AzTrials
AzTrials

Sickle Cell DiseaseNCT03201874

iCanCope With Sickle Cell Pain

A study testing Pain self-management and Education in people with Sickle Cell Disease, run by Seattle Children's Hospital at 4 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The project will test a tailored web and smartphone-based application (iCanCope with SCD) to improve pain self-management and functioning in youth (aged 12-18) with sickle cell disease. The program will include goal setting, peer-based social support, and pain self-management training. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Sickle Cell Disease
What is being tested?
Pain self-management and Education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
137 participants
Where
4 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
1 Jan 2018to 31 Aug 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • aged between 12-18 years
  • diagnosed with any type of SCD
  • able to speak and read English
  • score at least 4 (indicating some days with pain interference over the past month) on the Sickle Cell Pain Burden Interview
  • willing and able to complete online measures

Who cannot join

  • significant cognitive limitations that would impair their ability to use and understand the iCanCope with SCD program, as per their healthcare provider or parent
  • have previously received more than 4 sessions of outpatient psychological therapy for pain management in the 6 months prior to the time of screening.

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 2 countries.

4 sites in 2 countries

United States3 sites
  • Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center

    Hartford, Connecticut, 06106

  • Seattle Children's Hospital

    Seattle, Washington, 98105

Other trials in United States

Canada1 site
  • The Hospital for Sick Children

    Toronto, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: iCanCope With Sickle Cell Disease: A Mobile Pain Management Intervention for Adolescents

The project will test a tailored web and smartphone-based application (iCanCope with SCD) to improve pain self-management and functioning in youth (aged 12-18) with sickle cell disease. The program will include goal setting, peer-based social support, and pain self-management training. The investigators will determine initial program effectiveness through a pilot three-site randomized controlled trial in 160 youth randomized to treatment compared to attention control.

Read the detailed description

Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT) that promote pain self-management can lead to symptom reduction, improved quality of life, and decreased healthcare use. However, most people with SCD do not receive CBT-based treatment due to barriers such as poor accessibility, limited availability of professionals, and high costs. First, the investigators plan to apply a user-centered design approach to develop and refine the iCanCope with SCD program. Second, program feasibility and initial program effectiveness will be determined through a pilot three-site randomized controlled trial. The investigators will determine study accrual and dropout rates as well as levels of patient acceptability and engagement. Preliminary effectiveness will be determined in youth receiving treatment compared to attention control on a range of physical, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes assessed at post-treatment and 6-month follow-up. Third, moderators and mediators of treatment effect will be tested by examining whether differences in self-efficacy and patient activation predict changes in pain and functioning. These results will enable a future full-scale randomized controlled trial.

Being tested
Pain self-management, Education
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Sickle Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pain self-managementBehavioural

    The program is designed to enhance self-efficacy. The app will guide youth in setting structured and personalized goals aimed at improving their pain and functioning. The pain self-management skills will include personalized CBT-based coping skills including deep breathing, relaxation, and cognitive skills (e.g., staying positive). The app will provide in-the-moment access to pain coping strategies to promote positive changes in mood, behavior, and pain.

  • EducationBehavioural

    Education about sickle cell disease to increase disease knowledge

Study groups in NCT03201874
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Education ControlActive comparatorIn addition to standard medical care, youth in the education control group will be provided with access to a self-guided education study website, which will contain static education about SCD (no self-management skills, goal-setting, or social support content) to access over 8-weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: Education
Pain Self-Management InterventionExperimentalIn addition to standard medical SCD care, youth in the pain self-management intervention group will receive the iCanCope with SCD mobile intervention including goal-setting, peer social support, and pain self-management skills over a period of 8 weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: Pain self-management; Behavioral: Education

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Diary - Average Daily Pain

    App diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale for pain intensity for 7 days Scores range from 0-10 where higher scores indicate a worse outcome

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  2. Pain Diary - Average Daily Activity Limitations

    App diary using Child Activity Limitations Inventory 9-items to measure activity limitations for 7 days Scores range from 0-100 where higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  3. Adaptive Coping - Coping Attempts

    Coping Strategies Questionnaire for Sickle Cell Disease - Coping Attempts Factor Scores range from 0 - 180, higher scores mean a better outcome

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Treatment Acceptability

    Treatment Evaluation Inventory scores range from 9 - 45 where higher scores mean a better outcome

    Measured: 2 months after starting treatment

  2. Physical and Emotional Functioning - Depressive Symptoms

    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Profile v2.0 - Depressive Symptoms T-score, higher scores means higher depressive symptoms. 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. A T-score of 60 is indicative of sub-clinical or elevated levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  3. Physical and Emotional Functioning - Anxiety

    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Profile v2.0 - Anxiety T-score, higher scores means higher levels of anxiety. 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. A T-score of 60 is indicative of sub-clinical or elevated levels of anxiety.

