Primary Sjögren SyndromePhase 1/2NCT03226444
Lacripep™ in Subjects With Dry Eye Associated With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome
A Phase 1/2 study testing 0.005% Lacripep and 0.01% Lacripep in people with Primary Sjögren Syndrome and Dry Eye, run by TearSolutions, Inc. at 35 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two strengths of Lacripep™ ophthalmic solution versus placebo administered three times daily for four weeks in subjects with a diagnosis of Dry Eye associated with documented Primary Sjögren's Syndrome Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Primary Sjögren Syndrome, Dry Eye
- What is being tested?
- 0.005% Lacripep and 0.01% Lacripep
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 204 participants
- Where
- 35 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2017to 27 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects who meet the following criteria will be selected:
- Subjects who are age 18 years of age or older at the time of obtaining informed consent.
- Subjects with a documented prior history or current diagnosis of Primary Sjögren's Syndrome according the American-European Consensus Group Sjögren's Syndrome Criteria (Appendix 4; must meet either 4 out of 6 total criteria OR 3 out of 4 signs). Note: Subjects who are on systemic (oral) therapy for the treatment of Sjögren's Syndrome must be on stable systemic treatment defined as the same treatment for the immediately prior 90 days.
- Subjects with a history of dry eye-related ocular symptoms, and who have self-reported use of over the counter ocular wetting agents within the last 120 days.
- Subjects who meet the following criteria at both screening and Visit 2 (Randomization/Baseline) examinations:
- FCS total score ≥ 4 and < 15 in the NEI/Industry Workshop scale, (Appendix 6)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Symptom Severity score of ≥ 40 using the SANDE questionnaire (Appendix 3)
- Anesthetized Schirmer test score ≤ 5 mm wetting/5 min
- LGCS total score ≥ 5 using the NEI/Industry Workshop scale (where 0=no staining) Note: Subjects must meet all 4 criteria and eligible scores for FCS, Anesthetized Schirmer and LGCS must be in at least one eye and it must be in the same eye at the time of the visit.
Who cannot join
- Subjects meeting any of the following criteria at the Visit 1 (Screening) or Visit 2 (Randomization/Baseline) visits will be excluded:
- Subjects with any active infectious ocular condition.
- Subjects who are monocular or have a BCVA, using corrective lenses if necessary, of +1.0 logMAR or worse as assessed by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS).
- Subjects with ocular inflammatory conditions (e.g., conjunctivitis, keratitis, anterior blepharitis, etc.) not related to dry eye syndrome.
- Subjects with clinical evidence of cicatricial ocular surface disease, such as cicatricial ocular pemphigoid or Stevens Johnson syndrome.
- Subjects who cannot suspend the use of any topical eye medications (including topical cyclosporine) other than the investigational product during the run-in and the study treatment phase.
Show all 23Show fewer
- Subjects who have used Restasis® (topical ophthalmic cyclosporine) or Xiidra® (topical ophthalmic lifitegrast) within 14 days prior to Visit 1.
- Subjects who in the study eye have fluorescein corneal staining (FCS) Total Score = 15 or a Score = 3 in the superior region per the NEI/Industry Workshop scale or subjects who have FCS with diffuse confluent staining, filaments or frank epithelial defects.
- Subjects who have active or have had an outbreak of herpetic keratitis within 365 days of Visit 1 or subjects who are on chronic oral antivirals for ocular herpetic disease.
- Subjects who cannot suspend the use of and abstain from contact lens use from the Screening Visit (Visit 1) to the end of the study (Visit 5).
- Subjects who have a history of collagen vascular disease, auto immune disease or rheumatic disease other than Primary Sjögren's Syndrome (e.g., Lupus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, etc.).
- Subjects who have a history of or current Anterior Membrane Dystrophy.
- Subjects who have had a corneal transplant or similar corneal surgery (DALK, DSEK, DMEK, etc.).
- Subjects who have used or anticipate use of amiodarone.
- Subjects who within 30 days prior to Visit 1 alter the dose or anticipate alterations to the dose of the following: tetracyclines, Omega 3's or 6's.
- Subjects who within 60 days prior to Visit 1 and for the duration of the study alter the dose or anticipate alterations to the dose of the following: anticholinergics, antidepressants, oral contraceptives, isotretinoin, oral systemic corticosteroids, oral systemic immunosuppressive agents.
