AzTrials
AzTrials

Critical IllnessNCT03213899

Association Between Malnutrition and Clinical Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit

An observational study of Critical Illness and Malnutrition, run by JurongHealth.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Previous studies have demonstrated the direct associations between malnutrition and hospital mortality as well as the length of stay in critically ill patients. However, the validity of these results may be limited by inappropriate diagnoses of malnutrition, small sample size, possible treatment bias, and sub-optimal… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Critical Illness, Malnutrition
How many people
503 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Aug 2015to 31 Oct 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients ≥ 18 years old who had ≥ 24 hours length of stay in the ICU, and received a nutrition assessment (7-point SGA) from a dietitian within 48 hours of admission to the ICU.

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 18 years old who had ≥ 24 hours length of stay in the ICU
  • received a nutrition assessment (7-point SGA) from a dietitian within 48 hours of admission to the ICU

Who cannot join

  • Nil

About this study

Official title: Association Between Malnutrition and Hospital Mortality and Duration of Intensive Care Unit Admission in the Critically Ill: a Prospective Singapore Cohort Study

Previous studies have demonstrated the direct associations between malnutrition and hospital mortality as well as the length of stay in critically ill patients. However, the validity of these results may be limited by inappropriate diagnoses of malnutrition, small sample size, possible treatment bias, and sub-optimal statistical adjustment. This study aimed to further examine the aforementioned associations by addressing these limitations.

Read the detailed description

Design:

  • Prospective cohort study

Setting:

  • 35-bedded integrated intensive care/ high dependency unit in Ng Teng Fong General Hospital. Patients' status can be changed between ICU-status and HD-status within the same ICU-/ HD-bed

Participants:

  • All adult patients who will be admitted to the unit between August-2015 to October-2016 for ≥ 24 hours

Intervention:

Nil. Given the observational nature of this study, no attempt will be made to standardize care, including nutritional practices.

Measurement:

  • As per routine care, a validated nutritional assessment tool [7-point Subjective Global Assessment (7-point SGA)] will be used to determine patients' nutritional status within 48 hours of ICU admission
  • The primary outcomes will be hospital mortality and ICU length of stay. To measure hospital mortality, all patients will be followed until hospital discharge or death for up to one year after ICU admission. For ICU length of stay (in days), duration will be measured from the date of the first ICU admission to the date of the first change in ICU-status to HD-status or discharge to the general ward

Analysis:

  • Modified Cox regression model with robust variance and logistic regression will be used to determine the associations between nutritional status and hospital mortality. Analyses will be conducted in two ways: 1) presence versus absence of malnutrition, and 2) dose-dependent association for each 1-point decrease in the 7-point SGA
  • Multiple linear regression will be applied to determine the associations between nutritional status and ICU length of stay
Keywords
Subjective Global Assessment, Nutritional Status, Hospital Mortality, Length of Stay, Malnutrition
Medical subject headings
Critical Illness, Malnutrition

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hospital mortality

    Death during hospitalization

    Measured: Up to one year after admission to the ICU

  2. ICU length of stay

    Duration of the first intensive care unit admission

    Measured: From the date of the first ICU admission to the date of the first change in ICU-status to HD-status or discharge to the general ward, for up to one year after admission to the ICU

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2017
  2. Study start1 Aug 2015
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2016
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
503 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03213899
Sponsor's protocol ID
2014/00878/2
Other IDs
2014
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
7 Jul 2017
Last updated
11 Jul 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lew CCH, Yandell R, Fraser RJL, Chua AP, Chong MFF, Miller M. Association Between Malnutrition and Clinical Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review [Formula: see text]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017 Jul;41(5):744-758. doi: 10.1177/0148607115625638. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

    PubMed 26838530

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Critical Illness and Malnutrition, run by JurongHealth.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hospital mortality (time frame: Up to one year after admission to the ICU). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03213899, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in