AzTrials
AzTrials

Severe Aplastic AnemiaNCT03246178

Haploidentical Transplantation in Severe Aplastic Anemia

A study testing MSD-HSCT and HFD-HSCT in people with Severe Aplastic Anemia, run by Wu Xiaoxiong at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective case-control study on SAA patients treated with HSCT, order to further discuss and assess the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of HFD-HSCT which performed with reduced-intensity fludarabine-based conditioning regimen.Our findings would indicate that SAA patients who lack MSD benefited most… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Severe Aplastic Anemia
What is being tested?
MSD-HSCT and HFD-HSCT
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
10 Jul 2017to 1 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of SAA, very SAA or SAA and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) according to the International Aplastic Anemia Study Group; (ii) SAA patients no response to previous IST; (iii) adequate performance status [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0-2].

Who cannot join

  • Congenital forms of aplastic anemia; (ii)Patients with any severe pulmonary, cardiac, liver, or renal diseases or active infection.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Department of Hematology, 304th Clinical Division, Chinese PLA General Hospital

    Beijing, 100048

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Research on Haploidentical Transplantation in Severe Aplastic Anemia Using Reduced-intensity Fludarabine-based Conditioning

This is a prospective case-control study on SAA patients treated with HSCT, order to further discuss and assess the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of HFD-HSCT which performed with reduced-intensity fludarabine-based conditioning regimen.Our findings would indicate that SAA patients who lack MSD benefited most if HFD-HSCT was performed with reduced-intensity fludarabine-based conditioning regimen, and our improved outcomes with HFD-HSCT may lead to a salvaged therapy and an expanded direct role for SAA in the future.

Being tested
MSD-HSCT, HFD-HSCT
Keywords
Haploidentical, Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Severe aplastic anemia
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Aplastic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MSD-HSCTOther

    1. Conditioning regimens: (A) Patients had SAA and PNH, or heavy transfusion (RBC≥25U), or failed rabbit ATG therapy, and received 0.8 mg/kg/6h busulfan (days -7 to -6), 30mg/m2/day fludarabine (days -5 to -2), 25 mg/kg/day cyclophosphamide (days -5 to -2) and 2.5 mg/kg/day r-ATG (days -5 to -2). (B) The other patients with SAA or VSAA received same procedure but without busulfan;
    2. Allogeneic HSC infusion: Doner BM cells were harvested to achieve a target mononuclear cell count (MNC) of 2-4 × 108 per kilogram of recipient weight. The target MNC from PB was 4-6× 108 per kilogram of recipient weight;
    3. Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD: GVHD prophylaxis consisted of intravenous CSP 2-3 mg/kg/day in divided doses beginning on the day before transplantation (day -5) and the target concentration was adjusted to 150-250 ng/ml. The oral MMF dose was 20 mg/kg/day from day -1 and was tapered off after 1 months if no aGVHD was observed.
  • HFD-HSCTOther

    1. Conditioning regimens: (A) Patients had SAA and PNH, or heavy transfusion (RBC≥25U), or failed rabbit ATG therapy, and received 0.8 mg/kg/6h busulfan (days -7 to -6), 35mg/m2/day fludarabine (days -5 to -2), 25 mg/kg/day cyclophosphamide (days -5 to -2) and 2.5 mg/kg/day r-ATG (days -5 to -2). (B) The other patients with SAA or VSAA received same procedure but without busulfan;
    2. Allogeneic HSC infusion: Doner BM cells were harvested to achieve a target mononuclear cell count (MNC) of 2-4 × 108 per kilogram of recipient weight. The target MNC from PB was 4-6× 108 per kilogram of recipient weight;
    3. Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD: GVHD prophylaxis consisted of intravenous CSP 2-3 mg/kg/day in divided doses beginning on the day before transplantation (day -5) and the target concentration was adjusted to 200-300 ng/ml. The oral MMF dose was 20 mg/kg/day from day -3 and was tapered off after 2 months if no aGVHD was observed.
Study groups in NCT03246178
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MSD-HSCTOtherThis group received treatment of matched sibling donor - hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT).
Receives: Other: MSD-HSCT
HFD-HSCTExperimentalThis group received treatment of haploid family donor - hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HFD-HSCT).
Receives: Other: HFD-HSCT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Engraftment

    Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first of three consecutive days in which the neutrophil counts (ANC) exceeded 0.50 × 109/L, and platelet engraftment was defined as the first of five consecutive days in which the platelet count exceeded 20 × 109/L without transfusion. GF was classified as follows: (1) primary non-engraftment (failure to reach a neutrophil count of 0.5×109/L after transplant); (2) rejection (decrease in blood counts to < 0.5×109/L neutrophils, after achieving a neutrophil count of 0.5×109/L); (3) late graft failure (decrease of blood counts after day 100 to < 1.0×109/L neutrophils and < 30×109/L platelets).

    Measured: In the first months after infusion

  2. Toxicity grading

    The transplantation-related toxicity (TRT) was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Organ damage due to GVHD or infectious complications were excluded.

    Measured: TRT was defined as toxic effects occurring within 40 days after HSCT

  3. Chimerism analyses +30

    Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +30 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.

    Measured: Days +30 after HSCT

  4. Chimerism analyses +100

    Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +180 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.

    Measured: Days +100 after HSCT

  5. Chimerism analyses +180

    Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +100 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.

    Measured: Days +180 after HSCT

  6. Chimerism analyses +365

    Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +365 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.

    Measured: Days +365 after HSCT

  7. OS 1-year

    OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.

    Measured: 1-year after HSCT

  8. OS 2-year

    OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.

    Measured: 2-year after HSCT

  9. OS 5-year

    OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.

    Measured: 5-year after HSCT

  10. EFS 1-year

    EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.

    EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.

    Measured: 1-year after HSCT

  11. EFS 2-year

    EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.

    Measured: 2-year after HSCT

  12. EFS 5-year

    EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.

    Measured: 5-year after HSCT

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Aug 2017
  2. Study start10 Jul 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients with SAA
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03246178
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016QX-KS008
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
1 May 2017
Last updated
11 Aug 2017
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MSD-HSCT and HFD-HSCT in people with Severe Aplastic Anemia, run by Wu Xiaoxiong at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Engraftment (time frame: In the first months after infusion). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in