- Subjects who within 30 days prior to Visit 1 and for the duration of the study use topical ocular antihistamines, ocular, inhaled or intranasal corticosteroids, topical or oral mast cell stabilizers, oral antihistamines, topical or nasal vasoconstrictors, topical ocular NSAIDs, topical ocular antibiotics or serum tears.
- Subjects who in the study eye have had cauterization of the punctum or alterations to (insertion or removal) punctal plug(s) within the past 14 days prior to Visit 1. Note: If a punctal plug in place at Visit 2 (Randomization/Baseline) and it is dislodged, the plug should be replaced as soon as possible.
- Subjects who, in the study eye, have had corneal refractive surgery (LASIK, PRK, RK).
- Subjects who in the study eye, have a history of any operative procedure on the ocular surface or eyelids within 365 days prior to Visit 1 or with a history of intraocular surgery within 90 days prior to Visit 1.
- Subjects who are pregnant or suspected to be pregnant and subjects who are breastfeeding or intend to breastfeed. Female subjects of childbearing potential are required to have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening, and must agree to use an acceptable method of contraception from the time of signing informed consent until the end of study visit. Medically acceptable contraception methods include intrauterine device; barrier methods such as diaphragm, condom, cap or sponge, used with a spermicide; or hormonal contraception.
- Subjects with any physical or mental impairment that would preclude participation and the ability to give informed consent.
- Subjects who have participated in a device or Investigational drug study or clinical trial within 30 days of Visit 1. Participation in another during this study is excluded for the duration of this study.
Trial locations and contacts
35 sites in 1 country.
35 sites in 1 country
United States35 sites
Eye Consultants of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30339
University of Colorado Department of Ophthalmology
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Milton M. Hom, OD FAAO FACAA (Sc)
Azusa, California, 91702
University of California, Berkeley, School of Optometry
Berkeley, California, 94720
University of Alabama Eye Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Minnesota Eye Consultants, P.A.
Bloomington, Minnesota, 55431
University of Virginia University Eye Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
Abrams Eye Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44115
Ophthalmic Surgeons & Consultants of Ohio; The Eye Center of Columbus
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Bruce A. Segal, MD PA Private Practice
Delray Beach, Florida, 33484
Bergstrom Eye Research
Fargo, North Dakota, 58103
Orange County Ophthalmology
Garden Grove, California, 92843
Lugene Eye Institute
Glendale, California, 91204
Cornerstone Eye Care, PA
High Point, North Carolina, 27262
Chicago Cornea Consultants, Ltd.
Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 60169
Midwest Cornea Associates, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46290
Bowden Eye & Associates
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Tauber Eye Center
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
The Eye Clinic of Texas, an affiliate of Houston Eye Associates
League City, Texas, 77573
Corneal Consultants of Colorado
Littleton, Colorado, 80209
The Eye Care Institute
Louisville, Kentucky, 40206
UTHSC Department of Ophthalmology
Memphis, Tennessee, 38163
Virginia Eye Consultants
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
International Eye Associates, PA
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
University of Pennsylvania Scheie Eye Institute
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Martel Eye Medical Group
Rancho Cordova, California, 95670
Black Hills Eye Institute
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701
Vistar Eye Center
Roanoke, Virginia, 24011
Doctor My Eyes / Stephen Cohen, OD, PC
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85254
Schwartz Laser Eye Center
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85260
Cornea Consultants of Albany
Slingerlands, New York, 12159
Ophthalmology Associates
St Louis, Missouri, 63131
Perez Eye Center
Tampa, Florida, 33603
Wolstan & Goldberg Eye Associates
Torrance, California, 90505
Clinical Eye Research of Boston
Winchester, Massachusetts, 01890
About this study
Official title: A Double-Masked, Randomized, Multi-Center Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lacripep™ in Subjects With Dry Eye Associated With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two strengths of Lacripep™ ophthalmic solution versus placebo administered three times daily for four weeks in subjects with a diagnosis of Dry Eye associated with documented Primary Sjögren's Syndrome
Read the detailed description
This is a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, parallel-group study. Subjects will be randomized into three treatment groups: 0.005%, or 0.01% Lacripep™, or placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio.
- Conditions
- Primary Sjögren Syndrome, Dry Eye
- Being tested
- 0.005% Lacripep, 0.01% Lacripep, Placebo
- Keywords
- Dry Eye, Primary Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjogren's Syndrome
- Medical subject headings
- Dry Eye Syndromes, Sjogren's Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
0.005% LacripepDrug
One drop (approximately 50 microliters) of 0.005% ophthalmic solution will be administered three times a day (TID) to both eyes for four weeks.
