AzTrials
AzTrials

Cognitive DysfunctionPRIMENCT03242395

PRIME: Cognitive Outcome Following Major Burns

An observational study of Cognitive Dysfunction and Burns, run by Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

PRIME aims to demonstrate through neurocognitive assessment that BICU patients will have a degree of neurocognitive dysfunction following a major burn, that this neurocognitive dysfunction is due to an underlying neuroinflammatory process by fMRI neuroimaging techniques, and that the neurocognitive deficit is… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cognitive Dysfunction, Burns, Inflammation, Brain
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Oct 2014to Apr 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Severe burns survivors

Who may be able to join

  • Invasive ventilation on a Burns Intensive Care Unit (BICU) within the previous ten years
  • Burn injuries greater than 15% total body surface area (TBSA)
  • Adult

Who cannot join

  • Admission to BICU for other illnesses that were not burn related (such as Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Syndrome)
  • Evidence of head trauma
  • Known substance misuse or alcohol excess
  • Inability to understand plain verbal or written English
  • Severe mental health issues
  • Receiving formal psychiatric treatment
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Currently held under the Mental Health Act
  • If the subject's psychological health was deemed to be at risk from inclusion
  • Imprisoned
  • Contraindications to MRI
  • non-compatible pacemakers
  • surgical metalwork or foreign bodies
  • severe claustrophobia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    London, SW10 9NH

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Perioperative Research Into Memory (PRiMe): The Use of fMRI to Investigate Neuroinflammation, Cognitive Dysfunction and Quality of Life Following a Major Burn Injury and Critical Care Admission

PRIME aims to demonstrate through neurocognitive assessment that BICU patients will have a degree of neurocognitive dysfunction following a major burn, that this neurocognitive dysfunction is due to an underlying neuroinflammatory process by fMRI neuroimaging techniques, and that the neurocognitive deficit is associated with a reduced quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Patients were matched with for age, sex and IQ (as determined by National Adult Reading Test scores) controlled volunteers.

Participants were assessed for the following domains: verbal ability, verbal and visual learning, short-term memory, working memory, executive function, attention and processing speed. The domains were assessed with the following validated cognitive tests: The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, Trail making parts A and B, phonemic, semantic and switching verbal fluency as well as the Cogstate computerised battery: Identification speed, Detection speed, One Card Learning accuracy, One Back test accuracy, Two Back test accuracy, International Shopping List total correct answers and Groton Maze Learning total errors. Evidence of neuroinflammation was assessed using an fMRI protocol (Resting state MRI, T1w-MPR, T2 Space, Diffusion Tensor Imaging with 30 directions, right frontal white matter and posterior cingulate gyrus Single Voxel Spectroscopy, and patient group Susceptibility Weighted Imaging.

Quality of life was measured using the EuroQoL 5 Dimensions and visual analogue scale. Independent Activities of Daily Living was also assessed. Mental Health (as a confounder) was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9, the Beck Depression Index II, the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Trauma Screening Questionnaire.

Statistical methods include significant differences between the patient and control group using the Student t test (parametric data), the Mann Witney U test (non parametric data) or the Fisher's Exact test (qualitative scoring systems). MELODIC in FSL software was used to decompose the rs-fMRI data into brain networks using independent component analysis (ICA) and connectivity in these networks patients and controls was compared using dual regression. FreeSurfer was used to extract brain regions from T1 images and compare the normalised volume of the hippocampus, amygdala and precuneus for patients and controls. DTI data were analysed using tract based spatial statistics (TBSS) in FSL and using FreeSurfer regions for the hippocampus, amygdala and precuneus. Cho/Cr, Cho/NAA and Ins/Cr ratios were extracted from MRS data using Tarquin. SWI images were reviewed for the presence of microbleeds by two Radiologists.

Keywords
Neuroinflammation, fMRI, Post-operative cognitive dysfunction, Systemic inflammation, Severe burns
Medical subject headings
Cognitive Dysfunction, Burns, Encephalitis, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Neuroinflammatory Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03242395
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Burn patientsAdult survivors of severe burns who have been admitted to Burns ITU for invasive ventilation within 10 years of neurocognitive assessment
ControlsHealthy volunteers, controlled for age/sex/IQ

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Neurocognitive deficit

    Median T score of cognitive results (verbal ability, verbal and visual learning, short-term memory, working memory, executive function, attention and processing speed)

    Measured: Within 10 years of injury

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Quality of Life

    EuroQoL 5D score

    Measured: Within 10 years of injury

  2. Neuroinflammation

    As per the functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging protocol

    Measured: Within 10 years of injury

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Aug 2017
  2. Study startOct 2014
  3. Primary completionFeb 2017
  4. Study completionApr 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03242395
Sponsor's protocol ID
14/LO/0049
Acronym
PRIME
Status last verified
Dec 2016
First submitted
21 Apr 2017
Last updated
8 Aug 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cognitive Dysfunction and Burns, run by Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Neurocognitive deficit (time frame: Within 10 years of injury). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in