1 ratio):
- PSV group: will be treated by protective PSV settings until day 28 or death or performance of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT);
- PSV+Sigh group: will be treated by protective PSV settings with the addition of Sigh until day 28 or death or performance of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT).
Indications on ventilation settings, weaning, spontaneous breathing trial and rescue treatment will be specified.
Read the detailed description
Steering committee: Tommaso Mauri, Laurent Brochard, Jean-Michel Constantin, Giuseppe Foti, Claude Guerin, Jordi Mancebo, Paolo Pelosi, Marco Ranieri, Antonio Pesenti Statistical support: Carla Fornari and Sara Conti
Specific aims
This pilot RCT will serve to test the hypothesis that application of PSV+Sigh in spontaneously breathing intubated patients with mild to moderate AHRF and ARDS is feasible and to collect preliminary data on the safety of such an approach.
Methods
Study design. The investigators will conduct a pilot RCT on intubated spontaneously breathing patients with mild to moderate AHRF and ARDS admitted to the ICU.
Ethics approval. The investigators will seek approval from the institutional review boards of each participating center prior to start of enrollment and consent/information will be obtained from each patient or next of kin following local regulations.
Prevalence of Sigh responders. After enrollment, FiO2 will be titrated to obtain SpO2 of 90-96% and then each patient will first undergo a clinical test of PSV vs. PSV+Sigh to assess the prevalence of Sigh responders vs. non-responders in respect to improved oxygenation. After 30 minutes of clinical PSV+Sigh, SpO2/FiO2 ratio will be collected again to quantify the number of patients in whom it increased (i.e., "Sigh responders").
Randomization. After this test, patients will be randomized through an online automatic centralized and computerized system to the following study groups (1:1 ratio):
- PSV group: will be treated by protective PSV settings until day 28 or death or performance of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT);
- PSV+Sigh group: will be treated by protective PSV settings with the addition of Sigh until day 28 or death or performance of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT).
PSV group settings. Initially, clinicians will set PSV to meet the following targets: tidal volume (Vt) of 6-8 mL/Kg of predicted body weight (PBW), with respiratory rate (RR) 20-35 bpm. In presence of Vt >8 ml/kg PBW and/or RR <20 bpm, PSV zero (CPAP) will be selected. FiO2 will be left as selected before the pre-randomization Sigh test, while PEEP will be left as clinically set.
PSV+Sigh group settings. Similarly, PSV in this group will be set with the same protective targets of the PSV group (see above) and cyclic pressure control phase at 30 cmH2O for 3 seconds delivered once per minute (i.e., Sigh) will be added. PSV+Sigh is an easy to implement ventilation mode and, for the present study, the investigators will use high performance ICU ventilators already available in each clinical unit. Briefly, ventilators will be switched to biphasic positive airway pressure mode (e.g., BiPAP on Drager ventilators, SIMV-PC on Maquet and GE, DuoPAP on Hamilton) with the lower pressure level set at clinical PEEP and the higher pressure level set at 30 cmH2O with a 3-second inspiratory time and then a 57-second expiratory time. This Sigh rate of one per minute can be obtained by virtually all the already available high performance ICU ventilators, thus, even though a lower Sigh rate might be regarded as more physiological, we choose the 1/min rate for feasibility and costs related to the future large RCT. FiO2 will be left as selected before the pre-randomization Sigh test.
Adjusting ventilation settings. In both groups, PSV will be adjusted at least every 8 hours in the following way:
- PSV support will be decreased by 2 cmH2O step if Vt >8 ml/kg PBW and/or RR <20;
- PSV support will be increased by 2 cmH2O step if Vt <6 ml/kg PBW and/or RR >35 and or signs of respiratory distress (e.g., marked use of the accessory muscles).
- PEEP and then FiO2 will be increased by 2 cmH2O and 0.1 steps if SpO2 is <90%;
- FiO2 and then PEEP will be decreased by 0.1 and 2 cmH2O steps if SpO2 is >96%; Sigh settings instead will be left unchanged until day 28, death or SBT.
Switch to controlled mechanical ventilation. In both groups, switch to protective controlled ventilation will be allowed if patient will develop at least one of the following conditions:
- PSV support >20 cmH2O;
- PEEP ≥15 cmH2O;
- unstable hemodynamic status (SBP <90 mmHg with vasoactive drug);
- active cardiac ischemia (dynamic ST changes on cardiac monitor or electrocardiogram);
- unstable arrhythmias (heart rate >140 or <40);
- uncontrolled hypertension (SBP>180 mmHg);
- abrupt decrease in the level of consciousness (RASS <-3);
- dangerous agitation (RASS >+2);
- pH <7.30;
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤100 mmHg;
- necessity to perform diagnostic test (e.g., CT scan or bronchoscopy).
