AzTrials
AzTrials

Venous Thromboembolic DiseaseFIT-HNCT03206372

Risk Factors of Venous Thromboembolism in Women During Hormonal Exposure

An observational study of Venous Thromboembolic Disease, run by University Hospital, Brest at 8 sites in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Young women have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during hormonale exposure (estrogen-containing pill or pregnancy). In order to detect women at higher risk of VTE during hormonal exposure, thrombophilia testing is often performed in order to adapt contraception methods and/or to increases… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Venous Thromboembolic Disease
What is being tested?
Case group
How many people
2,640 participants
Where
8 sitesFrance
Study dates
24 Oct 2017to 24 Oct 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Definitions * cases are first-degree relatives (i.e., parents, siblings, children) of young women who have VTE during hormonal exposure; * controls are first-degree relatives (i.e., parents, siblings, children) of young women who did not have VTE during a similar hormonal exposure; * study subjects are first-degree relatives * propositi are young women on hormonal exposure, whether VTE was present of not * hormonal exposure is defined by estrogen-containg pill exposure (ongoing or stopped from less than 3 months) or pregnancy or post-partum (in the three months following delivery), in the absence of other provoking risk factors (such as surgery, prolonged immobilization or trauma of lower limbs in the past three months, or cancer in the past 2 years)

Who may be able to join

  • First-degree relatives (biological parents, brothers, sisters, children) of women of childbearing age 18-50 years (propositus) with a first MVTE in the hormonal setting and matched control women in the same hormonal setting who have never had MVTE, consenting to first-degree relatives being contacted to participate in the present study.
  • Written consent from propositi and family members.

Who cannot join

  • First-degree relatives whose propositus received preventive antithrombotic medication during pregnancy or contraception.
  • Family members of propositus who have had superficial or muscular venous thrombosis
  • No information can be obtained on first-degree relatives.
  • Family members under 16 years of age.
  • Vulnerable persons other than minors aged 16 to 18 (guardianship, curatorship).
  • Not affiliated to or not benefiting from a health insurance scheme.

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Francis Couturaud, MD, PHD contact

33 2 98 34 73 47

francis.couturaud@chu-brest.fr

8 sites in 1 country

France8 sites, 8 recruiting
  • CHRU Brest

    Brest, 29200

    Francis Couturaud, Professor, 33 2 98 34 73 47, francis.couturaud@chu-brest.fr

    Recruiting
  • HIA

    Brest

    Christelle GALLEGO, 06 73 42 43 33, chrystelle-gallego@hotmail.fr

    Recruiting
  • Clermont Ferrand

    Clermont-Ferrand

    Jeannot SCHMIDT, 04 73 75 45 49, jschmidt@chu-clermontferrand.fr

    Recruiting
  • CH Morlaix

    Morlaix

    Yannick LAMBERT, 06 48 77 39 69, ylambert@ch-morlaix.fr

    Recruiting
  • Paris HEGP

    Paris

    Nicolas GENDRON, 02 47 47 46 72, Nicolas.gendron@aphp.fr

    Recruiting
  • RENNES

    Rennes

    Alice BALLERIE, alice.ballerie@chu-rennes.fr

    Recruiting
  • Saint Etienne

    Saint-Etienne

    Laurent BERTOLETTI, 04 77 12 77 70

    Recruiting
  • Tours

    Tours

    Yves GRUEL, 02 47 47 46 72, gruel@med.univ-tours.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in First Degree Relatives of Women With or Without Venous Thromboembolism During Hormonal Exposure

Young women have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during hormonale exposure (estrogen-containing pill or pregnancy). In order to detect women at higher risk of VTE during hormonal exposure, thrombophilia testing is often performed in order to adapt contraception methods and/or to increases thromboprophylaxy during pregnancy. However, such practice is probably not accurate nor discriminent. Indeed, there are evidence that the impact of the familial history of VTE might be stronger than that of detectable inherited thrombophilia.

The "FIT-H" study is a cross-sectional study comparing the prevalence of previous venous thromboembolism in first-degree relatives of women (propositi) who had a first episode of venous thromboembolism in association with hormonal exposure with the prevalence of previous venous thromboembolism in first-degree relatives of women who did not have venous thromboembolism during a similar hormonal exposure.

The primary objective is to determine the association between the presence or the absence of VTE in young women during hormonal exposure and the presence or the absence of a previous episode of VTE in their first-degree relatives. Secondary objective is to determine the impact of associated inherited thrombophilia on the risk of VTE in first-degree relatives.

Read the detailed description

Rational

The annual incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is about 1 to 2/1000 person-years and mortality is 10% when VTE occurs as pulmonary embolism. VTE is a multifactorial disease caused by hereditary and acquired risk factors. Among the latter, hormonal exposure in young women (estrogen-containing pill, pregnancy) remains a major health issue given the frequency of this condition and the 4 to 5-fold increased risk of VTE in the presence of such exposure. In practice, inherited thrombophilia screening is often performed with the aim to identify young women at higher risk for VTE and to avoid estrogen-containing pill or to reinforce thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy. The increased risk of thrombosis in relatives is incompletely explained by the presence of known thrombophilias, as the risk of thrombosis in first-degree relatives is increased even if patients do not have a detectable defect.

In a large cross-sectional study including 2830 first-degree relatives of patients with VTE, we previously showed that the risk of VTE in the first-degree relatives of patients with a first VTE is strongly influenced by whether the VTE was provoked or unprovoked, the patient's age when the VTE occurred, and the number of relatives who have had thrombosis. The risk of VTE in first-degree relatives is about twice as high if the index case had an unprovoked compared to a provoked VTE, is about three times as high if the index case had VTE before about 50 years compared to later in life, and at least twice as high if two rather than one family members have had VTE. The influence of these factors on the risk of VTE in first-degree relatives was additive, and occurred independently of the presence of factor V Leiden or the prothrombin 20210A gene in index cases.

