Critically IllNCT03214575
Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Vascular Access - Novel Needle Navigation Technology Compared With Conventional Method
A study testing Conventional method and GPS Method in people with Critically Ill, run by University of Malaya.
Trial summary
Background: Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a very common procedure in the intensive care setting. A recent international guidelines advocated the use of ultrasound for routine internal jugular CVC insertion. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Critically Ill
- What is being tested?
- Conventional method and GPS Method
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2016to 31 Oct 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients in the ICU who required central venous vascular access.
Who cannot join
- Refusal to participate in this study by patient or their legal representative and patient with known history of difficult central venous access at internal jugular vein (IJV).
About this study
Official title: Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Vascular Access - Novel Needle Navigation Technology Compared With Conventional Method: A Prospective Randomized Study
Background: Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a very common procedure in the intensive care setting. A recent international guidelines advocated the use of ultrasound for routine internal jugular CVC insertion. The needle navigation technology is a new innovation, also known as guided positioning system (GPS) which allows clinician to visualize the needle position and trajectory in real time as it approaches the target. We hypothesised that the use of GPS would increase success rate and decrease performance time in vascular access procedures.
Objectives: To compare the success, efficacy and safety of the procedure using the ultrasound guidance (UG) with conventional versus GPS method.
Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled study in a single centre - intensive care unit. 100 patients were randomized into two groups (50 each each). Subjects would receive CVC insertion via internal jugular vein using ultrasound guidance out of plane approach by conventional versus GPS method. Outcomes measured were the procedure efficacy, safety, level of operators' experience and their satisfaction.
Read the detailed description
Introduction Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a very common procedure in the intensive care setting. A recent international guideline advocates the use of ultrasound for routine internal jugular central venous catheter insertion1. The needle navigation technology is a new innovation, also known as guided positioning system (GPS) which allows clinician to visualize the needle position and trajectory in real time as it approaches the target. We hypothesised that the use of GPS would increase success rate and decrease performance time in vascular access procedures. The objectives of this study are to compare the success, efficacy and safety of central venous catheter insertion via internal jugular vein using the ultrasound guidance with conventional method versus needle navigation technology.
Methods:
This was a prospective randomized controlled study. It was conducted in a single centre - intensive care unit (ICU), University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from February 2016 to October 2016. The ethic committee approval was obtained from the Malaysian medical research and ethics committee, MREC at the www.nih.gov.my (NMRR-16-334-29476).
The inclusion criterion was patients in the ICU who required central venous vascular access. The exclusion criteria were refusal to participate in this study by patient or their legal representative and patient with known history of difficult central venous access at internal jugular vein (IJV). The procedure operators were doctors in anaesthesia residency program with various level of experiences classified into 3 groups: 1 to < 2 years, 2 to < 3years, 3 years and above. Simply speaking all the operators have had previous training in ultrasound guided vascular access procedure. This would ensure that patient's safety is not compromised.
Study would be proceeded after obtaining consent from patient or the next of kin. The emergency verbal consent would be taken if the next of kin was not immediately available with subsequent written consent to follow. The available operator would perform CVC insertion via IJV using ultrasound guidance out of plane approach either with conventional method or needle guidance technology.
Study Protocol:
After obtaining consent, a computer generated randomisation would be assigned to either using the conventional or GPS method. Identified operators using GPS method would receive a standard 5 minute briefing on the needle guidance technology and got to practice with the new technology using the vascular phantom (Blue Phantom Inc., Bothell, WA, USA). The operators were allowed to practice until they were ready to perform on real patient.
All procedure would be performed using the ultrasound machine, eZono 4000 with eZGuide (eZono, Jena, Germany) and linear array transducer L3-12NGS (3-12 MHz). This ultrasound machine2 has a built-in adaptive needle recognition software called eZGuide. The navigation technology of the ultrasound device is based on an electromagnetic field that communicates with a transducer and an electromagnetic sensor sheathed by a vascular access needle. Needle movements and related magnetic field variation allow navigation system to compute the locations of the transducer and needle in the three dimensional space. The ultrasound screen would display colour coded alignment of the needle and the position of the tip relative to the imaging plane (Figure 1). Superimposed on the image is the real-time electronic needle guidance system. The dashed line represents the predicted needle trajectory. The red box represents the depth that the needle will cross the plane of the ultrasound. The solid lines on either side of the dashed line represent the actual depth of the needle. The top left corner shows a diagram of the transducer-needle relation. This allowed the user to identify the correct needle trajectory, prior to puncturing the patient's skin and maintain the chosen route to the target anatomy. Operators assigned to use GPS method would have activated the eZGuide software while those performing conventionally would have the software technology turned off when using the ultrasound machine.