Controlled ventilation will be set on volume mode with Vt 6-8 ml/kg PBW, RR to control pH, unchanged PEEP and FiO2. Controlled ventilation will be thereafter adjusted according to clinical evolution. Patients switched to controlled ventilation will be reassessed at least every 8 hours and they will be switched back to PSV or PSV+Sigh (to maintain study group assignment) targeting the abovementioned settings and adjustments as soon as all the following conditions will be met:
- Patient is able to trigger ventilator breaths;
- PaO2/FiO2 >100 mmHg;
- PEEP <15 cmH2O;
- pH ≥7.3;
- Stable hemodynamic status with stable or decreasing doses of vasopressors for ≥6 hours.
Rescue therapy. In case of desaturation (SpO2 ≤90%) of a patient it will be crucial to exclude hemodynamic impairment as a possible cause. Also, airway obstruction and ventilator malfunction must be ruled out as possible causes. Provided those factors are excluded, a rescue step-up strategy is allowed as follows: institution of protective controlled mechanical ventilation (see above for settings) and performance of recruitment maneuvers at 40-50 cmH2O, PEEP ≥15 cmH2O, prone positioning, inhaled nitric oxide, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Patients undergoing rescue treatments will be reassessed at least every 8 hours and switched back to PSV or PSV+Sigh (to maintain study group assignment) with the abovementioned settings and adjustments as soon as all the above mentioned conditions will be met.
Spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Patients with SpO2 ≥90% on FiO2 ≤0.4 and PEEP ≤5 cmH2O, no agitation, hemodynamically stable with norepinephrine ≤0.1 ug/kg/min or equivalent and at a stable or decreasing dose ≥6 hours and without any of the abovementioned criteria for switch to controlled ventilation will undergo a SBT:
- For patients in the PSV group, the attending physician will perform the SBT directly.
- For patients in the PSV+Sigh group, the attending physician will first withdraw Sigh, wait 60 min and confirm criteria: if confirmed, SBT will be performed; if not, Sigh will be reintroduced and clinical criteria will be checked again to repeat the procedure after at least 8 hours.
SBT will last at least 60 minutes with a combination of PEEP 0-5 cm H2O and PSV 0-5 cm H2O. At the end of the 60 minutes, patient will fail the SBT if any of the following will be present:
- criteria to start the SBT will not be confirmed;
- sustained (>5 min) respiratory rate >35 bpm;
- HR >140 bpm;
- SBP >180 or <80 mmHg;
- marked complaint of dyspnea;
- increased somnolence with elevated pCO2 and/or pH<7.3
- a cough will not be strong enough to clear secretions
- active cardiac ischemia (dynamic ST changes on cardiac monitor or electrocardiogram)
- abrupt decrease in the level of consciousness with RASS <-3. Patients who will fail the SBT will be switched back to PSV or PSV+Sigh (to maintain study group assignment) and clinical criteria will be checked again to repeat the procedure after at least 6 hours.
Patients who will pass the SBT will be extubated or, in the presence of tracheostomy, mechanical ventilation will be discontinued. If a patient will be re-intubated or mechanically ventilated through a tracheostomy again within 48 hours, PSV or PSV+Sigh (to maintain study group assignment) will be restored. If a patient will remain extubated or separated from the ventilator for >48 hours data collection only will continue.
Reasons for re-intubation. After extubation, re-intubation should be promptly performed if at least one of the following criteria is present:
- cardiac arrest;
- respiratory arrest (respiratory pauses with loss of consciousness or gasping for air);
- respiratory failure with SpO2 <90% and/or RR >35 bpm despite NIV;
- decreased level of consciousness impairing ability to protect airway;
- hemoptysis or hematemesis impairing ability to protect airway;
- abundant secretions that cannot be effectively cleared or are associated with lobar collapse, acidosis, hypoxemia, or change in mental status;
- surgical/invasive procedure requiring sedation/anaesthesia +/- neuromuscular blockade such that patient will no longer be able to sustain unassisted breathing;
- hemodynamic instability with SBP <80 mmHg despite vasoactive drugs.
Data collection
At enrolment. Before the Sigh test, the investigators will anonymously collect patients' demographic information (e.g., age, sex, height, weight), past (e.g., hypertension, chronic medications) and recent (e.g., etiology of the acute respiratory failure, days since intubation) medical history, severity of lung injury (e.g., ventilation setting, arterial blood gases, respiratory system compliance, diagnosis of ARDS) and of systemic diseases (e.g., presence of shock, number of organs failure), ventilation settings (e.g., PEEP, FiO2, PSV level).
