Lung CancerNCT03216109
Improving Supportive Care For Patients With Thoracic Malignancies
A study testing Weekly telephone symptom assessment in people with Lung Cancer and Quality of Life, run by Palo Alto Veterans Institute for Research at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to use a proactive approach to improve symptom management of patients with thoracic malignancies and ensure receipt of evidence-based cancer care delivery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer, Quality of Life, Supportive Care
- What is being tested?
- Weekly telephone symptom assessment
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Aug 2017to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients with lung cancer treated at VA Palo Alto. This includes all newly diagnosed patients and those under follow-up care.
Who cannot join
- Patients who do not anticipate receiving oncology care at the VA Palo Alto Health Care System.
- Patients who are unable to consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Palo Alto, California, 94304
About this study
The purpose of this study is to use a proactive approach to improve symptom management of patients with thoracic malignancies and ensure receipt of evidence-based cancer care delivery. In this pilot study, the investigators propose to evaluate the feasibility of using outbound, proactive telephone symptom assessment strategies and ensuring evidence-based care receipt and measure the efficacy of this approach on patient satisfaction with their care, patient activation, quality of life and use of healthcare resources.
Read the detailed description
The investigators have previously shown in previous work that patients and caregivers who experience thoracic malignancies express poor symptom management that result in utilization of healthcare resources after-hours for symptoms that could have been prevented if assessed more proactively and prospectively. Currently, there are limited proactive approaches to prospectively identify and intervene on patient-reported symptoms. The purpose of this study is to enhance symptom assessment strategies by using a proactive assessment approach to improve symptom relief for patients with thoracic malignancies.
The investigators will test whether a proactive telephone symptom assessment and management strategy is feasible and can facilitate early patient report of their symptoms and intervention. The knowledge gained from this approach will be used to identify solutions that can be scaled nationally to improve patient-reported symptom management and patient satisfaction with their clinical care.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, Quality of Life, Supportive Care
- Being tested
- Weekly telephone symptom assessment
- Keywords
- Supportive Care, Quality of Life
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Weekly telephone symptom assessmentBehavioural
Each patient who is enrolled in the intervention will receive a weekly phone call from the Research Assistant for a total of 9 months to assess symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Results of the symptom assessments will be provided to the clinic staff (RN and MD) for review each week. Care plans will be generated using an electronic management platform
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly telephone symptom assessment | Experimental | Each patient who is enrolled in the intervention will receive a weekly phone call from the Research Assistant for a total of 9 months to assess symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Results of the symptom assessments will be provided to the clinic staff (RN and MD) for review each week. Symptom assessments will be documented into an encrypted, HIPAA compliant digital platform which provides longitudinal symptom data management and also provides symptom assessment tools for the clinical team in their intervention strategies.
In addition, patients will complete symptom and quality of life surveys at 0, 3, 6 and 9 months. Receives: Behavioral: Weekly telephone symptom assessment |
| Control Arm | No intervention | Patients randomized to usual clinical care will receive standard of care for thoracic malignancies as provided by the VA Palo Alto Health Care System. Patients will complete outcome surveys at 0, 3, 6, and 9 months. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Symptom documentation
Defined as 75% documentation of symptoms for patients in the intervention arm
Measured: 6 months after patient enrollment
Secondary outcomes (14)
Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
Emergency Department visits for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record for each patient at 9 months
Measured: 9 months after patient enrollment
Hospitalizations (Chart Review)
Hospitalizations for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record for each patient at 9 months
Measured: 9 months after patient enrollment
Change in Quality of Life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung survey
Each patient will receive a validated survey to assess quality of life at baseline and 3 months
Measured: Change in Quality of Life from baseline to month 3
Change in Quality of Life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung survey
Each patient will receive a validated survey to assess quality of life at baseline and 6 months
Measured: Change in Quality of Life from baseline to month 6
Change in Quality of Life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung survey