The procedure time was measured in seconds using a stopwatch. The performance time was defined as time measured from placing the needle on the skin to successful vessel puncture as indicated by blood withdrawn into the syringe.
- Conditions
- Critically Ill
- Being tested
- Conventional method, GPS Method
- Keywords
- Central Venous Vascular Access, Intensive Care Unit, Needle Navigation Technology
- Medical subject headings
- Critical Illness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conventional methodDevice
GPS MethodProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional method | Active comparator | For the Conventional method of ultrasound guided central venous catheter insertion,we use the ultrasound machine, eZono 4000 and linear array transducer L3-12NGS (3-12 MHz) Receives: Device: Conventional method |
| GPS method | Experimental | For the GPS method, we use the ultrasound machine, eZono 4000 with built-in adaptive needle recognition software called eZGuide (eZono, Jena, Germany) and linear array transducer L3-12NGS (3-12 MHz). Receives: Procedure: GPS Method |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The procedure efficacy justified by successful cannulation.
The procedure efficacy justified by successful cannulation based on the performance time and number of attempts,
Measured: 0-120 seconds
Secondary outcomes (2)
Safety of procedure and complications.
The safety of the procedure by identifying any potential complications occur, i.e. secondary tissue injury, hematoma, bleeding, pneumothorax, haemothorax or arterial puncture.
Measured: During and within 24 hours after procedure.
Operators' satisfaction.
Level of operators' satisfaction.
Measured: within 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jul 2017
- Study start1 Feb 2016
- Primary completion1 Oct 2016
- Study completion31 Oct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Critically IllStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MalayaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Malaya
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Mohd Shahnaz, MBBS, M Anes, University of Malaya
- Investigators
- Mohd Shahnaz Hasan, MBBS, Principal investigator, University of Malaya
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03214575
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NMRR-16-334-29476
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 4 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 11 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Vascular Access - Novel Needle Navigation Technology Compared With Conventional Method: A Prospective Randomized Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03214575
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NMRR-16-334-29476
- Conditions
- Critically Ill
- Keywords
- Central Venous Vascular Access, Intensive Care Unit, Needle Navigation Technology
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MalayaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a very common procedure in the intensive care setting. A recent international guidelines advocated the use of ultrasound for routine internal jugular CVC insertion. The needle navigation technology is a new innovation, also known as guided positioning system (GPS) which allows clinician to visualize the needle position and trajectory in real time as it approaches the target. We hypothesised that the use of GPS would increase success rate and decrease performance time in vascular access procedures.
Objectives: To compare the success, efficacy and safety of the procedure using the ultrasound guidance (UG) with conventional versus GPS method.
Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled study in a single centre - intensive care unit. 100 patients were randomized into two groups (50 each each). Subjects would receive CVC insertion via internal jugular vein using ultrasound guidance out of plane approach by conventional versus GPS method. Outcomes measured were the procedure efficacy, safety, level of operators' experience and their satisfaction.
Detailed description
Introduction Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a very common procedure in the intensive care setting. A recent international guideline advocates the use of ultrasound for routine internal jugular central venous catheter insertion1. The needle navigation technology is a new innovation, also known as guided positioning system (GPS) which allows clinician to visualize the needle position and trajectory in real time as it approaches the target. We hypothesised that the use of GPS would increase success rate and decrease performance time in vascular access procedures. The objectives of this study are to compare the success, efficacy and safety of central venous catheter insertion via internal jugular vein using the ultrasound guidance with conventional method versus needle navigation technology.
Methods:
This was a prospective randomized controlled study. It was conducted in a single centre - intensive care unit (ICU), University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from February 2016 to October 2016. The ethic committee approval was obtained from the Malaysian medical research and ethics committee, MREC at the www.nih.gov.my (NMRR-16-334-29476).
