Severe Aplastic AnemiaNCT03246178
Haploidentical Transplantation in Severe Aplastic Anemia
A study testing MSD-HSCT and HFD-HSCT in people with Severe Aplastic Anemia, run by Wu Xiaoxiong at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This is a prospective case-control study on SAA patients treated with HSCT, order to further discuss and assess the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of HFD-HSCT which performed with reduced-intensity fludarabine-based conditioning regimen.Our findings would indicate that SAA patients who lack MSD benefited most… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Severe Aplastic Anemia
- What is being tested?
- MSD-HSCT and HFD-HSCT
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 10 Jul 2017to 1 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of SAA, very SAA or SAA and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) according to the International Aplastic Anemia Study Group; (ii) SAA patients no response to previous IST; (iii) adequate performance status [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0-2].
Who cannot join
- Congenital forms of aplastic anemia; (ii)Patients with any severe pulmonary, cardiac, liver, or renal diseases or active infection.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Department of Hematology, 304th Clinical Division, Chinese PLA General Hospital
Beijing, 100048
About this study
Official title: A Research on Haploidentical Transplantation in Severe Aplastic Anemia Using Reduced-intensity Fludarabine-based Conditioning
This is a prospective case-control study on SAA patients treated with HSCT, order to further discuss and assess the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of HFD-HSCT which performed with reduced-intensity fludarabine-based conditioning regimen.Our findings would indicate that SAA patients who lack MSD benefited most if HFD-HSCT was performed with reduced-intensity fludarabine-based conditioning regimen, and our improved outcomes with HFD-HSCT may lead to a salvaged therapy and an expanded direct role for SAA in the future.
- Conditions
- Severe Aplastic Anemia
- Being tested
- MSD-HSCT, HFD-HSCT
- Keywords
- Haploidentical, Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Severe aplastic anemia
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Aplastic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MSD-HSCTOther
- Conditioning regimens: (A) Patients had SAA and PNH, or heavy transfusion (RBC≥25U), or failed rabbit ATG therapy, and received 0.8 mg/kg/6h busulfan (days -7 to -6), 30mg/m2/day fludarabine (days -5 to -2), 25 mg/kg/day cyclophosphamide (days -5 to -2) and 2.5 mg/kg/day r-ATG (days -5 to -2). (B) The other patients with SAA or VSAA received same procedure but without busulfan;
- Allogeneic HSC infusion: Doner BM cells were harvested to achieve a target mononuclear cell count (MNC) of 2-4 × 108 per kilogram of recipient weight. The target MNC from PB was 4-6× 108 per kilogram of recipient weight;
- Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD: GVHD prophylaxis consisted of intravenous CSP 2-3 mg/kg/day in divided doses beginning on the day before transplantation (day -5) and the target concentration was adjusted to 150-250 ng/ml. The oral MMF dose was 20 mg/kg/day from day -1 and was tapered off after 1 months if no aGVHD was observed.
HFD-HSCTOther
- Conditioning regimens: (A) Patients had SAA and PNH, or heavy transfusion (RBC≥25U), or failed rabbit ATG therapy, and received 0.8 mg/kg/6h busulfan (days -7 to -6), 35mg/m2/day fludarabine (days -5 to -2), 25 mg/kg/day cyclophosphamide (days -5 to -2) and 2.5 mg/kg/day r-ATG (days -5 to -2). (B) The other patients with SAA or VSAA received same procedure but without busulfan;
- Allogeneic HSC infusion: Doner BM cells were harvested to achieve a target mononuclear cell count (MNC) of 2-4 × 108 per kilogram of recipient weight. The target MNC from PB was 4-6× 108 per kilogram of recipient weight;
- Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD: GVHD prophylaxis consisted of intravenous CSP 2-3 mg/kg/day in divided doses beginning on the day before transplantation (day -5) and the target concentration was adjusted to 200-300 ng/ml. The oral MMF dose was 20 mg/kg/day from day -3 and was tapered off after 2 months if no aGVHD was observed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MSD-HSCT | Other | This group received treatment of matched sibling donor - hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT). Receives: Other: MSD-HSCT |
| HFD-HSCT | Experimental | This group received treatment of haploid family donor - hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HFD-HSCT). Receives: Other: HFD-HSCT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Engraftment
Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first of three consecutive days in which the neutrophil counts (ANC) exceeded 0.50 × 109/L, and platelet engraftment was defined as the first of five consecutive days in which the platelet count exceeded 20 × 109/L without transfusion. GF was classified as follows: (1) primary non-engraftment (failure to reach a neutrophil count of 0.5×109/L after transplant); (2) rejection (decrease in blood counts to < 0.5×109/L neutrophils, after achieving a neutrophil count of 0.5×109/L); (3) late graft failure (decrease of blood counts after day 100 to < 1.0×109/L neutrophils and < 30×109/L platelets).