After the Sigh test. Then, the investigators will collect SatO2/FiO2 change in response to the pre-randomization Sigh test.
First 24 hours from randomization. In both groups for the first 24 hours the investigators will assess every 4 hours the SpO2/FiO2 ratio, RR and tidal volume delivered both during protective PSV and during Sigh to further characterize physiologic response to Sigh over time.
Daily. From day 1 (i.e., within 24 hours from enrollment) to day 28 or death or discharge from the ICU, the following data will be collected every day between 6:00 and 10:00 in the morning: switch from the allocated treatment to the other study arm for ≥24 hours, reason for switch from the allocated treatment, adverse events (i.e., hemodynamic instability with hypotension with SBP <90 mmHg despite vasoactive drugs; arrhythmias with heart rate <40 or >140 bpm; radiographic evidence of barotrauma with pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumatocoele, or subcutaneous emphysema), arterial SpO2, arterial and central venous blood gas analyses, numbers of quadrants involved on standard chest X-ray, ventilation settings and pattern (i.e., Sigh pressure level, Sigh tidal volume, PSV level, PSV tidal volume, respiratory rate, PEEP, FiO2, minute ventilation, P0.1, mean airway pressure), switch to controlled ventilation for ≥24 hours, reason for switch to controlled ventilation, use of rescue treatments (i.e., use of PEEP ≥15 cmH2O, prone positioning, inhaled nitric oxide, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), dosage of sedative agents, RASS value, tracheostomy, patient's comfort through visual analog scale, heart rate, arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, dosage of vaso-active drugs, cumulative fluid balance, SOFA score, SBT failure in the previous 24 hours, reason for SBT failure, time since extubation or separation from mechanical ventilation, time since re-intubation, reason for re-intubation.
Day 28. At day 28, for all enrolled patients, mortality and ventilator-free days will be collected. Ventilator-free days will be calculated as 28 minus the number of days between intubation and successful extubation or separation from mechanical ventilation for tracheostomized patients (i.e., for ≥48 hours).
- Being tested
- Sigh, Standard of care
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Distress Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SighProcedure or surgery
Also called Short cyclic recruitment breath
Application of cyclic pressure control breath delivered at 30 cmH2O for 3 seconds once per minute in patients undergoing pressure support ventilation
Standard of careProcedure or surgery
Standard of care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PSV group | Active comparator | Will be treated by standard of care for patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation (e.g., protective PSV settings, protocolized weaning, etc.). Receives: Procedure: Standard of care |
| PSV+Sigh group | Experimental | Will be treated by standard of care for patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation (e.g., protective PSV settings, protocolized weaning, etc.) + Sigh (short cyclic recruitment breath once every minute) until death or spontaneous breathing trial and extubation. Receives: Procedure: Sigh |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical feasibility of PSV+Sigh vs. standard of carde (PSV)
Feasibility will be assessed by measuring the number of patients in each group experiencing at least one of the following failure criteria:
- switch to controlled ventilation following presence of predefined criteria;
- use of PEEP ≥15 cmH2O, prone positioning, inhaled nitric oxide, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation;
- re-intubation within 48 hours from extubation following predefined criteria.
Based on previous data, the expected rate of failure in patients undergoing PSV will be 22% and we hypothesize a rate of 15% for patients in the PSV+Sigh group. Furthermore, we assume a non-inferiority of the treatment with PSV+Sigh, with a tolerance of 5%. Thus, a sample size of 258 patients (with 129 patients per study arm) will be sufficient to assess feasibility of the PSV+Sigh strategy in this pilot phase with power of 0.8 and alpha 0.05.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (6)
Clinical safety of PSV+Sigh comparing adverse events between 2 groups
Compare incidence of the following adverse events in the 2 study groups:
- hemodynamic instability with hypotension (i.e., SBP <90 mmHg) despite vasoactive drugs;
- arrhythmias with heart rate <40 or >140 bpm;
- radiographic evidence of barotrauma (i.e., pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumatocoele, or subcutaneous emphysema);
- new chest tube placement.
Measured: 2 years
Quantification of the prevalence of Sigh responders
Quantification of the prevalence of short- (i.e., within 30 minutes) and long-term (i.e., within 24 hours in the PSV+Sigh group) Sigh responders in respect to improved oxygenation.
