AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthy ParticipantsNCT03229434

Mountain Hiking & Environmental Influences

A study testing Mountain hiking in people with Healthy Participants, run by Universitaet Innsbruck at 1 site in Austria.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In a randomized crossover design, approximately 50 healthy participants will be randomly exposed to outdoor mountain hiking (approximately 6 hours each) in two different areas: an anthropogenically influenced area and in a widely pristine area. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy Participants
What is being tested?
Mountain hiking
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
29 Oct 2017to 1 Nov 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • voluntary participation

Who cannot join

  • pregnancy
  • breastfeeding
  • chronic or acute diseases (already existing or diagnosed during the study)
  • unable to be physically active assessed by the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Austria1 site
  • Department of Sport Science, Medical Section, University of Innsbruck

    Innsbruck, 6020

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: Effects of Mountain Hiking on Physiological and Psychological Health Parameters With Special Focus on the Influence of the Environment

In a randomized crossover design, approximately 50 healthy participants will be randomly exposed to outdoor mountain hiking (approximately 6 hours each) in two different areas: an anthropogenically influenced area and in a widely pristine area.

Being tested
Mountain hiking
Keywords
affective responses, stress-related parameters, green exercise

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mountain hikingBehavioural

    Also called Walking

    Compare arm description

Study groups in NCT03229434
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Widely pristine areaExperimentalOutdoor mountain hiking (approximately 6 hours, 8km, 800 altitude meters, estimated speed: 4km/h [uphill], 5.2km/h [downhill]) in a widely pristine area with moderate intensity (Rating of perceived exertion: ~ 11-15).
Receives: Behavioral: Mountain hiking
Anthropogenically influenced areaActive comparatorOutdoor mountain hiking (approximately 6 hours, 8km, 800 altitude meters, estimated speed: 4km/h [uphill], 5.2km/h [downhill]) in an anthropogenically influenced area with moderate intensity (Rating of perceived exertion: ~ 11-15). All characteristics of the hiking (duration, time, difference in altitude, ...) are planned to be comparable to the experimental condition except the area.
Receives: Behavioral: Mountain hiking

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline Cortisol (Saliva Sampling) at 6 hours

    Physiological response

    Measured: 6 hours

  2. Change from baseline subscales of mood survey scale at 6 hours

    Psychological response

    Measured: 6 hours

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change from baseline blood pressure at 6 hours

    Measured: 6 hours

  2. Change from baseline lung function at 6 hours

    Measured: 6 hours

  3. Change from baseline respiratory gas analysis at 6 hours

    Measured: 6 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jul 2017
  2. Study start29 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2017
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03229434
Sponsor's protocol ID
ARMH_2
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
19 Jul 2017
Last updated
22 Jan 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Niedermeier M, Einwanger J, Hartl A, Kopp M. Affective responses in mountain hiking-A randomized crossover trial focusing on differences between indoor and outdoor activity. PLoS One. 2017 May 16;12(5):e0177719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177719. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28520774

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mountain hiking in people with Healthy Participants, run by Universitaet Innsbruck at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline Cortisol (Saliva Sampling) at 6 hours (time frame: 6 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03229434, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 2 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in