Measured: In the first months after infusion
Toxicity grading
The transplantation-related toxicity (TRT) was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Organ damage due to GVHD or infectious complications were excluded.
Measured: TRT was defined as toxic effects occurring within 40 days after HSCT
Chimerism analyses +30
Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +30 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.
Measured: Days +30 after HSCT
Chimerism analyses +100
Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +180 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.
Measured: Days +100 after HSCT
Chimerism analyses +180
Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +100 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.
Measured: Days +180 after HSCT
Chimerism analyses +365
Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +365 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.
Measured: Days +365 after HSCT
OS 1-year
OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.
Measured: 1-year after HSCT
OS 2-year
OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.
Measured: 2-year after HSCT
OS 5-year
OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.
Measured: 5-year after HSCT
EFS 1-year
EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.
EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.
Measured: 1-year after HSCT
EFS 2-year
EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.
Measured: 2-year after HSCT
EFS 5-year
EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.
Measured: 5-year after HSCT
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Aug 2017
- Study start10 Jul 2017
- Primary completion1 Jul 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Severe Aplastic AnemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients with SAA
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wu Xiaoxiong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Wu Xiaoxiong, Chinese PLA General Hospital
- Investigators
- Xiaoxiong WU, PhD, Study director, The First Affiliated Hospital of General Hospital of PLA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03246178
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016QX-KS008
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 1 May 2017
- Last updated
- 11 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Research on Haploidentical Transplantation in Severe Aplastic Anemia Using Reduced-intensity Fludarabine-based Conditioning
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03246178
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016QX-KS008
- Conditions
- Severe Aplastic Anemia
- Keywords
- Haploidentical, Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Severe aplastic anemia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Wu XiaoxiongUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective case-control study on SAA patients treated with HSCT, order to further discuss and assess the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of HFD-HSCT which performed with reduced-intensity fludarabine-based conditioning regimen.Our findings would indicate that SAA patients who lack MSD benefited most if HFD-HSCT was performed with reduced-intensity fludarabine-based conditioning regimen, and our improved outcomes with HFD-HSCT may lead to a salvaged therapy and an expanded direct role for SAA in the future.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients with SAA
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MSD-HSCT | Other | Other: MSD-HSCTThis group received treatment of matched sibling donor - hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT). |
| HFD-HSCT | Experimental | Other: HFD-HSCTThis group received treatment of haploid family donor - hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HFD-HSCT). |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Diagnosis of SAA, very SAA or SAA and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) according to the International Aplastic Anemia Study Group; (ii) SAA patients no response to previous IST; (iii) adequate performance status [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0-2].