Measured: 2 years
Mortality
This analysis will be performed comparing the 2 study groups and in responders
Measured: 2 years
Ventilator-free days
This analysis will be performed comparing the 2 study groups and in responders
Measured: 2 years
Number of days on assisted ventilation until day 28
This analysis will be performed comparing the 2 study groups and in responders
Measured: 28 days
Patients' comfort by visual analog scale
This analysis will be performed comparing the 2 study groups and in responders
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jun 2017
- Study start20 Dec 2017
- Primary completion9 May 2019
- Study completion9 May 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (27)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Respiratory FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomised controlled trial, 2 groups, 1:1 randomisation
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 258 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Milan, University of Milano Bicocca
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tommaso Mauri, MD, Principal investigator, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoLaurent Brochard, MD, Principal investigator, St Michael Hospital, Toronto, Canada
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03201263
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Sigh study
- Acronym
- PROTECTION
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 19 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 23 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.
PubMed 26903337Matthay MA, Ware LB, Zimmerman GA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2012 Aug;122(8):2731-40. doi: 10.1172/JCI60331. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
PubMed 22850883Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):980. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1400293. No abstract available.
PubMed 24597883Mauri T, Foti G, Zanella A, Bombino M, Confalonieri A, Patroniti N, Bellani G, Pesenti A. Long-term extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with minimal ventilatory support: a new paradigm for severe ARDS? Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Mar;78(3):385-9.
PubMed 21617600Ranieri VM, Suter PM, Tortorella C, De Tullio R, Dayer JM, Brienza A, Bruno F, Slutsky AS. Effect of mechanical ventilation on inflammatory mediators in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999 Jul 7;282(1):54-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.1.54.
PubMed 10404912Hussain SN, Cornachione AS, Guichon C, Al Khunaizi A, Leite Fde S, Petrof BJ, Mofarrahi M, Moroz N, de Varennes B, Goldberg P, Rassier DE. Prolonged controlled mechanical ventilation in humans triggers myofibrillar contractile dysfunction and myofilament protein loss in the diaphragm. Thorax. 2016 May;71(5):436-45. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207559. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
PubMed 27033022Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, Jaber S, Arnal JM, Perez D, Seghboyan JM, Constantin JM, Courant P, Lefrant JY, Guerin C, Prat G, Morange S, Roch A; ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1107-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372.
PubMed 20843245Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20.
PubMed 23688302Kallet RH, Matthay MA. Hyperoxic acute lung injury. Respir Care. 2013 Jan;58(1):123-41. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01963.
PubMed 23271823Bellani G, Guerra L, Musch G, Zanella A, Patroniti N, Mauri T, Messa C, Pesenti A. Lung regional metabolic activity and gas volume changes induced by tidal ventilation in patients with acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 May 1;183(9):1193-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201008-1318OC. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
PubMed 21257791Yoshida T, Uchiyama A, Matsuura N, Mashimo T, Fujino Y. The comparison of spontaneous breathing and muscle paralysis in two different severities of experimental lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):536-45. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182711972.
PubMed 23263584Foti G, Cereda M, Sparacino ME, De Marchi L, Villa F, Pesenti A. Effects of periodic lung recruitment maneuvers on gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. Intensive Care Med. 2000 May;26(5):501-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340051196.
PubMed 10923722Patroniti N, Foti G, Cortinovis B, Maggioni E, Bigatello LM, Cereda M, Pesenti A. Sigh improves gas exchange and lung volume in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing pressure support ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2002 Apr;96(4):788-94. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00004.
PubMed 11964584Nacoti M, Spagnolli E, Bonanomi E, Barbanti C, Cereda M, Fumagalli R. Sigh improves gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in children undergoing pressure support after major surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Aug;78(8):920-9. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
PubMed 22531559Mauri T, Eronia N, Abbruzzese C, Marcolin R, Coppadoro A, Spadaro S, Patroniti N, Bellani G, Pesenti A. Effects of Sigh on Regional Lung Strain and Ventilation Heterogeneity in Acute Respiratory Failure Patients Undergoing Assisted Mechanical Ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1823-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001083.
PubMed 25985386
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PRessure suppOrT vEntilation + Sigh in aCuTe hypoxemIc respiratOry Failure patieNts (PROTECTION): a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03201263
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROTECTION / Sigh study
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 258 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Milan, University of Milano Bicocca
- Study start
- 20 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 May 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Mortality of intubated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients remains considerably high (around 40%) (Bellani 2016). Early implementation of a specific mechanical ventilation mode that enhances lung protection in patients with mild to moderate AHRF and ARDS on spontaneous breathing may have a tremendous impact on clinical practice.