The inclusion criterion was patients in the ICU who required central venous vascular access. The exclusion criteria were refusal to participate in this study by patient or their legal representative and patient with known history of difficult central venous access at internal jugular vein (IJV). The procedure operators were doctors in anaesthesia residency program with various level of experiences classified into 3 groups: 1 to < 2 years, 2 to < 3years, 3 years and above. Simply speaking all the operators have had previous training in ultrasound guided vascular access procedure. This would ensure that patient's safety is not compromised.
Study would be proceeded after obtaining consent from patient or the next of kin. The emergency verbal consent would be taken if the next of kin was not immediately available with subsequent written consent to follow. The available operator would perform CVC insertion via IJV using ultrasound guidance out of plane approach either with conventional method or needle guidance technology.
Study Protocol:
After obtaining consent, a computer generated randomisation would be assigned to either using the conventional or GPS method. Identified operators using GPS method would receive a standard 5 minute briefing on the needle guidance technology and got to practice with the new technology using the vascular phantom (Blue Phantom Inc., Bothell, WA, USA). The operators were allowed to practice until they were ready to perform on real patient.
All procedure would be performed using the ultrasound machine, eZono 4000 with eZGuide (eZono, Jena, Germany) and linear array transducer L3-12NGS (3-12 MHz). This ultrasound machine2 has a built-in adaptive needle recognition software called eZGuide. The navigation technology of the ultrasound device is based on an electromagnetic field that communicates with a transducer and an electromagnetic sensor sheathed by a vascular access needle. Needle movements and related magnetic field variation allow navigation system to compute the locations of the transducer and needle in the three dimensional space. The ultrasound screen would display colour coded alignment of the needle and the position of the tip relative to the imaging plane (Figure 1). Superimposed on the image is the real-time electronic needle guidance system. The dashed line represents the predicted needle trajectory. The red box represents the depth that the needle will cross the plane of the ultrasound. The solid lines on either side of the dashed line represent the actual depth of the needle. The top left corner shows a diagram of the transducer-needle relation. This allowed the user to identify the correct needle trajectory, prior to puncturing the patient's skin and maintain the chosen route to the target anatomy. Operators assigned to use GPS method would have activated the eZGuide software while those performing conventionally would have the software technology turned off when using the ultrasound machine.
The procedure time was measured in seconds using a stopwatch. The performance time was defined as time measured from placing the needle on the skin to successful vessel puncture as indicated by blood withdrawn into the syringe.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional method | Active comparator | Device: Conventional methodFor the Conventional method of ultrasound guided central venous catheter insertion,we use the ultrasound machine, eZono 4000 and linear array transducer L3-12NGS (3-12 MHz) |
| GPS method | Experimental | Procedure: GPS MethodFor the GPS method, we use the ultrasound machine, eZono 4000 with built-in adaptive needle recognition software called eZGuide (eZono, Jena, Germany) and linear array transducer L3-12NGS (3-12 MHz). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients in the ICU who required central venous vascular access.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Refusal to participate in this study by patient or their legal representative and patient with known history of difficult central venous access at internal jugular vein (IJV).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional method | Device | Conventional method |
| GPS Method | Procedure or surgery | GPS method |
Primary outcome
The procedure efficacy justified by successful cannulation.
Time frame: 0-120 seconds
The procedure efficacy justified by successful cannulation based on the performance time and number of attempts,
2 secondary outcomes
Safety of procedure and complications.
Time frame: During and within 24 hours after procedure.
Operators' satisfaction.
Time frame: within 1 week
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jul 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Critically Ill
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Extended and Intermittent Infusion of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Paediatric Patients
Infection, Sepsis
Recruiting
Development and Preliminary Validation of Intelligent Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Use
Critically Ill Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
Active, not recruiting
Weighted Blankets for Agitation in Adults in the Intensive Care Unit
Psychomotor Agitation, Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Core Competencies in General Intensive Care Ultrasound (GenIUS): a Delphi Study
Critical Illness, Ultrasound
RecruitingObservational study
Predicting Extubation Failure Using Machine Learning
Extubation Failure, Critical Illness
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohd Shahnaz Hasan, MBBS principal investigator
University of Malaya
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conventional method and GPS Method in people with Critically Ill, run by University of Malaya.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The procedure efficacy justified by successful cannulation. (time frame: 0-120 seconds). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2017.