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Congenital forms of aplastic anemia; (ii)Patients with any severe pulmonary, cardiac, liver, or renal diseases or active infection.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MSD-HSCT1. Conditioning regimens: (A) Patients had SAA and PNH, or heavy transfusion (RBC≥25U), or failed rabbit ATG therapy, and received 0.8 mg/kg/6h busulfan (days -7 to -6), 30mg/m2/day fludarabine (days -5 to -2), 25 mg/kg/day cyclophosphamide (days -5 to -2) and 2.5 mg/kg/day r-ATG (days -5 to -2). (B) The other patients with SAA or VSAA received same procedure but without busulfan; 2. Allogeneic HSC infusion: Doner BM cells were harvested to achieve a target mononuclear cell count (MNC) of 2-4 × 108 per kilogram of recipient weight. The target MNC from PB was 4-6× 108 per kilogram of recipient weight; 3. Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD: GVHD prophylaxis consisted of intravenous CSP 2-3 mg/kg/day in divided doses beginning on the day before transplantation (day -5) and the target concentration was adjusted to 150-250 ng/ml. The oral MMF dose was 20 mg/kg/day from day -1 and was tapered off after 1 months if no aGVHD was observed. | Other | MSD-HSCT |
| HFD-HSCT1. Conditioning regimens: (A) Patients had SAA and PNH, or heavy transfusion (RBC≥25U), or failed rabbit ATG therapy, and received 0.8 mg/kg/6h busulfan (days -7 to -6), 35mg/m2/day fludarabine (days -5 to -2), 25 mg/kg/day cyclophosphamide (days -5 to -2) and 2.5 mg/kg/day r-ATG (days -5 to -2). (B) The other patients with SAA or VSAA received same procedure but without busulfan; 2. Allogeneic HSC infusion: Doner BM cells were harvested to achieve a target mononuclear cell count (MNC) of 2-4 × 108 per kilogram of recipient weight. The target MNC from PB was 4-6× 108 per kilogram of recipient weight; 3. Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD: GVHD prophylaxis consisted of intravenous CSP 2-3 mg/kg/day in divided doses beginning on the day before transplantation (day -5) and the target concentration was adjusted to 200-300 ng/ml. The oral MMF dose was 20 mg/kg/day from day -3 and was tapered off after 2 months if no aGVHD was observed. | Other | HFD-HSCT |
Primary outcome
Engraftment
Time frame: In the first months after infusion
Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first of three consecutive days in which the neutrophil counts (ANC) exceeded 0.50 × 109/L, and platelet engraftment was defined as the first of five consecutive days in which the platelet count exceeded 20 × 109/L without transfusion. GF was classified as follows: (1) primary non-engraftment (failure to reach a neutrophil count of 0.5×109/L after transplant); (2) rejection (decrease in blood counts to < 0.5×109/L neutrophils, after achieving a neutrophil count of 0.5×109/L); (3) late graft failure (decrease of blood counts after day 100 to < 1.0×109/L neutrophils and < 30×109/L platelets).
Toxicity grading
Time frame: TRT was defined as toxic effects occurring within 40 days after HSCT
The transplantation-related toxicity (TRT) was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Organ damage due to GVHD or infectious complications were excluded.
Chimerism analyses +30
Time frame: Days +30 after HSCT
Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +30 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.
Chimerism analyses +100
Time frame: Days +100 after HSCT
Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +180 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.
Chimerism analyses +180
Time frame: Days +180 after HSCT
Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +100 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.
Chimerism analyses +365
Time frame: Days +365 after HSCT
Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +365 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.
OS 1-year
Time frame: 1-year after HSCT
OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.
OS 2-year
Time frame: 2-year after HSCT
OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.
OS 5-year
Time frame: 5-year after HSCT
OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.
EFS 1-year
Time frame: 1-year after HSCT
EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure. EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.
EFS 2-year
Time frame: 2-year after HSCT
EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.
EFS 5-year
Time frame: 5-year after HSCT
EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Aug 2017.
Related trials for Severe Aplastic Anemia
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Acquired and Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes
Severe Aplastic Anemia, Telomere Biology Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Severe Aplastic Anemia and Other Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes Using G-CSF Mobilized CD34+ Selected Hematopoietic Precursor Cells Co-Infused With a Reduced Dose of Non-Mobilized Donor T-cells
Severe Aplastic Anemia, MDS (Myelodysplastic Syndrome)
RecruitingObservational study
Tissue, Blood, and Body Fluid Sample Collection From Patients With Hematologic Cancer
Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
AlloSCT for Malignant and Non-malignant Hematologic Diseases Utilizing Alpha/Beta T Cell and CD19+ B Cell Depletion
Acute Leukemia, Severe Aplastic Anemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Infection Prophylaxis and Management in Treating Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Previously Treated With Donor Stem Cell Transplant
Hematopoietic/Lymphoid Cancer, Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Xiaoxiong WU, PhD study director
The First Affiliated Hospital of General Hospital of PLA
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MSD-HSCT and HFD-HSCT in people with Severe Aplastic Anemia, run by Wu Xiaoxiong at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Engraftment (time frame: In the first months after infusion). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2017.