0.01% LacripepDrug
One drop (approximately 50 microliters) of 0.01% ophthalmic solution will be administered three times a day (TID) to both eyes for four weeks.
PlaceboDrug
One drop (approximately 50 microliters) of placebo solution will be administered three times a day (TID) to both eyes for four weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 0.005% Lacripep | Experimental | 0.005% Lacripep ophthalmic solution Receives: Drug: 0.005% Lacripep |
| 0.01% Lacripep | Experimental | 0.01% Lacripep ophthalmic solution Receives: Drug: 0.01% Lacripep |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | placebo solution Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Fluorescein Corneal Staining total score
Mean change from Baseline/Randomization (Visit 2) to Day 28 (Visit 4) in Fluorescein Corneal Staining (FCS) total score [National Eye Institute (NEI)/Industry Workshop 0-15 scale, 0-3 scale in each of 5 regions] in the study eye.
Measured: Changes at Week 4 from Baseline
Secondary outcomes (15)
Eye Dryness
Mean change from Baseline/Randomization (Visit 2) to Day 28 (Visit 4) in Eye Dryness Score (0-100 VAS scale, OU) from Individual Symptom Assessments (Instantaneous)
Measured: Changes at Week 4 from Baseline
Mean Scores for Individual Symptom Assessments (Reflective)
Mean Scores for six Individual Symptom Assessments (Reflective) at Day 28 (Visit 4). The individual reflective symptom assessment is assessed in 6 categories (Eye Dryness, Burning/Stinging, Foreign Body Sensation, Eye Discomfort, Eye Pain and Fluctuating Vision). An anchor in the middle at 50 mm representing their symptom severity at the last visit. The 50 mm scale to the left of the anchor located in the center of the scale will measure worsening symptoms (a negative value) and the 50 mm scale to the right of the anchor located in the center of the scale will measure improving symptoms (a positive value). The lower score represents greater severity.
Measured: Day 28
Changes in SANDE-1 to Visit 4
Changes in Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye Questionnaires (SANDE) Version 1 global score from Randomization/Baseline (Visit 2) to Day 28 (Visit 4). SANDE Version 1 questionnaire contains two items measuring the frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms. Each item is assessed on a 100 mm visual analog scale from 0 (Rarely for frequency, Very mild for severity) to 100 mm (All the time for frequency, Very Severe for severity), with higher scores representing greater frequency/severity.
Measured: Changes from Baseline to Day 28.
Mean Scores SANDE 2
Mean Scores for Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye Questionnaires (SANDE) Version 2 global scores at day 28 (Visit 4). SANDE Version 2 questionnaire contains two items measuring the frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms.The 50 mm scale to the left of the anchor located in the center of the scale will measure improving symptoms (a negative value) and the 50 mm scale to the right of the anchor located in the center of the scale will measure worsening symptoms (a positive value).
Measured: Day 28
Changes in Individual Symptom Assessments (Instantaneous)
Changes in each of the 5 additional Individual Symptom Assessment (Instantaneous) from Randomization/Baseline (Visit 2) to Day 28 (Visit 4). The individual instantaneous symptom assessment is a questionnaire that uses a 0-100 mm visual analog scale to rate the severity of each ocular symptom for both eyes (OU). There are six categories (Eye Dryness, Burning/Stinging, Foreign Body Sensation, Eye Discomfort, Eye Pain and Fluctuating Vision). The higher score represents more severe symptoms.
Measured: Changes at Baseline to Day 28
Changes in LGCS
Changes in Lissamine Green Conjunctival Staining (LGCS) from Randomization/Baseline (Visit 2) to Day 28 (Visit 4) in the study eye.
Measured: Changes at Week 4 from Baseline
Changes in Anesthetized Schirmer test
Change in Anesthetized Schirmer test from Randomization/Baseline (Visit 2) to Day 28 (Visit 4) in the study eye.
Measured: Changes at Week 4 from Baseline
Changes in Tear Film Break Up Time (TFBUT)
Changes in tear film break up time (TFBUT) from Randomization/Baseline (Visit 2) to Day 28 (Visit 4) in the study eye
Measured: Changes at Week 4 from Baseline
Changes in FCS at Post-Treatment
Changes in Fluorescein Corneal Staining (FCS) from Randomization/Baseline (Visit 2) to the Post-Treatment Follow-Up Visit (day 42) in the study eye. The FCS assessment will be performed for each of the five sections (Central, Inferior, Superior, Temporal, and Nasal) on both eyes (study eye and fellow eye) using the National Eye Institute (NEI)/Industry Workshop scale. The staining in each of the 5 sections of the cornea is evaluated per the NEI score: Grades of 0, 1, 2, and 3 with higher grades representing greater severity.