Previous studies showed that the addition of cyclic short recruitment maneuvers (Sigh) to assisted mechanical ventilation: improves oxygenation without increasing ventilation pressures and FiO2; decreases the tidal volumes by decreasing the patient's inspiratory drive; increases the EELV by regional alveolar recruitment; decreases regional heterogeneity of lung parenchyma; decreases patients' inspiratory efforts limiting transpulmonary pressure; improves regional compliances. Thus, physiologic studies generated the hypothesis that addition of Sigh to pressure support ventilation (PSV, the most common assisted mechanical ventilation mode) might decrease ventilation pressures and FiO2, and limit regional lung strain and stress through various synergic mechanisms potentially yielding decreased risk of VILI, faster weaning and improved clinical outcomes.
The investigators conceived a pilot RCT to verify clinical feasibility of the addition of Sigh to PSV in comparison to standard PSV.
The investigators will enrol 258 intubated spontaneously breathing patients with mild to moderate AHRF and ARDS admitted to the ICU.
Patients will be randomized through an online automatic centralized and computerized system to the following study groups (1:1 ratio):
- PSV group: will be treated by protective PSV settings until day 28 or death or performance of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT);
- PSV+Sigh group: will be treated by protective PSV settings with the addition of Sigh until day 28 or death or performance of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT).
Indications on ventilation settings, weaning, spontaneous breathing trial and rescue treatment will be specified.
Detailed description
Steering committee: Tommaso Mauri, Laurent Brochard, Jean-Michel Constantin, Giuseppe Foti, Claude Guerin, Jordi Mancebo, Paolo Pelosi, Marco Ranieri, Antonio Pesenti Statistical support: Carla Fornari and Sara Conti
Specific aims
This pilot RCT will serve to test the hypothesis that application of PSV+Sigh in spontaneously breathing intubated patients with mild to moderate AHRF and ARDS is feasible and to collect preliminary data on the safety of such an approach.
Methods
Study design. The investigators will conduct a pilot RCT on intubated spontaneously breathing patients with mild to moderate AHRF and ARDS admitted to the ICU.
Ethics approval. The investigators will seek approval from the institutional review boards of each participating center prior to start of enrollment and consent/information will be obtained from each patient or next of kin following local regulations.
Prevalence of Sigh responders. After enrollment, FiO2 will be titrated to obtain SpO2 of 90-96% and then each patient will first undergo a clinical test of PSV vs. PSV+Sigh to assess the prevalence of Sigh responders vs. non-responders in respect to improved oxygenation. After 30 minutes of clinical PSV+Sigh, SpO2/FiO2 ratio will be collected again to quantify the number of patients in whom it increased (i.e., "Sigh responders").
Randomization. After this test, patients will be randomized through an online automatic centralized and computerized system to the following study groups (1:1 ratio):
- PSV group: will be treated by protective PSV settings until day 28 or death or performance of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT);
- PSV+Sigh group: will be treated by protective PSV settings with the addition of Sigh until day 28 or death or performance of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT).
PSV group settings. Initially, clinicians will set PSV to meet the following targets: tidal volume (Vt) of 6-8 mL/Kg of predicted body weight (PBW), with respiratory rate (RR) 20-35 bpm. In presence of Vt >8 ml/kg PBW and/or RR <20 bpm, PSV zero (CPAP) will be selected. FiO2 will be left as selected before the pre-randomization Sigh test, while PEEP will be left as clinically set.
PSV+Sigh group settings. Similarly, PSV in this group will be set with the same protective targets of the PSV group (see above) and cyclic pressure control phase at 30 cmH2O for 3 seconds delivered once per minute (i.e., Sigh) will be added. PSV+Sigh is an easy to implement ventilation mode and, for the present study, the investigators will use high performance ICU ventilators already available in each clinical unit. Briefly, ventilators will be switched to biphasic positive airway pressure mode (e.g., BiPAP on Drager ventilators, SIMV-PC on Maquet and GE, DuoPAP on Hamilton) with the lower pressure level set at clinical PEEP and the higher pressure level set at 30 cmH2O with a 3-second inspiratory time and then a 57-second expiratory time. This Sigh rate of one per minute can be obtained by virtually all the already available high performance ICU ventilators, thus, even though a lower Sigh rate might be regarded as more physiological, we choose the 1/min rate for feasibility and costs related to the future large RCT. FiO2 will be left as selected before the pre-randomization Sigh test.
