AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisNCT03213522

Comparison of Craniosacral Therapy vs Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy

A study testing Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy and Craniosacral Therapy in people with Multiple Sclerosis and Bladder Dysfunction, run by CentraState Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of CST for the treatment of LUTS in patients with MS and evaluate the acute effects compared to PFPT. A. Objectives To examine the effect of CST as compared to PFPT on QOL, SEMG resting biofeedback readings, and PVR ultrasonography measures in patients with MS and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy and Craniosacral Therapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
10 Apr 2017to 9 Apr 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
  • Currently have the following symptoms for at least three (3) months or longer: frequent urination, increased urge to urinate, nighttime urination, loss/leakage of urine with or without activity, and/or problems emptying your bladder.

Who cannot join

  • Unable or unwilling to give consent to be treated
  • Unable or unwilling to cover your portion of physical therapy treatment (i.e. co-pays and/or deductibles)
  • Cannot speak or read English
  • Have NOT had any urinary symptoms for at least three (3) months
  • Do not have Multiple Sclerosis; or have NOT been diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis
  • Take medication to treat your urinary symptoms; or have taken medication in the past three (3) months to treat your urinary symptoms
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Use an indwelling catheter (i.e. tube inserted into your bladder for continuous urine drainage); or you require intermittent catheterization
  • Currently are experiencing any of the following: shooting or radiating pain in your back or abdomen; pain that is not relieved with body position and/or medication; nausea; decreased appetite; pain with bowel movements or urination; and/or any symptom that is new and/or of unexplained onset (i.e. you do not know why it started or when it started)
  • Currently have cancer/tumors (i.e. tumors in the spine, brain, pelvis, etc.) and/or aneurysms (i.e. abdominal aortic aneurysm)
  • Received Botox injections in the past three (3) months
  • Received Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy and/or Craniosacral Therapy in the past three (3) months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Danielle T Robbins, DPT contact

7322942700

drobbins@centrastate.com

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • CentraState Medical Center

    Freehold, New Jersey, 07728

    Danielle T Robbins, DPT, 732-294-2700, drobbins@centrastate.com

    Emily Bessemer, DPT, 7322942700, ebesseme@centrastate.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Comparison of Craniosacral Therapy vs Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of CST for the treatment of LUTS in patients with MS and evaluate the acute effects compared to PFPT.

  1. Objectives To examine the effect of CST as compared to PFPT on QOL, SEMG resting biofeedback readings, and PVR ultrasonography measures in patients with MS and LUTS.
  2. Hypotheses / Research Question(s) It is hypothesized that patients who receive CST will demonstrate improved QOL, bladder control and ability to empty bladder as compared to those who receive PFPT.
Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine if Craniosacral Therapy is an effective therapy for treating bladder dysfunction in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). It will be compared to standard care for the treatment of bladder dysfunction, which is Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy. Bladder dysfunctions are extremely common in patients with Multiple Sclerosis. One of the most common symptoms of bladder dysfunction is called over-active bladder. Over- active bladder can be described by increased urges to urinate and frequency of urination, especially at night. Other common symptoms are: leakage of urine, with or without activity; inability to hold urine; and a decreased ability to empty bladder when urinating.

Being tested
Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy, Craniosacral Therapy
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Bladder, Overactive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pelvic Floor Physical TherapyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Bladder training, Pelvic floor muscle training, Prompted voiding

    Educating the PFPT group on therapeutic exercise, which includes, but not limited to, the pelvic brace, pelvic floor muscle exercise, and diaphragmatic breathing. If the patient is presenting with hypertonia of lower extremity muscles and/or muscles connecting to or part of the pelvic floor, the patient may be instructed on gentle static stretching and/or treated with passive stretching and diaphragmatic breathing.

  • Craniosacral TherapyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Osteopathic manipulation, Visceral manipulation

    Modified Upledger Institute 10-step protocol.

Study groups in NCT03213522
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pelvic Floor Physical TherapyActive comparatorPFPT group will be treated/educated with/on therapeutic exercise, which includes, but not limited to, the pelvic brace, pelvic floor muscle exercise, and diaphragmatic breathing. If the patient is presenting with hypertonia of lower extremity muscles and/or muscles connecting to or part of the pelvic floor, the patient may be instructed on gentle static stretching and/or treated with passive stretching and diaphragmatic breathing.
Receives: Procedure: Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy
CranioSacral TherapyActive comparatorModified Upledger Institute 10-step protocol. Sequence of hand placements (for this protocol)/type of intervention which will mirror many of the treatment sequences described in the systematic review by Jakel and von Hauenschild (2012).
Receives: Procedure: Craniosacral Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. PFDI-20

    Pelvic floor distress inventory self-report questionnaire

    Measured: Change from baseline PFDI-20 after six weeks of intervention

  2. PFIQ-7

    Pelvic floor incontinence questionnaire self-report

    Measured: Change from baseline PFIQ-7 after six weeks of intervention

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. MSQOL-54

    Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life self-report questionnaire

    Measured: Change from baseline MSQOL-54 after six weeks of intervention

  2. Post void residual volume

    PVR measurement

    Measured: Change from baseline PVR after six weeks of intervention

  3. Resting SEMG

    surface electromyographic reading, resting only

    Measured: Change from baseline Resting SEMG after six weeks of intervention

  4. Systolic BP

    blood pressure

    Measured: Change from baseline Systolic BP after six weeks of intervention

  5. Systolic BP

    blood pressure

    Measured: Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention at each of six intervention sessions

  6. Diastolic BP

    blood pressure

    Measured: Change from baseline Diastolic BP after six weeks of intervention

  7. Diastolic BP

    blood pressure

    Measured: Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention at each of six intervention sessions

  8. Pulse

    pulse

    Measured: Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention at each of six intervention sessions

  9. Pulse

    pulse

    Measured: Change from baseline Pulse after six weeks of intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2017
  2. Study start10 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion9 Apr 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completion9 Apr 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03213522
Sponsor's protocol ID
CSMC 2016-14
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
17 Apr 2017
Last updated
11 Jul 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy and Craniosacral Therapy in people with Multiple Sclerosis and Bladder Dysfunction, run by CentraState Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Danielle T Robbins, DPT (7322942700, drobbins@centrastate.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

PFDI-20 (time frame: Change from baseline PFDI-20 after six weeks of intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in