Measured: Baseline to Visit 5 / Day 42
Changes in SANDE-1 to Visit 5
Changes in Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye Questionnaires (SANDE) Version 1 global score from Randomization/Baseline (Visit 2) to the Post Treatment Follow-up visit (Day 42). SANDE Version 1 questionnaire contains two items measuring the frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms. Each item is assessed on a 100 mm visual analog scale from 0 (Rarely for frequency, Very mild for severity) to 100 mm (All the time for frequency, Very Severe for severity), with higher scores representing greater frequency/severity.
Measured: Baseline to Visit 5 / Day 42
Changes in Individual Symptom Assessments (Instantaneous) from Baseline Visit 5
Changes in six Individual Symptoms (Instantaneous) from Randomization/Baseline (Visit 2) to the Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit (Day 42). The individual instantaneous symptom assessment is a questionnaire that uses a 0-100 mm visual analog scale to rate the severity of each ocular symptom. There are six categories (Eye Dryness, Burning/Stinging, Foreign Body Sensation, Eye Discomfort, Eye Pain and Fluctuating Vision). The higher score represents more severe symptoms.
Measured: Baseline to Visit 5
Mean Scores for SANDE-2
Mean Scores for Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye Questionnaires (SANDE) Version 2 global score at the Post-Treatment Follow-Up Visit (Day 42). SANDE Version 2 questionnaire contains two items measuring the frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms.The 50 mm scale to the left of the anchor located in the center of the scale will measure improving symptoms (a negative value) and the 50 mm scale to the right of the anchor located in the center of the scale will measure worsening symptoms (a positive value).
Measured: Visit 5 / Day 42
Mean Scores for six Individual Symptom Assessments (Reflective)
Mean Scores for six Individual Symptom Assessments (Reflective) at the Post-Treatment Follow-Up Visit (Day 42). The individual reflective symptom assessment is assessed in 6 categories (Eye Dryness, Burning/Stinging, Foreign Body Sensation, Eye Discomfort, Eye Pain and Fluctuating Vision). The 50 mm scale to the left of the anchor located in the center of the scale will measure worsening symptoms (a negative value) and the 50 mm scale to the right of the anchor located in the center of the scale will measure improving symptoms (a positive value).
Measured: Visit 5 / Day 42
Changes in FCS
Mean change from Baseline/Randomization (Visit 2) to Day 28 (Visit 4) in Fluorescein Corneal Staining (FCS) total score [National Eye Institute (NEI)/Industry Workshop 0-15 scale, 0-3 scale in each of 5 regions] in the qualifying fellow eye.
Measured: Baseline to Day 28
Changes in LCGS Anesthetized Schirmer test, TFBUT
Changes in Lissamine Green Conjunctival Staining (LCGS) Anesthetized Schirmer test, tear film break up time (TFBUT) from Randomization/Baseline (Visit 2) to Day 28 (Visit 4) in the qualifying fellow eye.
Measured: Baseline to Day 28
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jul 2017
- Study start30 Jun 2017
- Primary completion27 Dec 2019
- Study completion27 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Primary Sjögren SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 204 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- TearSolutions, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marc Odrich, MD, Study director, TearSolutions, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03226444
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LOS-001
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 19 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 22 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Masked, Randomized, Multi-Center Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lacripep™ in Subjects With Dry Eye Associated With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03226444
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LOS-001
- Conditions
- Primary Sjögren Syndrome, Dry Eye
- Keywords
- Dry Eye, Primary Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjogren's Syndrome
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 204 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- TearSolutions, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two strengths of Lacripep™ ophthalmic solution versus placebo administered three times daily for four weeks in subjects with a diagnosis of Dry Eye associated with documented Primary Sjögren's Syndrome
Detailed description
This is a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, parallel-group study. Subjects will be randomized into three treatment groups: 0.005%, or 0.01% Lacripep™, or placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 0.005% Lacripep | Experimental | Drug: 0.005% Lacripep0.005% Lacripep ophthalmic solution |
| 0.01% Lacripep | Experimental | Drug: 0.01% Lacripep0.01% Lacripep ophthalmic solution |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placeboplacebo solution |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Subjects who are age 18 years of age or older at the time of obtaining informed consent.