Adjusting ventilation settings. In both groups, PSV will be adjusted at least every 8 hours in the following way:
- PSV support will be decreased by 2 cmH2O step if Vt >8 ml/kg PBW and/or RR <20;
- PSV support will be increased by 2 cmH2O step if Vt <6 ml/kg PBW and/or RR >35 and or signs of respiratory distress (e.g., marked use of the accessory muscles).
- PEEP and then FiO2 will be increased by 2 cmH2O and 0.1 steps if SpO2 is <90%;
- FiO2 and then PEEP will be decreased by 0.1 and 2 cmH2O steps if SpO2 is >96%; Sigh settings instead will be left unchanged until day 28, death or SBT.
Switch to controlled mechanical ventilation. In both groups, switch to protective controlled ventilation will be allowed if patient will develop at least one of the following conditions:
- PSV support >20 cmH2O;
- PEEP ≥15 cmH2O;
- unstable hemodynamic status (SBP <90 mmHg with vasoactive drug);
- active cardiac ischemia (dynamic ST changes on cardiac monitor or electrocardiogram);
- unstable arrhythmias (heart rate >140 or <40);
- uncontrolled hypertension (SBP>180 mmHg);
- abrupt decrease in the level of consciousness (RASS <-3);
- dangerous agitation (RASS >+2);
- pH <7.30;
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤100 mmHg;
- necessity to perform diagnostic test (e.g., CT scan or bronchoscopy).
Controlled ventilation will be set on volume mode with Vt 6-8 ml/kg PBW, RR to control pH, unchanged PEEP and FiO2. Controlled ventilation will be thereafter adjusted according to clinical evolution. Patients switched to controlled ventilation will be reassessed at least every 8 hours and they will be switched back to PSV or PSV+Sigh (to maintain study group assignment) targeting the abovementioned settings and adjustments as soon as all the following conditions will be met:
- Patient is able to trigger ventilator breaths;
- PaO2/FiO2 >100 mmHg;
- PEEP <15 cmH2O;
- pH ≥7.3;
- Stable hemodynamic status with stable or decreasing doses of vasopressors for ≥6 hours.
Rescue therapy. In case of desaturation (SpO2 ≤90%) of a patient it will be crucial to exclude hemodynamic impairment as a possible cause. Also, airway obstruction and ventilator malfunction must be ruled out as possible causes. Provided those factors are excluded, a rescue step-up strategy is allowed as follows: institution of protective controlled mechanical ventilation (see above for settings) and performance of recruitment maneuvers at 40-50 cmH2O, PEEP ≥15 cmH2O, prone positioning, inhaled nitric oxide, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Patients undergoing rescue treatments will be reassessed at least every 8 hours and switched back to PSV or PSV+Sigh (to maintain study group assignment) with the abovementioned settings and adjustments as soon as all the above mentioned conditions will be met.
Spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Patients with SpO2 ≥90% on FiO2 ≤0.4 and PEEP ≤5 cmH2O, no agitation, hemodynamically stable with norepinephrine ≤0.1 ug/kg/min or equivalent and at a stable or decreasing dose ≥6 hours and without any of the abovementioned criteria for switch to controlled ventilation will undergo a SBT:
- For patients in the PSV group, the attending physician will perform the SBT directly.
- For patients in the PSV+Sigh group, the attending physician will first withdraw Sigh, wait 60 min and confirm criteria: if confirmed, SBT will be performed; if not, Sigh will be reintroduced and clinical criteria will be checked again to repeat the procedure after at least 8 hours.
SBT will last at least 60 minutes with a combination of PEEP 0-5 cm H2O and PSV 0-5 cm H2O. At the end of the 60 minutes, patient will fail the SBT if any of the following will be present:
- criteria to start the SBT will not be confirmed;
- sustained (>5 min) respiratory rate >35 bpm;
- HR >140 bpm;
- SBP >180 or <80 mmHg;
- marked complaint of dyspnea;
- increased somnolence with elevated pCO2 and/or pH<7.3
- a cough will not be strong enough to clear secretions
- active cardiac ischemia (dynamic ST changes on cardiac monitor or electrocardiogram)
- abrupt decrease in the level of consciousness with RASS <-3. Patients who will fail the SBT will be switched back to PSV or PSV+Sigh (to maintain study group assignment) and clinical criteria will be checked again to repeat the procedure after at least 6 hours.
Patients who will pass the SBT will be extubated or, in the presence of tracheostomy, mechanical ventilation will be discontinued. If a patient will be re-intubated or mechanically ventilated through a tracheostomy again within 48 hours, PSV or PSV+Sigh (to maintain study group assignment) will be restored. If a patient will remain extubated or separated from the ventilator for >48 hours data collection only will continue.
