Fluid ResponsivenessNCT03222778
Combination of Static Echocardiographic Indices for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness During Cardiac Surgery
An observational study of Fluid Responsiveness, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
In the perioperative or critical care of hemodynamically unstable patients, appropriate fluid resuscitation guided by reliable preload indices is of pivotal importance as only half of them are fluid responsive, and that empiric fluid administration actually leads to dismal prognosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Fluid Responsiveness
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2017to 6 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: patients scheduled for off-pump coronary bypass surgery
Who may be able to join
- the patients scheduled for off-pump coronary bypass surgery
- tha age ≥20 yrs old
- the patients who are willing to provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- heart rhythm other than sinus, L, septal and/or lateral wall motion abnormalities, and a
- New York Heart Association functional class ≥III
- LV ejection fraction <40%
- emergency operation
- the patients with preoperative septal and/or lateral wall motion abnormalities
- contraindications to transesophageal echocardiography or balanced 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4
- the patients with any valvular heart disease ≥moderate degree
- No communication possible due to a language barrier or deafness
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Seoul, 120-752
About this study
In the perioperative or critical care of hemodynamically unstable patients, appropriate fluid resuscitation guided by reliable preload indices is of pivotal importance as only half of them are fluid responsive, and that empiric fluid administration actually leads to dismal prognosis. In the continuum of being non-invasive, combinations of tissue Doppler-derived parameters of early (e') and late (a') diastolic, and peak systolic velocity (s') of the mitral annulus provide information regarding the systolic dysfunction and preload (e'/s'), and LV stiffness (e'/a'). Although the left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA) alone is not a valid predictor of fluid responsiveness, combining LVEDA with these indices would provide comprehensive information regarding the LV dimension, preload, and compliance as well as systolic function. Also, it seems logical to assume that patients with low LVEDA and high e' velocity indicating preserved early diastolic relaxation or low e (early mitral inflow velocity) /e' ratio indicating normal LV filling pressure would more likely be fluid responsive. Yet, these assumptions have not been tested before. Moreover, these values can be reliably obtained regardless of the heart rhythm, except for a', and do not completely rely on heart-lung interaction as opposed to the dynamic indices. Thus, the aim of this prospective trial is to investigate the role of LVEDA combined with e, e', a' or s' as a preload index in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients scheduled for off-pump coronary bypass surgery, in closed-chest conditions.
- Conditions
- Fluid Responsiveness
- Keywords
- fluid responsiveness, tissue doppler, off-pump coronary bypass surgery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| hypovolemia (fluid responsiveness) | The patients with fluid responsiveness (an increase in stroke volume index of ≥12%) after fluid challenge using 6 ml/kg of balanced 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (Volulyte; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) | |
| NO hypovolemia (NO fluid responsiveness) | The patients without fluid responsiveness after fluid challenge using 6 ml/kg of balanced 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (Volulyte; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Predictive ability of combined echocardiographic index consisting of LVEDA, e, e', s' or a'
Fluid challenge is performed once using 6 ml/kg of balanced 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (Volulyte; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) 15 to 20 min after anesthetic induction during closed chest condition. Fluid responsiveness is defined as an increase in stroke volume index of ≥ 15%. Assessment of echocardiographic variables [LVEDA, e, e', a' or s'] is performed before fluid challenge. We assess the predictive ability of a combined echocardiographic preload index consisting of LVEDA, e, e', s' or a' on fluid responsiveness using the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUROC).
Measured: 15 to 20 min after anesthetic induction during closed chest condition
Secondary outcomes (1)
Comparison between the combine echocardiographic index and LVEDA alone, CVP, PCWP, RVEDV and PPV for the predictive ability on fluid responsiveness
CVP, PCWP, RVEDV and PPV are measured as well as echocardiographic variables [LVEDA, e, e', a' or s'] before fluid challenge. We also assess the predictive ability of LVEDA alone, CVP, PCWP, RVEDV and PPV on fluid responsiveness using each AUROC, and compare the predictive power of the combined echocardiographic index on fluid responsiveness with those of the LVEDA alone, CVP, PCWP, RVEDV, and PPV.