- Subjects with a documented prior history or current diagnosis of Primary Sjögren's Syndrome according the American-European Consensus Group Sjögren's Syndrome Criteria (Appendix 4; must meet either 4 out of 6 total criteria OR 3 out of 4 signs). Note: Subjects who are on systemic (oral) therapy for the treatment of Sjögren's Syndrome must be on stable systemic treatment defined as the same treatment for the immediately prior 90 days.
- Subjects with a history of dry eye-related ocular symptoms, and who have self-reported use of over the counter ocular wetting agents within the last 120 days.
- Subjects who meet the following criteria at both screening and Visit 2 (Randomization/Baseline) examinations:
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- Subjects meeting any of the following criteria at the Visit 1 (Screening) or Visit 2 (Randomization/Baseline) visits will be excluded:
- Subjects with any active infectious ocular condition.
- Subjects who are monocular or have a BCVA, using corrective lenses if necessary, of +1.0 logMAR or worse as assessed by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS).
- Subjects with ocular inflammatory conditions (e.g., conjunctivitis, keratitis, anterior blepharitis, etc.) not related to dry eye syndrome.
- Subjects with clinical evidence of cicatricial ocular surface disease, such as cicatricial ocular pemphigoid or Stevens Johnson syndrome.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 0.005% LacripepOne drop (approximately 50 microliters) of 0.005% ophthalmic solution will be administered three times a day (TID) to both eyes for four weeks. | Drug | 0.005% Lacripep |
| 0.01% LacripepOne drop (approximately 50 microliters) of 0.01% ophthalmic solution will be administered three times a day (TID) to both eyes for four weeks. | Drug | 0.01% Lacripep |
| PlaceboOne drop (approximately 50 microliters) of placebo solution will be administered three times a day (TID) to both eyes for four weeks. | Drug | placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in Fluorescein Corneal Staining total score
Time frame: Changes at Week 4 from Baseline
Mean change from Baseline/Randomization (Visit 2) to Day 28 (Visit 4) in Fluorescein Corneal Staining (FCS) total score [National Eye Institute (NEI)/Industry Workshop 0-15 scale, 0-3 scale in each of 5 regions] in the study eye.
15 secondary outcomes
Eye Dryness
Time frame: Changes at Week 4 from Baseline
Mean Scores for Individual Symptom Assessments (Reflective)
Time frame: Day 28
Changes in SANDE-1 to Visit 4
Time frame: Changes from Baseline to Day 28.
Mean Scores SANDE 2
Time frame: Day 28
Changes in Individual Symptom Assessments (Instantaneous)
Time frame: Changes at Baseline to Day 28
Changes in LGCS
Time frame: Changes at Week 4 from Baseline
Changes in Anesthetized Schirmer test
Time frame: Changes at Week 4 from Baseline
Changes in Tear Film Break Up Time (TFBUT)
Time frame: Changes at Week 4 from Baseline
Changes in FCS at Post-Treatment
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 5 / Day 42
Changes in SANDE-1 to Visit 5
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 5 / Day 42
Changes in Individual Symptom Assessments (Instantaneous) from Baseline Visit 5
Time frame: Baseline to Visit 5
Mean Scores for SANDE-2
Time frame: Visit 5 / Day 42
Mean Scores for six Individual Symptom Assessments (Reflective)
Time frame: Visit 5 / Day 42
Changes in FCS
Time frame: Baseline to Day 28
Changes in LCGS Anesthetized Schirmer test, TFBUT
Time frame: Baseline to Day 28
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jan 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Primary Sjögren Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
MYTP01 for Immune-Mediated Diseases
IgA Nephropathy, Kidney Transplant Recipients
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Prevalence, and Immunological Characteristics of Small Fiber Neuropathy in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome
Sjögren's Syndrome, Small Fiber Neuropathy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of QLS2416 Injection in Participants With Autoimmune Diseases
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Possible Sarcopenia, Sarcopenia, and Functional Status in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome
Primary Sjögren Syndrome, Sarcopenia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marc Odrich, MD study director
TearSolutions, Inc.
35 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing 0.005% Lacripep and 0.01% Lacripep in people with Primary Sjögren Syndrome and Dry Eye, run by TearSolutions, Inc. at 35 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 35 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Fluorescein Corneal Staining total score (time frame: Changes at Week 4 from Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.