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  4. Physical and Emotional Functioning - Mobility

    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Profile v2.0 - Mobility T-score, higher scores means better mobility. 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. A T-score of 40 is indicative of sub-clinical mobility limitations.

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  5. Physical and Emotional Functioning - Pain Interference

    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Profile v2.0 - Pain Interference T-score, higher scores means more pain interference. 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. A T-score of 60 is indicative of sub-clinical or elevated levels of pain interference.

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  6. Physical and Emotional Functioning - Fatigue

    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Profile v2.0 - Fatigue T-score, higher scores means higher levels of fatigue. 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. A T-score of 60 is indicative of sub-clinical or elevated levels of fatigue.

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  7. Physical and Emotional Functioning - Peer Relationships

    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Profile v2.0 - Peer Relationships T-score, higher scores means better peer relationships. 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. A T-score of 40 is indicative of sub-clinical or reduced quality of peer relationships.

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  8. Patient Global Impression of Change

    Global rating for improvement in pain and functioning Scores range from 1-7 where higher scores mean a better outcome

    Measured: 12 weeks and 26 weeks

  9. Parent Protectiveness

    Adult Responses to Children's Symptoms Scores range from 0-4 where higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  10. Health Services Utilization

    Client Services Receipt Inventory adapted for sickle cell disease - Number of hospitalizations and/or ED visits

    Measured: Baseline and 26 weeks

  11. Parent Psychological Distress

    Symptom Checklist 90 - Global Severity Index Scores range from 0-4, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  12. Child Physical and Emotional Functioning - Parent Report, Social Functioning

    Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire - Parent version, Social Functioning (score range: 0-36). A higher score indicates more impaired functioning for all subscales.

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  13. Child Physical and Emotional Functioning - Parent Report, Physical Functioning

    Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire - Parent version Physical Functioning (0-36). A higher score indicates more impaired functioning for all subscales.

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  14. Child Physical and Emotional Functioning - Parent Report, Depression

    Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire - Parent version, Depression (0-24). A higher score indicates more impaired functioning for all subscales.

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  15. Child Physical and Emotional Functioning - Parent Report, General Anxiety

    Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire - Parent version, General Anxiety (0-28). A higher score indicates more impaired functioning for all subscales.

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  16. Child Physical and Emotional Functioning - Parent Report, Pain Specific Anxiety

    Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire - Parent version, Pain Specific Anxiety (0-28). A higher score indicates more impaired functioning for all subscales.

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  17. Child Physical and Emotional Functioning - Parent Report, Family Functioning

    Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire - Parent, Family Functioning (0-48). A higher score indicates more impaired functioning for all subscales.

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  18. Child Physical and Emotional Functioning - Parent Report, Development

    Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire - Parent version, Development (0-44). A higher score indicates more impaired functioning for all subscales.

    Measured: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks

  19. Treatment Experiences - Child

    Self report of treatment experiences. The number of participants with high levels of increased stress or anxiety will be reported.

    Measured: 12 weeks and 26 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jun 2017
  2. Study start1 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2022
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
137 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03201874
Sponsor's protocol ID
R01HD086978
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
23 Jun 2017
Last updated
13 Dec 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Palermo TM, Srinakarin K, Zhou C, Lalloo C, Dampier C, Zempsky WT, Badawy SM, Bakshi N, Ko YJ, Nishat F, Stinson JN. Moderators of digital cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth with sickle cell disease pain: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2025 Mar 13;166(9):e233-e243. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003583.

    PubMed 40839690
  • Li R, Srinakarin K, Vega R, Murray CB, Palermo TM. Treatment expectations and pain-related outcomes in clinical trials of digital cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth with chronic pain. J Pain. 2025 Mar;28:104791. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.104791. Epub 2025 Jan 16.

    PubMed 39826678
  • Palermo TM, Lalloo C, Zhou C, Dampier C, Zempsky W, Badawy SM, Bakshi N, Ko YJ, Nishat F, Stinson JN. A cognitive-behavioral digital health intervention for sickle cell disease pain in adolescents: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. Pain. 2024 Jan 1;165(1):164-176. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003009. Epub 2023 Sep 21.

    PubMed 37733479
  • Lalloo C, Nishat F, Zempsky W, Bakshi N, Badawy S, Ko YJ, Dampier C, Stinson J, Palermo TM. Characterizing User Engagement With a Digital Intervention for Pain Self-management Among Youth With Sickle Cell Disease and Their Caregivers: Subanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 30;24(8):e40096. doi: 10.2196/40096.

    PubMed 36040789

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pain self-management and Education in people with Sickle Cell Disease, run by Seattle Children's Hospital at 4 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Dec 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Diary - Average Daily Pain (time frame: Baseline,12 weeks, and 26 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03201874, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in