Measured: 15 to 20 min after anesthetic induction during closed chest condition
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jul 2017
- Study start1 Dec 2017
- Primary completion6 Mar 2020
- Study completion6 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Fluid ResponsivenessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yonsei UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yonsei University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03222778
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4-2017-0403
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Combination of Static Echocardiographic Indices for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness During Cardiac Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03222778
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 4-2017-0403
- Conditions
- Fluid Responsiveness
- Keywords
- fluid responsiveness, tissue doppler, off-pump coronary bypass surgery
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yonsei UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the perioperative or critical care of hemodynamically unstable patients, appropriate fluid resuscitation guided by reliable preload indices is of pivotal importance as only half of them are fluid responsive, and that empiric fluid administration actually leads to dismal prognosis. In the continuum of being non-invasive, combinations of tissue Doppler-derived parameters of early (e') and late (a') diastolic, and peak systolic velocity (s') of the mitral annulus provide information regarding the systolic dysfunction and preload (e'/s'), and LV stiffness (e'/a'). Although the left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA) alone is not a valid predictor of fluid responsiveness, combining LVEDA with these indices would provide comprehensive information regarding the LV dimension, preload, and compliance as well as systolic function. Also, it seems logical to assume that patients with low LVEDA and high e' velocity indicating preserved early diastolic relaxation or low e (early mitral inflow velocity) /e' ratio indicating normal LV filling pressure would more likely be fluid responsive. Yet, these assumptions have not been tested before. Moreover, these values can be reliably obtained regardless of the heart rhythm, except for a', and do not completely rely on heart-lung interaction as opposed to the dynamic indices. Thus, the aim of this prospective trial is to investigate the role of LVEDA combined with e, e', a' or s' as a preload index in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients scheduled for off-pump coronary bypass surgery, in closed-chest conditions.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| hypovolemia (fluid responsiveness) | – | –The patients with fluid responsiveness (an increase in stroke volume index of ≥12%) after fluid challenge using 6 ml/kg of balanced 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (Volulyte; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) |
| NO hypovolemia (NO fluid responsiveness) | – | –The patients without fluid responsiveness after fluid challenge using 6 ml/kg of balanced 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (Volulyte; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- patients scheduled for off-pump coronary bypass surgery
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- the patients scheduled for off-pump coronary bypass surgery
- tha age ≥20 yrs old
- the patients who are willing to provide written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- heart rhythm other than sinus, L, septal and/or lateral wall motion abnormalities, and a
- New York Heart Association functional class ≥III
- LV ejection fraction <40%
- emergency operation
- the patients with preoperative septal and/or lateral wall motion abnormalities
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Predictive ability of combined echocardiographic index consisting of LVEDA, e, e', s' or a'
Time frame: 15 to 20 min after anesthetic induction during closed chest condition
Fluid challenge is performed once using 6 ml/kg of balanced 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (Volulyte; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) 15 to 20 min after anesthetic induction during closed chest condition. Fluid responsiveness is defined as an increase in stroke volume index of ≥ 15%. Assessment of echocardiographic variables [LVEDA, e, e', a' or s'] is performed before fluid challenge. We assess the predictive ability of a combined echocardiographic preload index consisting of LVEDA, e, e', s' or a' on fluid responsiveness using the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUROC).
1 secondary outcome
Comparison between the combine echocardiographic index and LVEDA alone, CVP, PCWP, RVEDV and PPV for the predictive ability on fluid responsiveness
Time frame: 15 to 20 min after anesthetic induction during closed chest condition
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Fluid Responsiveness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound-Calibrated Pulse Contour Cardiac Output Monitoring: Value and Accuracy in Hemodynamic Care
Sepsis, Circulatory Instability
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of PPV and LVOT VTI During Passive Leg Raising to Predict Fluid Responsiveness
Hemodynamic Instability, Hypovolemia
RecruitingObservational study
Role of End-Tidal CO2 During Passive Leg Raising to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in ICU
Circulatory Failure, Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Capillary Refill Time Variation to Predict Oxygen Comsumption Variation After FLuid Challenge (CARTOFL)
Critically Ill Patients, Circulatory Shock
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Fluid Responsiveness in Laparoscopic Surgery: End-Expiratory Occlusion Test Versus Mini-Fluid Challenge
Fluid Responsiveness, Laparoscopic Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Fluid Responsiveness, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Predictive ability of combined echocardiographic index consisting of LVEDA, e, e', s' or a' (time frame: 15 to 20 min after anesthetic induction during closed chest condition). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2020.