Reasons for re-intubation. After extubation, re-intubation should be promptly performed if at least one of the following criteria is present:
- cardiac arrest;
- respiratory arrest (respiratory pauses with loss of consciousness or gasping for air);
- respiratory failure with SpO2 <90% and/or RR >35 bpm despite NIV;
- decreased level of consciousness impairing ability to protect airway;
- hemoptysis or hematemesis impairing ability to protect airway;
- abundant secretions that cannot be effectively cleared or are associated with lobar collapse, acidosis, hypoxemia, or change in mental status;
- surgical/invasive procedure requiring sedation/anaesthesia +/- neuromuscular blockade such that patient will no longer be able to sustain unassisted breathing;
- hemodynamic instability with SBP <80 mmHg despite vasoactive drugs.
Data collection
At enrolment. Before the Sigh test, the investigators will anonymously collect patients' demographic information (e.g., age, sex, height, weight), past (e.g., hypertension, chronic medications) and recent (e.g., etiology of the acute respiratory failure, days since intubation) medical history, severity of lung injury (e.g., ventilation setting, arterial blood gases, respiratory system compliance, diagnosis of ARDS) and of systemic diseases (e.g., presence of shock, number of organs failure), ventilation settings (e.g., PEEP, FiO2, PSV level).
After the Sigh test. Then, the investigators will collect SatO2/FiO2 change in response to the pre-randomization Sigh test.
First 24 hours from randomization. In both groups for the first 24 hours the investigators will assess every 4 hours the SpO2/FiO2 ratio, RR and tidal volume delivered both during protective PSV and during Sigh to further characterize physiologic response to Sigh over time.
Daily. From day 1 (i.e., within 24 hours from enrollment) to day 28 or death or discharge from the ICU, the following data will be collected every day between 6:00 and 10:00 in the morning: switch from the allocated treatment to the other study arm for ≥24 hours, reason for switch from the allocated treatment, adverse events (i.e., hemodynamic instability with hypotension with SBP <90 mmHg despite vasoactive drugs; arrhythmias with heart rate <40 or >140 bpm; radiographic evidence of barotrauma with pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumatocoele, or subcutaneous emphysema), arterial SpO2, arterial and central venous blood gas analyses, numbers of quadrants involved on standard chest X-ray, ventilation settings and pattern (i.e., Sigh pressure level, Sigh tidal volume, PSV level, PSV tidal volume, respiratory rate, PEEP, FiO2, minute ventilation, P0.1, mean airway pressure), switch to controlled ventilation for ≥24 hours, reason for switch to controlled ventilation, use of rescue treatments (i.e., use of PEEP ≥15 cmH2O, prone positioning, inhaled nitric oxide, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), dosage of sedative agents, RASS value, tracheostomy, patient's comfort through visual analog scale, heart rate, arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, dosage of vaso-active drugs, cumulative fluid balance, SOFA score, SBT failure in the previous 24 hours, reason for SBT failure, time since extubation or separation from mechanical ventilation, time since re-intubation, reason for re-intubation.
Day 28. At day 28, for all enrolled patients, mortality and ventilator-free days will be collected. Ventilator-free days will be calculated as 28 minus the number of days between intubation and successful extubation or separation from mechanical ventilation for tracheostomized patients (i.e., for ≥48 hours).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomised controlled trial, 2 groups, 1:1 randomisation
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PSV group | Active comparator | Procedure: Standard of careWill be treated by standard of care for patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation (e.g., protective PSV settings, protocolized weaning, etc.). |
| PSV+Sigh group | Experimental | Procedure: SighWill be treated by standard of care for patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation (e.g., protective PSV settings, protocolized weaning, etc.) + Sigh (short cyclic recruitment breath once every minute) until death or spontaneous breathing trial and extubation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- patients intubated since >24 hours and ≤7 days,
- undergoing PSV since >4 and ≤24 hours,
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤300 mmHg (measured at clinical positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] and FiO2 values)
- clinical PEEP ≥5 cmH2O,
- Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) value of -2 to 0
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- patients with PEEP ≥15 cmH2O;
- PaCO2 >60 mmHg;
- Arterial pH <7.30;
- Age <18 year-old;
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤100 mmHg (measured at clinical PEEP and FiO2 values);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SighAlso: Short cyclic recruitment breathApplication of cyclic pressure control breath delivered at 30 cmH2O for 3 seconds once per minute in patients undergoing pressure support ventilation | Procedure or surgery | PSV+Sigh group |
| Standard of careStandard of care | Procedure or surgery | PSV group |
Primary outcome
Clinical feasibility of PSV+Sigh vs. standard of carde (PSV)
Time frame: 2 years
Feasibility will be assessed by measuring the number of patients in each group experiencing at least one of the following failure criteria: * switch to controlled ventilation following presence of predefined criteria; * use of PEEP ≥15 cmH2O, prone positioning, inhaled nitric oxide, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; * re-intubation within 48 hours from extubation following predefined criteria. Based on previous data, the expected rate of failure in patients undergoing PSV will be 22% and we hypothesize a rate of 15% for patients in the PSV+Sigh group. Furthermore, we assume a non-inferiority of the treatment with PSV+Sigh, with a tolerance of 5%. Thus, a sample size of 258 patients (with 129 patients per study arm) will be sufficient to assess feasibility of the PSV+Sigh strategy in this pilot phase with power of 0.8 and alpha 0.05.