The underlying hypothesis is that patients who have unprovoked VTE or at a young age often have undetected hereditary thrombophilias and that these defects increase the risk of thrombosis in their relatives. However, the number of included young women in the study was to low to confirm if such familial risk was also elevated if young women were on hormonal exposure.

In the present study, our hypothesis is that the risk of VTE in first-degree relatives of young women with VTE on hormonal exposure will be higher than that in first-degree relatives of young women on a similar hormonal exposure without VTE, independently of the presence or not of a detectable inherited thrombophilia.

Methods

Design: French multicentre prospective cross-sectional case-control study comparing the prevalence of VTE in first-degree relatives (subjects) of young women with VTE during hormonal exposure (propositus) with the prevalence of VTE in first-degree relatives (subjects) of young women without VTE during a similar hormonal exposure (propositus).

Objectives

  • Primary objective: to demonstrate that 1st-degree relatives (study subjects) of patients of childbearing age (propositi) with a first episode of MVTE in a hormonal context* have a higher risk of MTVE than 1st-degree relatives of propositi exposed to the same hormonal context and without MVTE.
  • Secondary objectives:
  1. determine the association between family risk of VTE and the presence, in the propositi, of a frequent hereditary thrombophilia (factor V Leiden, G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene);
  2. determine the impact of other variables on family risk of VTE: (age at onset of VTE, severity of VTE, number of symptomatic family members). Primary outcome: the presence of symptomatic VTE in 1st-degree relatives. Study population Eligibility criteria:
  • Propositi with objectively confirmed proximal deep vein thrombosis (i.e. ultrasonography) or pulmonary embolism (i.e. lung scanning) in women (18 to 50 years) while on hormonal exposure.

Inclusion criteria

  • First-degree relatives (biological parents, brothers, sisters, children) of women of childbearing age 18 to 50 years (propositus) with a first MVTE in the hormonal setting and matched control women in the same hormonal setting who have never had MVTE, consenting to first-degree relatives being contacted to participate in the present study.
  • Written consent from propositi and family members.

Exclusion criteria

  • First-degree relatives whose propositus received preventive antithrombotic medication during pregnancy or contraception.
  • Family members of propositus who have had superficial or muscular venous thrombosis
  • No information can be obtained on first-degree relatives.
  • Family members under 16 years of age.
  • Vulnerable persons other than minors aged 16 to 18 (guardianship, curatorship).
  • Non-affiliated and non-beneficiary of a health insurance scheme.

Matching criteria

First degree relatives "cases" will matched (1:1) with first-degree relatives "controls" via their propositi characteristics based on the following keys:

  • age ±2 years
  • hormonal exposure (pregnancy or estrogen-containing pill)
  • tobacco smoking
  • BMI

Previous VTE in First-Degree Relatives

  • Using a previously described algorithm, first-degree relatives were classified as "have had VTE" if they satisfied either of the following two criteria. First, results of diagnostic testing were available that documented previous deep vein thrombosis (including thrombosis confined to the distal deep veins) or pulmonary embolism. Second, they had, in addition to a history of symptoms suggestive of VTE, at least one of the following: i) a history of having been treated with anticoagulant therapy for at least two months without another indication; or ii) a current ultrasound examination that showed that the proximal deep veins were not fully compressible or that there was reflux in a popliteal vein; or iii) current symptoms and signs suggestive of the post-thrombotic syndrome (defined as a score ≥5 on the Villalta scale).
  • Relatives were classified as "have not had VTE" if they satisfied all of the following criteria: 1) no known or suspected previous diagnosis of VTE; and 2) no unexplained anticoagulation in the past; and 3) did not currently have symptoms or signs suggestive of the post thrombotic syndrome (i.e., had a score <5 on the Villalta scale).
  • Relatives were classified as "uncertain for previous VTE" if they did not satisfy the criteria for either previous, or no previous, VTE.

Factor V Leiden and the Prothrombin 20210A Gene Variant After first-degree relatives had completed assessments for previous VTE, their index cases will categorized as positive for factor V Leiden or the prothrombin 20210A gene variant, or negative for both. Personnel who will be unaware of the propositus family history of VTE, or the subject's past history of VTE, will perfome these assays in a central laboratory in France.

Being tested
Case group, Control group

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Case groupOther

    Questionnaire to be completed, blood sample and possibly echo-doppler

  • Control groupOther

    Questionnaire to be completed, blood sample and possibly echo-doppler

Study groups in NCT03206372
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Case groupThe cases are the first-degree family members of propositi having had an thromboembolic venous disease in hormonal context.
Receives: Other: Case group
Control groupThe controls are the first-degree family members of propositi who have never had an thromboembolic venous disease and have identical hormonal exposure
Receives: Other: Control group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Presence of venous thromboembolic disease in first-degree relatives.

    The primary outcome measure is defined by the presence of symptomatic venous thromboembolic disease in first degree relatives based on:

    • objective, validated and standardized criteria
    • or a validated and standardized questionnaire and leg ultrasound according to a validated algorithm

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jul 2017
  2. Study start24 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion24 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion24 Oct 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Family based
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
2,640 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03206372
Sponsor's protocol ID
FIT-H (29BRC17.0063)
Acronym
FIT-H
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
30 Jun 2017
Last updated
16 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Venous Thromboembolic Disease, run by University Hospital, Brest at 8 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Francis Couturaud, MD, PHD (33 2 98 34 73 47, francis.couturaud@chu-brest.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Presence of venous thromboembolic disease in first-degree relatives. (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in