Each patient will receive a validated survey to assess quality of life at baseline and 9 months
Measured: Change in Quality of Life from baseline to month 9
Change in patient satisfaction with decision-making using the Satisfaction with Decision Survey
Each patient will receive a validated survey to assess their satisfaction with decision at baseline and 3 months
Measured: Change in patient satisfaction with decision--making from baseline to 3 months
Change in patient satisfaction with decision-making using the Satisfaction with Decision Survey
Each patient will receive a validated survey to assess their satisfaction with decision at baseline and 6 months
Measured: Change in patient satisfaction with decision--making from baseline to 6 months
Change in patient satisfaction with decision-making using the Satisfaction with Decision Survey
Each patient will receive a validated survey to assess their satisfaction with decision at baseline and 9 months
Measured: Change in patient satisfaction with decision--making from baseline to 9 months
Change in Patient Activation using the validated Patient Activation Measure
Each patient will receive a validated survey to assess their activation at baseline and 3 months
Measured: Change in patient activation from baseline to 3 months
Change in Patient Activation using the validated Patient Activation Measure
Each patient will receive a validated survey to assess their activation at baseline and 6 months
Measured: Change in patient activation from baseline to 6 months
Change in Patient Activation using the validated Patient Activation Measure
Each patient will receive a validated survey to assess their activation at baseline and 9 months
Measured: Change in patient activation from baseline to 9 months
Change in symptoms using the validated Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
Each patient will receive a validated survey to assess their symptoms at baseline and 3 months
Measured: Change in symptoms from baseline to 3 months
Change in symptoms using the validated Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
Each patient will receive a validated survey to assess their symptoms at baseline and 6 months
Measured: Change in symptoms from baseline to 6 months
Change in symptoms using the validated Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
Each patient will receive a validated survey to assess their symptoms at baseline and 9 months
Measured: Change in symptoms from baseline to 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jul 2017
- Study start20 Aug 2017
- Primary completion28 Jun 2023
- Study completion31 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Palo Alto Veterans Institute for Research
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Carevive Systems, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Manali Patel, Palo Alto Veterans Institute for Research
- Investigators
- Manali I Patel, MD, Principal investigator, Faculty
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03216109
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PAT0001ARG
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 21 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Banks LC, Kapphahn K, Das M, Patel MI. Randomized Trial of a Volunteer-Led Symptom Assessment Intervention on Documentation, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Health Care Use Among Veterans With Lung Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Mar;20(3):419-428. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00557. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
PubMed 38207246Patel MI, Banks L, Das M. Improving supportive care for patients with Thoracic Malignancies - A randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 May 27;28:100929. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100929. eCollection 2022 Aug.
PubMed 35669484
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improving Supportive Care For Patients With Thoracic Malignancies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03216109
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PAT0001ARG
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, Quality of Life, Supportive Care
- Keywords
- Supportive Care, Quality of Life
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Palo Alto Veterans Institute for ResearchUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Carevive Systems, Inc.
- Study start
- 20 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to use a proactive approach to improve symptom management of patients with thoracic malignancies and ensure receipt of evidence-based cancer care delivery. In this pilot study, the investigators propose to evaluate the feasibility of using outbound, proactive telephone symptom assessment strategies and ensuring evidence-based care receipt and measure the efficacy of this approach on patient satisfaction with their care, patient activation, quality of life and use of healthcare resources.
Detailed description
The investigators have previously shown in previous work that patients and caregivers who experience thoracic malignancies express poor symptom management that result in utilization of healthcare resources after-hours for symptoms that could have been prevented if assessed more proactively and prospectively. Currently, there are limited proactive approaches to prospectively identify and intervene on patient-reported symptoms. The purpose of this study is to enhance symptom assessment strategies by using a proactive assessment approach to improve symptom relief for patients with thoracic malignancies.