6 secondary outcomes
Clinical safety of PSV+Sigh comparing adverse events between 2 groups
Time frame: 2 years
Quantification of the prevalence of Sigh responders
Time frame: 2 years
Mortality
Time frame: 2 years
Ventilator-free days
Time frame: 2 years
Number of days on assisted ventilation until day 28
Time frame: 28 days
Patients' comfort by visual analog scale
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 26903337Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.
- Background: PubMed 22850883Matthay MA, Ware LB, Zimmerman GA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2012 Aug;122(8):2731-40. doi: 10.1172/JCI60331. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
- Background: PubMed 24597883Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):980. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1400293. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21617600Mauri T, Foti G, Zanella A, Bombino M, Confalonieri A, Patroniti N, Bellani G, Pesenti A. Long-term extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with minimal ventilatory support: a new paradigm for severe ARDS? Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Mar;78(3):385-9.
- Background: PubMed 10404912Ranieri VM, Suter PM, Tortorella C, De Tullio R, Dayer JM, Brienza A, Bruno F, Slutsky AS. Effect of mechanical ventilation on inflammatory mediators in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999 Jul 7;282(1):54-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.1.54.
- Background: PubMed 27033022Hussain SN, Cornachione AS, Guichon C, Al Khunaizi A, Leite Fde S, Petrof BJ, Mofarrahi M, Moroz N, de Varennes B, Goldberg P, Rassier DE. Prolonged controlled mechanical ventilation in humans triggers myofibrillar contractile dysfunction and myofilament protein loss in the diaphragm. Thorax. 2016 May;71(5):436-45. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207559. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
- Background: PubMed 20843245Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, Jaber S, Arnal JM, Perez D, Seghboyan JM, Constantin JM, Courant P, Lefrant JY, Guerin C, Prat G, Morange S, Roch A; ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1107-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372.
- Background: PubMed 23688302Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 23271823Kallet RH, Matthay MA. Hyperoxic acute lung injury. Respir Care. 2013 Jan;58(1):123-41. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01963.
- Background: PubMed 21257791Bellani G, Guerra L, Musch G, Zanella A, Patroniti N, Mauri T, Messa C, Pesenti A. Lung regional metabolic activity and gas volume changes induced by tidal ventilation in patients with acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 May 1;183(9):1193-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201008-1318OC. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
- Background: PubMed 23263584Yoshida T, Uchiyama A, Matsuura N, Mashimo T, Fujino Y. The comparison of spontaneous breathing and muscle paralysis in two different severities of experimental lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):536-45. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182711972.
- Background: PubMed 10923722Foti G, Cereda M, Sparacino ME, De Marchi L, Villa F, Pesenti A. Effects of periodic lung recruitment maneuvers on gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. Intensive Care Med. 2000 May;26(5):501-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340051196.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Respiratory Failure
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Prospective Study Comparing VivAer to Alternative Surgical Procedures to Treat Nasal Airway Obstruction in Patients With Nasal Valve Dysfunction.
Nasal Airway Obstruction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Lactate/Albumin Ratio and Mortality in Respiratory Failure
Acute Respiratory Failure, Critical Illness
RecruitingPhase 3
Phase III Study of HS-10504 Versus Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy in Patients With C797S+ NSCLC
Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Genetics Branch Eligibility Screening Survey
Melanoma, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome
Recruiting
Measuring Nasal Airway Changes After VivAer Treatment Using AI Analysis
Nasal Airway Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tommaso Mauri, MD principal investigator
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Laurent Brochard, MD principal investigator
St Michael Hospital, Toronto, Canada
19 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sigh in people with Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico at 19 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in Italy, France, Spain, China, Germany and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical feasibility of PSV+Sigh vs. standard of carde (PSV) (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03201263, which also lists 27 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2021.