The investigators will test whether a proactive telephone symptom assessment and management strategy is feasible and can facilitate early patient report of their symptoms and intervention. The knowledge gained from this approach will be used to identify solutions that can be scaled nationally to improve patient-reported symptom management and patient satisfaction with their clinical care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly telephone symptom assessment | Experimental | Behavioral: Weekly telephone symptom assessmentEach patient who is enrolled in the intervention will receive a weekly phone call from the Research Assistant for a total of 9 months to assess symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Results of the symptom assessments will be provided to the clinic staff (RN and MD) for review each week. Symptom assessments will be documented into an encrypted, HIPAA compliant digital platform which provides longitudinal symptom data management and also provides symptom assessment tools for the clinical team in their intervention strategies. In addition, patients will complete symptom and quality of life surveys at 0, 3, 6 and 9 months. |
| Control Arm | No intervention | –Patients randomized to usual clinical care will receive standard of care for thoracic malignancies as provided by the VA Palo Alto Health Care System. Patients will complete outcome surveys at 0, 3, 6, and 9 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients with lung cancer treated at VA Palo Alto. This includes all newly diagnosed patients and those under follow-up care.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who do not anticipate receiving oncology care at the VA Palo Alto Health Care System.
- Patients who are unable to consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly telephone symptom assessmentEach patient who is enrolled in the intervention will receive a weekly phone call from the Research Assistant for a total of 9 months to assess symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Results of the symptom assessments will be provided to the clinic staff (RN and MD) for review each week. Care plans will be generated using an electronic management platform | Behavioural | Weekly telephone symptom assessment |
Primary outcome
Symptom documentation
Time frame: 6 months after patient enrollment
Defined as 75% documentation of symptoms for patients in the intervention arm
14 secondary outcomes
Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
Time frame: 9 months after patient enrollment
Hospitalizations (Chart Review)
Time frame: 9 months after patient enrollment
Change in Quality of Life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung survey
Time frame: Change in Quality of Life from baseline to month 3
Change in Quality of Life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung survey
Time frame: Change in Quality of Life from baseline to month 6
Change in Quality of Life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung survey
Time frame: Change in Quality of Life from baseline to month 9
Change in patient satisfaction with decision-making using the Satisfaction with Decision Survey
Time frame: Change in patient satisfaction with decision--making from baseline to 3 months
Change in patient satisfaction with decision-making using the Satisfaction with Decision Survey
Time frame: Change in patient satisfaction with decision--making from baseline to 6 months
Change in patient satisfaction with decision-making using the Satisfaction with Decision Survey
Time frame: Change in patient satisfaction with decision--making from baseline to 9 months
Change in Patient Activation using the validated Patient Activation Measure
Time frame: Change in patient activation from baseline to 3 months
Change in Patient Activation using the validated Patient Activation Measure
Time frame: Change in patient activation from baseline to 6 months
Change in Patient Activation using the validated Patient Activation Measure
Time frame: Change in patient activation from baseline to 9 months
Change in symptoms using the validated Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
Time frame: Change in symptoms from baseline to 3 months
Change in symptoms using the validated Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
Time frame: Change in symptoms from baseline to 6 months
Change in symptoms using the validated Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
Time frame: Change in symptoms from baseline to 9 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Mar 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38207246Banks LC, Kapphahn K, Das M, Patel MI. Randomized Trial of a Volunteer-Led Symptom Assessment Intervention on Documentation, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Health Care Use Among Veterans With Lung Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Mar;20(3):419-428. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00557. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35669484Patel MI, Banks L, Das M. Improving supportive care for patients with Thoracic Malignancies - A randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 May 27;28:100929. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100929. eCollection 2022 Aug.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Dual Energy CT - a Tool for Delineation of Tumor and Organs at Risk in Radiotherapy
Brain Metastases, Bone Metastases
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Combination Amivantamab and Carboplatin-Pemetrexed Therapy, Compared With Carboplatin-Pemetrexed, in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Characterized by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Exon 20 Insertions
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
RecruitingObservational study
Genetic Analysis of Birt Hogg-Dube Syndrome and Characterization of Predisposition to Kidney Cancer
Kidney Neoplasms, Kidney Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Autologous B7-H3 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Previously Treated Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer With Recurrent or Refractory Disease
Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer, Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Patient Reported Outcomes Following Percutaneous Lung Ablation
Lung Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Manali I Patel, MD principal investigator
Faculty
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Weekly telephone symptom assessment in people with Lung Cancer and Quality of Life, run by Palo Alto Veterans Institute for Research at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Symptom documentation (time frame: 6 months after patient enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03216109, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2024.